Analog validation of German-language symptom validity tests and the influence of coaching

Although symptom validity testing is an integral part of the repertory of neuropsychologists in a number of countries, this is not yet true for Germany. The German adaptations of two effort tests, the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT) by Green and the Amsterdam Short-Term Memory Test (ASTM) by Sc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of clinical neuropsychology 2005-08, Vol.20 (6), p.719-726
Hauptverfasser: Merten, Thomas, Green, Paul, Henry, Matthias, Blaskewitz, Nina, Brockhaus, Robbi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 726
container_issue 6
container_start_page 719
container_title Archives of clinical neuropsychology
container_volume 20
creator Merten, Thomas
Green, Paul
Henry, Matthias
Blaskewitz, Nina
Brockhaus, Robbi
description Although symptom validity testing is an integral part of the repertory of neuropsychologists in a number of countries, this is not yet true for Germany. The German adaptations of two effort tests, the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT) by Green and the Amsterdam Short-Term Memory Test (ASTM) by Schmand et al., were investigated with a German-language sample. An analog study was performed with 18 healthy experimental malingerers and 18 controls with a mean age of 25.4 years. The scenario contained detailed information about mild post-traumatic cognitive impairment, as well as an explicit warning against symptom exaggeration. In addition to MSVT and ASTM, the Trail Making Test (TMT), the Complex Figure Test (CFT), and Digit Span were performed. Half of the sample were also given Rey's 15-Item-Test (FIT). Both groups were significantly different in all effort and performance measures, with the exception of the ratio TMT-B:TMT-A. With MSVT and ASTM, correct classification of group membership was between 97 and 100%. For the ratio TMT-B:TMT-A, there was a considerable overlap in the test scores for the two groups and the sensitivity of the FIT was too low. Although the ASTM and the MSVT were identified by a number of subjects as possible effort measures, both tests obtained very good results within this analog design.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.acn.2005.04.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68012925</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0887617705000478</els_id><sourcerecordid>68012925</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-81593a06e1ca8a1d71e96303b4d04e70c0c8cf97d3320d3887d01af933fdc4f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EotvCD-CCcoFbwjhO4kScqhVsQatyKVLhYk39sfWS2Fs7qdh_X0dZASdOY2med_T6IeQNhYICbT7sC5SuKAHqAqoCoHpGVrTlLK_bij0nK2hbnjeU8zNyHuMeEkhp-ZKc0SY9W1qvyI9Lh73fZY_YW4Wj9S7zJtvoMKDLe3S7CXc6i8fhMPphoex4zEYdx5ihU9l4rzPrTD9pJ_WclR7lvXW7V-SFwT7q16d5Qb5__nSzvsq33zZf1pfbXNa0GfPUomMIjaYSW6SKU901DNhdpaDSHCTIVpqOK8ZKUCz9SAFF0zFmlKxMzS7I--XuIfiHKfUSg41S96m89lMUTQu07MoZpAsog48xaCMOwQ4YjoKCmH2KvUg-xexTQCWSz5R5ezo-3Q1a_U2cBCbg3QnAKLE3AZ208R-uqynUkLh84Wwc9e8_ewy_RMMZr8XV7U_x9Wazvb69Xosy8R8XXid1j1YHEaWdFSsbtByF8vY_tZ8A6waiBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68012925</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analog validation of German-language symptom validity tests and the influence of coaching</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Merten, Thomas ; Green, Paul ; Henry, Matthias ; Blaskewitz, Nina ; Brockhaus, Robbi</creator><creatorcontrib>Merten, Thomas ; Green, Paul ; Henry, Matthias ; Blaskewitz, Nina ; Brockhaus, Robbi</creatorcontrib><description>Although symptom validity testing is an integral part of the repertory of neuropsychologists in a number of countries, this is not yet true for Germany. The German adaptations of two effort tests, the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT) by Green and the Amsterdam Short-Term Memory Test (ASTM) by Schmand et al., were investigated with a German-language sample. An analog study was performed with 18 healthy experimental malingerers and 18 controls with a mean age of 25.4 years. The scenario contained detailed information about mild post-traumatic cognitive impairment, as well as an explicit warning against symptom exaggeration. In addition to MSVT and ASTM, the Trail Making Test (TMT), the Complex Figure Test (CFT), and Digit Span were performed. Half of the sample were also given Rey's 15-Item-Test (FIT). Both groups were significantly different in all effort and performance measures, with the exception of the ratio TMT-B:TMT-A. With MSVT and ASTM, correct classification of group membership was between 97 and 100%. For the ratio TMT-B:TMT-A, there was a considerable overlap in the test scores for the two groups and the sensitivity of the FIT was too low. Although the ASTM and the MSVT were identified by a number of subjects as possible effort measures, both tests obtained very good results within this analog design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-6177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5843</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.acn.2005.04.