A comparative review of apomorphine formulations for erectile dysfunction : Recommendations for use in the elderly

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common medical condition that affects the sexual life of millions of men worldwide. First-line oral therapy for ED includes the use of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil) and sublingual apomorphine. Apomorphine is a dopamine D(1)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Drugs & aging 2006-01, Vol.23 (4), p.309-319
Hauptverfasser: BRIGANTI, Alberto, CHUN, Felix K.-H, SALONIA, Andrea, ZANNI, Giuseppe, DEHO, Federico, BARBIERI, Luigi, KARAKIEWICZ, Pierre I, RIGATTI, Patrizio, MONTORSI, Francesco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 319
container_issue 4
container_start_page 309
container_title Drugs & aging
container_volume 23
creator BRIGANTI, Alberto
CHUN, Felix K.-H
SALONIA, Andrea
ZANNI, Giuseppe
DEHO, Federico
BARBIERI, Luigi
KARAKIEWICZ, Pierre I
RIGATTI, Patrizio
MONTORSI, Francesco
description Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common medical condition that affects the sexual life of millions of men worldwide. First-line oral therapy for ED includes the use of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil) and sublingual apomorphine. Apomorphine is a dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptor agonist that has been approved for marketing in Europe. Different apomorphine formulations have been tested, such as sublingual, subcutaneous and intranasal. However, the sublingual formulation has shown the best results in terms of efficacy, safety and tolerability, especially the 2mg and 3mg doses. Although clinical studies of the efficacy and tolerability of apomorphine sublingual (SL) have included older patients, who are more likely to have ED, no study has specifically assessed the efficacy and tolerability of different doses of apomorphine SL in aging men. Therefore, a MEDLINE search was conducted from January 1987 to November 2005 to identify studies of the efficacy, safety (in particular cardiovascular safety) and tolerability of different apomorphine formulations and doses as treatments for ED in the subcohort of aging men. On the basis of the most recent peer-reviewed publications, the first part of this article critically evaluates data regarding the epidemiology of ED in the aging population. The second part of the article focuses on the mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics of apomorphine both in the general and the elderly population. Finally, a critical analysis of the efficacy and safety of different apomorphine formulations and doses for the treatment of ED is reported. Apomorphine represents a first-line oral treatment for ED. Available formulations include only sublingual administration. Few studies have assessed the efficacy and safety of apomorphine in the elderly population. However, in clinical practice, older patients with multiple vascular risk factors and systematic vascular damage show poor overall response to apomorphine SL for the treatment of ED.
doi_str_mv 10.2165/00002512-200623040-00004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68022830</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A200670707</galeid><sourcerecordid>A200670707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-3339e5c9971254f0a52c9f1a0365a2b0e1b17e828bcbb1021b14fd79e4907ed53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkdFqFTEQhoMotlZfQQKid1snyWaz8e5QqhUKgih4F7LZiY3sbtZkt-W8vdmeo1Uwc5GZyfcPYX5CKINzzhr5FsrhkvGKAzRcQA3V1qofkVPGlK6YbvTj-xwqzvW3E_Is5x-wwZw9JSesUYI3Gk5J2lEXx9kmu4RbpAlvA97R6Kmd4xjTfBMmpD6mcR0KEae8FRQTuiUMSPt99uvkthf6jn7GMmvEqf8LXTPSMNHlBikOPaZh_5w88XbI-OJ4n5Gv7y-_XFxV158-fLzYXVdOSLlUQgiN0mmtGJe1Byu5055ZEI20vANkHVPY8rZzXceAl7L2vdJYa1DYS3FG3hzmzin-XDEvZgzZ4TDYCeOaTdMC562AAr46gN_tgCZMPi7Jug02u23BCkoU6vw_VIkex-DihL4s5F9BexC4FHNO6M2cwmjT3jAwm43mt43mj433rbpIXx6_vnYj9g_Co28FeH0EbHZ28MlOLuQHTulaKeDiF9KbpJ4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68022830</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative review of apomorphine formulations for erectile dysfunction : Recommendations for use in the elderly</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>BRIGANTI, Alberto ; CHUN, Felix K.-H ; SALONIA, Andrea ; ZANNI, Giuseppe ; DEHO, Federico ; BARBIERI, Luigi ; KARAKIEWICZ, Pierre I ; RIGATTI, Patrizio ; MONTORSI, Francesco</creator><creatorcontrib>BRIGANTI, Alberto ; CHUN, Felix K.-H ; SALONIA, Andrea ; ZANNI, Giuseppe ; DEHO, Federico ; BARBIERI, Luigi ; KARAKIEWICZ, Pierre I ; RIGATTI, Patrizio ; MONTORSI, Francesco</creatorcontrib><description>Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common medical condition that affects the sexual life of millions of men worldwide. First-line oral therapy for ED includes the use of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil) and sublingual apomorphine. Apomorphine is a dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptor agonist that has been approved for marketing in Europe. Different apomorphine formulations have been tested, such as sublingual, subcutaneous and intranasal. However, the sublingual formulation has shown the best results in terms of efficacy, safety and tolerability, especially the 2mg and 3mg doses. Although clinical studies of the efficacy and tolerability of apomorphine sublingual (SL) have included older patients, who are more likely to have ED, no study has specifically assessed the efficacy and tolerability of different doses of apomorphine SL in aging men. Therefore, a MEDLINE search was conducted from January 1987 to November 2005 to identify studies of the efficacy, safety (in particular cardiovascular safety) and tolerability of different apomorphine formulations and doses as treatments for ED in the subcohort of aging men. On the basis of the most recent peer-reviewed publications, the first part of this article critically evaluates data regarding the epidemiology of ED in the aging population. The second part of the article focuses on the mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics of apomorphine both in the general and the elderly population. Finally, a critical analysis of the efficacy and safety of different apomorphine formulations and doses for the treatment of ED is reported. Apomorphine represents a first-line oral treatment for ED. Available formulations include only sublingual administration. Few studies have assessed the efficacy and safety of apomorphine in the elderly population. However, in clinical practice, older patients with multiple vascular risk factors and systematic vascular damage show poor overall response to apomorphine SL for the treatment of ED.