Analog validation of German-language symptom validity tests and the influence of coaching
Although symptom validity testing is an integral part of the repertory of neuropsychologists in a number of countries, this is not yet true for Germany. The German adaptations of two effort tests, the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT) by Green and the Amsterdam Short-Term Memory Test (ASTM) by Sc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of clinical neuropsychology 2005-08, Vol.20 (6), p.719-726 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 726 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 719 |
container_title | Archives of clinical neuropsychology |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Merten, Thomas Green, Paul Henry, Matthias Blaskewitz, Nina Brockhaus, Robbi |
description | Although symptom validity testing is an integral part of the repertory of neuropsychologists in a number of countries, this is not yet true for Germany. The German adaptations of two effort tests, the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT) by Green and the Amsterdam Short-Term Memory Test (ASTM) by Schmand et al., were investigated with a German-language sample. An analog study was performed with 18 healthy experimental malingerers and 18 controls with a mean age of 25.4 years. The scenario contained detailed information about mild post-traumatic cognitive impairment, as well as an explicit warning against symptom exaggeration. In addition to MSVT and ASTM, the Trail Making Test (TMT), the Complex Figure Test (CFT), and Digit Span were performed. Half of the sample were also given Rey's 15-Item-Test (FIT). Both groups were significantly different in all effort and performance measures, with the exception of the ratio TMT-B:TMT-A. With MSVT and ASTM, correct classification of group membership was between 97 and 100%. For the ratio TMT-B:TMT-A, there was a considerable overlap in the test scores for the two groups and the sensitivity of the FIT was too low. Although the ASTM and the MSVT were identified by a number of subjects as possible effort measures, both tests obtained very good results within this analog design. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.acn.2005.04.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68012925</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0887617705000478</els_id><sourcerecordid>68012925</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-81593a06e1ca8a1d71e96303b4d04e70c0c8cf97d3320d3887d01af933fdc4f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EotvCD-CCcoFbwjhO4kScqhVsQatyKVLhYk39sfWS2Fs7qdh_X0dZASdOY2med_T6IeQNhYICbT7sC5SuKAHqAqoCoHpGVrTlLK_bij0nK2hbnjeU8zNyHuMeEkhp-ZKc0SY9W1qvyI9Lh73fZY_YW4Wj9S7zJtvoMKDLe3S7CXc6i8fhMPphoex4zEYdx5ihU9l4rzPrTD9pJ_WclR7lvXW7V-SFwT7q16d5Qb5__nSzvsq33zZf1pfbXNa0GfPUomMIjaYSW6SKU901DNhdpaDSHCTIVpqOK8ZKUCz9SAFF0zFmlKxMzS7I--XuIfiHKfUSg41S96m89lMUTQu07MoZpAsog48xaCMOwQ4YjoKCmH2KvUg-xexTQCWSz5R5ezo-3Q1a_U2cBCbg3QnAKLE3AZ208R-uqynUkLh84Wwc9e8_ewy_RMMZr8XV7U_x9Wazvb69Xosy8R8XXid1j1YHEaWdFSsbtByF8vY_tZ8A6waiBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68012925</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analog validation of German-language symptom validity tests and the influence of coaching</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Merten, Thomas ; Green, Paul ; Henry, Matthias ; Blaskewitz, Nina ; Brockhaus, Robbi</creator><creatorcontrib>Merten, Thomas ; Green, Paul ; Henry, Matthias ; Blaskewitz, Nina ; Brockhaus, Robbi</creatorcontrib><description>Although symptom validity testing is an integral part of the repertory of neuropsychologists in a number of countries, this is not yet true for Germany. The German adaptations of two effort tests, the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT) by Green and the Amsterdam Short-Term Memory Test (ASTM) by Schmand et al., were investigated with a German-language sample. An analog study was performed with 18 healthy experimental malingerers and 18 controls with a mean age of 25.4 years. The scenario contained detailed information about mild post-traumatic cognitive impairment, as well as an explicit warning against symptom exaggeration. In addition to MSVT and ASTM, the Trail Making Test (TMT), the Complex Figure Test (CFT), and Digit Span were performed. Half of the sample were also given Rey's 15-Item-Test (FIT). Both groups were significantly different in all effort and performance measures, with the exception of the ratio TMT-B:TMT-A. With MSVT and ASTM, correct classification of group membership was between 97 and 100%. For the ratio TMT-B:TMT-A, there was a considerable overlap in the test scores for the two groups and the sensitivity of the FIT was too low. Although the ASTM and the MSVT were identified by a number of subjects as possible effort measures, both tests obtained very good results within this analog design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-6177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5843</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.acn.2005.04.