Lasers for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: when is the fuss worth it?

In the recent past, several endoscopic procedures using laser technology have evolved for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The term "laser treatment of the prostate" comprises a variety of different application systems, different laser wavelengths, and different surgical tech...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current urology reports 2005-08, Vol.6 (4), p.257-262
Hauptverfasser: Hochreiter, Werner W, Müller, Roger M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 262
container_issue 4
container_start_page 257
container_title Current urology reports
container_volume 6
creator Hochreiter, Werner W
Müller, Roger M
description In the recent past, several endoscopic procedures using laser technology have evolved for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The term "laser treatment of the prostate" comprises a variety of different application systems, different laser wavelengths, and different surgical techniques to eliminate bladder outlet obstruction. The aim of laser prostatectomy is to be less invasive than transurethral electroresection, but equally effective. Promising short-term results led to a booming laser decade in the 1990s, stimulating the development of several devices. However, the emergence of medium-term data has shown that some of these techniques did not stand the test of time due to the lack of long-term efficacy, unacceptable morbidity, and high retreatment rates. Nevertheless, the results of transurethral resection of the prostate are challenged by some of the newer laser devices, putting the so-called "gold standard" into question.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11934-005-0018-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67977734</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67977734</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c214t-35a4cc4f70e797e6dab5f03f3909abc52c7312c93fe7ea12f6e6851f3bcdaa873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtLxDAQx4Morq5-AC-Sk7dqHm3TehFZfMGCFz2HNJ3YSl9mUpb99mbdBQ_DDPP4M_8fIVec3XLG1B1yXso0YSyLwYuEH5EznsVOLorseFcLlQgl1YKcI34zJhgr0lOy4FmpCiHSM9KvDYJH6kZPu3EDns6-HYzf0uCNDRS3_RTGHimCHYf6bzDSCob2a6CTHzGY0FrabCfwU2ewNfd008BAW6ShAepmRLoZfWhoGx4uyIkzHcLlIS_J5_PTx-o1Wb-_vK0e14kVPA2JzExqbeoUA1UqyGtTZY5JJ0tWmspmwirJhS2lAwWGC5dDXmTcycrWxhRKLsnNXjd--DMDBt23aKHrzADjjDqPskrJNC7y_aKNVtCD05Nv--hSc6Z3jPWesY6M9Y6x5vHm-iA-Vz3U_xcHqPIX3Sx57g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67977734</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lasers for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: when is the fuss worth it?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Hochreiter, Werner W ; Müller, Roger M</creator><creatorcontrib>Hochreiter, Werner W ; Müller, Roger M</creatorcontrib><description>In the recent past, several endoscopic procedures using laser technology have evolved for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The term "laser treatment of the prostate" comprises a variety of different application systems, different laser wavelengths, and different surgical techniques to eliminate bladder outlet obstruction. The aim of laser prostatectomy is to be less invasive than transurethral electroresection, but equally effective. Promising short-term results led to a booming laser decade in the 1990s, stimulating the development of several devices. However, the emergence of medium-term data has shown that some of these techniques did not stand the test of time due to the lack of long-term efficacy, unacceptable morbidity, and high retreatment rates. Nevertheless, the results of transurethral resection of the prostate are challenged by some of the newer laser devices, putting the so-called "gold standard" into question.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1527-2737</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-6285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11934-005-0018-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15978224</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Humans ; Laser Coagulation ; Laser Therapy ; Male ; Phosphates ; Prostate - surgery ; Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications ; Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery ; Titanium ; Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - etiology ; Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - surgery ; Urination Disorders - etiology ; Urination Disorders - surgery</subject><ispartof>Current urology reports, 2005-08, Vol.6 (4), p.257-262</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c214t-35a4cc4f70e797e6dab5f03f3909abc52c7312c93fe7ea12f6e6851f3bcdaa873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c214t-35a4cc4f70e797e6dab5f03f3909abc52c7312c93fe7ea12f6e6851f3bcdaa873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15978224$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hochreiter, Werner W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Roger M</creatorcontrib><title>Lasers for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: when is the fuss worth it?</title><title>Current urology reports</title><addtitle>Curr Urol Rep</addtitle><description>In the recent past, several endoscopic procedures using laser technology have evolved for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The term "laser treatment of the prostate" comprises a variety of different application systems, different laser wavelengths, and different surgical techniques to eliminate bladder outlet obstruction. The aim of laser prostatectomy is to be less invasive than transurethral electroresection, but equally effective. Promising short-term results led to a booming laser decade in the 1990s, stimulating the development of several devices. However, the emergence of medium-term data has shown that some of these techniques did not stand the test of time due to the lack of long-term efficacy, unacceptable morbidity, and high retreatment rates. Nevertheless, the results of transurethral resection of the prostate are challenged by some of the newer laser devices, putting the so-called "gold standard" into question.