Resource availability and quality influence patterns of diet mixing by sheep
In grazing systems, forage availability is a function of herbivore density, which can influence an animal's ability to be selective. In turn, the influence of food availability on selectivity has the potential to influence plant biodiversity. We hypothesized that the ability of herbivores to mi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of chemical ecology 2006-06, Vol.32 (6), p.1267-1278 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1278 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1267 |
container_title | Journal of chemical ecology |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Shaw, Ryan A Villalba, Juan J Provenza, Fredrick D |
description | In grazing systems, forage availability is a function of herbivore density, which can influence an animal's ability to be selective. In turn, the influence of food availability on selectivity has the potential to influence plant biodiversity. We hypothesized that the ability of herbivores to mix toxin-containing foods in their diets is a function of the availability of nontoxic foods and the nutritional characteristics of the toxin-containing foods. We evaluated this hypothesis in two trials simulating different diet qualities (high-quality foods in trial 1, low-quality foods in trial 2). Within each trial, the four treatment groups were offered with different amounts of nutritious, familiar foods-10, 30, 50, and 70% of ad libitum intake-but were offered with ad libitum access to toxin-containing foods. Each lamb was presented with five foods, including three toxin-containing unfamiliar foods (terpenes, tannins, and oxalates) and two nutritious familiar foods (alfalfa and barley). In trial 1, as the availability of nutritious familiar foods decreased, animals ate more of all three toxin-containing foods. As the availability of nutritious alternatives increased, the pattern of selection shifted from terpenes to tannins and oxalates. In trial 2, animals also ate more toxins as the availability of nutritious alternatives decreased, but their pattern of diet mixing changed. Low availability of nutritious alternatives resulted in the animals eating more oxalates. During preference tests when all five foods were offered ad libitum, animals fed with 10, 30, 50, and 70% of ad libitum intake from trial 1 ate 49, 47, 41, and 38% of the three toxin-containing foods, respectively. The lower diet quality in trial 2 affected intake of the toxin-containing foods such that animals fed with 10, 30, 50, and 70% of ad libitum intake ate 37, 36, 29, and 27%, respectively, of the three toxin-containing foods. Thus, the quality of toxin-containing foods and the availability of nutritious alternatives interacted to modify the pattern of diet mixing by lambs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10886-006-9083-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68067678</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2093606871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-25a2599c1a62214b7da4a50ef45f74e6604f16bc3096129f2cd1bbe648071873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AC8SPHiLzuz3HqX4BQVBel82yUa35KPNJmL_vaktCF48zRyeeZmZh5BLhFsEUHcRQWuZAsjUgGYpPSJTFIqlKCQekymA0SkwhhNyFuMKAKjU4pRMUCoFCtWULN58bIcu94n7dKFyWahCv01cUySbwf30oSmrwTcjsnZ977smJm2ZFMH3SR2-QvOeZNskfni_PicnpauivzjUGVk-Piznz-ni9ellfr9IcyZUn1LhqDAmRycpRZ6pwnEnwJdclIp7KYGXKLOcgZFITUnzArPMS67HnbViM3Kzj1137Wbwsbd1iLmvKtf4dohWapBKKv0viIYbLgwfwes_4Gp8SjPeYBVjAEzwXRruobxrY-x8adddqF23tQh258PufdjRh935sHScuToED1nti9-JgwD2DVKrhJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733003548</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resource availability and quality influence patterns of diet mixing by sheep</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Shaw, Ryan A ; Villalba, Juan J ; Provenza, Fredrick D</creator><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Ryan A ; Villalba, Juan J ; Provenza, Fredrick D</creatorcontrib><description>In grazing systems, forage availability is a function of herbivore density, which can influence an animal's ability to be selective. In turn, the influence of food availability on selectivity has the potential to influence plant biodiversity. We hypothesized that the ability of herbivores to mix toxin-containing foods in their diets is a function of the availability of nontoxic foods and the nutritional characteristics of the toxin-containing foods. We evaluated this hypothesis in two trials simulating different diet qualities (high-quality foods in trial 1, low-quality foods in trial 2). Within each trial, the four treatment groups were offered with different amounts of nutritious, familiar foods-10, 30, 50, and 70% of ad libitum intake-but were offered with ad libitum access to toxin-containing foods. Each lamb was presented with five foods, including three toxin-containing unfamiliar foods (terpenes, tannins, and oxalates) and two nutritious familiar foods (alfalfa and barley). In trial 1, as the availability of nutritious familiar foods decreased, animals ate more of all three toxin-containing foods. As the availability of nutritious