Comparison of the immunological memory after DNA vaccination and protein vaccination against anthrax in sheep

Currently available live spore vaccines against anthrax in animals have many drawbacks, one of which is their presumed inability to induce a long lasting immunity. In the present study we compared the immunological memory after a protein vaccination with DNA vaccinations in sheep. The antigen used w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vaccine 2006-05, Vol.24 (21), p.4595-4597
Hauptverfasser: Hahn, Ulrike K., Aichler, Michaela, Boehm, Reinhard, Beyer, Wolfgang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4597
container_issue 21
container_start_page 4595
container_title Vaccine
container_volume 24
creator Hahn, Ulrike K.
Aichler, Michaela
Boehm, Reinhard
Beyer, Wolfgang
description Currently available live spore vaccines against anthrax in animals have many drawbacks, one of which is their presumed inability to induce a long lasting immunity. In the present study we compared the immunological memory after a protein vaccination with DNA vaccinations in sheep. The antigen used was the protective antigen (PA83) of Bacillus anthracis. Sheep were vaccinated three times with either PA83 plus alhydrogel, or with one of four different plasmid DNA formulations, which all encoded either the full-length PA83 or its domain 4. Two pDNA formulations included Vaxfectin™ adjuvant, the other two were injected in PBS without adjuvant. Initially, the antibody titres of protein vaccinated sheep were significantly higher than the titres of pDNA vaccinated sheep. After 5 months, however, the antibody titres of protein vaccinated sheep had dropped remarkably, while the titres of all four pDNA vaccinated groups were either stable or had increased. Humoral responses of sheep immunised with pDNA formulated with Vaxfectin™ adjuvant were higher than the responses of the corresponding groups that received pDNA in PBS only.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.08.025
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68034967</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X05008273</els_id><sourcerecordid>3420526981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-9b0114140192a4c896bc9b9c5b18c8fb0f723eb11fc17da870d0fdccbc1f5a5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhEUCRkLglzDix45xQtbSAVLUXkLhZjjPuepXEi51U9O1xtSshuPRkyfP9M2N_jL1FqBBQftxX98ZaP1PFAUQFqgIunrENqrYuuUD1nG2Ay6ZsEH6esVcp7SGDNXYv2RlK7FQj-IZN2zAdTPQpzEVwxbKjwk_TOocx3HlrxmKiKcSHwriFYvH55qI4jjWLzwkzD8UhhoX8_O_9nfFzWnJ92UXzu8jltCM6vGYvnBkTvTmd5-zH1eX37dfy-vbLt-3FdWkbzpey6wGxwQaw46axqpO97frOih6VVa4H1_KaekRnsR2MamEAN1jbW3TCCFOfsw_Hvnm5XyulRU8-WRpHM1NYk5YK6qaT7ZMgtpxziU0G3_8H7sMa5_wIjUJ0AFIImSlxpGwMKUVy-hD9ZOKDRtCP2vRen7TpR20alM7acu7dqfvaTzT8TZ08ZeDTEaD8a_eeok7W02xp8JHsoofgnxjxBzbfrMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1559006556</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the immunological memory after DNA vaccination and protein vaccination against anthrax in sheep</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Hahn, Ulrike K. ; Aichler, Michaela ; Boehm, Reinhard ; Beyer, Wolfgang</creator><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Ulrike K. ; Aichler, Michaela ; Boehm, Reinhard ; Beyer, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><description>Currently available live spore vaccines against anthrax in animals have many drawbacks, one of which is their presumed inability to induce a long lasting immunity. In the present study we compared the immunological memory after a protein vaccination with DNA vaccinations in sheep. The antigen used was the protective antigen (PA83) of Bacillus anthracis. Sheep were vaccinated three times with either PA83 plus alhydrogel, or with one of four different plasmid DNA formulations, which all encoded either the full-length PA83 or its domain 4. Two pDNA formulations included Vaxfectin™ adjuvant, the other two were injected in PBS without adjuvant. Initially, the antibody titres of protein vaccinated sheep were significantly higher than the titres of pDNA vaccinated sheep. After 5 months, however, the antibody titres of protein vaccinated sheep had dropped remarkably, while the titres of all four pDNA vaccinated groups were either stable or had increased. Humoral responses of sheep immunised with pDNA formulated with Vaxfectin™ adjuvant were higher than the responses of the corresponding groups that received pDNA in PBS only.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.08.025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16198452</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antigens ; Bacillus anthracis ; Bacterial Proteins - administration &amp; dosage ; Base Sequence ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA Primers ; DNA vaccine ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; Immunization ; Immunologic Memory ; Lymphocytes ; Plasmids ; Proteins ; Sheep ; Sheep Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; Vaccines ; Vaccines, DNA - administration &amp; dosage ; Vaxfectin</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2006-05, Vol.24 (21), p.4595-4597</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited May 22, 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-9b0114140192a4c896bc9b9c5b18c8fb0f723eb11fc17da870d0fdccbc1f5a5a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-9b0114140192a4c896bc9b9c5b18c8fb0f723eb11fc17da870d0fdccbc1f5a5a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1559006556?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16198452$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Ulrike K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aichler, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boehm, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beyer, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the immunological memory after DNA vaccination and protein vaccination against anthrax in sheep</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>Currently available live spore vaccines against anthrax in animals have many drawbacks, one of which is their presumed inability to induce a long lasting immunity. In the present study we compared the immunological memory after a protein vaccination with DNA vaccinations in sheep. The antigen used was the protective antigen (PA83) of Bacillus anthracis. Sheep were vaccinated three times with either PA83 plus alhydrogel, or with one of four different plasmid DNA formulations, which all encoded either the full-length PA83 or its domain 4. Two pDNA formulations included Vaxfectin™ adjuvant, the other two were injected in PBS without adjuvant. Initially, the antibody titres of protein vaccinated sheep were significantly higher than the titres of pDNA vaccinated sheep. After 5 months, however, the antibody titres of protein vaccinated sheep had dropped remarkably, while the titres of all four pDNA vaccinated groups were either stable or had increased. Humoral responses of sheep immunised with pDNA formulated with Vaxfectin™ adjuvant were higher than the responses of the corresponding groups that received pDNA in PBS only.