Kinematics in newly walking toddlers does not depend upon postural stability
When a toddler starts to walk without support, gait kinematics and electromyographic (EMG) activity differ from those of older children and the body displays considerable oscillations due to poor equilibrium. Postural instability clearly affects motor patterns in adults, but does instability explain...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurophysiology 2005-07, Vol.94 (1), p.754-763 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 763 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 754 |
container_title | Journal of neurophysiology |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Ivanenko, Yuri P Dominici, Nadia Cappellini, Germana Lacquaniti, Francesco |
description | When a toddler starts to walk without support, gait kinematics and electromyographic (EMG) activity differ from those of older children and the body displays considerable oscillations due to poor equilibrium. Postural instability clearly affects motor patterns in adults, but does instability explain why toddlers walk with a different gait? Here we addressed this question by comparing kinematics and EMGs in toddlers performing their first independent steps with or without hand or trunk support. Hand support significantly improved postural stability and some general gait parameters, reducing percent of falls, step width, lateral hip deviations and trunk oscillations. However, the kinematic and EMG patterns were unaffected by increased postural stability. In particular, the co-variance of the angular motion of the lower limb segments, the pattern of bilateral coordination of the vertical movement of the two hip joints, high variability of the foot path, the elliptic or single peak trajectory of the foot in the swing phase, and characteristic EMG bursts at foot contact remained idiosyncratic of toddler locomotion. Instead the toddler pattern shared fundamental features with adult stepping in place, suggesting that toddlers implement a mixed locomotor strategy, combining forward progression with elements of stepping in place. Furthermore, gait kinematics remained basically unchanged until the occurrence of the first unsupported steps and rapidly matured thereafter. We conclude that idiosyncratic features in newly walking toddlers do not simply result from undeveloped balance control but may represent an innate kinematic template of stepping. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1152/jn.00088.2004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68031360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68031360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-d82afd0a392ea2d08e996dd478049f6eb40a59b15393b24c6ae3b00ab2e30e1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0DtPwzAQwHELgWgpjKzIE1vK2c5zRBUvUYkFZsuJL8jFsUPsCPXbkz4kRqY7nX664U_INYMlYxm_27glAJTlkgOkJ2Q-3XjCsqo8JXOAaRdQFDNyEcJmckUG_JzMWFbwsij4nKxfjcNORdMEahx1-GO39EfZL-M-afRaWxwC1R4DdT5SjT06TcfeO9r7EMdBWRqiqo01cXtJzlplA14d54J8PD68r56T9dvTy-p-nTSC85jokqtWgxIVR8U1lFhVudZpUUJatTnWKaisqlkmKlHztMkVihpA1RwFIFNiQW4Pf_vBf48YouxMaNBa5dCPQeYlCCZy-BeyQuRZtofJATaDD2HAVvaD6dSwlQzkrrPcOLnvLHedJ39zfDzWHeo_fQwrfgEsanj7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17365560</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Kinematics in newly walking toddlers does not depend upon postural stability</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Physiological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Ivanenko, Yuri P ; Dominici, Nadia ; Cappellini, Germana ; Lacquaniti, Francesco</creator><creatorcontrib>Ivanenko, Yuri P ; Dominici, Nadia ; Cappellini, Germana ; Lacquaniti, Francesco</creatorcontrib><description>When a toddler starts to walk without support, gait kinematics and electromyographic (EMG) activity differ from those of older children and the body displays considerable oscillations due to poor equilibrium. Postural instability clearly affects motor patterns in adults, but does instability explain why toddlers walk with a different gait? Here we addressed this question by comparing kinematics and EMGs in toddlers performing their first independent steps with or without hand or trunk support. Hand support significantly improved postural stability and some general gait parameters, reducing percent of falls, step width, lateral hip deviations and trunk oscillations. However, the kinematic and EMG patterns were unaffected by increased postural stability. In particular, the co-variance of the angular motion of the lower limb segments, the pattern of bilateral coordination of the vertical movement of the two hip joints, high variability of the foot path, the elliptic or single peak trajectory of the foot in the swing phase, and characteristic EMG bursts at foot contact remained idiosyncratic of toddler locomotion. Instead the toddler pattern shared fundamental features with adult stepping in place, suggesting that toddlers implement a mixed locomotor strategy, combining forward progression with elements of stepping in place. Furthermore, gait kinematics remained basically unchanged until the occurrence of the first unsupported steps and rapidly matured thereafter. We conclude that idiosyncratic features in newly walking toddlers do not simply result from undeveloped balance control but may represent an innate kinematic template of stepping.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3077</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/jn.00088.2004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15728772</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Analysis of Variance ; Biomechanical Phenomena - methods ; Child ; Child Development - physiology ; Electromyography - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Models, Biological ; Muscle, Skeletal - growth & development ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Postural Balance - physiology ; Posture - physiology ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Walking - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurophysiology, 2005-07, Vol.94 (1), p.754-763</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-d82afd0a392ea2d08e996dd478049f6eb40a59b15393b24c6ae3b00ab2e30e1a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-d82afd0a392ea2d08e996dd478049f6eb40a59b15393b24c6ae3b00ab2e30e1a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3039,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15728772$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ivanenko, Yuri P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dominici, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cappellini, Germana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacquaniti, Francesco</creatorcontrib><title>Kinematics in newly walking toddlers does not depend upon postural stability</title><title>Journal of neurophysiology</title><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>When a toddler starts to walk without support, gait kinematics and electromyographic (EMG) activity differ from those of older children and the body displays considerable oscillations due to poor equilibrium. Postural instability clearly affects motor patterns in adults, but does instability