Presence and Density of Helicobacter pylori Biofilms in Human Gastric Mucosa in Patients With Peptic Ulcer Disease
Our purpose was to use endoscopically directed biopsies and scanning electron microscopy to quantify Helicobacter pylori biofilm density on the surface of human gastric mucosa in urease-positive and -negative patients. Participating patients underwent flexible esophagogastroduodenoscopies coupled wi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2006-06, Vol.10 (6), p.883-889 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 889 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 883 |
container_title | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Coticchia, James M. Sugawa, Choichi Tran, Vivian R. Gurrola, Jose Kowalski, Evan Carron, Michael A. |
description | Our purpose was to use endoscopically directed biopsies and scanning electron microscopy to quantify
Helicobacter pylori biofilm density on the surface of human gastric mucosa in urease-positive and -negative patients. Participating patients underwent flexible esophagogastroduodenoscopies coupled with gastric mucosal biopsies. Rapid urease testing was performed on all specimens to determine the presence of
H. pylori, followed by scanning electron microscopy to identify the existence of biofilms. Samples were then analyzed using Carnoy Image Analysis Software to determine percent biofilm coverage of the total surface area. These data were compared to control specimens that were urease negative. Of the patients who tested urease positive for
H. pylori, the average percent of total surface area covered by biofilms was 97.3%. Those testing negative had an average surface area coverage of only 1.64%. These differences were determined to be statistically significant at the 0.0001 level. This study demonstrates that compared with controls, urease-positive specimens have significant biofilm formation, whereas urease-negative specimens have little to none. This was reflected in the significantly increased biofilm surface density in urease positive specimens compared with urease-negative controls. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.12.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68064719</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1091255X0500867X</els_id><sourcerecordid>68064719</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-fc8afbea4795175d8c4b73cbd8c9ca1c3ac2160e8f8888a8cb3622f84afc34b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVGL1DAQx4so3nn6DUQCgm-tSZqm6Yugd3ornLgPHvoW0ulUs7TNXiYV9tubZRcEH8xLhuQ3_wn5FcVLwSvBhX67q346ojVWkvOmErLivHtUXArT1qXSUj_ONe9EKZvmx0XxjGjHuWi5ME-LC6Fb3TVKXxZxG5FwAWRuGdgNLuTTgYWRbXDyEHoHCSPbH6YQPfvgw-inmZhf2Gad3cJuHaXogX1ZIZA7nm9d8rgkYt99-sW2uE_5-n6CnHLjCR3h8-LJ6CbCF-f9qrj_9PHb9aa8-3r7-fr9XQm1MakcwbixR6farhFtMxhQfVtDn4sOnIDagRSaoxlNXs5AX2spR6PcCLXqm_qqeHPK3cfwsCIlO3sCnCa3YFjJasO1akWXwdf_gLuwxiW_zQohZN22hqtMqRMFMRBFHO0--tnFgxXcHo3YnT0ZsUcjVkibjeS2V-fwtZ9x-Nt0VpCBdycA81_89hgtgT8aGXxESHYI_v8T_gDbGJ-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1112377804</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Presence and Density of Helicobacter pylori Biofilms in Human Gastric Mucosa in Patients With Peptic Ulcer Disease</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Coticchia, James M. ; Sugawa, Choichi ; Tran, Vivian R. ; Gurrola, Jose ; Kowalski, Evan ; Carron, Michael A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Coticchia, James M. ; Sugawa, Choichi ; Tran, Vivian R. ; Gurrola, Jose ; Kowalski, Evan ; Carron, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><description>Our purpose was to use endoscopically directed biopsies and scanning electron microscopy to quantify
Helicobacter pylori biofilm density on the surface of human gastric mucosa in urease-positive and -negative patients. Participating patients underwent flexible esophagogastroduodenoscopies coupled with gastric mucosal biopsies. Rapid urease testing was performed on all specimens to determine the presence of
H. pylori, followed by scanning electron microscopy to identify the existence of biofilms. Samples were then analyzed using Carnoy Image Analysis Software to determine percent biofilm coverage of the total surface area. These data were compared to control specimens that were urease negative. Of the patients who tested urease positive for
