A laboratory investigation of the effectiveness of various skin and surface decontaminants for aliphatic polyisocyanates

Isocyanates may cause contact dermatitis and respiratory sensitization leading to asthma. Dermal exposure to aliphatic isocyanates in auto body shops is very common. However, little is known about the effectiveness of available commercial products used for decontaminating aliphatic polyisocyanates....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental monitoring 2005-07, Vol.7 (7), p.716-716
Hauptverfasser: Bello, Dhimiter, Woskie, Susan R, Streicher, Robert P, Stowe, Meredith H, Sparer, Judy, Redlich, Carrie A, Cullen, Mark R, Liu, Youcheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 716
container_issue 7
container_start_page 716
container_title Journal of environmental monitoring
container_volume 7
creator Bello, Dhimiter
Woskie, Susan R
Streicher, Robert P
Stowe, Meredith H
Sparer, Judy
Redlich, Carrie A
Cullen, Mark R
Liu, Youcheng
description Isocyanates may cause contact dermatitis and respiratory sensitization leading to asthma. Dermal exposure to aliphatic isocyanates in auto body shops is very common. However, little is known about the effectiveness of available commercial products used for decontaminating aliphatic polyisocyanates. This experimental study evaluated the decontamination effectiveness of aliphatic polyisocyanates for several skin and surface decontaminants available for use in the auto body industry. The efficiency of two major decontamination mechanisms, namely (i) consumption of free isocyanate groups via chemical reactions with active hydrogen components of the decontaminant and (ii) physical removal processes such as dissolution were studied separately for each decontaminant. Considerable differences were observed among surface decontaminants in their rate of isocyanate consumption, of which those containing free amine groups performed the best. Overall, Pine-Sol(R) MEA containing monoethanolamine was the most efficient surface decontaminant, operating primarily via chemical reaction with the isocyanate group. Polypropylene glycol (PPG) had the highest physical removal efficiency and the lowest reaction rate with isocyanates. All tested skin decontaminants performed similarly, accomplishing decontamination primarily via physical processes and removing 70-80% of isocyanates in one wiping. Limitations of these skin decontaminants are discussed and alternatives presented. In vitro testing using animal skins and in vivo testing with field workers are being conducted to further assess the efficiency and identify related determinants.
doi_str_mv 10.1039/b503807c
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67986337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>14747095</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-ae127fef78c15bbfd88dd21d72806d8f7acd6ac3bb227d698144eab493eb1b8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtPGzEUhS1UBCEg9RdUXlVsUvyYGXuWKOJRCYkNrEfX9jWYTuzUdqLm3zMooV12dY-uPh3pnEPIV85-cCb7K9MyqZmyR2TGm65ZMCnll79atKfkrJQ3xphUTJyQU972umOtmJE_13QEkzLUlHc0xC2WGl6ghhRp8rS-IkXv0dawxYilfDy3kEPaFFp-hUghOlo22YNF6tCmWGEVIsRaqE-ZwhjWr5Odpes07kJJdgcRKpZzcuxhLHhxuHPyfHvztLxfPDze_VxePyys5KIuALlQHr3SlrfGeKe1c4I7JTTrnPYKrOvASmOEUK7rNW8aBNP0Eg032sk5-b73Xef0ezOlG1ahWBxHiDiFGDo1VSGl-i_IG9Uo1rcTeLkHbU6lZPTDOocV5N3A2fAxx_A5x4R-O3huzArdP_DQv3wHGlaIwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14747095</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A laboratory investigation of the effectiveness of various skin and surface decontaminants for aliphatic polyisocyanates</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Royal Society of Chemistry Journals Archive (1841-2007)</source><source>Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-</source><creator>Bello, Dhimiter ; Woskie, Susan R ; Streicher, Robert P ; Stowe, Meredith H ; Sparer, Judy ; Redlich, Carrie A ; Cullen, Mark R ; Liu, Youcheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Bello, Dhimiter ; Woskie, Susan R ; Streicher, Robert P ; Stowe, Meredith H ; Sparer, Judy ; Redlich, Carrie A ; Cullen, Mark R ; Liu, Youcheng</creatorcontrib><description>Isocyanates may cause contact dermatitis and respiratory sensitization leading to asthma. Dermal exposure to aliphatic isocyanates in auto body shops is very common. However, little is known about the effectiveness of available commercial products used for decontaminating aliphatic polyisocyanates. This experimental study evaluated the decontamination effectiveness of aliphatic polyisocyanates for several skin and surface decontaminants available for use in the auto body industry. The efficiency of two major decontamination mechanisms, namely (i) consumption of free isocyanate groups via chemical reactions with active hydrogen components of the decontaminant and (ii) physical removal processes such as dissolution were studied separately for each decontaminant. Considerable differences were observed among surface decontaminants in their rate of isocyanate consumption, of which those containing free amine groups performed the best. Overall, Pine-Sol(R) MEA containing