Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of TENS versus intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized study

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is perceived as a major public health problem, and today, various treatment modalities are used to manage this condition. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and intra-articular hylan G-F 20 (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advances in therapy 2006-03, Vol.23 (2), p.342-353
Hauptverfasser: Paker, Nurdan, Tekdös, Demet, Kesiktas, Nur, Soy, Derya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 353
container_issue 2
container_start_page 342
container_title Advances in therapy
container_volume 23
creator Paker, Nurdan
Tekdös, Demet
Kesiktas, Nur
Soy, Derya
description Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is perceived as a major public health problem, and today, various treatment modalities are used to manage this condition. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and intra-articular hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc; Genzyme Corporation, Ridgefield, NJ) in patients with symptomatic knee OA. A total of 60 patients with primary knee OA were randomized into 2 treatment groups. TENS was applied for 3 weeks in the first group, and in the second group, hylan G-F 20 was injected intra-articularly once a week for 3 weeks. Patients were then followed for 6 months. Disease severity was measured with the Lequesne Index. Efficacy in terms of pain, functional status, and quality of life was assessed through analysis of changes in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) scores. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. WOMAC pain scores were improved at the first control visit in the TENS group and in the viscosupplementation group; this improvement was statistically significant. WOMAC stiffness scores showed a statistically significant decrease in the TENS group at the first control visit. Stiffness did not decrease during the first month in the second group; however, these patients exhibited improvement during the sixth month after injection. Physical function scores and SF-36 total scores did not change in either group after treatment. Pain relief was observed at the first month and continued throughout the 6-month follow-up period in both groups. Stiffness decreased by the sixth month in both groups. Improvement in WOMAC physical function scores was greater in the intra-articular hylan group than in the TENS group at the end of follow-up; however, quality of life was not improved in either group. These therapies used in combination may alleviate symptoms in patients with OA.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF02850139
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68041143</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21157863</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-4326e2da656cbfb64cdd3109034c5d8eafbb58b0de5783053ad07af9b4f3641f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFO3DAQhi1EBVvaCw-AfOJQKa0dx06WW1lBi4TgUCr1Fk3ssdaQxKntUG2fpw9aR6zEkcNoDvP9_8zoJ-SUs8-csfrL5TUrG8m4WB-QFW-ULHKVh2TF6ooXpWh-HZP3MT4yVrJaNkfkmKtacq7Uivzb-GGC4KIfqbc0bXGpABPOyWmK1joNerfMHq7uftBnDHGO1I0pQAEhM3MPgW530M_Bj1kC2pk8f0SdXDZ1I50gORxTpH9c2tKnEZH6mNBn-Ta45OIFBToFH6dF84w0wGj84P6ioTHNZveBvLPQR_y47yfk5_XVw-Z7cXv_7Wbz9bbQQtapqESpsDSgpNKd7VSljRGcrZmotDQNgu062XTMoKwbwaQAw2qw666yQlXcihNy_uKbj_k9Y0zt4KLGvocR_Rxb1bCK80q8CZac5xVqAT-9gDq_FwPadgpugLBrOWuX8NrX8DJ8tneduwHNK7pPS_wHWu2Y0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21157863</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of TENS versus intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Paker, Nurdan ; Tekdös, Demet ; Kesiktas, Nur ; Soy, Derya</creator><creatorcontrib>Paker, Nurdan ; Tekdös, Demet ; Kesiktas, Nur ; Soy, Derya</creatorcontrib><description>Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is perceived as a major public health problem, and today, various treatment modalities are used to manage this condition. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and intra-articular hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc; Genzyme Corporation, Ridgefield, NJ) in patients with symptomatic knee OA. A total of 60 patients with primary knee OA were randomized into 2 treatment groups. TENS was applied for 3 weeks in the first group, and in the second group, hylan G-F 20 was injected intra-articularly once a week for 3 weeks. Patients were then followed for 6 months. Disease severity was measured with the Lequesne Index. Efficacy in terms of pain, functional status, and quality of life was assessed through analysis of changes in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) scores. