Hybrid layer thickness and morphology: the influence of cavity preparation with Er:YAG laser

Dentinal surfaces prepared with Er:YAG laser have significantly different characteristics from those prepared with conventional instruments. Different hybrid layer morphologies and thicknesses occur, which may result in differences in the quality of restorations placed on dentinal surfaces prepared...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Operative dentistry 2005-05, Vol.30 (3), p.304-310
Hauptverfasser: Barceleiro, Marcos de Oliveira, de Mello, Jose Benedicto, de Mello, Guilherme Scarpel, Dias, Kátia Regina Hostílio Cervantes, de Miranda, Mauro Sayão, Sampaio Filho, Helio Rodrigues
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 310
container_issue 3
container_start_page 304
container_title Operative dentistry
container_volume 30
creator Barceleiro, Marcos de Oliveira
de Mello, Jose Benedicto
de Mello, Guilherme Scarpel
Dias, Kátia Regina Hostílio Cervantes
de Miranda, Mauro Sayão
Sampaio Filho, Helio Rodrigues
description Dentinal surfaces prepared with Er:YAG laser have significantly different characteristics from those prepared with conventional instruments. Different hybrid layer morphologies and thicknesses occur, which may result in differences in the quality of restorations placed on dentinal surfaces prepared with a diamond bur when compared with using an Er:YAG Laser. This study compared the hybrid layer thickness and morphology formed utilizing Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (SBMP) on dentin prepared with a diamond bur in a high speed handpiece and dentin prepared with an Er:YAG laser. Flat dentin surfaces obtained from five human teeth were treated with the two methods and then with the dentin adhesive system according to the manufacturer's instructions. After a layer of composite was applied, the specimens were sectioned, flattened, polished and prepared for SEM observation. Ten different measurements of hybrid layer thickness were obtained along the bonded surface in each specimen. Results showed that SBMP produced a 3.43 +/- 0.75 microm hybrid layer in dentin prepared with a diamond bur. This hybrid layer was regular and constantly found. In the laser group, the dentin adhesive system produced a 1.54 +/- 0.35 microm hybrid layer that was very irregular and not found constantly. Statistical analysis of variance (p < 0.05) showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the groups. These data indicate that the Er:YAG laser, with parameters used in the experiment, is not a preparation method that allows for a thick hybrid layer formation, which is in opposition to using a diamond bur in a high speed turbine.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67984441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67984441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p209t-692503816c63f1b1ba693da844e8d078f3069dcdfa8682f698a8613f9b5e7f113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMFLwzAchXNQ3Jz-C5KTt0LSpGmy2xhzGwy86EEQStr8YqNtU5NW6X9vxXl6D97Hd3gXaEmYoEmeM75A1zG-E8IznmVXaEEzJYXiaoleD1MZnMGNniDgoXbVRwcxYt0Z3PrQ177xb9N6XgC7zjYjdBVgb3Glv9ww4T5Ar4MenO_wtxtqvAvrl81-9kUIN-jS6ibC7TlX6Plh97Q9JKfH_XG7OSV9StSQCJVmhEkqKsEsLWmphWJGS85BGpJLy4hQpjJWSyFTK5ScC2VWlRnkllK2Qvd_3j74zxHiULQuVtA0ugM_xkLkapbxX_DuDI5lC6bog2t1mIr_P9gPkWRbhg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67984441</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hybrid layer thickness and morphology: the influence of cavity preparation with Er:YAG laser</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Barceleiro, Marcos de Oliveira ; de Mello, Jose Benedicto ; de Mello, Guilherme Scarpel ; Dias, Kátia Regina Hostílio Cervantes ; de Miranda, Mauro Sayão ; Sampaio Filho, Helio Rodrigues</creator><creatorcontrib>Barceleiro, Marcos de Oliveira ; de Mello, Jose Benedicto ; de Mello, Guilherme Scarpel ; Dias, Kátia Regina Hostílio Cervantes ; de Miranda, Mauro Sayão ; Sampaio Filho, Helio Rodrigues</creatorcontrib><description>Dentinal surfaces prepared with Er:YAG laser have significantly different characteristics from those prepared with conventional instruments. Different hybrid layer morphologies and thicknesses occur, which may result in differences in the quality of restorations placed on dentinal surfaces prepared with a diamond bur when compared with using an Er:YAG Laser. This study compared the hybrid layer thickness and morphology formed utilizing Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (SBMP) on dentin prepared with a diamond bur in a high speed handpiece and dentin prepared with an Er:YAG laser. Flat dentin surfaces obtained from five human teeth were treated with the two methods and then with the dentin adhesive system according to the manufacturer's