Human Histological Research: Is It Necessary? Humane? Ethical?
A review of the dental literature in the United States over the past 60 years is replete with studies utilizing human histological evidence for research. The first reference found for the use of human tissue for histological study was published in 1941 in the Journal of Dental Research.1 Much of thi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of periodontology (1970) 2005-07, Vol.76 (7), p.1207-1210 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1210 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 1207 |
| container_title | Journal of periodontology (1970) |
| container_volume | 76 |
| creator | Leib, Alden M. Kowalski, Charles J. |
| description | A review of the dental literature in the United States over the past 60 years is replete with studies utilizing human histological evidence for research. The first reference found for the use of human tissue for histological study was published in 1941 in the Journal of Dental Research.1 Much of this literature focuses on the use of block sections, in which teeth scheduled for extraction are removed along with portions of the surrounding soft tissue and bone in order to study the effects of various interventions. The tissue removed in no way facilitates the surgical extraction of the tooth. It is removed to establish the type of healing, repair, or regeneration by histological evidence. There is no compensating benefit to the patient who, in fact, is put at risk—the removal of the extra tissue may compromise the fit of a subsequent prosthetic restoration. J Periodontol 2005;76:1207‐1210. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1902/jop.2005.76.7.1207 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68039410</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68039410</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3947-6b478c1afebaf96974ddf8130bbe738ee84a90e5b6c66982d1cf02a72e92f273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AQ-Sk7fE2d10PzxYpFRbKSql92WzmdhIYmo2QfrvTdqCV0_DwPO-MzyEXFOIqAZ291ltIwYwjqSIZEQZyBMypDrmIRcSTskQgLGQx5oNyIX3n91KYw7nZEAFUCWFGJKHeVvar2Ce-6Yqqo_c2SJYoUdbu819sPDBogle0aH3tt5Ngj2Nk2DWbHp0cknOMlt4vDrOEVk_zdbTebh8e15MH5eh4zqWoUhiqRy1GSY200LLOE0zRTkkCUquEFVsNeA4EU4IrVhKXQbMSoaaZUzyEbk91G7r6rtF35gy9w6Lonumar0RCro7FDqQHUBXV97XmJltnZfd64aC6aWZTprppRkpjDS9tC50c2xvkxLTv8jRUgeoA_CTF7j7R6V5eZ-t9t2_ZDB4gQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68039410</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human Histological Research: Is It Necessary? Humane? Ethical?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Leib, Alden M. ; Kowalski, Charles J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Leib, Alden M. ; Kowalski, Charles J.</creatorcontrib><description>A review of the dental literature in the United States over the past 60 years is replete with studies utilizing human histological evidence for research. The first reference found for the use of human tissue for histological study was published in 1941 in the Journal of Dental Research.1 Much of this literature focuses on the use of block sections, in which teeth scheduled for extraction are removed along with portions of the surrounding soft tissue and bone in order to study the effects of various interventions. The tissue removed in no way facilitates the surgical extraction of the tooth. It is removed to establish the type of healing, repair, or regeneration by histological evidence. There is no compensating benefit to the patient who, in fact, is put at risk—the removal of the extra tissue may compromise the fit of a subsequent prosthetic restoration. J Periodontol 2005;76:1207‐1210.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3492</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3670</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.7.1207</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16018766</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>737 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611‐2690, USA: American Academy of Periodontology</publisher><subject>Dental Research - ethics ; Dentistry ; Ethics, Research ; Histological research ; Histology - ethics ; Human Experimentation - ethics ; Humans ; review literature</subject><ispartof>Journal of periodontology (1970), 2005-07, Vol.76 (7), p.1207-1210</ispartof><rights>2005 American Academy of Periodontology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3947-6b478c1afebaf96974ddf8130bbe738ee84a90e5b6c66982d1cf02a72e92f273</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1902%2Fjop.2005.76.7.1207$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1902%2Fjop.2005.76.7.1207$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16018766$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leib, Alden M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kowalski, Charles J.</creatorcontrib><title>Human Histological Research: Is It Necessary? Humane? Ethical?