Lasers for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: when is the fuss worth it?
In the recent past, several endoscopic procedures using laser technology have evolved for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The term "laser treatment of the prostate" comprises a variety of different application systems, different laser wavelengths, and different surgical tech...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current urology reports 2005-08, Vol.6 (4), p.257-262 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 262 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 257 |
container_title | Current urology reports |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Hochreiter, Werner W Müller, Roger M |
description | In the recent past, several endoscopic procedures using laser technology have evolved for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The term "laser treatment of the prostate" comprises a variety of different application systems, different laser wavelengths, and different surgical techniques to eliminate bladder outlet obstruction. The aim of laser prostatectomy is to be less invasive than transurethral electroresection, but equally effective. Promising short-term results led to a booming laser decade in the 1990s, stimulating the development of several devices. However, the emergence of medium-term data has shown that some of these techniques did not stand the test of time due to the lack of long-term efficacy, unacceptable morbidity, and high retreatment rates. Nevertheless, the results of transurethral resection of the prostate are challenged by some of the newer laser devices, putting the so-called "gold standard" into question. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11934-005-0018-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67977734</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67977734</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c214t-35a4cc4f70e797e6dab5f03f3909abc52c7312c93fe7ea12f6e6851f3bcdaa873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtLxDAQx4Morq5-AC-Sk7dqHm3TehFZfMGCFz2HNJ3YSl9mUpb99mbdBQ_DDPP4M_8fIVec3XLG1B1yXso0YSyLwYuEH5EznsVOLorseFcLlQgl1YKcI34zJhgr0lOy4FmpCiHSM9KvDYJH6kZPu3EDns6-HYzf0uCNDRS3_RTGHimCHYf6bzDSCob2a6CTHzGY0FrabCfwU2ewNfd008BAW6ShAepmRLoZfWhoGx4uyIkzHcLlIS_J5_PTx-o1Wb-_vK0e14kVPA2JzExqbeoUA1UqyGtTZY5JJ0tWmspmwirJhS2lAwWGC5dDXmTcycrWxhRKLsnNXjd--DMDBt23aKHrzADjjDqPskrJNC7y_aKNVtCD05Nv--hSc6Z3jPWesY6M9Y6x5vHm-iA-Vz3U_xcHqPIX3Sx57g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67977734</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lasers for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: when is the fuss worth it?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Hochreiter, Werner W ; Müller, Roger M</creator><creatorcontrib>Hochreiter, Werner W ; Müller, Roger M</creatorcontrib><description>In the recent past, several endoscopic procedures using laser technology have evolved for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The term "laser treatment of the prostate" comprises a variety of different application systems, different laser wavelengths, and different surgical techniques to eliminate bladder outlet obstruction. The aim of laser prostatectomy is to be less invasive than transurethral electroresection, but equally effective. Promising short-term results led to a booming laser decade in the 1990s, stimulating the development of several devices. However, the emergence of medium-term data has shown that some of these techniques did not stand the test of time due to the lack of long-term efficacy, unacceptable morbidity, and high retreatment rates. Nevertheless, the results of transurethral resection of the prostate are challenged by some of the newer laser devices, putting the so-called "gold standard" into question.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1527-2737</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-6285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11934-005-0018-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15978224</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Humans ; Laser Coagulation ; Laser Therapy ; Male ; Phosphates ; Prostate - surgery ; Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications ; Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery ; Titanium ; Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - etiology ; Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - surgery ; Urination Disorders - etiology ; Urination Disorders - surgery</subject><ispartof>Current urology reports, 2005-08, Vol.6 (4), p.257-262</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c214t-35a4cc4f70e797e6dab5f03f3909abc52c7312c93fe7ea12f6e6851f3bcdaa873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c214t-35a4cc4f70e797e6dab5f03f3909abc52c7312c93fe7ea12f6e6851f3bcdaa873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15978224$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hochreiter, Werner W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Roger M</creatorcontrib><title>Lasers for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: when is the fuss worth it?</title><title>Current urology reports</title><addtitle>Curr Urol Rep</addtitle><description>In the recent past, several endoscopic procedures using laser technology have evolved for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The term "laser treatment of the prostate" comprises a variety of different application systems, different laser wavelengths, and different surgical techniques to eliminate bladder outlet obstruction. The aim of laser prostatectomy is to be less invasive than transurethral electroresection, but equally effective. Promising short-term results led to a booming laser decade in the 1990s, stimulating the development of several devices. However, the emergence of medium-term data has shown that some of these techniques did not stand the test of time due to the lack of long-term efficacy, unacceptable morbidity, and high retreatment rates. Nevertheless, the results of transurethral resection of the prostate are challenged by some of the newer laser devices, putting the so-called "gold standard" into question.