H. pylori, the average percent of total surface area covered by biofilms was 97.3%. Those testing negative had an average surface area coverage of only 1.64%. These differences were determined to be statistically significant at the 0.0001 level. This study demonstrates that compared with controls, urease-positive specimens have significant biofilm formation, whereas urease-negative specimens have little to none. This was reflected in the significantly increased biofilm surface density in urease positive specimens compared with urease-negative controls.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1091-255X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.12.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16769546</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biofilms ; Cell Count ; Disease ; Gastric Mucosa - microbiology ; H. pylori, scanning electron microscopy ; Helicobacter Infections - microbiology ; Helicobacter pylori ; Humans ; image analysis ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Peptic Ulcer - microbiology ; peptic ulcer disease ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Stomach ; Urease - metabolism</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2006-06, Vol.10 (6), p.883-889</ispartof><rights>2006 The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract</rights><rights>The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Inc. 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-fc8afbea4795175d8c4b73cbd8c9ca1c3ac2160e8f8888a8cb3622f84afc34b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-fc8afbea4795175d8c4b73cbd8c9ca1c3ac2160e8f8888a8cb3622f84afc34b53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16769546$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coticchia, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugawa, Choichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Vivian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurrola, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kowalski, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carron, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><title>Presence and Density of Helicobacter pylori Biofilms in Human Gastric Mucosa in Patients With Peptic Ulcer Disease</title><title>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</title><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><description>Our purpose was to use endoscopically directed biopsies and scanning electron microscopy to quantify
Helicobacter pylori biofilm density on the surface of human gastric mucosa in urease-positive and -negative patients. Participating patients underwent flexible esophagogastroduodenoscopies coupled with gastric mucosal biopsies. Rapid urease testing was performed on all specimens to determine the presence of
H. pylori, followed by scanning electron microscopy to identify the existence of biofilms. Samples were then analyzed using Carnoy Image Analysis Software to determine percent biofilm coverage of the total surface area. These data were compared to control specimens that were urease negative. Of the patients who tested urease positive for
H. pylori, the average percent of total surface area covered by biofilms was 97.3%. Those testing negative had an average surface area coverage of only 1.64%. These differences were determined to be statistically significant at the 0.0001 level. This study demonstrates that compared with controls, urease-positive specimens have significant biofilm formation, whereas urease-negative specimens have little to none. This was reflected in the significantly increased biofilm surface density in urease positive specimens compared with urease-negative controls.</description><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Cell Count</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Gastric Mucosa - microbiology</subject><subject>H. pylori, scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Helicobacter Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Helicobacter pylori</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>image analysis</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Peptic Ulcer - microbiology</subject><subject>peptic ulcer disease</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Stomach</subject><subject>Urease - metabolism</subject><issn>1091-255X</issn><issn>1873-4626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVGL1DAQx4so3nn6DUQCgm-tSZqm6Yugd3ornLgPHvoW0ulUs7TNXiYV9tubZRcEH8xLhuQ3_wn5FcVLwSvBhX67q346ojVWkvOmErLivHtUXArT1qXSUj_ONe9EKZvmx0XxjGjHuWi5ME-LC6Fb3TVKXxZxG5FwAWRuGdgNLuTTgYWRbXDyEHoHCSPbH6YQPfvgw-inmZhf2Gad3cJuHaXogX1ZIZA7nm9d8rgkYt99-sW2uE_5-n6CnHLjCR3h8-LJ6CbCF-f9qrj_9PHb9aa8-3r7-fr9XQm1MakcwbixR6farhFtMxhQfVtDn4sOnIDagRSaoxlNXs5AX2spR6PcCLXqm_qqeHPK3cfwsCIlO3sCnCa3YFjJasO1akWXwdf_gLuwxiW_zQohZN22hqtMqRMFMRBFHO0--tnFgxXcHo3YnT0ZsUcjVkibjeS2V-fwtZ9x-Nt0VpCBdycA81_89hgtgT8aGXxESHYI_v8T_gDbGJ-w</recordid><startdate>20060601</startdate><enddate>20060601</enddate><creator>Coticchia, James M.</creator><creator>Sugawa, Choichi</creator><creator>Tran, Vivian R.