Mechanisms of pain associated with internal defibrillation shocks: Results of a randomized study of shock waveform

Shock pain has limited the acceptance of the implantable atrial cardioverter and is a complication of ventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Rounding off of the peak of a shock waveform reduces pain. Whether the pain reduction results from reduction in the peak voltage or from t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart rhythm 2005-07, Vol.2 (7), p.708-713
Hauptverfasser: Boriani, Giuseppe, Biffi, Mauro, Silvestri, Paolo, Martignani, Cristian, Valzania, Cinzia, Diemberger, Igor, Moulder, Chris, Mouchawar, Gabriel, Kroll, Mark, Branzi, Angelo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 713
container_issue 7
container_start_page 708
container_title Heart rhythm
container_volume 2
creator Boriani, Giuseppe
Biffi, Mauro
Silvestri, Paolo
Martignani, Cristian
Valzania, Cinzia
Diemberger, Igor
Moulder, Chris
Mouchawar, Gabriel
Kroll, Mark
Branzi, Angelo
description Shock pain has limited the acceptance of the implantable atrial cardioverter and is a complication of ventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Rounding off of the peak of a shock waveform reduces pain. Whether the pain reduction results from reduction in the peak voltage or from the rounding has not been established. In other words, does reducing the extreme dV/dt (voltage derivative) of the conventional truncated exponential capacitive discharge waveform reduce pain? The purpose of this study was to compare the relative contributions of peak voltage and waveform shape to pain. We compared rounded and conventional waveforms with equal peak voltages. Eighty-five shocks of 50 to 500 V were delivered to 10 patients requiring atrial cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation. The patient touched an analog pain scale (0–15 cm) and orally reported a pain score on a scale from 0 to 5. An observer scored thoracic contractions on a scale from 0 to 5. No differences between the rounded and conventional waveform on any scale were noted for either univariate or multivariate analyses. However, all three response scales were strongly predicted by voltage with r 2 = 0.77 (oral), r 2 = 0.86 (analog), and r 2 = 0.85 (contraction) after correcting for patient variability and including a log voltage term. Patient pain perception was determined primarily by waveform peak voltage and not by the rounding, per se.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.03.024
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67992119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1547527105014463</els_id><sourcerecordid>67992119</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-8bf5a9d92c4f4d28f53b66884a0fccd9cbc999d696e30c6cf00e03d9a61606453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE-L1jAQh4Mo7rr6CQTJyVvrpGnSRvAgi7oLK4LoOaTJhOa1bV6TdJf109v3D3jzNMPw_GaSh5DXDGoGTL7b1WMq41w3AKIGXkPTPiGXTAhZ8b5jTw9921Wi6dgFeZHzDqBREvhzcsGEUk3XyEuSvqIdzRLynGn0dG_CQk3O0QZT0NGHUEYaloJpMRN16MOQwjSZEuJC8xjtr_yefse8TuWYNzSZxcU5_NnCuazu8TA9gvTB3KOPaX5JnnkzZXx1rlfk5-dPP65vqrtvX26vP95VlouuVP3ghVFONbb1rWt6L_ggZd-3Bry1TtnBKqWcVBI5WGk9AAJ3ykgmQbaCX5G3p737FH-vmIueQ7a4vX7BuGYtu00CY2oD-Qm0Keac0Ot9CrNJj5qBPqjWO31UrQ-qNXC9qd5Sb87r12FG9y9zdrsBH04Abp-8D5h0tgEXiy4ktEW7GP574C9E0JNH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67992119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mechanisms of pain associated with internal defibrillation shocks: Results of a randomized study of shock waveform</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Boriani, Giuseppe ; Biffi, Mauro ; Silvestri, Paolo ; Martignani, Cristian ; Valzania, Cinzia ; Diemberger, Igor ; Moulder, Chris ; Mouchawar, Gabriel ; Kroll, Mark ; Branzi, Angelo</creator><creatorcontrib>Boriani, Giuseppe ; Biffi, Mauro ; Silvestri, Paolo ; Martignani, Cristian ; Valzania, Cinzia ; Diemberger, Igor ; Moulder, Chris ; Mouchawar, Gabriel ; Kroll, Mark ; Branzi, Angelo</creatorcontrib><description>Shock pain has limited the acceptance of the implantable atrial cardioverter and is a complication of ventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Rounding off of the peak of a shock waveform reduces pain. Whether the pain reduction results from reduction in the peak voltage or from the rounding has not been established. In other words, does reducing the extreme dV/dt (voltage derivative) of the conventional truncated exponential capacitive discharge waveform reduce pain? The purpose of this study was to compare the relative contributions of peak voltage and waveform shape to pain. We compared rounded and conventional waveforms with equal peak voltages. Eighty-five shocks of 50 to 500 V were delivered to 10 patients requiring atrial cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation. The patient touched an analog pain scale (0–15 cm) and orally reported a pain score on a scale from 0 to 5. An observer scored thoracic contractions on a scale from 0 to 5. No differences between the rounded and conventional waveform on any scale were noted for either univariate or multivariate analyses. However, all three response scales were strongly predicted by voltage with r 2 = 0.77 (oral), r 2 = 0.86 (analog), and r 2 = 0.85 (contraction) after correcting for patient variability and including a log voltage term. Patient pain perception was determined primarily by waveform peak voltage and not by the rounding, per se.