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1170-229X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1179-1969</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2165/00002512-200623040-00004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16732690</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Auckland: Adis International</publisher><subject>Aged ; Apomorphine - pharmacokinetics ; Apomorphine - pharmacology ; Apomorphine - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Dosage Forms ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Drug Administration Routes ; Erectile Dysfunction - drug therapy ; Genital system. Reproduction ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><ispartof>Drugs &amp; aging, 2006-01, Vol.23 (4), p.309-319</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2006 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-3339e5c9971254f0a52c9f1a0365a2b0e1b17e828bcbb1021b14fd79e4907ed53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17947702$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16732690$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BRIGANTI, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHUN, Felix K.-H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SALONIA, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZANNI, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEHO, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARBIERI, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KARAKIEWICZ, Pierre I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RIGATTI, Patrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MONTORSI, Francesco</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative review of apomorphine formulations for erectile dysfunction : Recommendations for use in the elderly</title><title>Drugs &amp; aging</title><addtitle>Drugs Aging</addtitle><description>Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common medical condition that affects the sexual life of millions of men worldwide. First-line oral therapy for ED includes the use of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil) and sublingual apomorphine. Apomorphine is a dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptor agonist that has been approved for marketing in Europe. Different apomorphine formulations have been tested, such as sublingual, subcutaneous and intranasal. However, the sublingual formulation has shown the best results in terms of efficacy, safety and tolerability, especially the 2mg and 3mg doses. Although clinical studies of the efficacy and tolerability of apomorphine sublingual (SL) have included older patients, who are more likely to have ED, no study has specifically assessed the efficacy and tolerability of different doses of apomorphine SL in aging men. Therefore, a MEDLINE search was conducted from January 1987 to November 2005 to identify studies of the efficacy, safety (in particular cardiovascular safety) and tolerability of different apomorphine formulations and doses as treatments for ED in the subcohort of aging men. On the basis of the most recent peer-reviewed publications, the first part of this article critically evaluates data regarding the epidemiology of ED in the aging population. The second part of the article focuses on the mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics of apomorphine both in the general and the elderly population. Finally, a critical analysis of the efficacy and safety of different apomorphine formulations and doses for the treatment of ED is reported. Apomorphine represents a first-line oral treatment for ED. Available formulations include only sublingual administration. Few studies have assessed the efficacy and safety of apomorphine in the elderly population. However, in clinical practice, older patients with multiple vascular risk factors and systematic vascular damage show poor overall response to apomorphine SL for the treatment of ED.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Apomorphine - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Apomorphine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Apomorphine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Dosage Forms</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Drug Administration Routes</subject><subject>Erectile Dysfunction - drug therapy</subject><subject>Genital system. Reproduction</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><issn>1170-229X</issn><issn>1179-1969</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkdFqFTEQhoMotlZfQQKid1snyWaz8e5QqhUKgih4F7LZiY3sbtZkt-W8vdmeo1Uwc5GZyfcPYX5CKINzzhr5FsrhkvGKAzRcQA3V1qofkVPGlK6YbvTj-xwqzvW3E_Is5x-wwZw9JSesUYI3Gk5J2lEXx9kmu4RbpAlvA97R6Kmd4xjTfBMmpD6mcR0KEae8FRQTuiUMSPt99uvkthf6jn7GMmvEqf8LXTPSMNHlBikOPaZh_5w88XbI-OJ4n5Gv7y-_XFxV158-fLzYXVdOSLlUQgiN0mmtGJe1Byu5055ZEI20vANkHVPY8rZzXceAl7L2vdJYa1DYS3FG3hzmzin-XDEvZgzZ4TDYCeOaTdMC562AAr46gN_tgCZMPi7Jug02u23BCkoU6vw_VIkex-DihL4s5F9BexC4FHNO6M2cwmjT3jAwm43mt43mj433rbpIXx6_vnYj9g_Co28FeH0EbHZ28MlOLuQHTulaKeDiF9KbpJ4</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>BRIGANTI, Alberto</creator><creator>CHUN, Felix K.