Physiological modelling of agitation–sedation dynamics including endogenous agitation reduction

Sedation administration and agitation management are fundamental activities in any intensive care unit. A lack of objective measures of agitation and sedation, as well as poor understanding of the underlying dynamics, contribute to inefficient outcomes and expensive healthcare. Recent models of agit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical engineering & physics 2006-09, Vol.28 (7), p.629-638
Hauptverfasser: Rudge, A.D., Chase, J.G., Shaw, G.M., Lee, D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 638
container_issue 7
container_start_page 629
container_title Medical engineering & physics
container_volume 28
creator Rudge, A.D.
Chase, J.G.
Shaw, G.M.
Lee, D.
description Sedation administration and agitation management are fundamental activities in any intensive care unit. A lack of objective measures of agitation and sedation, as well as poor understanding of the underlying dynamics, contribute to inefficient outcomes and expensive healthcare. Recent models of agitation–sedation pharmacodynamics have enhanced understanding of the underlying dynamics and enable development of advanced protocols for semi-automated sedation administration. However, these initial models do not capture all observed dynamics, particularly periods of low sedative infusion. A physiologically representative model that incorporates endogenous agitation reduction (EAR) dynamics is presented and validated using data from 37 critical care patients. High median relative average normalised density (RAND) values of 0.77 and 0.78 support and minimum RAND values of 0.51 and 0.55 for models without and with EAR dynamics respectively show that both models are valid representations of the fundamental agitation–sedation dynamics present in a broad spectrum of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. While the addition of the EAR dynamic increases the ability of the model to capture the observed dynamics of the agitation–sedation system, the improvement is relatively small and the sensitivity of the model to the EAR dynamic is low. Although this may represent a limitation of the model, the inclusion of EAR is shown to be important for accurately capturing periods of low, or no, sedative infusion, such as during weaning prior to extubation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.10.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68069650</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1350453305002213</els_id><sourcerecordid>19437518</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-73de0e6dcfdfed545cc6359ea76f0d06a923b15be1e3da799760cc0a016dcd8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0Eou3AK9Cs2GW4Hv8kWVYV0EqVYAFry-N7k3qU2NM4QZod79A37JPgdEZ02ZWP7O_42ucwdslhzYHrL7v1QEih298f1hsAlXfXAPUbds7rSpQSBLzNWigopRLijF2ktAMAKbV4z8643jS1kvyc2Z_3h-RjHzvvbF8MEanvfeiK2Ba285OdfAxPfx8T4bMs8BDs4F0qfHD9jAtKAWNHIc7pxVKMhLNb1Af2rrV9oo-ndcV-f_v66_qmvPvx_fb66q50UjZTWQkkII2uxZZQSeWcFqohW-kWELRtNmLL1ZY4CbRV01QanAOb00CHtRUr9vl4736MDzOlyQw-ufwbGyg_zegadKMVvAryRopK8TqD1RF0Y0xppNbsRz_Y8WA4mKUGszP_azBLDctBriE7P51GzNtMvPhOuWfg6ghQTuSPp9Ek5yk4Qj-SmwxG_-qQf1tSoeE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19437518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physiological modelling of agitation–sedation dynamics including endogenous agitation reduction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rudge, A.D. ; Chase, J.G. ; Shaw, G.M. ; Lee, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rudge, A.D. ; Chase, J.G. ; Shaw, G.M. ; Lee, D.</creatorcontrib><description>Sedation administration and agitation management are fundamental activities in any intensive care unit. A lack of objective measures of agitation and sedation, as well as poor understanding of the underlying dynamics, contribute to inefficient outcomes and expensive healthcare. Recent models of agitation–sedation pharmacodynamics have enhanced understanding of the underlying dynamics and enable development of advanced protocols for semi-automated sedation administration. However, these initial models do not capture all observed dynamics, particularly periods of low sedative infusion. A physiologically representative model that incorporates endogenous agitation reduction (EAR) dynamics is presented and validated using data from 37 critical care patients. High median relative average normalised density (RAND) values of 0.77 and 0.78 support and minimum RAND values of 0.51 and 0.55 for models without and with EAR dynamics respectively show that both models are valid representations of the fundamental agitation–sedation dynamics present in a broad spectrum of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. While the addition of the EAR dynamic increases the ability of the model to capture the observed dynamics of the agitation–sedation system, the improvement is relatively small and the sensitivity of the model to the EAR dynamic is low. Although this may represent a limitation of the model, the inclusion of EAR is shown to be important for accurately capturing periods of low, or no, sedative infusion, such as during weaning prior to extubation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-4533</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4030</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.10.