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Bacillus anthracis</subject><subject>Bacterial Proteins - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Base Sequence</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA Primers</subject><subject>DNA vaccine</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Immunologic Memory</subject><subject>Lymphocytes</subject><subject>Plasmids</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Sheep Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Vaccines, DNA - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Vaxfectin</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhEUCRkLglzDix45xQtbSAVLUXkLhZjjPuepXEi51U9O1xtSshuPRkyfP9M2N_jL1FqBBQftxX98ZaP1PFAUQFqgIunrENqrYuuUD1nG2Ay6ZsEH6esVcp7SGDNXYv2RlK7FQj-IZN2zAdTPQpzEVwxbKjwk_TOocx3HlrxmKiKcSHwriFYvH55qI4jjWLzwkzD8UhhoX8_O_9nfFzWnJ92UXzu8jltCM6vGYvnBkTvTmd5-zH1eX37dfy-vbLt-3FdWkbzpey6wGxwQaw46axqpO97frOih6VVa4H1_KaekRnsR2MamEAN1jbW3TCCFOfsw_Hvnm5XyulRU8-WRpHM1NYk5YK6qaT7ZMgtpxziU0G3_8H7sMa5_wIjUJ0AFIImSlxpGwMKUVy-hD9ZOKDRtCP2vRen7TpR20alM7acu7dqfvaTzT8TZ08ZeDTEaD8a_eeok7W02xp8JHsoofgnxjxBzbfrMQ</recordid><startdate>20060522</startdate><enddate>20060522</enddate><creator>Hahn, Ulrike K.</creator><creator>Aichler, Michaela</creator><creator>Boehm, Reinhard</creator><creator>Beyer, Wolfgang</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060522</creationdate><title>Comparison of the immunological memory after DNA vaccination and protein vaccination against anthrax in sheep</title><author>Hahn, Ulrike K. ; Aichler, Michaela ; Boehm, Reinhard ; Beyer, Wolfgang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-9b0114140192a4c896bc9b9c5b18c8fb0f723eb11fc17da870d0fdccbc1f5a5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Bacillus anthracis</topic><topic>Bacterial Proteins - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Base Sequence</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA Primers</topic><topic>DNA vaccine</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Immunologic Memory</topic><topic>Lymphocytes</topic><topic>Plasmids</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Sheep Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Vaccines, DNA - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Vaxfectin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Ulrike K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aichler, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boehm, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beyer, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hahn, Ulrike K.</au><au>Aichler, Michaela</au><au>Boehm, Reinhard</au><au>Beyer, Wolfgang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the immunological memory after DNA vaccination and protein vaccination against anthrax in sheep</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2006-05-22</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>4595</spage><epage>4597</epage><pages>4595-4597</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>Currently available live spore vaccines against anthrax in animals have many drawbacks, one of which is their presumed inability to induce a long lasting immunity. In the present study we compared the immunological memory after a protein vaccination with DNA vaccinations in sheep. The antigen used was the protective antigen (PA83) of Bacillus anthracis. Sheep were vaccinated three times with either PA83 plus alhydrogel, or with one of four different plasmid DNA formulations, which all encoded either the full-length PA83 or its domain 4. Two pDNA formulations included Vaxfectin™ adjuvant, the other two were injected in PBS without adjuvant. Initially, the antibody titres of protein vaccinated sheep were significantly higher than the titres of pDNA vaccinated sheep. After 5 months, however, the antibody titres of protein vaccinated sheep had dropped remarkably, while the titres of all four pDNA vaccinated groups were either stable or had increased. Humoral responses of sheep immunised with pDNA formulated with Vaxfectin™ adjuvant were higher than the responses of the corresponding groups that received pDNA in PBS only.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16198452</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.08.025</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-410X
ispartof Vaccine, 2006-05, Vol.24 (21), p.4595-4597
issn 0264-410X
1873-2518
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68034967
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Animals
Antigens
Bacillus anthracis
Bacterial Proteins - administration & dosage
Base Sequence
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
DNA Primers
DNA vaccine
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Immunization
Immunologic Memory
Lymphocytes
Plasmids
Proteins
Sheep
Sheep Diseases - prevention & control
Vaccines
Vaccines, DNA - administration & dosage
Vaxfectin
title Comparison of the immunological memory after DNA vaccination and protein vaccination against anthrax in sheep
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T07%3A17%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20immunological%20memory%20after%20DNA%20vaccination%20and%20protein%20vaccination%20against%20anthrax%20in%20sheep&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Hahn,%20Ulrike%20K.&rft.date=2006-05-22&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=4595&rft.epage=4597&rft.pages=4595-4597&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.08.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3420526981%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1559006556&rft_id=info:pmid/16198452&rft_els_id=S0264410X05008273&rfr_iscdi=true