alternatives increased, the pattern of selection shifted from terpenes to tannins and oxalates. In trial 2, animals also ate more toxins as the availability of nutritious alternatives decreased, but their pattern of diet mixing changed. Low availability of nutritious alternatives resulted in the animals eating more oxalates. During preference tests when all five foods were offered ad libitum, animals fed with 10, 30, 50, and 70% of ad libitum intake from trial 1 ate 49, 47, 41, and 38% of the three toxin-containing foods, respectively. The lower diet quality in trial 2 affected intake of the toxin-containing foods such that animals fed with 10, 30, 50, and 70% of ad libitum intake ate 37, 36, 29, and 27%, respectively, of the three toxin-containing foods. Thus, the quality of toxin-containing foods and the availability of nutritious alternatives interacted to modify the pattern of diet mixing by lambs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-0331</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1561</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10886-006-9083-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16770717</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Alfalfa ; Animals ; Diet ; Feeding Behavior ; Food availability ; Food quality ; Herbivores ; Hordeum vulgare ; Quality ; Resource availability ; Sheep ; Tannins ; Toxins ; Toxins, Biological - administration & dosage</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical ecology, 2006-06, Vol.32 (6), p.1267-1278</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-25a2599c1a62214b7da4a50ef45f74e6604f16bc3096129f2cd1bbe648071873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-25a2599c1a62214b7da4a50ef45f74e6604f16bc3096129f2cd1bbe648071873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16770717$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Ryan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villalba, Juan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Provenza, Fredrick D</creatorcontrib><title>Resource availability and quality influence patterns of diet mixing by sheep</title><title>Journal of chemical ecology</title><addtitle>J Chem Ecol</addtitle><description>In grazing systems, forage availability is a function of herbivore density, which can influence an animal's ability to be selective. In turn, the influence of food availability on selectivity has the potential to influence plant biodiversity. We hypothesized that the ability of herbivores to mix toxin-containing foods in their diets is a function of the availability of nontoxic foods and the nutritional characteristics of the toxin-containing foods. We evaluated this hypothesis in two trials simulating different diet qualities (high-quality foods in trial 1, low-quality foods in trial 2). Within each trial, the four treatment groups were offered with different amounts of nutritious, familiar foods-10, 30, 50, and 70% of ad libitum intake-but were offered with ad libitum access to toxin-containing foods. Each lamb was presented with five foods, including three toxin-containing unfamiliar foods (terpenes, tannins, and oxalates) and two nutritious familiar foods (alfalfa and barley). In trial 1, as the availability of nutritious familiar foods decreased, animals ate more of all three toxin-containing foods. As the availability of nutritious alternatives increased, the pattern of selection shifted from terpenes to tannins and oxalates. In trial 2, animals also ate more toxins as the availability of nutritious alternatives decreased, but their pattern of diet mixing changed. Low availability of nutritious alternatives resulted in the animals eating more oxalates. During preference tests when all five foods were offered ad libitum, animals fed with 10, 30, 50, and 70% of ad libitum intake from trial 1 ate 49, 47, 41, and 38% of the three toxin-containing foods, respectively. The lower diet quality in trial 2 affected intake of the toxin-containing foods such that animals fed with 10, 30, 50, and 70% of ad libitum intake ate 37, 36, 29, and 27%, respectively, of the three toxin-containing foods. Thus, the quality of toxin-containing foods and the availability of nutritious alternatives interacted to modify the pattern of diet mixing by lambs.</description><subject>Alfalfa</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Food availability</subject><subject>Food quality</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Hordeum vulgare</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Resource availability</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Tannins</subject><subject>Toxins</subject><subject>Toxins, Biological - administration & dosage</subject><issn>0098-0331</issn><issn>1573-1561</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AC8SPHiLzuz3HqX4BQVBel82yUa35KPNJmL_vaktCF48zRyeeZmZh5BLhFsEUHcRQWuZAsjUgGYpPSJTFIqlKCQekymA0SkwhhNyFuMKAKjU4pRMUCoFCtWULN58bIcu94n7dKFyWahCv01cUySbwf30oSmrwTcjsnZ977smJm2ZFMH3SR2-QvOeZNskfni_PicnpauivzjUGVk-Piznz-ni9ellfr9IcyZUn1LhqDAmRycpRZ6pwnEnwJdclIp7KYGXKLOcgZFITUnzArPMS67HnbViM3Kzj1137Wbwsbd1iLmvKtf4dohWapBKKv0viIYbLgwfwes_4Gp8SjPeYBVjAEzwXRruobxrY-x8adddqF23tQh258PufdjRh935sHScuToED1nti9-JgwD2DVKrhJw</recordid><startdate>200606</startdate><enddate>200606</enddate><creator>Shaw, Ryan