</creator><creator>Gurrola, Jose</creator><creator>Kowalski, Evan</creator><creator>Carron, Michael A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060601</creationdate><title>Presence and Density of Helicobacter pylori Biofilms in Human Gastric Mucosa in Patients With Peptic Ulcer Disease</title><author>Coticchia, James M. ; Sugawa, Choichi ; Tran, Vivian R. ; Gurrola, Jose ; Kowalski, Evan ; Carron, Michael A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-fc8afbea4795175d8c4b73cbd8c9ca1c3ac2160e8f8888a8cb3622f84afc34b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Cell Count</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Gastric Mucosa - microbiology</topic><topic>H. pylori, scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Helicobacter Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Helicobacter pylori</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>image analysis</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Peptic Ulcer - microbiology</topic><topic>peptic ulcer disease</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Stomach</topic><topic>Urease - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coticchia, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugawa, Choichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Vivian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurrola, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kowalski, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carron, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coticchia, James M.</au><au>Sugawa, Choichi</au><au>Tran, Vivian R.</au><au>Gurrola, Jose</au><au>Kowalski, Evan</au><au>Carron, Michael A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Presence and Density of Helicobacter pylori Biofilms in Human Gastric Mucosa in Patients With Peptic Ulcer Disease</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><date>2006-06-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>883</spage><epage>889</epage><pages>883-889</pages><issn>1091-255X</issn><eissn>1873-4626</eissn><abstract>Our purpose was to use endoscopically directed biopsies and scanning electron microscopy to quantify
Helicobacter pylori biofilm density on the surface of human gastric mucosa in urease-positive and -negative patients. Participating patients underwent flexible esophagogastroduodenoscopies coupled with gastric mucosal biopsies. Rapid urease testing was performed on all specimens to determine the presence of
H. pylori, followed by scanning electron microscopy to identify the existence of biofilms. Samples were then analyzed using Carnoy Image Analysis Software to determine percent biofilm coverage of the total surface area. These data were compared to control specimens that were urease negative. Of the patients who tested urease positive for
H. pylori, the average percent of total surface area covered by biofilms was 97.3%. Those testing negative had an average surface area coverage of only 1.64%. These differences were determined to be statistically significant at the 0.0001 level. This study demonstrates that compared with controls, urease-positive specimens have significant biofilm formation, whereas urease-negative specimens have little to none. This was reflected in the significantly increased biofilm surface density in urease positive specimens compared with urease-negative controls.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16769546</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gassur.2005.12.009</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1091-255X |
ispartof | Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2006-06, Vol.10 (6), p.883-889 |
issn | 1091-255X 1873-4626 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68064719 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Biofilms Cell Count Disease Gastric Mucosa - microbiology H. pylori, scanning electron microscopy Helicobacter Infections - microbiology Helicobacter pylori Humans image analysis Microscopy, Electron, Scanning Peptic Ulcer - microbiology peptic ulcer disease Scanning electron microscopy Stomach Urease - metabolism |
title | Presence and Density of Helicobacter pylori Biofilms in Human Gastric Mucosa in Patients With Peptic Ulcer Disease |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A02%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Presence%20and%20Density%20of%20Helicobacter%20pylori%20Biofilms%20in%20Human%20Gastric%20Mucosa%20in%20Patients%20With%20Peptic%20Ulcer%20Disease&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastrointestinal%20surgery&rft.au=Coticchia,%20James%20M.&rft.date=2006-06-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=883&rft.epage=889&rft.pages=883-889&rft.issn=1091-255X&rft.eissn=1873-4626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.12.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68064719%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1112377804&rft_id=info:pmid/16769546&rft_els_id=S1091255X0500867X&rfr_iscdi=true |