Clinical experience with inactivated, virosomal influenza vaccine

Current available influenza vaccines are safe and effective in preventing influenza. Nevertheless, there is a need for influenza vaccines with improved efficacy in the elderly. This need is underscored by both the observation that influenza has a major clinical and economic impact in the elderly and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vaccine 2005-07, Vol.23, p.S39-S49
Hauptverfasser: de Bruijn, I.A., Nauta, J., Cramer, W.C.M., Gerez, L., Palache, A.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S49
container_issue
container_start_page S39
container_title Vaccine
container_volume 23
creator de Bruijn, I.A.
Nauta, J.
Cramer, W.C.M.
Gerez, L.
Palache, A.M.
description Current available influenza vaccines are safe and effective in preventing influenza. Nevertheless, there is a need for influenza vaccines with improved efficacy in the elderly. This need is underscored by both the observation that influenza has a major clinical and economic impact in the elderly and the fact that currently available vaccines are generally less effective in elderly than in younger subjects. Several approaches are currently being pursued in order to improve the efficacy of influenza vaccines in elderly individuals and others who have impaired immune responses to conventional influenza vaccines. A novel antigen-presenting strategy to overcome impaired immune responses is the use of virosomes. Previously, data on safety and reactogenicity have been published regarding the use of virosomal influenza vaccines. Data from three recent clinical trials are presented here. The first of these was a comparative study of a virosomal vaccine and a conventional subunit vaccine in “at-risk” adults with underlying chronic illness. The virosomal vaccine demonstrated comparable tolerability to the subunit vaccine, with about 98% of patients reporting tolerability to be good or very good. The vast majority of adverse events reported were mild to moderate in severity. With both vaccine types, mean HI titres decreased with age for both the A-H 1N 1 and B influenza virus strains, but for the A-H 3N 2 strain (the most virulent of the three strains), mean HI titres did not decrease with age, suggesting a better response with the virosomal vaccine when compared to the subunit vaccine. All three studies explored the long-term persistence of antibodies after vaccination with virosomal influenza vaccines. Immunogenicity declined over time but remained high at 4, 6 and 12 months post-vaccination compared to baseline, indicating that adequate seroprotection is achievable for the duration of the influenza season. Virosomal vaccines may induce better immunity in elderly subjects and may be more effective in reducing morbidity and mortality in this age group.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.04.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68071381</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X05004615</els_id><sourcerecordid>68071381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-ee26d2141f153e678ce61445b9bc75dabd1dfd13dd1e39d19aa7257d952b04533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1P3DAQhq0KVBbanwDKCfVAwozjj-RUoVVLkZC4UKk3y7EnqlfZZBtnl5Zfj7cbiRucZg7PzCu9D2PnCAUCqutVsbPOhZ4KDiALEAVw-MAWWOky5xKrI7YArkQuEH6dsNMYV5DAEuuP7ARVWpHDgt0su9AHZ7uM_m5oDNQ7yp7C9DsLvXVT2NmJ_FW2C-MQh3XCQt92W-qfbTbnf2LHre0ifZ7nGfv5_dvj8kd-_3B7t7y5z53gesqJuPIcBbYoS1K6cqRQCNnUjdPS28ajbz2W3iOVtcfaWs2l9rXkDQhZlmfs8vB3Mw5_thQnsw7RUdfZnoZtNKoCjWWF74KohUIEncAvb4NSQfrI1T5cHlCXeogjtWYzhrUd_xkEs_dhVmbuw-x9GBAm-Uh3F3PEtlmTf72aBSTg6wGgVN0u0Gii-y_Bh5HcZPwQ3ol4AY4Ondk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1560138263</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical experience with inactivated, virosomal influenza vaccine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>de Bruijn, I.A. ; Nauta, J. ; Cramer, W.C.M. ; Gerez, L. ; Palache, A.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Bruijn, I.A. ; Nauta, J. ; Cramer, W.C.M. ; Gerez, L. ; Palache, A.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Current available influenza vaccines are safe and effective in preventing influenza. Nevertheless, there is a need for influenza vaccines with improved efficacy in the elderly. This need is underscored by both the observation that influenza has a major clinical and economic impact in the elderly and the fact that currently available vaccines are generally less effective in elderly than in younger subjects. Several approaches are currently being pursued in order to improve the efficacy of influenza vaccines in elderly individuals and others who have impaired immune responses to conventional influenza vaccines. A novel antigen-presenting strategy to overcome impaired immune responses is the use of virosomes. Previously, data on safety and reactogenicity have been published regarding the use of virosomal influenza vaccines. Data from three recent clinical trials are presented here. The first of these was a comparative study of a virosomal vaccine and a conventional subunit vaccine in “at-risk” adults with underlying chronic illness. The virosomal vaccine demonstrated comparable tolerability to the subunit vaccine, with about 98% of patients reporting tolerability to be good or very good. The vast majority of adverse events reported were mild to moderate in severity. With both vaccine types, mean HI titres decreased with age for both the A-H 1N 1 and B influenza virus strains, but for the A-H 3N 2 strain (the most virulent of the three strains), mean HI titres did not decrease with age, suggesting a better response with the virosomal vaccine when compared to the subunit vaccine. All three studies explored the long-term persistence of antibodies after vaccination with virosomal influenza vaccines. Immunogenicity declined over time but remained high at 4, 6 and 12 months post-vaccination compared to baseline, indicating that adequate seroprotection is achievable for the duration of the influenza season. Virosomal vaccines may induce better immunity in elderly subjects and may be more effective in reducing morbidity and mortality in this age group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.04.