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laser Coagulation</subject><subject>Laser Therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Phosphates</subject><subject>Prostate - surgery</subject><subject>Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications</subject><subject>Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - etiology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - surgery</subject><subject>Urination Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Urination Disorders - surgery</subject><issn>1527-2737</issn><issn>1534-6285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEtLxDAQx4Morq5-AC-Sk7dqHm3TehFZfMGCFz2HNJ3YSl9mUpb99mbdBQ_DDPP4M_8fIVec3XLG1B1yXso0YSyLwYuEH5EznsVOLorseFcLlQgl1YKcI34zJhgr0lOy4FmpCiHSM9KvDYJH6kZPu3EDns6-HYzf0uCNDRS3_RTGHimCHYf6bzDSCob2a6CTHzGY0FrabCfwU2ewNfd008BAW6ShAepmRLoZfWhoGx4uyIkzHcLlIS_J5_PTx-o1Wb-_vK0e14kVPA2JzExqbeoUA1UqyGtTZY5JJ0tWmspmwirJhS2lAwWGC5dDXmTcycrWxhRKLsnNXjd--DMDBt23aKHrzADjjDqPskrJNC7y_aKNVtCD05Nv--hSc6Z3jPWesY6M9Y6x5vHm-iA-Vz3U_xcHqPIX3Sx57g</recordid><startdate>20050801</startdate><enddate>20050801</enddate><creator>Hochreiter, Werner W</creator><creator>Müller, Roger M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050801</creationdate><title>Lasers for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: when is the fuss worth it?</title><author>Hochreiter, Werner W ; Müller, Roger M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c214t-35a4cc4f70e797e6dab5f03f3909abc52c7312c93fe7ea12f6e6851f3bcdaa873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laser Coagulation</topic><topic>Laser Therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Phosphates</topic><topic>Prostate - surgery</topic><topic>Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications</topic><topic>Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - etiology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - surgery</topic><topic>Urination Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Urination Disorders - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hochreiter, Werner W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Roger M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current urology reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hochreiter, Werner W</au><au>Müller, Roger M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lasers for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: when is the fuss worth it?</atitle><jtitle>Current urology reports</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Urol Rep</addtitle><date>2005-08-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>257</spage><epage>262</epage><pages>257-262</pages><issn>1527-2737</issn><eissn>1534-6285</eissn><abstract>In the recent past, several endoscopic procedures using laser technology have evolved for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The term "laser treatment of the prostate" comprises a variety of different application systems, different laser wavelengths, and different surgical techniques to eliminate bladder outlet obstruction. The aim of laser prostatectomy is to be less invasive than transurethral electroresection, but equally effective. Promising short-term results led to a booming laser decade in the 1990s, stimulating the development of several devices. However, the emergence of medium-term data has shown that some of these techniques did not stand the test of time due to the lack of long-term efficacy, unacceptable morbidity, and high retreatment rates. Nevertheless, the results of transurethral resection of the prostate are challenged by some of the newer laser devices, putting the so-called "gold standard" into question.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>15978224</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11934-005-0018-1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1527-2737
ispartof Current urology reports, 2005-08, Vol.6 (4), p.257-262
issn 1527-2737
1534-6285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67977734
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Humans
Laser Coagulation
Laser Therapy
Male
Phosphates
Prostate - surgery
Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications
Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery
Titanium
Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - etiology
Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction - surgery
Urination Disorders - etiology
Urination Disorders - surgery
title Lasers for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: when is the fuss worth it?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T18%3A44%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lasers%20for%20lower%20urinary%20tract%20symptoms%20secondary%20to%20benign%20prostatic%20hyperplasia:%20when%20is%20the%20fuss%20worth%20it?&rft.jtitle=Current%20urology%20reports&rft.au=Hochreiter,%20Werner%20W&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=262&rft.pages=257-262&rft.issn=1527-2737&rft.eissn=1534-6285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11934-005-0018-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67977734%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67977734&rft_id=info:pmid/15978224&rfr_iscdi=true