Songbird abundance and parasitism differ between urban and rural shrublands

Many studies have examined differences in avian community composition between urban and rural habitats, but few, if any, have looked at nesting success of urban shrubland birds in a replicated fashion while controlling for habitat. We tested factors affecting nest survival, parasitism by the Brown-h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological applications 2006-02, Vol.16 (1), p.394-405
Hauptverfasser: Burhans, Dirk E., Thompson, Frank R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 405
container_issue 1
container_start_page 394
container_title Ecological applications
container_volume 16
creator Burhans, Dirk E.
Thompson, Frank R.
description Many studies have examined differences in avian community composition between urban and rural habitats, but few, if any, have looked at nesting success of urban shrubland birds in a replicated fashion while controlling for habitat. We tested factors affecting nest survival, parasitism by the Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater), and species abundance in shrubland habitat in rural and urban landscapes. We found no support for our hypothesis that nest survival was lower in urban landscapes, but strong support for the hypothesis that survival increased with nest height. We found strong support for our hypothesis that cowbird parasitism was greater in urban than rural landscapes; parasitism in urban sites was at least twice that of rural sites. We found strong support for an urban landscape effect on abundance for several species; Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) and Brown-headed Cowbirds were more abundant in urban landscapes, whereas Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla) and Blue-winged Warbler (Vermivora pinus) were more abundant in rural sites. There was support for lower abundances of Blue-gray Gnatcatcher (Polioptila caerulea) and Indigo Bunting (Passerina cyanea) with increased housing density. For six other species, edge and trail density or vegetation parameters best explained abundance. Lower abundances and greater parasitism in habitat patches in urban landscapes are evidence that, for some species, these urban landscapes do not fulfill the same role as comparable habitats in rural landscapes. Regional bird conservation planning and local habitat management in urban landscapes may need to consider these effects in efforts to sustain bird populations at regional and local scales.
doi_str_mv 10.1890/04-0927
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67977428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40061807</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40061807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3994-2ccb9f4babbadec3adffb62df75c6228e967866d736518ee21f1ac1aacb5a0bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtP3TAQha2qVXm04hdAs2pXKTNO4scSIUqrIhWJsrbGLwjKTW7tGyH-Pb7NFayqzsZj-TtnxoexI4SvqDScQluD5vIN20fd6LrrFH9beuiwBilwjx3k_AClOOfv2R4KCZ1Wap_9vJnGO9snX5GdR0-jCxWNvlpTotxv-ryqfB9jSJUNm8cQxmpOlsa_TJoTDVW-T7Mdyj1_YO8iDTl83J2H7Pbbxe_z7_XVr8sf52dXtWu0bmvunNWxtWQt-eAa8jFawX2UnROcq6CFVEJ42YgOVQgcI5JDImc7AhubQ_Z58V2n6c8c8sas-uzCUJYI05yNkFrKlqv_gqi1VFxiAb8soEtTzilEs079itKTQTDbgA20ZhtwIU92lrNdBf_K7RItAF-Ax34IT__yMRdn1xxAoMBGt0V0vIge8mZKL6J2SyjYTv20vEeaDN2lPpvbGw7YAEL5bdnrGRZfl7M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19978271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Songbird abundance and parasitism differ between urban and rural shrublands</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Burhans, Dirk E. ; Thompson, Frank R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Burhans, Dirk E. ; Thompson, Frank R.</creatorcontrib><description>Many studies have examined differences in avian community composition between urban and rural habitats, but few, if any, have looked at nesting success of urban shrubland birds in a replicated fashion while controlling for habitat. We tested factors affecting nest survival, parasitism by the Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater), and species abundance in shrubland habitat in rural and urban landscapes. We found no support for our hypothesis that nest survival was lower in urban landscapes, but strong support for the hypothesis that survival increased with nest height. We found strong support for our hypothesis that cowbird parasitism was greater in urban than rural landscapes; parasitism in urban sites was at least twice that of rural sites. We found strong support for an urban landscape effect on abundance for several species; Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) and Brown-headed Cowbirds were more abundant in urban landscapes, whereas Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla) and Blue-winged Warbler (Vermivora pinus) were more abundant in rural sites. There was support for lower abundances of Blue-gray Gnatcatcher (Polioptila caerulea) and Indigo Bunting (Passerina cyanea) with increased housing density. For six other species, edge and trail density or vegetation parameters best explained abundance. Lower abundances and greater parasitism in habitat patches in urban landscapes are evidence that, for some species, these urban landscapes do not fulfill the same role as comparable habitats in rural landscapes. Regional bird conservation planning and local habitat management in urban landscapes may need to consider these effects in efforts to sustain bird populations at regional and local scales.