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. WOMAC pain scores were improved at the first control visit in the TENS group and in the viscosupplementation group; this improvement was statistically significant. WOMAC stiffness scores showed a statistically significant decrease in the TENS group at the first control visit. Stiffness did not decrease during the first month in the second group; however, these patients exhibited improvement during the sixth month after injection. Physical function scores and SF-36 total scores did not change in either group after treatment. Pain relief was observed at the first month and continued throughout the 6-month follow-up period in both groups. Stiffness decreased by the sixth month in both groups. Improvement in WOMAC physical function scores was greater in the intra-articular hylan group than in the TENS group at the end of follow-up; however, quality of life was not improved in either group. These therapies used in combination may alleviate symptoms in patients with OA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-238X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-8652</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02850139</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16751166</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adjuvants, Immunologic - administration &amp; dosage ; Adjuvants, Immunologic - therapeutic use ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Hyaluronic Acid - administration &amp; dosage ; Hyaluronic Acid - therapeutic use ; Injections, Intra-Articular ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - drug therapy ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - pathology ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - therapy ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of Life ; Recovery of Function ; Severity of Illness Index ; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Advances in therapy, 2006-03, Vol.23 (2), p.342-353</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-4326e2da656cbfb64cdd3109034c5d8eafbb58b0de5783053ad07af9b4f3641f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-4326e2da656cbfb64cdd3109034c5d8eafbb58b0de5783053ad07af9b4f3641f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16751166$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paker, Nurdan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tekdös, Demet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesiktas, Nur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soy, Derya</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of TENS versus intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized study</title><title>Advances in therapy</title><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><description>Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is perceived as a major public health problem, and today, various treatment modalities are used to manage this condition. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and intra-articular hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc; Genzyme Corporation, Ridgefield, NJ) in patients with symptomatic knee OA. A total of 60 patients with primary knee OA were randomized into 2 treatment groups. TENS was applied for 3 weeks in the first group, and in the second group, hylan G-F 20 was injected intra-articularly once a week for 3 weeks. Patients were then followed for 6 months. Disease severity was measured with the Lequesne Index. Efficacy in terms of pain, functional status, and quality of life was assessed through analysis of changes in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) scores. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. WOMAC pain scores were improved at the first control visit in the TENS group and in the viscosupplementation group; this improvement was statistically significant. WOMAC stiffness scores showed a statistically significant decrease in the TENS group at the first control visit. Stiffness did not decrease during the first month in the second group; however, these patients exhibited improvement during the sixth month after injection. Physical function scores and SF-36 total scores did not change in either group after treatment. Pain relief was observed at the first month and continued throughout the 6-month follow-up period in both groups. Stiffness decreased by the sixth month in both groups. Improvement in WOMAC physical function scores was greater in the intra-articular hylan group than in the TENS group at the end of follow-up; however, quality of life was not improved in either group. These therapies used in combination may alleviate symptoms in patients with OA.</description><subject>Adjuvants, Immunologic - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Adjuvants, Immunologic - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyaluronic Acid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Hyaluronic Acid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Injections, Intra-Articular</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - drug therapy</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - pathology</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - therapy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0741-238X</issn><issn>1865-8652</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFO3DAQhi1EBVvaCw-AfOJQKa0dx06WW1lBi4TgUCr1Fk3ssdaQxKntUG2fpw9aR6zEkcNoDvP9_8zoJ-SUs8-csfrL5TUrG8m4WB-QFW-ULHKVh2TF6ooXpWh-HZP3MT4yVrJaNkfkmKtacq7Uivzb-GGC4KIfqbc0bXGpABPOyWmK1joNerfMHq7uftBnDHGO1I0pQAEhM3MPgW530M_Bj1kC2pk8f0SdXDZ1I50gORxTpH9c2tKnEZH6mNBn-Ta45OIFBToFH6dF84w0wGj84P6ioTHNZveBvLPQR_y47yfk5_XVw-Z7cXv_7Wbz9bbQQtapqESpsDSgpNKd7VSljRGcrZmotDQNgu062XTMoKwbwaQAw2qw666yQlXcihNy_uKbj_k9Y0zt4KLGvocR_Rxb1bCK80q8CZac5xVqAT-9gDq_FwPadgpugLBrOWuX8NrX8DJ8tneduwHNK7pPS_wHWu2Y0g</recordid><startdate>20060301</startdate><enddate>20060301</enddate><creator>Paker, Nurdan</creator><creator>Tekdös, Demet</creator><creator>Kesiktas, Nur</creator><creator>Soy, Derya</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060301</creationdate><title>Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of