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16005815</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACNEET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Germany ; Humans ; Language ; Male ; Malingering ; Malingering - diagnosis ; Malingering - psychology ; Medical sciences ; Memory ; Negative response bias ; Neuropsychological assessment ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Reference Values ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Symptom validity testing ; Techniques and methods</subject><ispartof>Archives of clinical neuropsychology, 2005-08, Vol.20 (6), p.719-726</ispartof><rights>2005 National Academy of Neuropsychology</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-81593a06e1ca8a1d71e96303b4d04e70c0c8cf97d3320d3887d01af933fdc4f53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16951050$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16005815$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Merten, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blaskewitz, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brockhaus, Robbi</creatorcontrib><title>Analog validation of German-language symptom validity tests and the influence of coaching</title><title>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</title><addtitle>Arch Clin Neuropsychol</addtitle><description>Although symptom validity testing is an integral part of the repertory of neuropsychologists in a number of countries, this is not yet true for Germany. The German adaptations of two effort tests, the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT) by Green and the Amsterdam Short-Term Memory Test (ASTM) by Schmand et al., were investigated with a German-language sample. An analog study was performed with 18 healthy experimental malingerers and 18 controls with a mean age of 25.4 years. The scenario contained detailed information about mild post-traumatic cognitive impairment, as well as an explicit warning against symptom exaggeration. In addition to MSVT and ASTM, the Trail Making Test (TMT), the Complex Figure Test (CFT), and Digit Span were performed. Half of the sample were also given Rey's 15-Item-Test (FIT). Both groups were significantly different in all effort and performance measures, with the exception of the ratio TMT-B:TMT-A. With MSVT and ASTM, correct classification of group membership was between 97 and 100%. For the ratio TMT-B:TMT-A, there was a considerable overlap in the test scores for the two groups and the sensitivity of the FIT was too low. Although the ASTM and the MSVT were identified by a number of subjects as possible effort measures, both tests obtained very good results within this analog design.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malingering</subject><subject>Malingering - diagnosis</subject><subject>Malingering - psychology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Negative response bias</subject><subject>Neuropsychological assessment</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Symptom validity testing</subject><subject>Techniques and methods</subject><issn>0887-6177</issn><issn>1873-5843</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EotvCD-CCcoFbwjhO4kScqhVsQatyKVLhYk39sfWS2Fs7qdh_X0dZASdOY2med_T6IeQNhYICbT7sC5SuKAHqAqoCoHpGVrTlLK_bij0nK2hbnjeU8zNyHuMeEkhp-ZKc0SY9W1qvyI9Lh73fZY_YW4Wj9S7zJtvoMKDLe3S7CXc6i8fhMPphoex4zEYdx5ihU9l4rzPrTD9pJ_WclR7lvXW7V-SFwT7q16d5Qb5__nSzvsq33zZf1pfbXNa0GfPUomMIjaYSW6SKU901DNhdpaDSHCTIVpqOK8ZKUCz9SAFF0zFmlKxMzS7I--XuIfiHKfUSg41S96m89lMUTQu07MoZpAsog48xaCMOwQ4YjoKCmH2KvUg-xexTQCWSz5R5ezo-3Q1a_U2cBCbg3QnAKLE3AZ208R-uqynUkLh84Wwc9e8_ewy_RMMZr8XV7U_x9Wazvb69Xosy8R8XXid1j1YHEaWdFSsbtByF8vY_tZ8A6waiBA</recordid><startdate>20050801</startdate><enddate>20050801</enddate><creator>Merten, Thomas</creator><creator>Green, Paul</creator><creator>Henry, Matthias</creator><creator>Blaskewitz, Nina</creator><creator>Brockhaus, Robbi</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050801</creationdate><title>Analog