The Impact of Prostate Size in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Large prostates can be challenging to remove during open or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Our objective was to critically analyse the impact of prostate volume in LRP. 400 cases of LRP were performed. Three hundred and fourteen patients had a small prostate (weight

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urology 2005-08, Vol.48 (2), p.285-290
Hauptverfasser: Chang, C.M., Moon, D., Gianduzzo, T.R., Eden, C.G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 290
container_issue 2
container_start_page 285
container_title European urology
container_volume 48
creator Chang, C.M.
Moon, D.
Gianduzzo, T.R.
Eden, C.G.
description Large prostates can be challenging to remove during open or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Our objective was to critically analyse the impact of prostate volume in LRP. 400 cases of LRP were performed. Three hundred and fourteen patients had a small prostate (weight
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68018593</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0302283805002745</els_id><sourcerecordid>68018593</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-f3abc1b483d423e012c7483db77c74bb203134ffc38bfa5f3dd97f33b57ff7a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gUhv9K71pKdt2htBhh-DgaLzOqRpghnrWpNWmL_elA5351WSw3POefMQckkhokCz23WketvbJooB0giSCOLiiExpzjBkaQbHZAoIcRjnmE_ImXNrAMC0wFMyoWmRYYbJlNyvPlWwqFshu6DRwattXCc6FbybHxWYbbAUrfA12bRGBm-iMlJs_ijZNfXunJxosXHqYn_OyMfjw2r-HC5fnhbz-2UokzTrQo2ilLRMcqySGBXQWLLhUTLmL2UZA1JMtJaYl1qkGquqYBqxTJnWTDCckZtxbmubr165jtfGSbXZiK1qesezHGjuv-fBZASlj-ms0ry1phZ2xynwQR1f81EdH9RxSLhX59uu9vP7slbVoWnvygPXe0A4b0FbsZXGHbiswJjBsP9u5JS38W2U5U4atZWqMtYr41Vj_k_yC9QQjqY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68018593</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Impact of Prostate Size in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Chang, C.M. ; Moon, D. ; Gianduzzo, T.R. ; Eden, C.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chang, C.M. ; Moon, D. ; Gianduzzo, T.R. ; Eden, C.G.</creatorcontrib><description>Large prostates can be challenging to remove during open or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Our objective was to critically analyse the impact of prostate volume in LRP. 400 cases of LRP were performed. Three hundred and fourteen patients had a small prostate (weight &lt;75 g) and 86 patients had a large prostate (weight ≥75 g) on final histology. The following outcomes were assessed: operative time; estimated blood loss (EBL); transfusion rate; length of hospital stay (LOS); length of catheterisation; perioperative and postoperative complications (including incontinence and erectile dysfunction); surgical margin status; and early biochemical recurrence rates. Patients’ age, PSA, Gleason sum and clinical stage were all similar. Larger prostates were associated with a 14 minutes longer mean operating time ( p &lt; 0.001), but fewer positive surgical margins ( p = 0.01). Blood loss, blood transfusion rate, length of hospital stay, length of catheterisation and complication rate were all similar in both groups. Prostate size should not be a factor determining a patient's suitability for LRP. Further follow-up is needed to assess the effect of prostate size on long-term functional and oncological results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-2838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15963634</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EUURAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Laparoscopic surgery ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Male genital diseases ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Postoperative Complications ; Prostate - pathology ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatectomy - methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors ; Tumors of the urinary system ; Urinary tract. Prostate gland</subject><ispartof>European urology, 2005-08, Vol.48 (2), p.285-290</ispartof><rights>2005</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-f3abc1b483d423e012c7483db77c74bb203134ffc38bfa5f3dd97f33b57ff7a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-f3abc1b483d423e012c7483db77c74bb203134ffc38bfa5f3dd97f33b57ff7a73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.029$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16932703$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15963634$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chang, C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianduzzo, T.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eden, C.G.</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of Prostate Size in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy</title><title>European urology</title><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><description>Large prostates can be challenging to remove during open or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Our objective was to critically analyse the impact of prostate volume in LRP. 400 cases of LRP were performed. Three hundred and fourteen patients had a small prostate (weight &lt;75 g) and 86 patients had a large prostate (weight ≥75 g) on final histology. The following outcomes were assessed: operative time; estimated blood loss (EBL); transfusion rate; length of hospital stay (LOS); length of catheterisation; perioperative and postoperative complications (including incontinence and erectile dysfunction); surgical margin status; and early biochemical recurrence rates. Patients’ age, PSA, Gleason sum and clinical stage were all similar. Larger prostates were associated with a 14 minutes longer mean operating time ( p &lt; 0.001), but fewer positive surgical margins ( p = 0.01). Blood loss, blood transfusion rate, length of hospital stay, length of catheterisation and complication rate were all similar in both groups. Prostate size should not be a factor determining a patient's suitability for LRP. Further follow-up is needed to assess the effect of prostate size on long-term functional and oncological results.