Implications of Direct and Indirect Range Restriction for Meta-Analysis Methods and Findings
Range restriction in most data sets is indirect, but the meta-analysis methods used to date have applied the correction for direct range restriction to data in which range restriction is indirect. The authors show that this results in substantial undercorrections for the effects of range restriction...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied psychology 2006-05, Vol.91 (3), p.594-612 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 612 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 594 |
| container_title | Journal of applied psychology |
| container_volume | 91 |
| creator | Hunter, John E Schmidt, Frank L Le, Huy |
| description | Range restriction in most data sets is indirect, but the meta-analysis methods used to date have applied the correction for direct range restriction to data in which range restriction is indirect. The authors show that this results in substantial undercorrections for the effects of range restriction, and they present meta-analysis methods for making accurate corrections when range restriction is indirect. Applying these methods to a well-known large-sample empirical database, the authors estimate that previous meta-analyses have underestimated the correlation between general mental ability and job performance by about 25%, indicating that this is potentially an important methodological issue in meta-analysis in general. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.594 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68028069</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68028069</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a512t-9516437936dad6da8ae65301b3e57488975c5a72c6da21d6793420049eebb0823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0V1rFDEUBuBQlHat_QO9kEHUG5k13x-XpVpdaCkUvSuEs5lMTZnNjMnMxf57M-5itYi9COGQ5-SEvAidErwkmKkPGFNSG1xKQ5ZsKQw_QAtimKmJFvwZWvwGR-hFzvcYE84MPkRHRCqmmFALdLvaDF1wMIY-5qpvq48heTdWEJtqFZtdcQPxzlc3Po8puFlWbZ-qKz9CfRah2-aQ5-p73-RfjRehdMa7_BI9b6HL_mS_H6NvF5--nn-pL68_r87PLmsQhI61EURypgyTDTRlafBSMEzWzAvFtTZKOAGKunJGSSOL5BRjbrxfr7Gm7Bi92907pP7HVJ5pNyE733UQfT9lKzWmGkvzJBSKUsrp05ApJSTnusDXj-B9P6XyKWUq4Zwbodj_ECWsBIaJLIjukEt9zsm3dkhhA2lrCbZz3naO085xWkMssyXv0vRqf_O03vjmoWUfcAFv9wCyg65NEF3ID05pbiSdp7_fORjADnnrII3BdT67KSUfRwtD9-fYN__Wf7OfjfjLgA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614449573</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implications of Direct and Indirect Range Restriction for Meta-Analysis Methods and Findings</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Hunter, John E ; Schmidt, Frank L ; Le, Huy</creator><contributor>Zedeck, Sheldon</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hunter, John E ; Schmidt, Frank L ; Le, Huy ; Zedeck, Sheldon</creatorcontrib><description>Range restriction in most data sets is indirect, but the meta-analysis methods used to date have applied the correction for direct range restriction to data in which range restriction is indirect. The authors show that this results in substantial undercorrections for the effects of range restriction, and they present meta-analysis methods for making accurate corrections when range restriction is indirect. Applying these methods to a well-known large-sample empirical database, the authors estimate that previous meta-analyses have underestimated the correlation between general mental ability and job performance by about 25%, indicating that this is potentially an important methodological issue in meta-analysis in general.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.594</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16737357</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPGBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Applied psychology ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Cognitive Ability ; Correlation analysis ; Data analysis ; Direct approach ; Employee Performance Appraisal ; Experimental Methods ; Forecasts ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Indirect modes ; Intellectual ability ; Job Performance ; Meta Analysis ; Models, Psychological ; Personnel selection ; Psychology - methods ; Psychology - statistics & numerical data ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology ; Recruitment ; Restrictions ; Statistical Analysis ; Statistical Data ; Statistics. Mathematics ; Studies ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied psychology, 2006-05, Vol.91 (3), p.594-612</ispartof><rights>2006 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association May 2006</rights><rights>2006, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a512t-9516437936dad6da8ae65301b3e57488975c5a72c6da21d6793420049eebb0823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a512t-9516437936dad6da8ae65301b3e57488975c5a72c6da21d6793420049eebb0823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,30998,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17849626$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16737357$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Zedeck, Sheldon</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hunter, John E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Frank L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le, Huy</creatorcontrib><title>Implications of Direct and Indirect Range Restriction for Meta-Analysis Methods and Findings</title><title>Journal of applied psychology</title><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><description>Range restriction in most data sets is indirect, but the meta-analysis methods used to date have applied the correction for direct range restriction to data in which range restriction is indirect. The authors show that this results in substantial undercorrections for the effects of range restriction, and they present meta-analysis methods for making accurate corrections when range restriction is indirect. Applying these methods to a well-known large-sample empirical database, the authors estimate that previous meta-analyses have underestimated the correlation between general mental ability and job performance by about 25%, indicating that this is potentially an important methodological issue in meta-analysis in general.