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/04-0927</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16705988</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biodiversity ; Bird nesting ; Brood parasitism ; Brown-headed Cowbird ; Cardinalis cardinalis ; Cities ; Edge effects ; Environment ; Forest habitats ; Forestry ; Geography ; Habitat conservation ; landscape ; landscape ecology ; Landscapes ; Missouri ; Molothrus ; Molothrus ater ; Nematoda - classification ; Nematoda - physiology ; nest predation ; Nesting Behavior ; nesting success ; Passerina cyanea ; Phylogeny ; Polioptila caerulea ; population density ; Population Dynamics ; Predation ; Predatory Behavior ; rural areas ; shrubland ; Shrublands ; social parasitism ; Songbirds ; Songbirds - classification ; Songbirds - physiology ; Spizella ; Spizella pusilla ; urban ; urban areas ; Urban habitats ; Vermivora pinus ; wild birds</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2006-02, Vol.16 (1), p.394-405</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2006 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3994-2ccb9f4babbadec3adffb62df75c6228e967866d736518ee21f1ac1aacb5a0bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3994-2ccb9f4babbadec3adffb62df75c6228e967866d736518ee21f1ac1aacb5a0bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40061807$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40061807$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16705988$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burhans, Dirk E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Frank R.</creatorcontrib><title>Songbird abundance and parasitism differ between urban and rural shrublands</title><title>Ecological applications</title><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><description>Many studies have examined differences in avian community composition between urban and rural habitats, but few, if any, have looked at nesting success of urban shrubland birds in a replicated fashion while controlling for habitat. We tested factors affecting nest survival, parasitism by the Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater), and species abundance in shrubland habitat in rural and urban landscapes. We found no support for our hypothesis that nest survival was lower in urban landscapes, but strong support for the hypothesis that survival increased with nest height. We found strong support for our hypothesis that cowbird parasitism was greater in urban than rural landscapes; parasitism in urban sites was at least twice that of rural sites. We found strong support for an urban landscape effect on abundance for several species; Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) and Brown-headed Cowbirds were more abundant in urban landscapes, whereas Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla) and Blue-winged Warbler (Vermivora pinus) were more abundant in rural sites. There was support for lower abundances of Blue-gray Gnatcatcher (Polioptila caerulea) and Indigo Bunting (Passerina cyanea) with increased housing density. For six other species, edge and trail density or vegetation parameters best explained abundance. Lower abundances and greater parasitism in habitat patches in urban landscapes are evidence that, for some species, these urban landscapes do not fulfill the same role as comparable habitats in rural landscapes. Regional bird conservation planning and local habitat management in urban landscapes may need to consider these effects in efforts to sustain bird populations at regional and local scales.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Brood parasitism</subject><subject>Brown-headed Cowbird</subject><subject>Cardinalis cardinalis</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Edge effects</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>landscape</subject><subject>landscape ecology</subject><subject>Landscapes</subject><subject>Missouri</subject><subject>Molothrus</subject><subject>Molothrus ater</subject><subject>Nematoda - classification</subject><subject>Nematoda - physiology</subject><subject>nest predation</subject><subject>Nesting Behavior</subject><subject>nesting success</subject><subject>Passerina cyanea</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Polioptila caerulea</subject><subject>population density</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>rural areas</subject><subject>shrubland</subject><subject>Shrublands</subject><subject>social parasitism</subject><subject>Songbirds</subject><subject>Songbirds - classification</subject><subject>Songbirds - physiology</subject><subject>Spizella</subject><subject>Spizella pusilla</subject><subject>urban</subject><subject>urban areas</subject><subject>Urban habitats</subject><subject>Vermivora pinus</subject><subject>wild birds</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtP3TAQha2qVXm04hdAs2pXKTNO4scSIUqrIhWJsrbGLwjKTW7tGyH-Pb7NFayqzsZj-TtnxoexI4SvqDScQluD5vIN20fd6LrrFH9beuiwBilwjx3k_AClOOfv2R4KCZ1Wap_9vJnGO9snX5GdR0-jCxWNvlpTotxv-ryqfB9jSJUNm8cQxmpOlsa_TJoTDVW-T7Mdyj1_YO8iDTl83J2H7Pbbxe_z7_XVr8sf52dXtWu0bmvunNWxtWQt-eAa8jFawX2UnROcq6CFVEJ42YgOVQgcI5JDImc7AhubQ_Z58V2n6c8c8sas-uzCUJYI05yNkFrKlqv_gqi1VFxiAb8soEtTzilEs079itKTQTDbgA20ZhtwIU92lrNdBf_K7RItAF-Ax34IT__yMRdn1xxAoMBGt0V0vIge8mZKL6J2SyjYTv20vEeaDN2lPpvbGw7YAEL5bdnrGRZfl7M</recordid><startdate>200602</startdate><enddate>200602</enddate><creator>Burhans, Dirk E.</creator><creator>Thompson, Frank R.