Kinematics in newly walking toddlers does not depend upon postural stability

When a toddler starts to walk without support, gait kinematics and electromyographic (EMG) activity differ from those of older children and the body displays considerable oscillations due to poor equilibrium. Postural instability clearly affects motor patterns in adults, but does instability explain...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurophysiology 2005-07, Vol.94 (1), p.754-763
Hauptverfasser: Ivanenko, Yuri P, Dominici, Nadia, Cappellini, Germana, Lacquaniti, Francesco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 763
container_issue 1
container_start_page 754
container_title Journal of neurophysiology
container_volume 94
creator Ivanenko, Yuri P
Dominici, Nadia
Cappellini, Germana
Lacquaniti, Francesco
description When a toddler starts to walk without support, gait kinematics and electromyographic (EMG) activity differ from those of older children and the body displays considerable oscillations due to poor equilibrium. Postural instability clearly affects motor patterns in adults, but does instability explain why toddlers walk with a different gait? Here we addressed this question by comparing kinematics and EMGs in toddlers performing their first independent steps with or without hand or trunk support. Hand support significantly improved postural stability and some general gait parameters, reducing percent of falls, step width, lateral hip deviations and trunk oscillations. However, the kinematic and EMG patterns were unaffected by increased postural stability. In particular, the co-variance of the angular motion of the lower limb segments, the pattern of bilateral coordination of the vertical movement of the two hip joints, high variability of the foot path, the elliptic or single peak trajectory of the foot in the swing phase, and characteristic EMG bursts at foot contact remained idiosyncratic of toddler locomotion. Instead the toddler pattern shared fundamental features with adult stepping in place, suggesting that toddlers implement a mixed locomotor strategy, combining forward progression with elements of stepping in place. Furthermore, gait kinematics remained basically unchanged until the occurrence of the first unsupported steps and rapidly matured thereafter. We conclude that idiosyncratic features in newly walking toddlers do not simply result from undeveloped balance control but may represent an innate kinematic template of stepping.
doi_str_mv 10.1152/jn.00088.2004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68031360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68031360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-d82afd0a392ea2d08e996dd478049f6eb40a59b15393b24c6ae3b00ab2e30e1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0DtPwzAQwHELgWgpjKzIE1vK2c5zRBUvUYkFZsuJL8jFsUPsCPXbkz4kRqY7nX664U_INYMlYxm_27glAJTlkgOkJ2Q-3XjCsqo8JXOAaRdQFDNyEcJmckUG_JzMWFbwsij4nKxfjcNORdMEahx1-GO39EfZL-M-afRaWxwC1R4DdT5SjT06TcfeO9r7EMdBWRqiqo01cXtJzlplA14d54J8PD68r56T9dvTy-p-nTSC85jokqtWgxIVR8U1lFhVudZpUUJatTnWKaisqlkmKlHztMkVihpA1RwFIFNiQW4Pf_vBf48YouxMaNBa5dCPQeYlCCZy-BeyQuRZtofJATaDD2HAVvaD6dSwlQzkrrPcOLnvLHedJ39zfDzWHeo_fQwrfgEsanj7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17365560</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Kinematics in newly walking toddlers does not depend upon postural stability</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Physiological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Ivanenko, Yuri P ; Dominici, Nadia ; Cappellini, Germana ; Lacquaniti, Francesco</creator><creatorcontrib>Ivanenko, Yuri P ; Dominici, Nadia ; Cappellini, Germana ; Lacquaniti, Francesco</creatorcontrib><description>When a toddler starts to walk without support, gait kinematics and electromyographic (EMG) activity differ from those of older children and the body displays considerable oscillations due to poor equilibrium. Postural instability clearly affects motor patterns in adults, but does instability explain why toddlers walk with a different gait? Here we addressed this question by comparing kinematics and EMGs in toddlers performing their first independent steps with or without hand or trunk support. Hand support significantly improved postural stability and some general gait parameters, reducing percent of falls, step width, lateral hip deviations and trunk oscillations. However, the kinematic and EMG patterns were unaffected by increased postural stability. In particular, the co-variance of the angular motion of the lower limb segments, the pattern of bilateral coordination of the vertical movement of the two hip joints, high variability of the foot path, the elliptic or single peak trajectory of the foot in the swing phase, and characteristic EMG bursts at foot contact remained idiosyncratic of toddler locomotion. Instead the toddler pattern shared fundamental features with adult stepping in place, suggesting that toddlers implement a mixed locomotor strategy, combining forward progression with elements of stepping in place. Furthermore, gait kinematics remained basically unchanged until the occurrence of the first unsupported steps and rapidly matured thereafter. We conclude that idiosyncratic features in newly walking toddlers do not simply result from undeveloped balance control but may represent an innate kinematic template of stepping.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3077</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/jn.00088.2004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15728772</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Analysis of Variance ; Biomechanical Phenomena - methods ; Child ; Child Development - physiology ; Electromyography - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Models, Biological ; Muscle, Skeletal - growth &amp; development ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Postural Balance - physiology ; Posture - physiology ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Walking - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurophysiology, 2005-07, Vol.94 (1), p.754-763</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-d82afd0a392ea2d08e996dd478049f6eb40a59b15393b24c6ae3b00ab2e30e1a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-d82afd0a392ea2d08e996dd478049f6eb40a59b15393b24c6ae3b00ab2e30e1a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3039,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15728772$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ivanenko, Yuri P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dominici, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cappellini, Germana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacquaniti, Francesco</creatorcontrib><title>Kinematics in newly walking toddlers does not depend upon postural stability</title><title>Journal of neurophysiology</title><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>When a toddler starts to walk without support, gait kinematics and electromyographic (EMG) activity differ from those of older children and the body displays considerable oscillations due to poor equilibrium. Postural