instructions. After a layer of composite was applied, the specimens were sectioned, flattened, polished and prepared for SEM observation. Ten different measurements of hybrid layer thickness were obtained along the bonded surface in each specimen. Results showed that SBMP produced a 3.43 +/- 0.75 microm hybrid layer in dentin prepared with a diamond bur. This hybrid layer was regular and constantly found. In the laser group, the dentin adhesive system produced a 1.54 +/- 0.35 microm hybrid layer that was very irregular and not found constantly. Statistical analysis of variance (p &lt; 0.05) showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the groups. These data indicate that the Er:YAG laser, with parameters used in the experiment, is not a preparation method that allows for a thick hybrid layer formation, which is in opposition to using a diamond bur in a high speed turbine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-7734</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15986949</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Dental Cavity Preparation - methods ; Dental High-Speed Equipment ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Lasers ; Molar - chemistry ; Resin Cements - chemistry ; Smear Layer</subject><ispartof>Operative dentistry, 2005-05, Vol.30 (3), p.304-310</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15986949$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barceleiro, Marcos de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Mello, Jose Benedicto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Mello, Guilherme Scarpel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, Kátia Regina Hostílio Cervantes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Miranda, Mauro Sayão</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampaio Filho, Helio Rodrigues</creatorcontrib><title>Hybrid layer thickness and morphology: the influence of cavity preparation with Er:YAG laser</title><title>Operative dentistry</title><addtitle>Oper Dent</addtitle><description>Dentinal surfaces prepared with Er:YAG laser have significantly different characteristics from those prepared with conventional instruments. Different hybrid layer morphologies and thicknesses occur, which may result in differences in the quality of restorations placed on dentinal surfaces prepared with a diamond bur when compared with using an Er:YAG Laser. This study compared the hybrid layer thickness and morphology formed utilizing Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (SBMP) on dentin prepared with a diamond bur in a high speed handpiece and dentin prepared with an Er:YAG laser. Flat dentin surfaces obtained from five human teeth were treated with the two methods and then with the dentin adhesive system according to the manufacturer's instructions. After a layer of composite was applied, the specimens were sectioned, flattened, polished and prepared for SEM observation. Ten different measurements of hybrid layer thickness were obtained along the bonded surface in each specimen. Results showed that SBMP produced a 3.43 +/- 0.75 microm hybrid layer in dentin prepared with a diamond bur. This hybrid layer was regular and constantly found. In the laser group, the dentin adhesive system produced a 1.54 +/- 0.35 microm hybrid layer that was very irregular and not found constantly. Statistical analysis of variance (p &lt; 0.05) showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the groups. These data indicate that the Er:YAG laser, with parameters used in the experiment, is not a preparation method that allows for a thick hybrid layer formation, which is in opposition to using a diamond bur in a high speed turbine.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Dental Cavity Preparation - methods</subject><subject>Dental High-Speed Equipment</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Molar - chemistry</subject><subject>Resin Cements - chemistry</subject><subject>Smear Layer</subject><issn>0361-7734</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kMFLwzAchXNQ3Jz-C5KTt0LSpGmy2xhzGwy86EEQStr8YqNtU5NW6X9vxXl6D97Hd3gXaEmYoEmeM75A1zG-E8IznmVXaEEzJYXiaoleD1MZnMGNniDgoXbVRwcxYt0Z3PrQ177xb9N6XgC7zjYjdBVgb3Glv9ww4T5Ar4MenO_wtxtqvAvrl81-9kUIN-jS6ibC7TlX6Plh97Q9JKfH_XG7OSV9StSQCJVmhEkqKsEsLWmphWJGS85BGpJLy4hQpjJWSyFTK5ScC2VWlRnkllK2Qvd_3j74zxHiULQuVtA0ugM_xkLkapbxX_DuDI5lC6bog2t1mIr_P9gPkWRbhg</recordid><startdate>200505</startdate><enddate>200505</enddate><creator>Barceleiro, Marcos de Oliveira</creator><creator>de Mello, Jose Benedicto</creator><creator>de Mello, Guilherme Scarpel</creator><creator>Dias, Kátia Regina Hostílio Cervantes</creator><creator>de Miranda, Mauro Sayão</creator><creator>Sampaio Filho, Helio