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16005815</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACNEET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Germany ; Humans ; Language ; Male ; Malingering ; Malingering - diagnosis ; Malingering - psychology ; Medical sciences ; Memory ; Negative response bias ; Neuropsychological assessment ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Reference Values ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Symptom validity testing ; Techniques and methods</subject><ispartof>Archives of clinical neuropsychology, 2005-08, Vol.20 (6), p.719-726</ispartof><rights>2005 National Academy of Neuropsychology</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-81593a06e1ca8a1d71e96303b4d04e70c0c8cf97d3320d3887d01af933fdc4f53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16951050$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16005815$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Merten, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blaskewitz, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brockhaus, Robbi</creatorcontrib><title>Analog validation of German-language symptom validity tests and the influence of coaching</title><title>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</title><addtitle>Arch Clin Neuropsychol</addtitle><description>Although symptom validity testing is an integral part of the repertory of neuropsychologists in a number of countries, this is not yet true for Germany. The German adaptations of two effort tests, the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT) by Green and the Amsterdam Short-Term Memory Test (ASTM) by Schmand et al., were investigated with a German-language sample. An analog study was performed with 18 healthy experimental malingerers and 18 controls with a mean age of 25.4 years. The scenario contained detailed information about mild post-traumatic cognitive impairment, as well as an explicit warning against symptom exaggeration. In addition to MSVT and ASTM, the Trail Making Test (TMT), the Complex Figure Test (CFT), and Digit Span were performed. Half of the sample were also given Rey's 15-Item-Test (FIT). Both groups were significantly different in all effort and performance measures, with the exception of the ratio TMT-B:TMT-A. With MSVT and ASTM, correct classification of group membership was between 97 and 100%. For the ratio TMT-B:TMT-A, there was a considerable overlap in the test scores for the two groups and the sensitivity of the FIT was too low. Although the ASTM and the MSVT were identified by a number of subjects as possible effort measures, both tests obtained very good results within this analog design.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malingering</subject><subject>Malingering - diagnosis</subject><subject>Malingering - psychology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Negative response bias</subject><subject>Neuropsychological assessment</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Symptom validity testing</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><issn>0887-6177</issn><issn>1873-5843</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EotvCD-CCcoFbwjhO4kScqhVsQatyKVLhYk39sfWS2Fs7qdh_X0dZASdOY2med_T6IeQNhYICbT7sC5SuKAHqAqoCoHpGVrTlLK_bij0nK2hbnjeU8zNyHuMeEkhp-ZKc0SY9W1qvyI9Lh73fZY_YW4Wj9S7zJtvoMKDLe3S7CXc6i8fhMPphoex4zEYdx5ihU9l4rzPrTD9pJ_WclR7lvXW7V-SFwT7q16d5Qb5__nSzvsq33zZf1pfbXNa0GfPUomMIjaYSW6SKU901DNhdpaDSHCTIVpqOK8ZKUCz9SAFF0zFmlKxMzS7I--XuIfiHKfUSg41S96m89lMUTQu07MoZpAsog48xaCMOwQ4YjoKCmH2KvUg-xexTQCWSz5R5ezo-3Q1a_U2cBCbg3QnAKLE3AZ208R-uqynUkLh84Wwc9e8_ewy_RMMZr8XV7U_x9Wazvb69Xosy8R8XXid1j1YHEaWdFSsbtByF8vY_tZ8A6waiBA</recordid><startdate>20050801</startdate><enddate>20050801</enddate><creator>Merten, Thomas</creator><creator>Green, Paul</creator><creator>Henry, Matthias</creator><creator>Blaskewitz, Nina</creator><creator>Brockhaus, Robbi</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050801</creationdate><title>Analog