Automated Interpretation of Regional Left Ventricular Wall Motion from Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Images

Magnetic resonance (MR) diagnosis of regional left ventricular (LV) dysfunction relies on visual interpretation of cine images that suffers from wide inter-observer variability, especially when performed by readers not specifically trained in the assessment of LV wall motion. Quantitative analysis t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance 2006-01, Vol.8 (3), p.427-433
Hauptverfasser: Caiani, Enrico G., Toledo, Eran, MacEneaney, Peter, Bardo, Dianna, Cerutti, Sergio, Lang, Roberto M., Mor-Avi, Victor
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 433
container_issue 3
container_start_page 427
container_title Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance
container_volume 8
creator Caiani, Enrico G.
Toledo, Eran
MacEneaney, Peter
Bardo, Dianna
Cerutti, Sergio
Lang, Roberto M.
Mor-Avi, Victor
description Magnetic resonance (MR) diagnosis of regional left ventricular (LV) dysfunction relies on visual interpretation of cine images that suffers from wide inter-observer variability, especially when performed by readers not specifically trained in the assessment of LV wall motion. Quantitative analysis tools, though widely available, are rarely used because they provide large amounts of detailed information, the interpretation of which requires additional time-consuming processing. We tested the feasibility of fast automated interpretation of regional LV function using computer analysis of this wall motion information. Methods: Dynamic, ECG-gated, steady-state free precession short-axis images were obtained in 6-10 slices in 28 subjects (10 normal volunteers; 18 patients). Images were reviewed by an expert cardiologist who provided "gold standard" grades (normal, abnormal) for regional wall motion and, independently, by four radiologists. Same images were then analyzed using custom software. Regional fractional area changes computed in normal volunteers were used to obtain the optimal segment- and slice-specific threshold values for automated classification of regional wall motion for each patient. The levels of agreement with the "gold standard" grades were compared between the radiologists and the automated interpretation. Results: While the visual interpretation required 2-5 minute per patient, the automated interpretation required < 1 sec, after endocardial border detection was complete. The automated interpretation resulted in higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (84%, 77%, 79%, respectively) than the radiologists' grades (80%, 76%, 77%, respectively) and eliminated the high interobserver variability. Conclusion: Once the endocardial boundaries are defined, computer analysis of the regional wall motion information allows accurate, fully automated, immediate, objective and experience-independent interpretation of regional LV function.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10976640600599486
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68047478</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68047478</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-826c211108611618272c268cd4ce01ee2327b628af238e9748d165e4661b9ac53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoVqs_wIvk5G01SbNJFk9S_ChUBPHrtkyzs-3K7qYm2YP_3mgLHgRPMzDP-8I8hJxwds6ZYRecFVopyRRjeVFIo3bIAc8nIpOieNtNe7pnCdAjchjCO2O80EzvkxFXOs-NMAdkdTVE10HEis76iH7tMUJsXE9dTR9xmTZo6RzrSF-wj76xQwuevkLb0nv3A9bedXQKvmrA0ntY9hgbm7IhRXuLdNbBEsMR2auhDXi8nWPyfHP9NL3L5g-3s-nVPLNSsZgZoazgPL2nOFfcCC2sUMZW0iLjiGIi9EIJA7WYGCy0NBVXOUql-KIAm0_G5GzTu_buY8AQy64JFtsWenRDKJVhUkttEsg3oPUuBI91ufZNB_6z5Kz81lv-0Zsyp9vyYdFh9ZvY-kzA5QZo-tr5DlYIbVxZ8Fi-u8Enl-Gf-i-0m4dV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68047478</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automated Interpretation of Regional Left Ventricular Wall Motion from Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Images</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Caiani, Enrico G. ; Toledo, Eran ; MacEneaney, Peter ; Bardo, Dianna ; Cerutti, Sergio ; Lang, Roberto M. ; Mor-Avi, Victor</creator><creatorcontrib>Caiani, Enrico G. ; Toledo, Eran ; MacEneaney, Peter ; Bardo, Dianna ; Cerutti, Sergio ; Lang, Roberto M. ; Mor-Avi, Victor</creatorcontrib><description>Magnetic resonance (MR) diagnosis of regional left ventricular (LV) dysfunction relies on visual interpretation of cine images that suffers from wide inter-observer variability, especially when performed by readers not specifically trained in the assessment of LV wall motion. Quantitative analysis tools, though widely available, are rarely used because they provide large amounts of detailed information, the interpretation of which requires additional time-consuming processing. We tested the feasibility of fast automated interpretation of regional LV function using computer analysis of this wall motion information. Methods: Dynamic, ECG-gated, steady-state free precession short-axis images were obtained in 6-10 slices in 28 subjects (10 normal volunteers; 18 patients). Images were reviewed by an expert cardiologist who provided "gold standard" grades (normal, abnormal) for regional wall motion and, independently, by four radiologists. Same images were then analyzed using custom software. Regional fractional area changes computed in normal volunteers were used to