Psychosocial differences as predictors for recovery from chronic low back pain following manipulation, stabilizing exercises and physician consultation or physician consultation alone

Three psychosocial profile groups are introduced in the Multidimensional Pain Inventory for chronic pain patients. Patients with the dysfunctional profile have shown a more favourable outcome after multidisciplinary treatments, due to the suggested effects of specific psychosocial treatment elements...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of rehabilitation medicine 2005-05, Vol.37 (3), p.152-158
Hauptverfasser: Riipinen, Markku, Niemistö, Leena, Lindgren, Karl-August, Hurri, Heikki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 158
container_issue 3
container_start_page 152
container_title Journal of rehabilitation medicine
container_volume 37
creator Riipinen, Markku
Niemistö, Leena
Lindgren, Karl-August
Hurri, Heikki
description Three psychosocial profile groups are introduced in the Multidimensional Pain Inventory for chronic pain patients. Patients with the dysfunctional profile have shown a more favourable outcome after multidisciplinary treatments, due to the suggested effects of specific psychosocial treatment elements. In this study we explored, among patients with chronic low back pain, whether the Multidimensional Pain Inventory patient profile groups might respond differently to treatment without planned psychosocial elements. Of 204 voluntarily recruited patients with chronic low back pain, 102 were randomized to a combined manipulation, exercise and physician consultation group (called the combination group) and 102 to a consultation-alone group. Although all subjects showed improvement during follow-up both on the Oswestry index and the Visual Analogue Scale, the dysfunctional profile patients in the combination group improved the most. Their high pre-treatment ratings on Oswestry and Visual Analogue-scales fell at the 5- and 12-month follow-ups to the same level as those of the adaptive copers or interpersonally distressed patients, and they were on a significantly lower level than the dysfunctional profile patients in consultation group during follow-up. All dysfunctional profile patients also showed a decrease in affective distress, equally in combination and consultation groups. We suggest that dysfunctional profile patients are more sensitive to respond even to treatment without any specific psychosocial elements. This should be considered when evaluating any treatment effects. Among dysfunctional profile patients, pain-related anxiety and decreased acceptance of pain may contribute to their sensitivity to treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/16501970410022426
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68073933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57076623</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-769af5e0714a65f8d45c5bb5dbb28bf070465bbd039905009a7dffaee3bc366e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFPFTEUhbvQCAI_gI3pipVPb6fT9s2SEAUTEl3AetJ2bn2VTju0M-Lzj_n36IOXuDCGVdNzv3NPcg8hpww-MFjDRyYFsE5BywCapm3kK3K401ZVVAfkbSk_AJgSXL0hB0xCC61qDsmfb2VrN6kk63Wgg3cOM0aLhepCp4yDt3PKhbqUaUabfmLeUpfTSO0mp-gtDemBGm3v6KR9rFyogo_f6aijn5agZ5_ie1pmbXzwv3cT_IXZ-rLLiAOdNtvia3qkNsWyhPnJQWvefyY6pIjH5LXToeDJ_j0it58_3Vxcra6_Xn65OL9eWS7kvFKy004gKNZqKdx6aIUVxojBmGZtHNR7yfofgHcdCIBOq8E5jciN5VIiPyJnz3unnO4XLHM_-mIxBB0xLaWXa1C84_xFUChQUjYvg0xxyVXbVJA9gzanUjK6fsp-1HnbM-h3nff_dF497_bLFzPi8NexL5w_ApF7rwE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17363742</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychosocial differences as predictors for recovery from chronic low back pain following manipulation, stabilizing exercises and physician consultation or physician consultation alone</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Riipinen, Markku ; Niemistö, Leena ; Lindgren, Karl-August ; Hurri, Heikki</creator><creatorcontrib>Riipinen, Markku ; Niemistö, Leena ; Lindgren, Karl-August ; Hurri, Heikki</creatorcontrib><description>Three psychosocial profile groups are introduced in the Multidimensional Pain Inventory for chronic pain patients. Patients with the dysfunctional profile have shown a more favourable outcome after multidisciplinary treatments, due to the suggested effects of specific psychosocial treatment elements. In this study we explored, among patients with chronic low back pain, whether the Multidimensional Pain Inventory patient profile groups might respond differently to treatment without planned psychosocial elements. Of 204 voluntarily recruited patients with chronic low back pain, 102 were randomized to a combined manipulation, exercise and physician consultation group (called the combination group) and 102 to a consultation-alone group. Although all subjects showed improvement during follow-up both on the Oswestry index and the Visual Analogue Scale, the dysfunctional profile patients in the combination group improved the most. Their high pre-treatment ratings on Oswestry and Visual Analogue-scales fell at the 5- and 12-month follow-ups to the same level as those of the adaptive copers or interpersonally distressed patients, and they were on a significantly lower