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16005120</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Delivery Systems ; Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests ; Humans ; Influenza ; Influenza Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage ; Influenza Vaccines - adverse effects ; Influenza Vaccines - immunology ; Influenza virus ; Middle Aged ; Single-Blind Method ; Vaccination ; Vaccine ; Vaccines, Inactivated - administration &amp; dosage ; Vaccines, Inactivated - adverse effects ; Vaccines, Inactivated - immunology ; Vaccines, Subunit - adverse effects ; Vaccines, Subunit - immunology ; Vaccines, Virosome - administration &amp; dosage ; Vaccines, Virosome - adverse effects ; Vaccines, Virosome - immunology ; Virosomal</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2005-07, Vol.23, p.S39-S49</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-ee26d2141f153e678ce61445b9bc75dabd1dfd13dd1e39d19aa7257d952b04533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-ee26d2141f153e678ce61445b9bc75dabd1dfd13dd1e39d19aa7257d952b04533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X05004615$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,64363,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16005120$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Bruijn, I.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nauta, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cramer, W.C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerez, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palache, A.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical experience with inactivated, virosomal influenza vaccine</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>Current available influenza vaccines are safe and effective in preventing influenza. Nevertheless, there is a need for influenza vaccines with improved efficacy in the elderly. This need is underscored by both the observation that influenza has a major clinical and economic impact in the elderly and the fact that currently available vaccines are generally less effective in elderly than in younger subjects. Several approaches are currently being pursued in order to improve the efficacy of influenza vaccines in elderly individuals and others who have impaired immune responses to conventional influenza vaccines. A novel antigen-presenting strategy to overcome impaired immune responses is the use of virosomes. Previously, data on safety and reactogenicity have been published regarding the use of virosomal influenza vaccines. Data from three recent clinical trials are presented here. The first of these was a comparative study of a virosomal vaccine and a conventional subunit vaccine in “at-risk” adults with underlying chronic illness. The virosomal vaccine demonstrated comparable tolerability to the subunit vaccine, with about 98% of patients reporting tolerability to be good or very good. The vast majority of adverse events reported were mild to moderate in severity. With both vaccine types, mean HI titres decreased with age for both the A-H 1N 1 and B influenza virus strains, but for the A-H 3N 2 strain (the most virulent of the three strains), mean HI titres did not decrease with age, suggesting a better response with the virosomal vaccine when compared to the subunit vaccine. All three studies explored the long-term persistence of antibodies after vaccination with virosomal influenza vaccines. Immunogenicity declined over time but remained high at 4, 6 and 12 months post-vaccination compared to baseline, indicating that adequate seroprotection is achievable for the duration of the influenza season. Virosomal vaccines may induce better immunity in elderly subjects and may be more effective in reducing morbidity and mortality in this age group.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug Delivery Systems</subject><subject>Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Influenza Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Influenza Vaccines - adverse effects</subject><subject>Influenza Vaccines - immunology</subject><subject>Influenza virus</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccine</subject><subject>Vaccines, Inactivated - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Vaccines, Inactivated - adverse effects</subject><subject>Vaccines, Inactivated - immunology</subject><subject>Vaccines, Subunit - adverse effects</subject><subject>Vaccines, Subunit - immunology</subject><subject>Vaccines, Virosome - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Vaccines, Virosome - adverse effects</subject><subject>Vaccines, Virosome - immunology</subject><subject>Virosomal</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1P3DAQhq0KVBbanwDKCfVAwozjj-RUoVVLkZC4UKk3y7EnqlfZZBtnl5Zfj7cbiRucZg7PzCu9D2PnCAUCqutVsbPOhZ4KDiALEAVw-MAWWOky5xKrI7YArkQuEH6dsNMYV5DAEuuP7ARVWpHDgt0su9AHZ7uM_m5oDNQ7yp7C9DsLvXVT2NmJ_FW2C-MQh3XCQt92W-qfbTbnf2LHre0ifZ7nGfv5_dvj8kd-_3B7t7y5z53gesqJuPIcBbYoS1K6cqRQCNnUjdPS28ajbz2W3iOVtcfaWs2l9rXkDQhZlmfs8vB3Mw5_thQnsw7RUdfZnoZtNKoCjWWF74KohUIEncAvb4NSQfrI1T5cHlCXeogjtWYzhrUd_xkEs_dhVmbuw-x9GBAm-Uh3F3PEtlmTf72aBSTg6wGgVN0u0Gii-y_Bh5HcZPwQ3ol4AY4Ondk</recordid><startdate>20050708</startdate><enddate>20050708</enddate><creator>de Bruijn, I.A.</creator><creator>Nauta, J.