Clinical experience with inactivated, virosomal influenza vaccine
Current available influenza vaccines are safe and effective in preventing influenza. Nevertheless, there is a need for influenza vaccines with improved efficacy in the elderly. This need is underscored by both the observation that influenza has a major clinical and economic impact in the elderly and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vaccine 2005-07, Vol.23, p.S39-S49 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S49 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | S39 |
container_title | Vaccine |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | de Bruijn, I.A. Nauta, J. Cramer, W.C.M. Gerez, L. Palache, A.M. |
description | Current available influenza vaccines are safe and effective in preventing influenza. Nevertheless, there is a need for influenza vaccines with improved efficacy in the elderly. This need is underscored by both the observation that influenza has a major clinical and economic impact in the elderly and the fact that currently available vaccines are generally less effective in elderly than in younger subjects. Several approaches are currently being pursued in order to improve the efficacy of influenza vaccines in elderly individuals and others who have impaired immune responses to conventional influenza vaccines. A novel antigen-presenting strategy to overcome impaired immune responses is the use of virosomes. Previously, data on safety and reactogenicity have been published regarding the use of virosomal influenza vaccines. Data from three recent clinical trials are presented here. The first of these was a comparative study of a virosomal vaccine and a conventional subunit vaccine in “at-risk” adults with underlying chronic illness. The virosomal vaccine demonstrated comparable tolerability to the subunit vaccine, with about 98% of patients reporting tolerability to be good or very good. The vast majority of adverse events reported were mild to moderate in severity. With both vaccine types, mean HI titres decreased with age for both the A-H
1N
1 and B influenza virus strains, but for the A-H
3N
2 strain (the most virulent of the three strains), mean HI titres did not decrease with age, suggesting a better response with the virosomal vaccine when compared to the subunit vaccine. All three studies explored the long-term persistence of antibodies after vaccination with virosomal influenza vaccines. Immunogenicity declined over time but remained high at 4, 6 and 12 months post-vaccination compared to baseline, indicating that adequate seroprotection is achievable for the duration of the influenza season. Virosomal vaccines may induce better immunity in elderly subjects and may be more effective in reducing morbidity and mortality in this age group. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.04.020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68071381</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X05004615</els_id><sourcerecordid>68071381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-ee26d2141f153e678ce61445b9bc75dabd1dfd13dd1e39d19aa7257d952b04533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1P3DAQhq0KVBbanwDKCfVAwozjj-RUoVVLkZC4UKk3y7EnqlfZZBtnl5Zfj7cbiRucZg7PzCu9D2PnCAUCqutVsbPOhZ4KDiALEAVw-MAWWOky5xKrI7YArkQuEH6dsNMYV5DAEuuP7ARVWpHDgt0su9AHZ7uM_m5oDNQ7yp7C9DsLvXVT2NmJ_FW2C-MQh3XCQt92W-qfbTbnf2LHre0ifZ7nGfv5_dvj8kd-_3B7t7y5z53gesqJuPIcBbYoS1K6cqRQCNnUjdPS28ajbz2W3iOVtcfaWs2l9rXkDQhZlmfs8vB3Mw5_thQnsw7RUdfZnoZtNKoCjWWF74KohUIEncAvb4NSQfrI1T5cHlCXeogjtWYzhrUd_xkEs_dhVmbuw-x9GBAm-Uh3F3PEtlmTf72aBSTg6wGgVN0u0Gii-y_Bh5HcZPwQ3ol4AY4Ondk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1560138263</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical experience with inactivated, virosomal influenza vaccine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>de Bruijn, I.A. ; Nauta, J. ; Cramer, W.C.M. ; Gerez, L. ; Palache, A.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Bruijn, I.A. ; Nauta, J. ; Cramer, W.C.M. ; Gerez, L. ; Palache, A.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Current available influenza vaccines are safe and effective in preventing influenza. Nevertheless, there is a need for influenza vaccines with improved efficacy in the elderly. This need is underscored by both the observation that influenza has a major clinical and economic impact in the elderly and the fact that currently available vaccines are generally less effective in elderly than in younger subjects. Several approaches are currently being pursued in order to improve the efficacy of influenza vaccines in elderly individuals and others who have impaired immune responses to conventional influenza vaccines. A novel antigen-presenting strategy to overcome impaired immune responses is the use of virosomes. Previously, data on safety and reactogenicity have been published regarding the use of virosomal influenza vaccines. Data from three recent clinical trials are presented here. The first of these was a comparative study of a virosomal vaccine and a conventional subunit vaccine in “at-risk” adults with underlying chronic illness. The virosomal vaccine demonstrated comparable tolerability to the subunit vaccine, with about 98% of patients reporting tolerability to be good or very good. The vast majority of adverse events reported were mild to moderate in severity. With both vaccine types, mean HI titres decreased with age for both the A-H
1N
1 and B influenza virus strains, but for the A-H
3N