monoethanolamine was the most efficient surface decontaminant, operating primarily via chemical reaction with the isocyanate group. Polypropylene glycol (PPG) had the highest physical removal efficiency and the lowest reaction rate with isocyanates. All tested skin decontaminants performed similarly, accomplishing decontamination primarily via physical processes and removing 70-80% of isocyanates in one wiping. Limitations of these skin decontaminants are discussed and alternatives presented. In vitro testing using animal skins and in vivo testing with field workers are being conducted to further assess the efficiency and identify related determinants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-0325</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0333</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/b503807c</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15986052</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Automobiles ; Decontamination ; Detergents ; Ethanolamine - chemistry ; Humans ; Isocyanates ; Polymers ; Propylene Glycols ; Skin ; Triazines</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental monitoring, 2005-07, Vol.7 (7), p.716-716</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-ae127fef78c15bbfd88dd21d72806d8f7acd6ac3bb227d698144eab493eb1b8d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-ae127fef78c15bbfd88dd21d72806d8f7acd6ac3bb227d698144eab493eb1b8d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2817,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15986052$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bello, Dhimiter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woskie, Susan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streicher, Robert P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stowe, Meredith H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sparer, Judy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redlich, Carrie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullen, Mark R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Youcheng</creatorcontrib><title>A laboratory investigation of the effectiveness of various skin and surface decontaminants for aliphatic polyisocyanates</title><title>Journal of environmental monitoring</title><addtitle>J Environ Monit</addtitle><description>Isocyanates may cause contact dermatitis and respiratory sensitization leading to asthma. Dermal exposure to aliphatic isocyanates in auto body shops is very common. However, little is known about the effectiveness of available commercial products used for decontaminating aliphatic polyisocyanates. This experimental study evaluated the decontamination effectiveness of aliphatic polyisocyanates for several skin and surface decontaminants available for use in the auto body industry. The efficiency of two major decontamination mechanisms, namely (i) consumption of free isocyanate groups via chemical reactions with active hydrogen components of the decontaminant and (ii) physical removal processes such as dissolution were studied separately for each decontaminant. Considerable differences were observed among surface decontaminants in their rate of isocyanate consumption, of which those containing free amine groups performed the best. Overall, Pine-Sol(R) MEA containing monoethanolamine was the most efficient surface decontaminant, operating primarily via chemical reaction with the isocyanate group. Polypropylene glycol (PPG) had the highest physical removal efficiency and the lowest reaction rate with isocyanates. All tested skin decontaminants performed similarly, accomplishing decontamination primarily via physical processes and removing 70-80% of isocyanates in one wiping. Limitations of these skin decontaminants are discussed and alternatives presented. In vitro testing using animal skins and in vivo testing with field workers are being conducted to further assess the efficiency and identify related determinants.</description><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Decontamination</subject><subject>Detergents</subject><subject>Ethanolamine - chemistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isocyanates</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Propylene Glycols</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Triazines</subject><issn>1464-0325</issn><issn>1464-0333</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtPGzEUhS1UBCEg9RdUXlVsUvyYGXuWKOJRCYkNrEfX9jWYTuzUdqLm3zMooV12dY-uPh3pnEPIV85-cCb7K9MyqZmyR2TGm65ZMCnll79atKfkrJQ3xphUTJyQU972umOtmJE_13QEkzLUlHc0xC2WGl6ghhRp8rS-IkXv0dawxYilfDy3kEPaFFp-hUghOlo22YNF6tCmWGEVIsRaqE-ZwhjWr5Odpes07kJJdgcRKpZzcuxhLHhxuHPyfHvztLxfPDze_VxePyys5KIuALlQHr3SlrfGeKe1c4I7JTTrnPYKrOvASmOEUK7rNW8aBNP0Eg032sk5-b73Xef0ezOlG1ahWBxHiDiFGDo1VSGl-i_IG9Uo1rcTeLkHbU6lZPTDOocV5N3A2fAxx_A5x4R-O3huzArdP_DQv3wHGlaIwA</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>Bello, Dhimiter</creator><creator>Woskie, Susan R</creator><creator>Streicher, Robert P</creator><creator>Stowe, Meredith H</creator><creator>Sparer, Judy</creator><creator>Redlich, Carrie A</creator><creator>Cullen, Mark