explain why toddlers walk with a different gait? Here we addressed this question by comparing kinematics and EMGs in toddlers performing their first independent steps with or without hand or trunk support. Hand support significantly improved postural stability and some general gait parameters, reducing percent of falls, step width, lateral hip deviations and trunk oscillations. However, the kinematic and EMG patterns were unaffected by increased postural stability. In particular, the co-variance of the angular motion of the lower limb segments, the pattern of bilateral coordination of the vertical movement of the two hip joints, high variability of the foot path, the elliptic or single peak trajectory of the foot in the swing phase, and characteristic EMG bursts at foot contact remained idiosyncratic of toddler locomotion. Instead the toddler pattern shared fundamental features with adult stepping in place, suggesting that toddlers implement a mixed locomotor strategy, combining forward progression with elements of stepping in place. Furthermore, gait kinematics remained basically unchanged until the occurrence of the first unsupported steps and rapidly matured thereafter. We conclude that idiosyncratic features in newly walking toddlers do not simply result from undeveloped balance control but may represent an innate kinematic template of stepping.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena - methods</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Development - physiology</subject><subject>Electromyography - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - growth & development</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Postural Balance - physiology</subject><subject>Posture - physiology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Walking - physiology</subject><issn>0022-3077</issn><issn>1522-1598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0DtPwzAQwHELgWgpjKzIE1vK2c5zRBUvUYkFZsuJL8jFsUPsCPXbkz4kRqY7nX664U_INYMlYxm_27glAJTlkgOkJ2Q-3XjCsqo8JXOAaRdQFDNyEcJmckUG_JzMWFbwsij4nKxfjcNORdMEahx1-GO39EfZL-M-afRaWxwC1R4DdT5SjT06TcfeO9r7EMdBWRqiqo01cXtJzlplA14d54J8PD68r56T9dvTy-p-nTSC85jokqtWgxIVR8U1lFhVudZpUUJatTnWKaisqlkmKlHztMkVihpA1RwFIFNiQW4Pf_vBf48YouxMaNBa5dCPQeYlCCZy-BeyQuRZtofJATaDD2HAVvaD6dSwlQzkrrPcOLnvLHedJ39zfDzWHeo_fQwrfgEsanj7</recordid><startdate>200507</startdate><enddate>200507</enddate><creator>Ivanenko, Yuri P</creator><creator>Dominici, Nadia</creator><creator>Cappellini, Germana</creator><creator>Lacquaniti, Francesco</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200507</creationdate><title>Kinematics in newly walking toddlers does not depend upon postural stability</title><author>Ivanenko, Yuri P ; Dominici, Nadia ; Cappellini, Germana ; Lacquaniti, Francesco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-d82afd0a392ea2d08e996dd478049f6eb40a59b15393b24c6ae3b00ab2e30e1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena - methods</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Development - physiology</topic><topic>Electromyography - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - growth & development</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Postural Balance - physiology</topic><topic>Posture - physiology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Walking - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ivanenko, Yuri P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dominici, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cappellini, Germana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacquaniti, Francesco</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ivanenko, Yuri P</au><au>Dominici, Nadia</au><au>Cappellini, Germana</au><au>Lacquaniti, Francesco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Kinematics in newly walking toddlers does not depend upon postural stability</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>2005-07</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>754</spage><epage>763</epage><pages>754-763</pages><issn>0022-3077</issn><eissn>1522-1598</eissn><abstract>When a toddler starts to walk without support, gait kinematics and electromyographic (EMG) activity differ from those of older children and the body displays considerable oscillations due to poor equilibrium. Postural instability clearly affects motor patterns in adults, but does instability explain why toddlers walk with a different gait? Here we addressed this question by comparing kinematics and EMGs in toddlers performing their first independent steps with or without hand or trunk support. Hand support significantly improved postural stability and some general gait parameters, reducing percent of falls, step width, lateral hip deviations and trunk oscillations. However, the kinematic and EMG patterns were unaffected by increased postural stability. In particular, the co-variance of the angular motion of the lower limb segments, the pattern of bilateral coordination of the vertical movement of the two hip joints, high variability of the foot path, the elliptic or single peak trajectory of the foot in the swing phase, and characteristic EMG bursts at foot contact remained idiosyncratic of toddler locomotion. Instead the toddler pattern shared fundamental features with adult stepping in place, suggesting that toddlers implement a mixed locomotor strategy, combining forward progression with elements of stepping in place. Furthermore, gait kinematics remained basically unchanged until the occurrence of the first unsupported steps and rapidly matured thereafter. We conclude that idiosyncratic features in newly walking toddlers do not simply result from undeveloped balance control but may represent an innate kinematic template of stepping.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>15728772</pmid><doi>10.1152/jn.00088.2004</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3077 |
ispartof | Journal of neurophysiology, 2005-07, Vol.94 (1), p.754-763 |
issn | 0022-3077 1522-1598 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68031360 |
source | MEDLINE; American Physiological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adult Age Factors Analysis of Variance Biomechanical Phenomena - methods Child Child Development - physiology Electromyography - methods Female Humans Infant Male Models, Biological Muscle, Skeletal - growth & development Muscle, Skeletal - physiology Postural Balance - physiology Posture - physiology Psychomotor Performance - physiology Walking - physiology |
title | Kinematics in newly walking toddlers does not depend upon postural stability |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T07%3A12%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Kinematics%20in%20newly%20walking%20toddlers%20does%20not%20depend%20upon%20postural%20stability&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Ivanenko,%20Yuri%20P&rft.date=2005-07&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=754&rft.epage=763&rft.pages=754-763&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/jn.00088.2004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68031360%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17365560&rft_id=info:pmid/15728772&rfr_iscdi=true |