validation of German-language symptom validity tests and the influence of coaching</title><author>Merten, Thomas ; Green, Paul ; Henry, Matthias ; Blaskewitz, Nina ; Brockhaus, Robbi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-81593a06e1ca8a1d71e96303b4d04e70c0c8cf97d3320d3887d01af933fdc4f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malingering</topic><topic>Malingering - diagnosis</topic><topic>Malingering - psychology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Negative response bias</topic><topic>Neuropsychological assessment</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Symptom validity testing</topic><topic>Techniques and methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Merten, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blaskewitz, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brockhaus, Robbi</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Merten, Thomas</au><au>Green, Paul</au><au>Henry, Matthias</au><au>Blaskewitz, Nina</au><au>Brockhaus, Robbi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analog validation of German-language symptom validity tests and the influence of coaching</atitle><jtitle>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Clin Neuropsychol</addtitle><date>2005-08-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>719</spage><epage>726</epage><pages>719-726</pages><issn>0887-6177</issn><eissn>1873-5843</eissn><coden>ACNEET</coden><abstract>Although symptom validity testing is an integral part of the repertory of neuropsychologists in a number of countries, this is not yet true for Germany. The German adaptations of two effort tests, the Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT) by Green and the Amsterdam Short-Term Memory Test (ASTM) by Schmand et al., were investigated with a German-language sample. An analog study was performed with 18 healthy experimental malingerers and 18 controls with a mean age of 25.4 years. The scenario contained detailed information about mild post-traumatic cognitive impairment, as well as an explicit warning against symptom exaggeration. In addition to MSVT and ASTM, the Trail Making Test (TMT), the Complex Figure Test (CFT), and Digit Span were performed. Half of the sample were also given Rey's 15-Item-Test (FIT). Both groups were significantly different in all effort and performance measures, with the exception of the ratio TMT-B:TMT-A. With MSVT and ASTM, correct classification of group membership was between 97 and 100%. For the ratio TMT-B:TMT-A, there was a considerable overlap in the test scores for the two groups and the sensitivity of the FIT was too low. Although the ASTM and the MSVT were identified by a number of subjects as possible effort measures, both tests obtained very good results within this analog design.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16005815</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.acn.2005.04.004</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0887-6177 |
ispartof | Archives of clinical neuropsychology, 2005-08, Vol.20 (6), p.719-726 |
issn | 0887-6177 1873-5843 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68012925 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Female Germany Humans Language Male Malingering Malingering - diagnosis Malingering - psychology Medical sciences Memory Negative response bias Neuropsychological assessment Neuropsychological Tests Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems Psychopathology. Psychiatry Reaction Time - physiology Reference Values Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Symptom validity testing Techniques and methods |
title | Analog validation of German-language symptom validity tests and the influence of coaching |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T11%3A23%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analog%20validation%20of%20German-language%20symptom%20validity%20tests%20and%20the%20influence%20of%20coaching&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20clinical%20neuropsychology&rft.au=Merten,%20Thomas&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=719&rft.epage=726&rft.pages=719-726&rft.issn=0887-6177&rft.eissn=1873-5843&rft.coden=ACNEET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.acn.2005.04.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68012925%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68012925&rft_id=info:pmid/16005815&rft_els_id=S0887617705000478&rfr_iscdi=true |