</title><title>Journal of periodontology (1970)</title><addtitle>J Periodontol</addtitle><description>A review of the dental literature in the United States over the past 60 years is replete with studies utilizing human histological evidence for research. The first reference found for the use of human tissue for histological study was published in 1941 in the Journal of Dental Research.1 Much of this literature focuses on the use of block sections, in which teeth scheduled for extraction are removed along with portions of the surrounding soft tissue and bone in order to study the effects of various interventions. The tissue removed in no way facilitates the surgical extraction of the tooth. It is removed to establish the type of healing, repair, or regeneration by histological evidence. There is no compensating benefit to the patient who, in fact, is put at risk—the removal of the extra tissue may compromise the fit of a subsequent prosthetic restoration. J Periodontol 2005;76:1207‐1210.</description><subject>Dental Research - ethics</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Ethics, Research</subject><subject>Histological research</subject><subject>Histology - ethics</subject><subject>Human Experimentation - ethics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>review literature</subject><issn>0022-3492</issn><issn>1943-3670</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AQ-Sk7fE2d10PzxYpFRbKSql92WzmdhIYmo2QfrvTdqCV0_DwPO-MzyEXFOIqAZ291ltIwYwjqSIZEQZyBMypDrmIRcSTskQgLGQx5oNyIX3n91KYw7nZEAFUCWFGJKHeVvar2Ce-6Yqqo_c2SJYoUdbu819sPDBogle0aH3tt5Ngj2Nk2DWbHp0cknOMlt4vDrOEVk_zdbTebh8e15MH5eh4zqWoUhiqRy1GSY200LLOE0zRTkkCUquEFVsNeA4EU4IrVhKXQbMSoaaZUzyEbk91G7r6rtF35gy9w6Lonumar0RCro7FDqQHUBXV97XmJltnZfd64aC6aWZTprppRkpjDS9tC50c2xvkxLTv8jRUgeoA_CTF7j7R6V5eZ-t9t2_ZDB4gQ</recordid><startdate>200507</startdate><enddate>200507</enddate><creator>Leib, Alden M.</creator><creator>Kowalski, Charles J.</creator><general>American Academy of Periodontology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200507</creationdate><title>Human Histological Research: Is It Necessary? Humane? Ethical?</title><author>Leib, Alden M. ; Kowalski, Charles J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3947-6b478c1afebaf96974ddf8130bbe738ee84a90e5b6c66982d1cf02a72e92f273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Dental Research - ethics</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Ethics, Research</topic><topic>Histological research</topic><topic>Histology - ethics</topic><topic>Human Experimentation - ethics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>review literature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leib, Alden M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kowalski, Charles J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of periodontology (1970)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leib, Alden M.</au><au>Kowalski, Charles J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human Histological Research: Is It Necessary? Humane? Ethical?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of periodontology (1970)</jtitle><addtitle>J Periodontol</addtitle><date>2005-07</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1207</spage><epage>1210</epage><pages>1207-1210</pages><issn>0022-3492</issn><eissn>1943-3670</eissn><abstract>A review of the dental literature in the United States over the past 60 years is replete with studies utilizing human histological evidence for research. The first reference found for the use of human tissue for histological study was published in 1941 in the Journal of Dental Research.1 Much of this literature focuses on the use of block sections, in which teeth scheduled for extraction are removed along with portions of the surrounding soft tissue and bone in order to study the effects of various interventions. The tissue removed in no way facilitates the surgical extraction of the tooth. It is removed to establish the type of healing, repair, or regeneration by histological evidence. There is no compensating benefit to the patient who, in fact, is put at risk—the removal of the extra tissue may compromise the fit of a subsequent prosthetic restoration. J Periodontol 2005;76:1207‐1210.</abstract><cop>737 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60611‐2690, USA</cop><pub>American Academy of Periodontology</pub><pmid>16018766</pmid><doi>10.1902/jop.2005.76.7.1207</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-3492 |
| ispartof | Journal of periodontology (1970), 2005-07, Vol.76 (7), p.1207-1210 |
| issn | 0022-3492 1943-3670 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68039410 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Dental Research - ethics Dentistry Ethics, Research Histological research Histology - ethics Human Experimentation - ethics Humans review literature |
| title | Human Histological Research: Is It Necessary? Humane? Ethical? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T16%3A24%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20Histological%20Research:%20Is%20It%20Necessary?%20Humane?%20Ethical?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20periodontology%20(1970)&rft.au=Leib,%20Alden%20M.&rft.date=2005-07&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1207&rft.epage=1210&rft.pages=1207-1210&rft.issn=0022-3492&rft.eissn=1943-3670&rft_id=info:doi/10.1902/jop.2005.76.7.1207&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68039410%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68039410&rft_id=info:pmid/16018766&rfr_iscdi=true |