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200602</creationdate><title>Songbird abundance and parasitism differ between urban and rural shrublands</title><author>Burhans, Dirk E. ; Thompson, Frank R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3994-2ccb9f4babbadec3adffb62df75c6228e967866d736518ee21f1ac1aacb5a0bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Brood parasitism</topic><topic>Brown-headed Cowbird</topic><topic>Cardinalis cardinalis</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Edge effects</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>landscape</topic><topic>landscape ecology</topic><topic>Landscapes</topic><topic>Missouri</topic><topic>Molothrus</topic><topic>Molothrus ater</topic><topic>Nematoda - classification</topic><topic>Nematoda - physiology</topic><topic>nest predation</topic><topic>Nesting Behavior</topic><topic>nesting success</topic><topic>Passerina cyanea</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Polioptila caerulea</topic><topic>population density</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>rural areas</topic><topic>shrubland</topic><topic>Shrublands</topic><topic>social parasitism</topic><topic>Songbirds</topic><topic>Songbirds - classification</topic><topic>Songbirds - physiology</topic><topic>Spizella</topic><topic>Spizella pusilla</topic><topic>urban</topic><topic>urban areas</topic><topic>Urban habitats</topic><topic>Vermivora pinus</topic><topic>wild birds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burhans, Dirk E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Frank R.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burhans, Dirk E.</au><au>Thompson, Frank R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Songbird abundance and parasitism differ between urban and rural shrublands</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><date>2006-02</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>394</spage><epage>405</epage><pages>394-405</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>Many studies have examined differences in avian community composition between urban and rural habitats, but few, if any, have looked at nesting success of urban shrubland birds in a replicated fashion while controlling for habitat. We tested factors affecting nest survival, parasitism by the Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater), and species abundance in shrubland habitat in rural and urban landscapes. We found no support for our hypothesis that nest survival was lower in urban landscapes, but strong support for the hypothesis that survival increased with nest height. We found strong support for our hypothesis that cowbird parasitism was greater in urban than rural landscapes; parasitism in urban sites was at least twice that of rural sites. We found strong support for an urban landscape effect on abundance for several species; Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) and Brown-headed Cowbirds were more abundant in urban landscapes, whereas Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla) and Blue-winged Warbler (Vermivora pinus) were more abundant in rural sites. There was support for lower abundances of Blue-gray Gnatcatcher (Polioptila caerulea) and Indigo Bunting (Passerina cyanea) with increased housing density. For six other species, edge and trail density or vegetation parameters best explained abundance. Lower abundances and greater parasitism in habitat patches in urban landscapes are evidence that, for some species, these urban landscapes do not fulfill the same role as comparable habitats in rural landscapes. Regional bird conservation planning and local habitat management in urban landscapes may need to consider these effects in efforts to sustain bird populations at regional and local scales.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><pmid>16705988</pmid><doi>10.1890/04-0927</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1051-0761
ispartof Ecological applications, 2006-02, Vol.16 (1), p.394-405
issn 1051-0761
1939-5582
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67977428
source MEDLINE; Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection; JSTOR
subjects Animals
Biodiversity
Bird nesting
Brood parasitism
Brown-headed Cowbird
Cardinalis cardinalis
Cities
Edge effects
Environment
Forest habitats
Forestry
Geography
Habitat conservation
landscape
landscape ecology
Landscapes
Missouri
Molothrus
Molothrus ater
Nematoda - classification
Nematoda - physiology
nest predation
Nesting Behavior
nesting success
Passerina cyanea
Phylogeny
Polioptila caerulea
population density
Population Dynamics
Predation
Predatory Behavior
rural areas
shrubland
Shrublands
social parasitism
Songbirds
Songbirds - classification
Songbirds - physiology
Spizella
Spizella pusilla
urban
urban areas
Urban habitats
Vermivora pinus
wild birds
title Songbird abundance and parasitism differ between urban and rural shrublands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T06%3A40%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Songbird%20abundance%20and%20parasitism%20differ%20between%20urban%20and%20rural%20shrublands&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Burhans,%20Dirk%20E.&rft.date=2006-02&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=394&rft.epage=405&rft.pages=394-405&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/04-0927&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40061807%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19978271&rft_id=info:pmid/16705988&rft_jstor_id=40061807&rfr_iscdi=true