TENS versus intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized study</title><author>Paker, Nurdan ; Tekdös, Demet ; Kesiktas, Nur ; Soy, Derya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-4326e2da656cbfb64cdd3109034c5d8eafbb58b0de5783053ad07af9b4f3641f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adjuvants, Immunologic - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Adjuvants, Immunologic - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyaluronic Acid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Hyaluronic Acid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Injections, Intra-Articular</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - drug therapy</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - pathology</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - therapy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paker, Nurdan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tekdös, Demet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesiktas, Nur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soy, Derya</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Advances in therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paker, Nurdan</au><au>Tekdös, Demet</au><au>Kesiktas, Nur</au><au>Soy, Derya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of TENS versus intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized study</atitle><jtitle>Advances in therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><date>2006-03-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>342</spage><epage>353</epage><pages>342-353</pages><issn>0741-238X</issn><eissn>1865-8652</eissn><abstract>Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is perceived as a major public health problem, and today, various treatment modalities are used to manage this condition. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and intra-articular hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc; Genzyme Corporation, Ridgefield, NJ) in patients with symptomatic knee OA. A total of 60 patients with primary knee OA were randomized into 2 treatment groups. TENS was applied for 3 weeks in the first group, and in the second group, hylan G-F 20 was injected intra-articularly once a week for 3 weeks. Patients were then followed for 6 months. Disease severity was measured with the Lequesne Index. Efficacy in terms of pain, functional status, and quality of life was assessed through analysis of changes in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) scores. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. WOMAC pain scores were improved at the first control visit in the TENS group and in the viscosupplementation group; this improvement was statistically significant. WOMAC stiffness scores showed a statistically significant decrease in the TENS group at the first control visit. Stiffness did not decrease during the first month in the second group; however, these patients exhibited improvement during the sixth month after injection. Physical function scores and SF-36 total scores did not change in either group after treatment. Pain relief was observed at the first month and continued throughout the 6-month follow-up period in both groups. Stiffness decreased by the sixth month in both groups. Improvement in WOMAC physical function scores was greater in the intra-articular hylan group than in the TENS group at the end of follow-up; however, quality of life was not improved in either group. These therapies used in combination may alleviate symptoms in patients with OA.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>16751166</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF02850139</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-238X
ispartof Advances in therapy, 2006-03, Vol.23 (2), p.342-353
issn 0741-238X
1865-8652
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68041143
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Adjuvants, Immunologic - administration & dosage
Adjuvants, Immunologic - therapeutic use
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Health technology assessment
Humans
Hyaluronic Acid - administration & dosage
Hyaluronic Acid - therapeutic use
Injections, Intra-Articular
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis, Knee - drug therapy
Osteoarthritis, Knee - pathology
Osteoarthritis, Knee - therapy
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life
Recovery of Function
Severity of Illness Index
Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
Treatment Outcome
title Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of TENS versus intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T12%3A24%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20therapeutic%20efficacy%20of%20TENS%20versus%20intra-articular%20hyaluronic%20acid%20injection%20in%20patients%20with%20knee%20osteoarthritis:%20a%20prospective%20randomized%20study&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20therapy&rft.au=Paker,%20Nurdan&rft.date=2006-03-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=342&rft.epage=353&rft.pages=342-353&rft.issn=0741-238X&rft.eissn=1865-8652&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02850139&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21157863%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21157863&rft_id=info:pmid/16751166&rfr_iscdi=true