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopic surgery</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Male genital diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Tumors of the urinary system</subject><subject>Urinary tract. Prostate gland</subject><issn>0302-2838</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gUhv9K71pKdt2htBhh-DgaLzOqRpghnrWpNWmL_elA5351WSw3POefMQckkhokCz23WketvbJooB0giSCOLiiExpzjBkaQbHZAoIcRjnmE_ImXNrAMC0wFMyoWmRYYbJlNyvPlWwqFshu6DRwattXCc6FbybHxWYbbAUrfA12bRGBm-iMlJs_ijZNfXunJxosXHqYn_OyMfjw2r-HC5fnhbz-2UokzTrQo2ilLRMcqySGBXQWLLhUTLmL2UZA1JMtJaYl1qkGquqYBqxTJnWTDCckZtxbmubr165jtfGSbXZiK1qesezHGjuv-fBZASlj-ms0ry1phZ2xynwQR1f81EdH9RxSLhX59uu9vP7slbVoWnvygPXe0A4b0FbsZXGHbiswJjBsP9u5JS38W2U5U4atZWqMtYr41Vj_k_yC9QQjqY</recordid><startdate>20050801</startdate><enddate>20050801</enddate><creator>Chang, C.M.</creator><creator>Moon, D.</creator><creator>Gianduzzo, T.R.</creator><creator>Eden, C.G.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050801</creationdate><title>The Impact of Prostate Size in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy</title><author>Chang, C.M. ; Moon, D. ; Gianduzzo, T.R. ; Eden, C.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-f3abc1b483d423e012c7483db77c74bb203134ffc38bfa5f3dd97f33b57ff7a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopic surgery</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Male genital diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Tumors of the urinary system</topic><topic>Urinary tract. Prostate gland</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chang, C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianduzzo, T.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eden, C.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chang, C.M.</au><au>Moon, D.</au><au>Gianduzzo, T.R.</au><au>Eden, C.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Impact of Prostate Size in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy</atitle><jtitle>European urology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><date>2005-08-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>285</spage><epage>290</epage><pages>285-290</pages><issn>0302-2838</issn><eissn>1873-7560</eissn><coden>EUURAV</coden><abstract>Large prostates can be challenging to remove during open or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Our objective was to critically analyse the impact of prostate volume in LRP. 400 cases of LRP were performed. Three hundred and fourteen patients had a small prostate (weight &lt;75 g) and 86 patients had a large prostate (weight ≥75 g) on final histology. The following outcomes were assessed: operative time; estimated blood loss (EBL); transfusion rate; length of hospital stay (LOS); length of catheterisation; perioperative and postoperative complications (including incontinence and erectile dysfunction); surgical margin status; and early biochemical recurrence rates. Patients’ age, PSA, Gleason sum and clinical stage were all similar. Larger prostates were associated with a 14 minutes longer mean operating time ( p &lt; 0.001), but fewer positive surgical margins ( p = 0.01). Blood loss, blood transfusion rate, length of hospital stay, length of catheterisation and complication rate were all similar in both groups. Prostate size should not be a factor determining a patient's suitability for LRP. Further follow-up is needed to assess the effect of prostate size on long-term functional and oncological results.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>15963634</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.029</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0302-2838
ispartof European urology, 2005-08, Vol.48 (2), p.285-290
issn 0302-2838
1873-7560
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68018593
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adenocarcinoma - pathology
Adenocarcinoma - surgery
Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Laparoscopic surgery
Laparoscopy
Male
Male genital diseases
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
Postoperative Complications
Prostate - pathology
Prostate cancer
Prostatectomy
Prostatectomy - methods
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery
Treatment Outcome
Tumors
Tumors of the urinary system
Urinary tract. Prostate gland
title The Impact of Prostate Size in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A41%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20Prostate%20Size%20in%20Laparoscopic%20Radical%20Prostatectomy&rft.jtitle=European%20urology&rft.au=Chang,%20C.M.&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=290&rft.pages=285-290&rft.issn=0302-2838&rft.eissn=1873-7560&rft.coden=EUURAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68018593%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68018593&rft_id=info:pmid/15963634&rft_els_id=S0302283805002745&rfr_iscdi=true