</creator><creator>Cramer, W.C.M.</creator><creator>Gerez, L.</creator><creator>Palache, A.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050708</creationdate><title>Clinical experience with inactivated, virosomal influenza vaccine</title><author>de Bruijn, I.A. ; Nauta, J. ; Cramer, W.C.M. ; Gerez, L. ; Palache, A.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-ee26d2141f153e678ce61445b9bc75dabd1dfd13dd1e39d19aa7257d952b04533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug Delivery Systems</topic><topic>Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Influenza Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Influenza Vaccines - adverse effects</topic><topic>Influenza Vaccines - immunology</topic><topic>Influenza virus</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccine</topic><topic>Vaccines, Inactivated - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Vaccines, Inactivated - adverse effects</topic><topic>Vaccines, Inactivated - immunology</topic><topic>Vaccines, Subunit - adverse effects</topic><topic>Vaccines, Subunit - immunology</topic><topic>Vaccines, Virosome - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Vaccines, Virosome - adverse effects</topic><topic>Vaccines, Virosome - immunology</topic><topic>Virosomal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Bruijn, I.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nauta, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cramer, W.C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerez, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palache, A.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Bruijn, I.A.</au><au>Nauta, J.</au><au>Cramer, W.C.M.</au><au>Gerez, L.</au><au>Palache, A.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical experience with inactivated, virosomal influenza vaccine</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2005-07-08</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>23</volume><spage>S39</spage><epage>S49</epage><pages>S39-S49</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>Current available influenza vaccines are safe and effective in preventing influenza. Nevertheless, there is a need for influenza vaccines with improved efficacy in the elderly. This need is underscored by both the observation that influenza has a major clinical and economic impact in the elderly and the fact that currently available vaccines are generally less effective in elderly than in younger subjects. Several approaches are currently being pursued in order to improve the efficacy of influenza vaccines in elderly individuals and others who have impaired immune responses to conventional influenza vaccines. A novel antigen-presenting strategy to overcome impaired immune responses is the use of virosomes. Previously, data on safety and reactogenicity have been published regarding the use of virosomal influenza vaccines. Data from three recent clinical trials are presented here. The first of these was a comparative study of a virosomal vaccine and a conventional subunit vaccine in “at-risk” adults with underlying chronic illness. The virosomal vaccine demonstrated comparable tolerability to the subunit vaccine, with about 98% of patients reporting tolerability to be good or very good. The vast majority of adverse events reported were mild to moderate in severity. With both vaccine types, mean HI titres decreased with age for both the A-H 1N 1 and B influenza virus strains, but for the A-H 3N 2 strain (the most virulent of the three strains), mean HI titres did not decrease with age, suggesting a better response with the virosomal vaccine when compared to the subunit vaccine. All three studies explored the long-term persistence of antibodies after vaccination with virosomal influenza vaccines. Immunogenicity declined over time but remained high at 4, 6 and 12 months post-vaccination compared to baseline, indicating that adequate seroprotection is achievable for the duration of the influenza season. Virosomal vaccines may induce better immunity in elderly subjects and may be more effective in reducing morbidity and mortality in this age group.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16005120</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.04.020</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-410X
ispartof Vaccine, 2005-07, Vol.23, p.S39-S49
issn 0264-410X
1873-2518
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68071381
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Double-Blind Method
Drug Delivery Systems
Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests
Humans
Influenza
Influenza Vaccines - administration & dosage
Influenza Vaccines - adverse effects
Influenza Vaccines - immunology
Influenza virus
Middle Aged
Single-Blind Method
Vaccination
Vaccine
Vaccines, Inactivated - administration & dosage
Vaccines, Inactivated - adverse effects
Vaccines, Inactivated - immunology
Vaccines, Subunit - adverse effects
Vaccines, Subunit - immunology
Vaccines, Virosome - administration & dosage
Vaccines, Virosome - adverse effects
Vaccines, Virosome - immunology
Virosomal
title Clinical experience with inactivated, virosomal influenza vaccine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T16%3A13%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20experience%20with%20inactivated,%20virosomal%20influenza%20vaccine&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=de%20Bruijn,%20I.A.&rft.date=2005-07-08&rft.volume=23&rft.spage=S39&rft.epage=S49&rft.pages=S39-S49&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.04.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68071381%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1560138263&rft_id=info:pmid/16005120&rft_els_id=S0264410X05004615&rfr_iscdi=true