obtain the optimal segment- and slice-specific threshold values for automated classification of regional wall motion for each patient. The levels of agreement with the "gold standard" grades were compared between the radiologists and the automated interpretation. Results: While the visual interpretation required 2-5 minute per patient, the automated interpretation required &lt; 1 sec, after endocardial border detection was complete. The automated interpretation resulted in higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (84%, 77%, 79%, respectively) than the radiologists' grades (80%, 76%, 77%, respectively) and eliminated the high interobserver variability. Conclusion: Once the endocardial boundaries are defined, computer analysis of the regional wall motion information allows accurate, fully automated, immediate, objective and experience-independent interpretation of regional LV function.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1097-6647</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-429X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10976640600599486</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16755828</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Automation ; Clinical Competence ; Electrocardiography ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reference Values ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Software ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology ; Ventricular Function, Left - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance, 2006-01, Vol.8 (3), p.427-433</ispartof><rights>2006 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-826c211108611618272c268cd4ce01ee2327b628af238e9748d165e4661b9ac53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-826c211108611618272c268cd4ce01ee2327b628af238e9748d165e4661b9ac53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10976640600599486$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10976640600599486$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,61197,61378</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16755828$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Caiani, Enrico G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toledo, Eran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacEneaney, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardo, Dianna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerutti, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Roberto M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mor-Avi, Victor</creatorcontrib><title>Automated Interpretation of Regional Left Ventricular Wall Motion from Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Images</title><title>Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance</title><addtitle>J Cardiovasc Magn Reson</addtitle><description>Magnetic resonance (MR) diagnosis of regional left ventricular (LV) dysfunction relies on visual interpretation of cine images that suffers from wide inter-observer variability, especially when performed by readers not specifically trained in the assessment of LV wall motion. Quantitative analysis tools, though widely available, are rarely used because they provide large amounts of detailed information, the interpretation of which requires additional time-consuming processing. We tested the feasibility of fast automated interpretation of regional LV function using computer analysis of this wall motion information. Methods: Dynamic, ECG-gated, steady-state free precession short-axis images were obtained in 6-10 slices in 28 subjects (10 normal volunteers; 18 patients). Images were reviewed by an expert cardiologist who provided "gold standard" grades (normal, abnormal) for regional wall motion and, independently, by four radiologists. Same images were then analyzed using custom software. Regional fractional area changes computed in normal volunteers were used to obtain the optimal segment- and slice-specific threshold values for automated classification of regional wall motion for each patient. The levels of agreement with the "gold standard" grades were compared between the radiologists and the automated interpretation. Results: While the visual interpretation required 2-5 minute per patient, the automated interpretation required &lt; 1 sec, after endocardial border detection was complete. The automated interpretation resulted in higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (84%, 77%, 79%, respectively) than the radiologists' grades (80%, 76%, 77%, respectively) and eliminated the high interobserver variability. Conclusion: Once the endocardial boundaries are defined, computer analysis of the regional wall motion information allows accurate, fully automated, immediate, objective and experience-independent interpretation of regional LV function.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Left - physiology</subject><issn>1097-6647</issn><issn>1532-429X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoVqs_wIvk5G01SbNJFk9S_ChUBPHrtkyzs-3K7qYm2YP_3mgLHgRPMzDP-8I8hJxwds6ZYRecFVopyRRjeVFIo3bIAc8nIpOieNtNe7pnCdAjchjCO2O80EzvkxFXOs-NMAdkdTVE10HEis76iH7tMUJsXE9dTR9xmTZo6RzrSF-wj76xQwuevkLb0nv3A9bedXQKvmrA0ntY9hgbm7IhRXuLdNbBEsMR2auhDXi8nWPyfHP9NL3L5g-3s-nVPLNSsZgZoazgPL2nOFfcCC2sUMZW0iLjiGIi9EIJA7WYGCy0NBVXOUql-KIAm0_G5GzTu_buY8AQy64JFtsWenRDKJVhUkttEsg3oPUuBI91ufZNB_6z5Kz81lv-0Zsyp9vyYdFh9ZvY-kzA5QZo-tr5DlYIbVxZ8Fi-u8Enl-Gf-i-0m4dV</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Caiani, Enrico G.