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16298541</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agitation ; Biomedical Engineering ; Critical Care ; Dynamic modelling ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration &amp; dosage ; Hypnotics and Sedatives - pharmacokinetics ; Midazolam - administration &amp; dosage ; Midazolam - pharmacokinetics ; Models, Biological ; Morphine - administration &amp; dosage ; Morphine - pharmacokinetics ; Non-linear dynamics ; Nonlinear Dynamics ; Physiological models ; Psychomotor Agitation - drug therapy ; Psychomotor Agitation - physiopathology ; Sedation</subject><ispartof>Medical engineering &amp; physics, 2006-09, Vol.28 (7), p.629-638</ispartof><rights>2005 IPEM</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-73de0e6dcfdfed545cc6359ea76f0d06a923b15be1e3da799760cc0a016dcd8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-73de0e6dcfdfed545cc6359ea76f0d06a923b15be1e3da799760cc0a016dcd8a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.10.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16298541$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rudge, A.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chase, J.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, G.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Physiological modelling of agitation–sedation dynamics including endogenous agitation reduction</title><title>Medical engineering &amp; physics</title><addtitle>Med Eng Phys</addtitle><description>Sedation administration and agitation management are fundamental activities in any intensive care unit. A lack of objective measures of agitation and sedation, as well as poor understanding of the underlying dynamics, contribute to inefficient outcomes and expensive healthcare. Recent models of agitation–sedation pharmacodynamics have enhanced understanding of the underlying dynamics and enable development of advanced protocols for semi-automated sedation administration. However, these initial models do not capture all observed dynamics, particularly periods of low sedative infusion. A physiologically representative model that incorporates endogenous agitation reduction (EAR) dynamics is presented and validated using data from 37 critical care patients. High median relative average normalised density (RAND) values of 0.77 and 0.78 support and minimum RAND values of 0.51 and 0.55 for models without and with EAR dynamics respectively show that both models are valid representations of the fundamental agitation–sedation dynamics present in a broad spectrum of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. While the addition of the EAR dynamic increases the ability of the model to capture the observed dynamics of the agitation–sedation system, the improvement is relatively small and the sensitivity of the model to the EAR dynamic is low. Although this may represent a limitation of the model, the inclusion of EAR is shown to be important for accurately capturing periods of low, or no, sedative infusion, such as during weaning prior to extubation.</description><subject>Agitation</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Dynamic modelling</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Hypnotics and Sedatives - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Midazolam - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Midazolam - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Morphine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Morphine - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Non-linear dynamics</subject><subject>Nonlinear Dynamics</subject><subject>Physiological models</subject><subject>Psychomotor Agitation - drug therapy</subject><subject>Psychomotor Agitation - physiopathology</subject><subject>Sedation</subject><issn>1350-4533</issn><issn>1873-4030</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0Eou3AK9Cs2GW4Hv8kWVYV0EqVYAFry-N7k3qU2NM4QZod79A37JPgdEZ02ZWP7O_42ucwdslhzYHrL7v1QEih298f1hsAlXfXAPUbds7rSpQSBLzNWigopRLijF2ktAMAKbV4z8643jS1kvyc2Z_3h-RjHzvvbF8MEanvfeiK2Ba285OdfAxPfx8T4bMs8BDs4F0qfHD9jAtKAWNHIc7pxVKMhLNb1Af2rrV9oo-ndcV-f_v66_qmvPvx_fb66q50UjZTWQkkII2uxZZQSeWcFqohW-kWELRtNmLL1ZY4CbRV01QanAOb00CHtRUr9vl4736MDzOlyQw-ufwbGyg_zegadKMVvAryRopK8TqD1RF0Y0xppNbsRz_Y8WA4mKUGszP_azBLDctBriE7P51GzNtMvPhOuWfg6ghQTuSPp9Ek5yk4Qj-SmwxG_-qQf1tSoeE</recordid><startdate>20060901</startdate><enddate>20060901</enddate><creator>Rudge, A.D.</creator><creator>Chase, J.G.</creator><creator>Shaw, G.M.</creator><creator>Lee, D.