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1547-5271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-3871</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.03.024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15992726</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Atrial fibrillation ; Atrial Fibrillation - therapy ; Defibrillation ; Defibrillators, Implantable ; Electric Capacitance ; Electric Countershock - adverse effects ; Electric Countershock - methods ; Humans ; Internal cardioversion ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain ; Pain - etiology ; Pain - physiopathology ; Pain - prevention &amp; control ; Pain Measurement ; Prospective Studies ; Waveform</subject><ispartof>Heart rhythm, 2005-07, Vol.2 (7), p.708-713</ispartof><rights>2005 Heart Rhythm Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-8bf5a9d92c4f4d28f53b66884a0fccd9cbc999d696e30c6cf00e03d9a61606453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-8bf5a9d92c4f4d28f53b66884a0fccd9cbc999d696e30c6cf00e03d9a61606453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.03.024$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27926,27927,45997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15992726$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boriani, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biffi, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvestri, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martignani, Cristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valzania, Cinzia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diemberger, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moulder, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mouchawar, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroll, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branzi, Angelo</creatorcontrib><title>Mechanisms of pain associated with internal defibrillation shocks: Results of a randomized study of shock waveform</title><title>Heart rhythm</title><addtitle>Heart Rhythm</addtitle><description>Shock pain has limited the acceptance of the implantable atrial cardioverter and is a complication of ventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Rounding off of the peak of a shock waveform reduces pain. Whether the pain reduction results from reduction in the peak voltage or from the rounding has not been established. In other words, does reducing the extreme dV/dt (voltage derivative) of the conventional truncated exponential capacitive discharge waveform reduce pain? The purpose of this study was to compare the relative contributions of peak voltage and waveform shape to pain. We compared rounded and conventional waveforms with equal peak voltages. Eighty-five shocks of 50 to 500 V were delivered to 10 patients requiring atrial cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation. The patient touched an analog pain scale (0–15 cm) and orally reported a pain score on a scale from 0 to 5. An observer scored thoracic contractions on a scale from 0 to 5. No differences between the rounded and conventional waveform on any scale were noted for either univariate or multivariate analyses. However, all three response scales were strongly predicted by voltage with r 2 = 0.77 (oral), r 2 = 0.86 (analog), and r 2 = 0.85 (contraction) after correcting for patient variability and including a log voltage term. Patient pain perception was determined primarily by waveform peak voltage and not by the rounding, per se.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Atrial fibrillation</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - therapy</subject><subject>Defibrillation</subject><subject>Defibrillators, Implantable</subject><subject>Electric Capacitance</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - adverse effects</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal cardioversion</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pain - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Waveform</subject><issn>1547-5271</issn><issn>1556-3871</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE-L1jAQh4Mo7rr6CQTJyVvrpGnSRvAgi7oLK4LoOaTJhOa1bV6TdJf109v3D3jzNMPw_GaSh5DXDGoGTL7b1WMq41w3AKIGXkPTPiGXTAhZ8b5jTw9921Wi6dgFeZHzDqBREvhzcsGEUk3XyEuSvqIdzRLynGn0dG_CQk3O0QZT0NGHUEYaloJpMRN16MOQwjSZEuJC8xjtr_yefse8TuWYNzSZxcU5_NnCuazu8TA9gvTB3KOPaX5JnnkzZXx1rlfk5-dPP65vqrtvX26vP95VlouuVP3ghVFONbb1rWt6L_ggZd-3Bry1TtnBKqWcVBI5WGk9AAJ3ykgmQbaCX5G3p737FH-vmIueQ7a4vX7BuGYtu00CY2oD-Qm0Keac0Ot9CrNJj5qBPqjWO31UrQ-qNXC9qd5Sb87r12FG9y9zdrsBH04Abp-8D5h0tgEXiy4ktEW7GP574C9E0JNH</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>Boriani, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Biffi, Mauro</creator><creator>Silvestri, Paolo</creator><creator>Martignani, Cristian</creator><creator>Valzania, Cinzia</creator><creator>Diemberger, Igor</creator><creator>Moulder, Chris</creator><creator>Mouchawar, Gabriel</creator><creator>Kroll, Mark</creator><creator>Branzi, Angelo</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>Mechanisms of pain associated with internal