</creator><creator>Toledo, Eran</creator><creator>MacEneaney, Peter</creator><creator>Bardo, Dianna</creator><creator>Cerutti, Sergio</creator><creator>Lang, Roberto M.</creator><creator>Mor-Avi, Victor</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>Automated Interpretation of Regional Left Ventricular Wall Motion from Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Images</title><author>Caiani, Enrico G. ; Toledo, Eran ; MacEneaney, Peter ; Bardo, Dianna ; Cerutti, Sergio ; Lang, Roberto M. ; Mor-Avi, Victor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-826c211108611618272c268cd4ce01ee2327b628af238e9748d165e4661b9ac53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Left - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caiani, Enrico G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toledo, Eran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacEneaney, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardo, Dianna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerutti, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Roberto M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mor-Avi, Victor</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caiani, Enrico G.</au><au>Toledo, Eran</au><au>MacEneaney, Peter</au><au>Bardo, Dianna</au><au>Cerutti, Sergio</au><au>Lang, Roberto M.</au><au>Mor-Avi, Victor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automated Interpretation of Regional Left Ventricular Wall Motion from Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Images</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance</jtitle><addtitle>J Cardiovasc Magn Reson</addtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>427</spage><epage>433</epage><pages>427-433</pages><issn>1097-6647</issn><eissn>1532-429X</eissn><abstract>Magnetic resonance (MR) diagnosis of regional left ventricular (LV) dysfunction relies on visual interpretation of cine images that suffers from wide inter-observer variability, especially when performed by readers not specifically trained in the assessment of LV wall motion. Quantitative analysis tools, though widely available, are rarely used because they provide large amounts of detailed information, the interpretation of which requires additional time-consuming processing. We tested the feasibility of fast automated interpretation of regional LV function using computer analysis of this wall motion information. Methods: Dynamic, ECG-gated, steady-state free precession short-axis images were obtained in 6-10 slices in 28 subjects (10 normal volunteers; 18 patients). Images were reviewed by an expert cardiologist who provided "gold standard" grades (normal, abnormal) for regional wall motion and, independently, by four radiologists. Same images were then analyzed using custom software. Regional fractional area changes computed in normal volunteers were used to obtain the optimal segment- and slice-specific threshold values for automated classification of regional wall motion for each patient. The levels of agreement with the "gold standard" grades were compared between the radiologists and the automated interpretation. Results: While the visual interpretation required 2-5 minute per patient, the automated interpretation required &lt; 1 sec, after endocardial border detection was complete. The automated interpretation resulted in higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (84%, 77%, 79%, respectively) than the radiologists' grades (80%, 76%, 77%, respectively) and eliminated the high interobserver variability. Conclusion: Once the endocardial boundaries are defined, computer analysis of the regional wall motion information allows accurate, fully automated, immediate, objective and experience-independent interpretation of regional LV function.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>16755828</pmid><doi>10.1080/10976640600599486</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1097-6647
ispartof Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance, 2006-01, Vol.8 (3), p.427-433
issn 1097-6647
1532-429X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68047478
source MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete
subjects Automation
Clinical Competence
Electrocardiography
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
Male
Middle Aged
Reference Values
Sensitivity and Specificity
Software
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology
Ventricular Function, Left - physiology
title Automated Interpretation of Regional Left Ventricular Wall Motion from Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Images
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T07%3A10%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automated%20Interpretation%20of%20Regional%20Left%20Ventricular%20Wall%20Motion%20from%20Cardiac%20Magnetic%20Resonance%20Images&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiovascular%20magnetic%20resonance&rft.au=Caiani,%20Enrico%20G.&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=427&rft.epage=433&rft.pages=427-433&rft.issn=1097-6647&rft.eissn=1532-429X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10976640600599486&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68047478%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68047478&rft_id=info:pmid/16755828&rfr_iscdi=true