2 strain (the most virulent of the three strains), mean HI titres did not decrease with age, suggesting a better response with the virosomal vaccine when compared to the subunit vaccine. All three studies explored the long-term persistence of antibodies after vaccination with virosomal influenza vaccines. Immunogenicity declined over time but remained high at 4, 6 and 12 months post-vaccination compared to baseline, indicating that adequate seroprotection is achievable for the duration of the influenza season. Virosomal vaccines may induce better immunity in elderly subjects and may be more effective in reducing morbidity and mortality in this age group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.04.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16005120</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Delivery Systems ; Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests ; Humans ; Influenza ; Influenza Vaccines - administration & dosage ; Influenza Vaccines - adverse effects ; Influenza Vaccines - immunology ; Influenza virus ; Middle Aged ; Single-Blind Method ; Vaccination ; Vaccine ; Vaccines, Inactivated - administration & dosage ; Vaccines, Inactivated - adverse effects ; Vaccines, Inactivated - immunology ; Vaccines, Subunit - adverse effects ; Vaccines, Subunit - immunology ; Vaccines, Virosome - administration & dosage ; Vaccines, Virosome - adverse effects ; Vaccines, Virosome - immunology ; Virosomal</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2005-07, Vol.23, p.S39-S49</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-ee26d2141f153e678ce61445b9bc75dabd1dfd13dd1e39d19aa7257d952b04533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-ee26d2141f153e678ce61445b9bc75dabd1dfd13dd1e39d19aa7257d952b04533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X05004615$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,64363,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16005120$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Bruijn, I.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nauta, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cramer, W.C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerez, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palache, A.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical experience with inactivated, virosomal influenza vaccine</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>Current available influenza vaccines are safe and effective in preventing influenza. Nevertheless, there is a need for influenza vaccines with improved efficacy in the elderly. This need is underscored by both the observation that influenza has a major clinical and economic impact in the elderly and the fact that currently available vaccines are generally less effective in elderly than in younger subjects. Several approaches are currently being pursued in order to improve the efficacy of influenza vaccines in elderly individuals and others who have impaired immune responses to conventional influenza vaccines. A novel antigen-presenting strategy to overcome impaired immune responses is the use of virosomes. Previously, data on safety and reactogenicity have been published regarding the use of virosomal influenza vaccines. Data from three recent clinical trials are presented here. The first of these was a comparative study of a virosomal vaccine and a conventional subunit vaccine in “at-risk” adults with underlying chronic illness. The virosomal vaccine demonstrated comparable tolerability to the subunit vaccine, with about 98% of patients reporting tolerability to be good or very good. The vast majority of adverse events reported were mild to moderate in severity. With both vaccine types, mean HI titres decreased with age for both the A-H
1N
1 and B influenza virus strains, but for the A-H
3N
2 strain (the most virulent of the three strains), mean HI titres did not decrease with age, suggesting a better response with the virosomal vaccine when compared to the subunit vaccine. All three studies explored the long-term persistence of antibodies after vaccination with virosomal influenza vaccines. Immunogenicity declined over time but remained high at 4, 6 and 12 months post-vaccination compared to baseline, indicating that adequate seroprotection is achievable for the duration of the influenza season. Virosomal vaccines may induce better immunity in elderly subjects and may be more effective in reducing morbidity and mortality in this age group.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug Delivery Systems</subject><subject>Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Influenza Vaccines - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Influenza Vaccines - adverse effects</subject><subject>Influenza Vaccines - immunology</subject><subject>Influenza virus</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccine</subject><subject>Vaccines, Inactivated - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Vaccines, Inactivated - adverse effects</subject><subject>Vaccines, Inactivated - immunology</subject><subject>Vaccines, Subunit - adverse effects</subject><subject>Vaccines, Subunit - immunology</subject><subject>Vaccines, Virosome - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Vaccines, Virosome - adverse effects</subject><subject>Vaccines, Virosome - immunology</subject><subject>Virosomal</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1P3DAQhq0KVBbanwDKCfVAwozjj-RUoVVLkZC4UKk3y7EnqlfZZBtnl5Zfj7cbiRucZg7PzCu9D2PnCAUCqutVsbPOhZ4KDiALEAVw-MAWWOky5xKrI7YArkQuEH6dsNMYV5DAEuuP7ARVWpHDgt0su9AHZ7uM_m5oDNQ7yp7C9DsLvXVT2NmJ_FW2C-MQh3XCQt92W-qfbTbnf2LHre0ifZ7nGfv5_dvj8kd-_3B7t7y5z53gesqJuPIcBbYoS1K6cqRQCNnUjdPS28ajbz2W3iOVtcfaWs2l9rXkDQhZlmfs8vB3Mw5_thQnsw7RUdfZnoZtNKoCjWWF74KohUIEncAvb4NSQfrI1T5cHlCXeogjtWYzhrUd_xkEs_dhVmbuw-x9GBAm-Uh3F3PEtlmTf72aBSTg6wGgVN0u0Gii-y_Bh5HcZPwQ3ol4AY4Ondk</recordid><startdate>20050708</startdate><enddate>20050708</enddate><creator>de Bruijn, I.A.</creator><creator>Nauta, J.