</description><subject>Applied psychology</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Direct approach</subject><subject>Employee Performance Appraisal</subject><subject>Experimental Methods</subject><subject>Forecasts</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indirect modes</subject><subject>Intellectual ability</subject><subject>Job Performance</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Personnel selection</subject><subject>Psychology - methods</subject><subject>Psychology - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Restrictions</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Statistical Data</subject><subject>Statistics. Mathematics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0021-9010</issn><issn>1939-1854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0V1rFDEUBuBQlHat_QO9kEHUG5k13x-XpVpdaCkUvSuEs5lMTZnNjMnMxf57M-5itYi9COGQ5-SEvAidErwkmKkPGFNSG1xKQ5ZsKQw_QAtimKmJFvwZWvwGR-hFzvcYE84MPkRHRCqmmFALdLvaDF1wMIY-5qpvq48heTdWEJtqFZtdcQPxzlc3Po8puFlWbZ-qKz9CfRah2-aQ5-p73-RfjRehdMa7_BI9b6HL_mS_H6NvF5--nn-pL68_r87PLmsQhI61EURypgyTDTRlafBSMEzWzAvFtTZKOAGKunJGSSOL5BRjbrxfr7Gm7Bi92907pP7HVJ5pNyE733UQfT9lKzWmGkvzJBSKUsrp05ApJSTnusDXj-B9P6XyKWUq4Zwbodj_ECWsBIaJLIjukEt9zsm3dkhhA2lrCbZz3naO085xWkMssyXv0vRqf_O03vjmoWUfcAFv9wCyg65NEF3ID05pbiSdp7_fORjADnnrII3BdT67KSUfRwtD9-fYN__Wf7OfjfjLgA</recordid><startdate>20060501</startdate><enddate>20060501</enddate><creator>Hunter, John E</creator><creator>Schmidt, Frank L</creator><creator>Le, Huy</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060501</creationdate><title>Implications of Direct and Indirect Range Restriction for Meta-Analysis Methods and Findings</title><author>Hunter, John E ; Schmidt, Frank L ; Le, Huy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a512t-9516437936dad6da8ae65301b3e57488975c5a72c6da21d6793420049eebb0823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Applied psychology</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Direct approach</topic><topic>Employee Performance Appraisal</topic><topic>Experimental Methods</topic><topic>Forecasts</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indirect modes</topic><topic>Intellectual ability</topic><topic>Job Performance</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Personnel selection</topic><topic>Psychology - methods</topic><topic>Psychology - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Restrictions</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Statistical Data</topic><topic>Statistics. Mathematics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hunter, John E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Frank L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le, Huy</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hunter, John E</au><au>Schmidt, Frank L</au><au>Le, Huy</au><au>Zedeck, Sheldon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implications of Direct and Indirect Range Restriction for Meta-Analysis Methods and Findings</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><date>2006-05-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>594</spage><epage>612</epage><pages>594-612</pages><issn>0021-9010</issn><eissn>1939-1854</eissn><coden>JAPGBP</coden><abstract>Range restriction in most data sets is indirect, but the meta-analysis methods used to date have applied the correction for direct range restriction to data in which range restriction is indirect. The authors show that this results in substantial undercorrections for the effects of range restriction, and they present meta-analysis methods for making accurate corrections when range restriction is indirect. Applying these methods to a well-known large-sample empirical database, the authors estimate that previous meta-analyses have underestimated the correlation between general mental ability and job performance by about 25%, indicating that this is potentially an important methodological issue in meta-analysis in general.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>16737357</pmid><doi>10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.594</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-9010 |
| ispartof | Journal of applied psychology, 2006-05, Vol.91 (3), p.594-612 |
| issn | 0021-9010 1939-1854 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68028069 |
| source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Applied psychology Bias Biological and medical sciences Cognition Cognitive Ability Correlation analysis Data analysis Direct approach Employee Performance Appraisal Experimental Methods Forecasts Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Indirect modes Intellectual ability Job Performance Meta Analysis Models, Psychological Personnel selection Psychology - methods Psychology - statistics & numerical data Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychometrics. Statistics. Methodology Recruitment Restrictions Statistical Analysis Statistical Data Statistics. Mathematics Studies Systematic review |
| title | Implications of Direct and Indirect Range Restriction for Meta-Analysis Methods and Findings |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T22%3A49%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implications%20of%20Direct%20and%20Indirect%20Range%20Restriction%20for%20Meta-Analysis%20Methods%20and%20Findings&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20psychology&rft.au=Hunter,%20John%20E&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=594&rft.epage=612&rft.pages=594-612&rft.issn=0021-9010&rft.eissn=1939-1854&rft.coden=JAPGBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.594&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68028069%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614449573&rft_id=info:pmid/16737357&rfr_iscdi=true |