instability clearly affects motor patterns in adults, but does instability explain why toddlers walk with a different gait? Here we addressed this question by comparing kinematics and EMGs in toddlers performing their first independent steps with or without hand or trunk support. Hand support significantly improved postural stability and some general gait parameters, reducing percent of falls, step width, lateral hip deviations and trunk oscillations. However, the kinematic and EMG patterns were unaffected by increased postural stability. In particular, the co-variance of the angular motion of the lower limb segments, the pattern of bilateral coordination of the vertical movement of the two hip joints, high variability of the foot path, the elliptic or single peak trajectory of the foot in the swing phase, and characteristic EMG bursts at foot contact remained idiosyncratic of toddler locomotion. Instead the toddler pattern shared fundamental features with adult stepping in place, suggesting that toddlers implement a mixed locomotor strategy, combining forward progression with elements of stepping in place. Furthermore, gait kinematics remained basically unchanged until the occurrence of the first unsupported steps and rapidly matured thereafter. We conclude that idiosyncratic features in newly walking toddlers do not simply result from undeveloped balance control but may represent an innate kinematic template of stepping.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena - methods</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Development - physiology</subject><subject>Electromyography - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Postural Balance - physiology</subject><subject>Posture - physiology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Walking - physiology</subject><issn>0022-3077</issn><issn>1522-1598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0DtPwzAQwHELgWgpjKzIE1vK2c5zRBUvUYkFZsuJL8jFsUPsCPXbkz4kRqY7nX664U_INYMlYxm_27glAJTlkgOkJ2Q-3XjCsqo8JXOAaRdQFDNyEcJmckUG_JzMWFbwsij4nKxfjcNORdMEahx1-GO39EfZL-M-afRaWxwC1R4DdT5SjT06TcfeO9r7EMdBWRqiqo01cXtJzlplA14d54J8PD68r56T9dvTy-p-nTSC85jokqtWgxIVR8U1lFhVudZpUUJatTnWKaisqlkmKlHztMkVihpA1RwFIFNiQW4Pf_vBf48YouxMaNBa5dCPQeYlCCZy-BeyQuRZtofJATaDD2HAVvaD6dSwlQzkrrPcOLnvLHedJ39zfDzWHeo_fQwrfgEsanj7</recordid><startdate>200507</startdate><enddate>200507</enddate><creator>Ivanenko, Yuri P</creator><creator>Dominici, Nadia</creator><creator>Cappellini, Germana</creator><creator>Lacquaniti, Francesco</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200507</creationdate><title>Kinematics in newly walking toddlers does not depend upon postural stability</title><author>Ivanenko, Yuri P ; Dominici, Nadia ; Cappellini, Germana ; Lacquaniti, Francesco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-d82afd0a392ea2d08e996dd478049f6eb40a59b15393b24c6ae3b00ab2e30e1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena - methods</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Development - physiology</topic><topic>Electromyography - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Postural Balance - physiology</topic><topic>Posture - physiology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Walking - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ivanenko, Yuri P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dominici, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cappellini, Germana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacquaniti, Francesco</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ivanenko, Yuri P</au><au>Dominici, Nadia</au><au>Cappellini, Germana</au><au>Lacquaniti, Francesco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Kinematics in newly walking toddlers does not depend upon postural stability</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>2005-07</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>754</spage><epage>763</epage><pages>754-763</pages><issn>0022-3077</issn><eissn>1522-1598</eissn><abstract>When a toddler starts to walk without support, gait kinematics and electromyographic (EMG) activity differ from those of older children and the body displays considerable oscillations due to poor equilibrium. Postural instability clearly affects motor patterns in adults, but does instability explain why toddlers walk with a different gait? Here we addressed this question by comparing kinematics and EMGs in toddlers performing their first independent steps with or without hand or trunk support. Hand support significantly improved postural stability and some general gait parameters, reducing percent of falls, step width, lateral hip deviations and trunk oscillations. However, the kinematic and EMG patterns were unaffected by increased postural stability. In particular, the co-variance of the angular motion of the lower limb segments, the pattern of bilateral coordination of the vertical movement of the two hip joints, high variability of the foot path, the elliptic or single peak trajectory of the foot in the swing phase, and characteristic EMG bursts at foot contact remained idiosyncratic of toddler locomotion. Instead the toddler pattern shared fundamental features with adult stepping in place, suggesting that toddlers implement a mixed locomotor strategy, combining forward progression with elements of stepping in place. Furthermore, gait kinematics remained basically unchanged until the occurrence of the first unsupported steps and rapidly matured thereafter. We conclude that idiosyncratic features in newly walking toddlers do not simply result from undeveloped balance control but may represent an innate kinematic template of stepping.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>15728772</pmid><doi>10.1152/jn.00088.2004</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3077
ispartof Journal of neurophysiology, 2005-07, Vol.94 (1), p.754-763
issn 0022-3077
1522-1598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68031360
source MEDLINE; American Physiological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
Age Factors
Analysis of Variance
Biomechanical Phenomena - methods
Child
Child Development - physiology
Electromyography - methods
Female
Humans
Infant
Male
Models, Biological
Muscle, Skeletal - growth & development
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Postural Balance - physiology
Posture - physiology
Psychomotor Performance - physiology
Walking - physiology
title Kinematics in newly walking toddlers does not depend upon postural stability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T07%3A12%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Kinematics%20in%20newly%20walking%20toddlers%20does%20not%20depend%20upon%20postural%20stability&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Ivanenko,%20Yuri%20P&rft.date=2005-07&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=754&rft.epage=763&rft.pages=754-763&rft.issn=0022-3077&rft.eissn=1522-1598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/jn.00088.2004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68031360%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17365560&rft_id=info:pmid/15728772&rfr_iscdi=true