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laser Coagulation</subject><subject>Laser Therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Phosphates</subject><subject>Prostate - surgery</subject><subject>Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications</subject><subject>Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - etiology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - surgery</subject><subject>Urination Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Urination Disorders - surgery</subject><issn>1527-2737</issn><issn>1534-6285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEtLxDAQx4Morq5-AC-Sk7dqHm3TehFZfMGCFz2HNJ3YSl9mUpb99mbdBQ_DDPP4M_8fIVec3XLG1B1yXso0YSyLwYuEH5EznsVOLorseFcLlQgl1YKcI34zJhgr0lOy4FmpCiHSM9KvDYJH6kZPu3EDns6-HYzf0uCNDRS3_RTGHimCHYf6bzDSCob2a6CTHzGY0FrabCfwU2ewNfd008BAW6ShAepmRLoZfWhoGx4uyIkzHcLlIS_J5_PTx-o1Wb-_vK0e14kVPA2JzExqbeoUA1UqyGtTZY5JJ0tWmspmwirJhS2lAwWGC5dDXmTcycrWxhRKLsnNXjd--DMDBt23aKHrzADjjDqPskrJNC7y_aKNVtCD05Nv--hSc6Z3jPWesY6M9Y6x5vHm-iA-Vz3U_xcHqPIX3Sx57g</recordid><startdate>20050801</startdate><enddate>20050801</enddate><creator>Hochreiter, Werner W</creator><creator>Müller, Roger M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050801</creationdate><title>Lasers for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: when is the fuss worth it?</title><author>Hochreiter, Werner W ; Müller, Roger M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c214t-35a4cc4f70e797e6dab5f03f3909abc52c7312c93fe7ea12f6e6851f3bcdaa873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laser Coagulation</topic><topic>Laser Therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Phosphates</topic><topic>Prostate - surgery</topic><topic>Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications</topic><topic>Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - etiology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - surgery</topic><topic>Urination Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Urination Disorders - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hochreiter, Werner W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Roger M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current urology reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hochreiter, Werner W</au><au>Müller, Roger M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lasers for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: when is the fuss worth it?</atitle><jtitle>Current urology reports</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Urol Rep</addtitle><date>2005-08-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>257</spage><epage>262</epage><pages>257-262</pages><issn>1527-2737</issn><eissn>1534-6285</eissn><abstract>In the recent past, several endoscopic procedures using laser technology have evolved for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The term "laser treatment of the prostate" comprises a variety of different application systems, different laser wavelengths, and different surgical techniques to eliminate bladder outlet obstruction. The aim of laser prostatectomy is to be less invasive than transurethral electroresection, but equally effective. Promising short-term results led to a booming laser decade in the 1990s, stimulating the development of several devices. However, the emergence of medium-term data has shown that some of these techniques did not stand the test of time due to the lack of long-term efficacy, unacceptable morbidity, and high retreatment rates. Nevertheless, the results of transurethral resection of the prostate are challenged by some of the newer laser devices, putting the so-called "gold standard" into question.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>15978224</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11934-005-0018-1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1527-2737 |
ispartof | Current urology reports, 2005-08, Vol.6 (4), p.257-262 |
issn | 1527-2737 1534-6285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67977734 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Humans Laser Coagulation Laser Therapy Male Phosphates Prostate - surgery Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery Titanium Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - etiology Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - surgery Urination Disorders - etiology Urination Disorders - surgery |
title | Lasers for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: when is the fuss worth it? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T18%3A44%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lasers%20for%20lower%20urinary%20tract%20symptoms%20secondary%20to%20benign%20prostatic%20hyperplasia:%20when%20is%20the%20fuss%20worth%20it?&rft.jtitle=Current%20urology%20reports&rft.au=Hochreiter,%20Werner%20W&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=262&rft.pages=257-262&rft.issn=1527-2737&rft.eissn=1534-6285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11934-005-0018-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67977734%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67977734&rft_id=info:pmid/15978224&rfr_iscdi=true |