defibrillation shocks: Results of a randomized study of shock waveform</title><author>Boriani, Giuseppe ; Biffi, Mauro ; Silvestri, Paolo ; Martignani, Cristian ; Valzania, Cinzia ; Diemberger, Igor ; Moulder, Chris ; Mouchawar, Gabriel ; Kroll, Mark ; Branzi, Angelo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-8bf5a9d92c4f4d28f53b66884a0fccd9cbc999d696e30c6cf00e03d9a61606453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Atrial fibrillation</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - therapy</topic><topic>Defibrillation</topic><topic>Defibrillators, Implantable</topic><topic>Electric Capacitance</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - adverse effects</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal cardioversion</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pain - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Waveform</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boriani, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biffi, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silvestri, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martignani, Cristian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valzania, Cinzia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diemberger, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moulder, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mouchawar, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroll, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branzi, Angelo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Heart rhythm</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boriani, Giuseppe</au><au>Biffi, Mauro</au><au>Silvestri, Paolo</au><au>Martignani, Cristian</au><au>Valzania, Cinzia</au><au>Diemberger, Igor</au><au>Moulder, Chris</au><au>Mouchawar, Gabriel</au><au>Kroll, Mark</au><au>Branzi, Angelo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mechanisms of pain associated with internal defibrillation shocks: Results of a randomized study of shock waveform</atitle><jtitle>Heart rhythm</jtitle><addtitle>Heart Rhythm</addtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>708</spage><epage>713</epage><pages>708-713</pages><issn>1547-5271</issn><eissn>1556-3871</eissn><abstract>Shock pain has limited the acceptance of the implantable atrial cardioverter and is a complication of ventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Rounding off of the peak of a shock waveform reduces pain. Whether the pain reduction results from reduction in the peak voltage or from the rounding has not been established. In other words, does reducing the extreme dV/dt (voltage derivative) of the conventional truncated exponential capacitive discharge waveform reduce pain? The purpose of this study was to compare the relative contributions of peak voltage and waveform shape to pain. We compared rounded and conventional waveforms with equal peak voltages. Eighty-five shocks of 50 to 500 V were delivered to 10 patients requiring atrial cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation. The patient touched an analog pain scale (0–15 cm) and orally reported a pain score on a scale from 0 to 5. An observer scored thoracic contractions on a scale from 0 to 5. No differences between the rounded and conventional waveform on any scale were noted for either univariate or multivariate analyses. However, all three response scales were strongly predicted by voltage with r 2 = 0.77 (oral), r 2 = 0.86 (analog), and r 2 = 0.85 (contraction) after correcting for patient variability and including a log voltage term. Patient pain perception was determined primarily by waveform peak voltage and not by the rounding, per se.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15992726</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.03.024</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1547-5271
ispartof Heart rhythm, 2005-07, Vol.2 (7), p.708-713
issn 1547-5271
1556-3871
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67992119
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Aged
Atrial fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation - therapy
Defibrillation
Defibrillators, Implantable
Electric Capacitance
Electric Countershock - adverse effects
Electric Countershock - methods
Humans
Internal cardioversion
Male
Middle Aged
Pain
Pain - etiology
Pain - physiopathology
Pain - prevention & control
Pain Measurement
Prospective Studies
Waveform
title Mechanisms of pain associated with internal defibrillation shocks: Results of a randomized study of shock waveform
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T08%3A07%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mechanisms%20of%20pain%20associated%20with%20internal%20defibrillation%20shocks:%20Results%20of%20a%20randomized%20study%20of%20shock%20waveform&rft.jtitle=Heart%20rhythm&rft.au=Boriani,%20Giuseppe&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=708&rft.epage=713&rft.pages=708-713&rft.issn=1547-5271&rft.eissn=1556-3871&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.03.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67992119%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67992119&rft_id=info:pmid/15992726&rft_els_id=S1547527105014463&rfr_iscdi=true