</creator><creator>Cramer, W.C.M.</creator><creator>Gerez, L.</creator><creator>Palache, A.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050708</creationdate><title>Clinical experience with inactivated, virosomal influenza vaccine</title><author>de Bruijn, I.A. ; Nauta, J. ; Cramer, W.C.M. ; Gerez, L. ; Palache, A.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-ee26d2141f153e678ce61445b9bc75dabd1dfd13dd1e39d19aa7257d952b04533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug Delivery Systems</topic><topic>Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Influenza Vaccines - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Influenza Vaccines - adverse effects</topic><topic>Influenza Vaccines - immunology</topic><topic>Influenza virus</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccine</topic><topic>Vaccines, Inactivated - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Vaccines, Inactivated - adverse effects</topic><topic>Vaccines, Inactivated - immunology</topic><topic>Vaccines, Subunit - adverse effects</topic><topic>Vaccines, Subunit - immunology</topic><topic>Vaccines, Virosome - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Vaccines, Virosome - adverse effects</topic><topic>Vaccines, Virosome - immunology</topic><topic>Virosomal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Bruijn, I.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nauta, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cramer, W.C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerez, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palache, A.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Bruijn, I.A.</au><au>Nauta, J.</au><au>Cramer, W.C.M.</au><au>Gerez, L.</au><au>Palache, A.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical experience with inactivated, virosomal influenza vaccine</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2005-07-08</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>23</volume><spage>S39</spage><epage>S49</epage><pages>S39-S49</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>Current available influenza vaccines are safe and effective in preventing influenza. Nevertheless, there is a need for influenza vaccines with improved efficacy in the elderly. This need is underscored by both the observation that influenza has a major clinical and economic impact in the elderly and the fact that currently available vaccines are generally less effective in elderly than in younger subjects. Several approaches are currently being pursued in order to improve the efficacy of influenza vaccines in elderly individuals and others who have impaired immune responses to conventional influenza vaccines. A novel antigen-presenting strategy to overcome impaired immune responses is the use of virosomes. Previously, data on safety and reactogenicity have been published regarding the use of virosomal influenza vaccines. Data from three recent clinical trials are presented here. The first of these was a comparative study of a virosomal vaccine and a conventional subunit vaccine in “at-risk” adults with underlying chronic illness. The virosomal vaccine demonstrated comparable tolerability to the subunit vaccine, with about 98% of patients reporting tolerability to be good or very good. The vast majority of adverse events reported were mild to moderate in severity. With both vaccine types, mean HI titres decreased with age for both the A-H
1N
1 and B influenza virus strains, but for the A-H
3N
2 strain (the most virulent of the three strains), mean HI titres did not decrease with age, suggesting a better response with the virosomal vaccine when compared to the subunit vaccine. All three studies explored the long-term persistence of antibodies after vaccination with virosomal influenza vaccines. Immunogenicity declined over time but remained high at 4, 6 and 12 months post-vaccination compared to baseline, indicating that adequate seroprotection is achievable for the duration of the influenza season. Virosomal vaccines may induce better immunity in elderly subjects and may be more effective in reducing morbidity and mortality in this age group.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16005120</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.04.020</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
ispartof | Vaccine, 2005-07, Vol.23, p.S39-S49 |
issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68071381 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Double-Blind Method Drug Delivery Systems Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests Humans Influenza Influenza Vaccines - administration & dosage Influenza Vaccines - adverse effects Influenza Vaccines - immunology Influenza virus Middle Aged Single-Blind Method Vaccination Vaccine Vaccines, Inactivated - administration & dosage Vaccines, Inactivated - adverse effects Vaccines, Inactivated - immunology Vaccines, Subunit - adverse effects Vaccines, Subunit - immunology Vaccines, Virosome - administration & dosage Vaccines, Virosome - adverse effects Vaccines, Virosome - immunology Virosomal |
title | Clinical experience with inactivated, virosomal influenza vaccine |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T16%3A13%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20experience%20with%20inactivated,%20virosomal%20influenza%20vaccine&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=de%20Bruijn,%20I.A.&rft.date=2005-07-08&rft.volume=23&rft.spage=S39&rft.epage=S49&rft.pages=S39-S49&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.04.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68071381%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1560138263&rft_id=info:pmid/16005120&rft_els_id=S0264410X05004615&rfr_iscdi=true |