-H</creator><creator>SALONIA, Andrea</creator><creator>ZANNI, Giuseppe</creator><creator>DEHO, Federico</creator><creator>BARBIERI, Luigi</creator><creator>KARAKIEWICZ, Pierre I</creator><creator>RIGATTI, Patrizio</creator><creator>MONTORSI, Francesco</creator><general>Adis International</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>A comparative review of apomorphine formulations for erectile dysfunction : Recommendations for use in the elderly</title><author>BRIGANTI, Alberto ; CHUN, Felix K.-H ; SALONIA, Andrea ; ZANNI, Giuseppe ; DEHO, Federico ; BARBIERI, Luigi ; KARAKIEWICZ, Pierre I ; RIGATTI, Patrizio ; MONTORSI, Francesco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-3339e5c9971254f0a52c9f1a0365a2b0e1b17e828bcbb1021b14fd79e4907ed53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Apomorphine - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Apomorphine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Apomorphine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Dosage Forms</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Drug Administration Routes</topic><topic>Erectile Dysfunction - drug therapy</topic><topic>Genital system. Reproduction</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BRIGANTI, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHUN, Felix K.-H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SALONIA, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZANNI, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEHO, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARBIERI, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KARAKIEWICZ, Pierre I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RIGATTI, Patrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MONTORSI, Francesco</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Drugs &amp; aging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BRIGANTI, Alberto</au><au>CHUN, Felix K.-H</au><au>SALONIA, Andrea</au><au>ZANNI, Giuseppe</au><au>DEHO, Federico</au><au>BARBIERI, Luigi</au><au>KARAKIEWICZ, Pierre I</au><au>RIGATTI, Patrizio</au><au>MONTORSI, Francesco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative review of apomorphine formulations for erectile dysfunction : Recommendations for use in the elderly</atitle><jtitle>Drugs &amp; aging</jtitle><addtitle>Drugs Aging</addtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>309</spage><epage>319</epage><pages>309-319</pages><issn>1170-229X</issn><eissn>1179-1969</eissn><abstract>Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common medical condition that affects the sexual life of millions of men worldwide. First-line oral therapy for ED includes the use of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil) and sublingual apomorphine. Apomorphine is a dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptor agonist that has been approved for marketing in Europe. Different apomorphine formulations have been tested, such as sublingual, subcutaneous and intranasal. However, the sublingual formulation has shown the best results in terms of efficacy, safety and tolerability, especially the 2mg and 3mg doses. Although clinical studies of the efficacy and tolerability of apomorphine sublingual (SL) have included older patients, who are more likely to have ED, no study has specifically assessed the efficacy and tolerability of different doses of apomorphine SL in aging men. Therefore, a MEDLINE search was conducted from January 1987 to November 2005 to identify studies of the efficacy, safety (in particular cardiovascular safety) and tolerability of different apomorphine formulations and doses as treatments for ED in the subcohort of aging men. On the basis of the most recent peer-reviewed publications, the first part of this article critically evaluates data regarding the epidemiology of ED in the aging population. The second part of the article focuses on the mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics of apomorphine both in the general and the elderly population. Finally, a critical analysis of the efficacy and safety of different apomorphine formulations and doses for the treatment of ED is reported. Apomorphine represents a first-line oral treatment for ED. Available formulations include only sublingual administration. Few studies have assessed the efficacy and safety of apomorphine in the elderly population. However, in clinical practice, older patients with multiple vascular risk factors and systematic vascular damage show poor overall response to apomorphine SL for the treatment of ED.</abstract><cop>Auckland</cop><pub>Adis International</pub><pmid>16732690</pmid><doi>10.2165/00002512-200623040-00004</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1170-229X
ispartof Drugs & aging, 2006-01, Vol.23 (4), p.309-319
issn 1170-229X
1179-1969
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68022830
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Aged
Apomorphine - pharmacokinetics
Apomorphine - pharmacology
Apomorphine - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Dosage Forms
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Drug Administration Routes
Erectile Dysfunction - drug therapy
Genital system. Reproduction
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
title A comparative review of apomorphine formulations for erectile dysfunction : Recommendations for use in the elderly
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T15%3A23%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20review%20of%20apomorphine%20formulations%20for%20erectile%20dysfunction%20:%20Recommendations%20for%20use%20in%20the%20elderly&rft.jtitle=Drugs%20&%20aging&rft.au=BRIGANTI,%20Alberto&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=319&rft.pages=309-319&rft.issn=1170-229X&rft.eissn=1179-1969&rft_id=info:doi/10.2165/00002512-200623040-00004&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA200670707%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68022830&rft_id=info:pmid/16732690&rft_galeid=A200670707&rfr_iscdi=true