Rodrigues</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200505</creationdate><title>Hybrid layer thickness and morphology: the influence of cavity preparation with Er:YAG laser</title><author>Barceleiro, Marcos de Oliveira ; de Mello, Jose Benedicto ; de Mello, Guilherme Scarpel ; Dias, Kátia Regina Hostílio Cervantes ; de Miranda, Mauro Sayão ; Sampaio Filho, Helio Rodrigues</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p209t-692503816c63f1b1ba693da844e8d078f3069dcdfa8682f698a8613f9b5e7f113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Dental Cavity Preparation - methods</topic><topic>Dental High-Speed Equipment</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Molar - chemistry</topic><topic>Resin Cements - chemistry</topic><topic>Smear Layer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barceleiro, Marcos de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Mello, Jose Benedicto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Mello, Guilherme Scarpel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, Kátia Regina Hostílio Cervantes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Miranda, Mauro Sayão</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampaio Filho, Helio Rodrigues</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Operative dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barceleiro, Marcos de Oliveira</au><au>de Mello, Jose Benedicto</au><au>de Mello, Guilherme Scarpel</au><au>Dias, Kátia Regina Hostílio Cervantes</au><au>de Miranda, Mauro Sayão</au><au>Sampaio Filho, Helio Rodrigues</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hybrid layer thickness and morphology: the influence of cavity preparation with Er:YAG laser</atitle><jtitle>Operative dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Oper Dent</addtitle><date>2005-05</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>304</spage><epage>310</epage><pages>304-310</pages><issn>0361-7734</issn><abstract>Dentinal surfaces prepared with Er:YAG laser have significantly different characteristics from those prepared with conventional instruments. Different hybrid layer morphologies and thicknesses occur, which may result in differences in the quality of restorations placed on dentinal surfaces prepared with a diamond bur when compared with using an Er:YAG Laser. This study compared the hybrid layer thickness and morphology formed utilizing Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (SBMP) on dentin prepared with a diamond bur in a high speed handpiece and dentin prepared with an Er:YAG laser. Flat dentin surfaces obtained from five human teeth were treated with the two methods and then with the dentin adhesive system according to the manufacturer's instructions. After a layer of composite was applied, the specimens were sectioned, flattened, polished and prepared for SEM observation. Ten different measurements of hybrid layer thickness were obtained along the bonded surface in each specimen. Results showed that SBMP produced a 3.43 +/- 0.75 microm hybrid layer in dentin prepared with a diamond bur. This hybrid layer was regular and constantly found. In the laser group, the dentin adhesive system produced a 1.54 +/- 0.35 microm hybrid layer that was very irregular and not found constantly. Statistical analysis of variance (p &lt; 0.05) showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the groups. These data indicate that the Er:YAG laser, with parameters used in the experiment, is not a preparation method that allows for a thick hybrid layer formation, which is in opposition to using a diamond bur in a high speed turbine.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>15986949</pmid><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-7734
ispartof Operative dentistry, 2005-05, Vol.30 (3), p.304-310
issn 0361-7734
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67984441
source MEDLINE; Allen Press Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Analysis of Variance
Dental Cavity Preparation - methods
Dental High-Speed Equipment
Dentistry
Humans
Lasers
Molar - chemistry
Resin Cements - chemistry
Smear Layer
title Hybrid layer thickness and morphology: the influence of cavity preparation with Er:YAG laser
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T01%3A52%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hybrid%20layer%20thickness%20and%20morphology:%20the%20influence%20of%20cavity%20preparation%20with%20Er:YAG%20laser&rft.jtitle=Operative%20dentistry&rft.au=Barceleiro,%20Marcos%20de%20Oliveira&rft.date=2005-05&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=304&rft.epage=310&rft.pages=304-310&rft.issn=0361-7734&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67984441%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67984441&rft_id=info:pmid/15986949&rfr_iscdi=true