A</creator><creator>Villalba, Juan J</creator><creator>Provenza, Fredrick D</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200606</creationdate><title>Resource availability and quality influence patterns of diet mixing by sheep</title><author>Shaw, Ryan A ; Villalba, Juan J ; Provenza, Fredrick D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-25a2599c1a62214b7da4a50ef45f74e6604f16bc3096129f2cd1bbe648071873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Alfalfa</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Food availability</topic><topic>Food quality</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Hordeum vulgare</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Resource availability</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Tannins</topic><topic>Toxins</topic><topic>Toxins, Biological - administration & dosage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Ryan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villalba, Juan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Provenza, Fredrick D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shaw, Ryan A</au><au>Villalba, Juan J</au><au>Provenza, Fredrick D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resource availability and quality influence patterns of diet mixing by sheep</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical ecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Chem Ecol</addtitle><date>2006-06</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1267</spage><epage>1278</epage><pages>1267-1278</pages><issn>0098-0331</issn><eissn>1573-1561</eissn><abstract>In grazing systems, forage availability is a function of herbivore density, which can influence an animal's ability to be selective. In turn, the influence of food availability on selectivity has the potential to influence plant biodiversity. We hypothesized that the ability of herbivores to mix toxin-containing foods in their diets is a function of the availability of nontoxic foods and the nutritional characteristics of the toxin-containing foods. We evaluated this hypothesis in two trials simulating different diet qualities (high-quality foods in trial 1, low-quality foods in trial 2). Within each trial, the four treatment groups were offered with different amounts of nutritious, familiar foods-10, 30, 50, and 70% of ad libitum intake-but were offered with ad libitum access to toxin-containing foods. Each lamb was presented with five foods, including three toxin-containing unfamiliar foods (terpenes, tannins, and oxalates) and two nutritious familiar foods (alfalfa and barley). In trial 1, as the availability of nutritious familiar foods decreased, animals ate more of all three toxin-containing foods. As the availability of nutritious alternatives increased, the pattern of selection shifted from terpenes to tannins and oxalates. In trial 2, animals also ate more toxins as the availability of nutritious alternatives decreased, but their pattern of diet mixing changed. Low availability of nutritious alternatives resulted in the animals eating more oxalates. During preference tests when all five foods were offered ad libitum, animals fed with 10, 30, 50, and 70% of ad libitum intake from trial 1 ate 49, 47, 41, and 38% of the three toxin-containing foods, respectively. The lower diet quality in trial 2 affected intake of the toxin-containing foods such that animals fed with 10, 30, 50, and 70% of ad libitum intake ate 37, 36, 29, and 27%, respectively, of the three toxin-containing foods. Thus, the quality of toxin-containing foods and the availability of nutritious alternatives interacted to modify the pattern of diet mixing by lambs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>16770717</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10886-006-9083-2</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-0331 |
ispartof | Journal of chemical ecology, 2006-06, Vol.32 (6), p.1267-1278 |
issn | 0098-0331 1573-1561 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68067678 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Alfalfa Animals Diet Feeding Behavior Food availability Food quality Herbivores Hordeum vulgare Quality Resource availability Sheep Tannins Toxins Toxins, Biological - administration & dosage |
title | Resource availability and quality influence patterns of diet mixing by sheep |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T20%3A51%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resource%20availability%20and%20quality%20influence%20patterns%20of%20diet%20mixing%20by%20sheep&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20ecology&rft.au=Shaw,%20Ryan%20A&rft.date=2006-06&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1267&rft.epage=1278&rft.pages=1267-1278&rft.issn=0098-0331&rft.eissn=1573-1561&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10886-006-9083-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2093606871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733003548&rft_id=info:pmid/16770717&rfr_iscdi=true |