level than the dysfunctional profile patients in consultation group during follow-up. All dysfunctional profile patients also showed a decrease in affective distress, equally in combination and consultation groups. We suggest that dysfunctional profile patients are more sensitive to respond even to treatment without any specific psychosocial elements. This should be considered when evaluating any treatment effects. Among dysfunctional profile patients, pain-related anxiety and decreased acceptance of pain may contribute to their sensitivity to treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1650-1977</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/16501970410022426</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16040472</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sweden</publisher><subject>Adult ; Chronic Disease ; Chronic low back pain ; Exercise Therapy ; Female ; Finland ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Low Back Pain - psychology ; Low Back Pain - rehabilitation ; Low Back Pain - therapy ; Male ; Manipulation, Orthopedic ; Outcomes ; Pain Measurement ; Patients ; Prognosis ; Psychosocial factors ; Recovery ; Recovery of Function ; Referral and Consultation ; Social Support ; Treatment ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2005-05, Vol.37 (3), p.152-158</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-769af5e0714a65f8d45c5bb5dbb28bf070465bbd039905009a7dffaee3bc366e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912,30987</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16040472$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Riipinen, Markku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niemistö, Leena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindgren, Karl-August</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurri, Heikki</creatorcontrib><title>Psychosocial differences as predictors for recovery from chronic low back pain following manipulation, stabilizing exercises and physician consultation or physician consultation alone</title><title>Journal of rehabilitation medicine</title><addtitle>J Rehabil Med</addtitle><description>Three psychosocial profile groups are introduced in the Multidimensional Pain Inventory for chronic pain patients. Patients with the dysfunctional profile have shown a more favourable outcome after multidisciplinary treatments, due to the suggested effects of specific psychosocial treatment elements. In this study we explored, among patients with chronic low back pain, whether the Multidimensional Pain Inventory patient profile groups might respond differently to treatment without planned psychosocial elements. Of 204 voluntarily recruited patients with chronic low back pain, 102 were randomized to a combined manipulation, exercise and physician consultation group (called the combination group) and 102 to a consultation-alone group. Although all subjects showed improvement during follow-up both on the Oswestry index and the Visual Analogue Scale, the dysfunctional profile patients in the combination group improved the most. Their high pre-treatment ratings on Oswestry and Visual Analogue-scales fell at the 5- and 12-month follow-ups to the same level as those of the adaptive copers or interpersonally distressed patients, and they were on a significantly lower level than the dysfunctional profile patients in consultation group during follow-up. All dysfunctional profile patients also showed a decrease in affective distress, equally in combination and consultation groups. We suggest that dysfunctional profile patients are more sensitive to respond even to treatment without any specific psychosocial elements. This should be considered when evaluating any treatment effects. Among dysfunctional profile patients, pain-related anxiety and decreased acceptance of pain may contribute to their sensitivity to treatment.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Chronic low back pain</subject><subject>Exercise Therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Finland</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - psychology</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Manipulation, Orthopedic</subject><subject>Outcomes</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Psychosocial factors</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1650-1977</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFPFTEUhbvQCAI_gI3pipVPb6fT9s2SEAUTEl3AetJ2bn2VTju0M-Lzj_n36IOXuDCGVdNzv3NPcg8hpww-MFjDRyYFsE5BywCapm3kK3K401ZVVAfkbSk_AJgSXL0hB0xCC61qDsmfb2VrN6kk63Wgg3cOM0aLhepCp4yDt3PKhbqUaUabfmLeUpfTSO0mp-gtDemBGm3v6KR9rFyogo_f6aijn5agZ5_ie1pmbXzwv3cT_IXZ-rLLiAOdNtvia3qkNsWyhPnJQWvefyY6pIjH5LXToeDJ_j0it58_3Vxcra6_Xn65OL9eWS7kvFKy004gKNZqKdx6aIUVxojBmGZtHNR7yfofgHcdCIBOq8E5jciN5VIiPyJnz3unnO4XLHM_-mIxBB0xLaWXa1C84_xFUChQUjYvg0xxyVXbVJA9gzanUjK6fsp-1HnbM-h3nff_dF497_bLFzPi8NexL5w_ApF7rwE</recordid><startdate>20050501</startdate><enddate>20050501</enddate><creator>Riipinen, Markku</creator><creator>Niemistö, Leena</creator><creator>Lindgren, Karl-August</creator><creator>Hurri, Heikki</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050501</creationdate><title>Psychosocial differences as predictors for recovery