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060901</creationdate><title>Physiological modelling of agitation–sedation dynamics including endogenous agitation reduction</title><author>Rudge, A.D. ; Chase, J.G. ; Shaw, G.M. ; Lee, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-73de0e6dcfdfed545cc6359ea76f0d06a923b15be1e3da799760cc0a016dcd8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Agitation</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Dynamic modelling</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Hypnotics and Sedatives - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Midazolam - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Midazolam - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Morphine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Morphine - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Non-linear dynamics</topic><topic>Nonlinear Dynamics</topic><topic>Physiological models</topic><topic>Psychomotor Agitation - drug therapy</topic><topic>Psychomotor Agitation - physiopathology</topic><topic>Sedation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rudge, A.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chase, J.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, G.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical engineering &amp; physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rudge, A.D.</au><au>Chase, J.G.</au><au>Shaw, G.M.</au><au>Lee, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physiological modelling of agitation–sedation dynamics including endogenous agitation reduction</atitle><jtitle>Medical engineering &amp; physics</jtitle><addtitle>Med Eng Phys</addtitle><date>2006-09-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>629</spage><epage>638</epage><pages>629-638</pages><issn>1350-4533</issn><eissn>1873-4030</eissn><abstract>Sedation administration and agitation management are fundamental activities in any intensive care unit. A lack of objective measures of agitation and sedation, as well as poor understanding of the underlying dynamics, contribute to inefficient outcomes and expensive healthcare. Recent models of agitation–sedation pharmacodynamics have enhanced understanding of the underlying dynamics and enable development of advanced protocols for semi-automated sedation administration. However, these initial models do not capture all observed dynamics, particularly periods of low sedative infusion. A physiologically representative model that incorporates endogenous agitation reduction (EAR) dynamics is presented and validated using data from 37 critical care patients. High median relative average normalised density (RAND) values of 0.77 and 0.78 support and minimum RAND values of 0.51 and 0.55 for models without and with EAR dynamics respectively show that both models are valid representations of the fundamental agitation–sedation dynamics present in a broad spectrum of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. While the addition of the EAR dynamic increases the ability of the model to capture the observed dynamics of the agitation–sedation system, the improvement is relatively small and the sensitivity of the model to the EAR dynamic is low. Although this may represent a limitation of the model, the inclusion of EAR is shown to be important for accurately capturing periods of low, or no, sedative infusion, such as during weaning prior to extubation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16298541</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.10.008</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1350-4533
ispartof Medical engineering & physics, 2006-09, Vol.28 (7), p.629-638
issn 1350-4533
1873-4030
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68069650
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Agitation
Biomedical Engineering
Critical Care
Dynamic modelling
Humans
Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration & dosage
Hypnotics and Sedatives - pharmacokinetics
Midazolam - administration & dosage
Midazolam - pharmacokinetics
Models, Biological
Morphine - administration & dosage
Morphine - pharmacokinetics
Non-linear dynamics
Nonlinear Dynamics
Physiological models
Psychomotor Agitation - drug therapy
Psychomotor Agitation - physiopathology
Sedation
title Physiological modelling of agitation–sedation dynamics including endogenous agitation reduction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T04%3A49%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physiological%20modelling%20of%20agitation%E2%80%93sedation%20dynamics%20including%20endogenous%20agitation%20reduction&rft.jtitle=Medical%20engineering%20&%20physics&rft.au=Rudge,%20A.D.&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=629&rft.epage=638&rft.pages=629-638&rft.issn=1350-4533&rft.eissn=1873-4030&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.10.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19437518%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19437518&rft_id=info:pmid/16298541&rft_els_id=S1350453305002213&rfr_iscdi=true