validation of German-language symptom validity tests and the influence of coaching</title><author>Merten, Thomas ; Green, Paul ; Henry, Matthias ; Blaskewitz, Nina ; Brockhaus, Robbi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-81593a06e1ca8a1d71e96303b4d04e70c0c8cf97d3320d3887d01af933fdc4f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malingering</topic><topic>Malingering - diagnosis</topic><topic>Malingering - psychology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Negative response bias</topic><topic>Neuropsychological assessment</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Symptom validity testing</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Merten, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blaskewitz, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brockhaus, Robbi</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Merten, Thomas</au><au>Green, Paul</au><au>Henry, Matthias</au><au>Blaskewitz, Nina</au><au>Brockhaus, Robbi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analog validation of German-language symptom validity tests and the influence of coaching</atitle><jtitle>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Clin Neuropsychol</addtitle><date>2005-08-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>719</spage><epage>726</epage><pages>719-726</pages><issn>0887-6177</issn><eissn>1873-5843</eissn><coden>ACNEET</coden><abstract>Although symptom validity testing is an integral part of the repertory of neuropsychologists in a number of countries, this is not yet true for Germany. The German adaptations of two effort tests, the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT) by Green and the Amsterdam Short-Term Memory Test (ASTM) by Schmand et al., were investigated with a German-language sample. An analog study was performed with 18 healthy experimental malingerers and 18 controls with a mean age of 25.4 years. The scenario contained detailed information about mild post-traumatic cognitive impairment, as well as an explicit warning against symptom exaggeration. In addition to MSVT and ASTM, the Trail Making Test (TMT), the Complex Figure Test (CFT), and Digit Span were performed. Half of the sample were also given Rey's 15-Item-Test (FIT). Both groups were significantly different in all effort and performance measures, with the exception of the ratio TMT-B:TMT-A. With MSVT and ASTM, correct classification of group membership was between 97 and 100%. For the ratio TMT-B:TMT-A, there was a considerable overlap in the test scores for the two groups and the sensitivity of the FIT was too low. Although the ASTM and the MSVT were identified by a number of subjects as possible effort measures, both tests obtained very good results within this analog design.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16005815</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.acn.2005.04.004</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0887-6177
ispartof Archives of clinical neuropsychology, 2005-08, Vol.20 (6), p.719-726
issn 0887-6177
1873-5843
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68012925
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Germany
Humans
Language
Male
Malingering
Malingering - diagnosis
Malingering - psychology
Medical sciences
Memory
Negative response bias
Neuropsychological assessment
Neuropsychological Tests
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Reaction Time - physiology
Reference Values
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Symptom validity testing
Techniques and methods
title Analog validation of German-language symptom validity tests and the influence of coaching
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T11%3A23%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analog%20validation%20of%20German-language%20symptom%20validity%20tests%20and%20the%20influence%20of%20coaching&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20clinical%20neuropsychology&rft.au=Merten,%20Thomas&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=719&rft.epage=726&rft.pages=719-726&rft.issn=0887-6177&rft.eissn=1873-5843&rft.coden=ACNEET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.acn.2005.04.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68012925%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68012925&rft_id=info:pmid/16005815&rft_els_id=S0887617705000478&rfr_iscdi=true