from chronic low back pain following manipulation, stabilizing exercises and physician consultation or physician consultation alone</title><author>Riipinen, Markku ; Niemistö, Leena ; Lindgren, Karl-August ; Hurri, Heikki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-769af5e0714a65f8d45c5bb5dbb28bf070465bbd039905009a7dffaee3bc366e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Chronic low back pain</topic><topic>Exercise Therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Finland</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - psychology</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Manipulation, Orthopedic</topic><topic>Outcomes</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Psychosocial factors</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Riipinen, Markku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niemistö, Leena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindgren, Karl-August</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurri, Heikki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of rehabilitation medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Riipinen, Markku</au><au>Niemistö, Leena</au><au>Lindgren, Karl-August</au><au>Hurri, Heikki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychosocial differences as predictors for recovery from chronic low back pain following manipulation, stabilizing exercises and physician consultation or physician consultation alone</atitle><jtitle>Journal of rehabilitation medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Rehabil Med</addtitle><date>2005-05-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>152</spage><epage>158</epage><pages>152-158</pages><issn>1650-1977</issn><abstract>Three psychosocial profile groups are introduced in the Multidimensional Pain Inventory for chronic pain patients. Patients with the dysfunctional profile have shown a more favourable outcome after multidisciplinary treatments, due to the suggested effects of specific psychosocial treatment elements. In this study we explored, among patients with chronic low back pain, whether the Multidimensional Pain Inventory patient profile groups might respond differently to treatment without planned psychosocial elements. Of 204 voluntarily recruited patients with chronic low back pain, 102 were randomized to a combined manipulation, exercise and physician consultation group (called the combination group) and 102 to a consultation-alone group. Although all subjects showed improvement during follow-up both on the Oswestry index and the Visual Analogue Scale, the dysfunctional profile patients in the combination group improved the most. Their high pre-treatment ratings on Oswestry and Visual Analogue-scales fell at the 5- and 12-month follow-ups to the same level as those of the adaptive copers or interpersonally distressed patients, and they were on a significantly lower level than the dysfunctional profile patients in consultation group during follow-up. All dysfunctional profile patients also showed a decrease in affective distress, equally in combination and consultation groups. We suggest that dysfunctional profile patients are more sensitive to respond even to treatment without any specific psychosocial elements. This should be considered when evaluating any treatment effects. Among dysfunctional profile patients, pain-related anxiety and decreased acceptance of pain may contribute to their sensitivity to treatment.</abstract><cop>Sweden</cop><pmid>16040472</pmid><doi>10.1080/16501970410022426</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1650-1977
ispartof Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2005-05, Vol.37 (3), p.152-158
issn 1650-1977
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68073933
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Chronic Disease
Chronic low back pain
Exercise Therapy
Female
Finland
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Low Back Pain - psychology
Low Back Pain - rehabilitation
Low Back Pain - therapy
Male
Manipulation, Orthopedic
Outcomes
Pain Measurement
Patients
Prognosis
Psychosocial factors
Recovery
Recovery of Function
Referral and Consultation
Social Support
Treatment
Treatment Outcome
title Psychosocial differences as predictors for recovery from chronic low back pain following manipulation, stabilizing exercises and physician consultation or physician consultation alone
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T18%3A35%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychosocial%20differences%20as%20predictors%20for%20recovery%20from%20chronic%20low%20back%20pain%20following%20manipulation,%20stabilizing%20exercises%20and%20physician%20consultation%20or%20physician%20consultation%20alone&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20rehabilitation%20medicine&rft.au=Riipinen,%20Markku&rft.date=2005-05-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=152&rft.epage=158&rft.pages=152-158&rft.issn=1650-1977&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/16501970410022426&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57076623%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17363742&rft_id=info:pmid/16040472&rfr_iscdi=true