R</creator><creator>Liu, Youcheng</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>A laboratory investigation of the effectiveness of various skin and surface decontaminants for aliphatic polyisocyanates</title><author>Bello, Dhimiter ; Woskie, Susan R ; Streicher, Robert P ; Stowe, Meredith H ; Sparer, Judy ; Redlich, Carrie A ; Cullen, Mark R ; Liu, Youcheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-ae127fef78c15bbfd88dd21d72806d8f7acd6ac3bb227d698144eab493eb1b8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Decontamination</topic><topic>Detergents</topic><topic>Ethanolamine - chemistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isocyanates</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Propylene Glycols</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Triazines</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bello, Dhimiter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woskie, Susan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streicher, Robert P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stowe, Meredith H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sparer, Judy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redlich, Carrie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullen, Mark R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Youcheng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental monitoring</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bello, Dhimiter</au><au>Woskie, Susan R</au><au>Streicher, Robert P</au><au>Stowe, Meredith H</au><au>Sparer, Judy</au><au>Redlich, Carrie A</au><au>Cullen, Mark R</au><au>Liu, Youcheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A laboratory investigation of the effectiveness of various skin and surface decontaminants for aliphatic polyisocyanates</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental monitoring</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Monit</addtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>716</spage><epage>716</epage><pages>716-716</pages><issn>1464-0325</issn><eissn>1464-0333</eissn><abstract>Isocyanates may cause contact dermatitis and respiratory sensitization leading to asthma. Dermal exposure to aliphatic isocyanates in auto body shops is very common. However, little is known about the effectiveness of available commercial products used for decontaminating aliphatic polyisocyanates. This experimental study evaluated the decontamination effectiveness of aliphatic polyisocyanates for several skin and surface decontaminants available for use in the auto body industry. The efficiency of two major decontamination mechanisms, namely (i) consumption of free isocyanate groups via chemical reactions with active hydrogen components of the decontaminant and (ii) physical removal processes such as dissolution were studied separately for each decontaminant. Considerable differences were observed among surface decontaminants in their rate of isocyanate consumption, of which those containing free amine groups performed the best. Overall, Pine-Sol(R) MEA containing monoethanolamine was the most efficient surface decontaminant, operating primarily via chemical reaction with the isocyanate group. Polypropylene glycol (PPG) had the highest physical removal efficiency and the lowest reaction rate with isocyanates. All tested skin decontaminants performed similarly, accomplishing decontamination primarily via physical processes and removing 70-80% of isocyanates in one wiping. Limitations of these skin decontaminants are discussed and alternatives presented. In vitro testing using animal skins and in vivo testing with field workers are being conducted to further assess the efficiency and identify related determinants.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>15986052</pmid><doi>10.1039/b503807c</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-0325
ispartof Journal of environmental monitoring, 2005-07, Vol.7 (7), p.716-716
issn 1464-0325
1464-0333
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67986337
source MEDLINE; Royal Society of Chemistry Journals Archive (1841-2007); Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-
subjects Automobiles
Decontamination
Detergents
Ethanolamine - chemistry
Humans
Isocyanates
Polymers
Propylene Glycols
Skin
Triazines
title A laboratory investigation of the effectiveness of various skin and surface decontaminants for aliphatic polyisocyanates
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T11%3A47%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20laboratory%20investigation%20of%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20various%20skin%20and%20surface%20decontaminants%20for%20aliphatic%20polyisocyanates&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20monitoring&rft.au=Bello,%20Dhimiter&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=716&rft.epage=716&rft.pages=716-716&rft.issn=1464-0325&rft.eissn=1464-0333&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/b503807c&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14747095%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14747095&rft_id=info:pmid/15986052&rfr_iscdi=true