Songbird abundance and parasitism differ between urban and rural shrublands
Many studies have examined differences in avian community composition between urban and rural habitats, but few, if any, have looked at nesting success of urban shrubland birds in a replicated fashion while controlling for habitat. We tested factors affecting nest survival, parasitism by the Brown-h...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecological applications 2006-02, Vol.16 (1), p.394-405 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 405 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 394 |
container_title | Ecological applications |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Burhans, Dirk E. Thompson, Frank R. |
description | Many studies have examined differences in avian community composition between urban and rural habitats, but few, if any, have looked at nesting success of urban shrubland birds in a replicated fashion while controlling for habitat. We tested factors affecting nest survival, parasitism by the Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater), and species abundance in shrubland habitat in rural and urban landscapes. We found no support for our hypothesis that nest survival was lower in urban landscapes, but strong support for the hypothesis that survival increased with nest height. We found strong support for our hypothesis that cowbird parasitism was greater in urban than rural landscapes; parasitism in urban sites was at least twice that of rural sites. We found strong support for an urban landscape effect on abundance for several species; Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) and Brown-headed Cowbirds were more abundant in urban landscapes, whereas Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla) and Blue-winged Warbler (Vermivora pinus) were more abundant in rural sites. There was support for lower abundances of Blue-gray Gnatcatcher (Polioptila caerulea) and Indigo Bunting (Passerina cyanea) with increased housing density. For six other species, edge and trail density or vegetation parameters best explained abundance. Lower abundances and greater parasitism in habitat patches in urban landscapes are evidence that, for some species, these urban landscapes do not fulfill the same role as comparable habitats in rural landscapes. Regional bird conservation planning and local habitat management in urban landscapes may need to consider these effects in efforts to sustain bird populations at regional and local scales. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1890/04-0927 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67977428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40061807</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40061807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3994-2ccb9f4babbadec3adffb62df75c6228e967866d736518ee21f1ac1aacb5a0bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtP3TAQha2qVXm04hdAs2pXKTNO4scSIUqrIhWJsrbGLwjKTW7tGyH-Pb7NFayqzsZj-TtnxoexI4SvqDScQluD5vIN20fd6LrrFH9beuiwBilwjx3k_AClOOfv2R4KCZ1Wap_9vJnGO9snX5GdR0-jCxWNvlpTotxv-ryqfB9jSJUNm8cQxmpOlsa_TJoTDVW-T7Mdyj1_YO8iDTl83J2H7Pbbxe_z7_XVr8sf52dXtWu0bmvunNWxtWQt-eAa8jFawX2UnROcq6CFVEJ42YgOVQgcI5JDImc7AhubQ_Z58V2n6c8c8sas-uzCUJYI05yNkFrKlqv_gqi1VFxiAb8soEtTzilEs079itKTQTDbgA20ZhtwIU92lrNdBf_K7RItAF-Ax34IT__yMRdn1xxAoMBGt0V0vIge8mZKL6J2SyjYTv20vEeaDN2lPpvbGw7YAEL5bdnrGRZfl7M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19978271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Songbird abundance and parasitism differ between urban and rural shrublands</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Burhans, Dirk E. ; Thompson, Frank R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Burhans, Dirk E. ; Thompson, Frank R.</creatorcontrib><description>Many studies have examined differences in avian community composition between urban and rural habitats, but few, if any, have looked at nesting success of urban shrubland birds in a replicated fashion while controlling for habitat. We tested factors affecting nest survival, parasitism by the Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater), and species abundance in shrubland habitat in rural and urban landscapes. We found no support for our hypothesis that nest survival was lower in urban landscapes, but strong support for the hypothesis that survival increased with nest height. We found strong support for our hypothesis that cowbird parasitism was greater in urban than rural landscapes; parasitism in urban sites was at least twice that of rural sites. We found strong support for an urban landscape effect on abundance for several species; Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) and Brown-headed Cowbirds were more abundant in urban landscapes, whereas Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla) and Blue-winged Warbler (Vermivora pinus) were more abundant in rural sites. There was support for lower abundances of Blue-gray Gnatcatcher (Polioptila caerulea) and Indigo Bunting (Passerina cyanea) with increased housing density. For six other species, edge and trail density or vegetation parameters best explained abundance. Lower abundances and greater parasitism in habitat patches in urban landscapes are evidence that, for some species, these urban landscapes do not fulfill the same role as comparable habitats in rural landscapes. Regional bird conservation planning and local habitat management in urban landscapes may need to consider these effects in efforts to sustain bird populations at regional and local scales.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/04-0927</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16705988</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biodiversity ; Bird nesting ; Brood parasitism ; Brown-headed Cowbird ; Cardinalis cardinalis ; Cities ; Edge effects ; Environment ; Forest habitats ; Forestry ; Geography ; Habitat conservation ; landscape ; landscape ecology ; Landscapes ; Missouri ; Molothrus ; Molothrus ater ; Nematoda - classification ; Nematoda - physiology ; nest predation ; Nesting Behavior ; nesting success ; Passerina cyanea ; Phylogeny ; Polioptila caerulea ; population density ; Population Dynamics ; Predation ; Predatory Behavior ; rural areas ; shrubland ; Shrublands ; social parasitism ; Songbirds ; Songbirds - classification ; Songbirds - physiology ; Spizella ; Spizella pusilla ; urban ; urban areas ; Urban habitats ; Vermivora pinus ; wild birds</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2006-02, Vol.16 (1), p.394-405</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2006 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3994-2ccb9f4babbadec3adffb62df75c6228e967866d736518ee21f1ac1aacb5a0bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3994-2ccb9f4babbadec3adffb62df75c6228e967866d736518ee21f1ac1aacb5a0bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40061807$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40061807$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16705988$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burhans, Dirk E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Frank R.</creatorcontrib><title>Songbird abundance and parasitism differ between urban and rural shrublands</title><title>Ecological applications</title><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><description>Many studies have examined differences in avian community composition between urban and rural habitats, but few, if any, have looked at nesting success of urban shrubland birds in a replicated fashion while controlling for habitat. We tested factors affecting nest survival, parasitism by the Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater), and species abundance in shrubland habitat in rural and urban landscapes. We found no support for our hypothesis that nest survival was lower in urban landscapes, but strong support for the hypothesis that survival increased with nest height. We found strong support for our hypothesis that cowbird parasitism was greater in urban than rural landscapes; parasitism in urban sites was at least twice that of rural sites. We found strong support for an urban landscape effect on abundance for several species; Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) and Brown-headed Cowbirds were more abundant in urban landscapes, whereas Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla) and Blue-winged Warbler (Vermivora pinus) were more abundant in rural sites. There was support for lower abundances of Blue-gray Gnatcatcher (Polioptila caerulea) and Indigo Bunting (Passerina cyanea) with increased housing density. For six other species, edge and trail density or vegetation parameters best explained abundance. Lower abundances and greater parasitism in habitat patches in urban landscapes are evidence that, for some species, these urban landscapes do not fulfill the same role as comparable habitats in rural landscapes. Regional bird conservation planning and local habitat management in urban landscapes may need to consider these effects in efforts to sustain bird populations at regional and local scales.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Brood parasitism</subject><subject>Brown-headed Cowbird</subject><subject>Cardinalis cardinalis</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Edge effects</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>landscape</subject><subject>landscape ecology</subject><subject>Landscapes</subject><subject>Missouri</subject><subject>Molothrus</subject><subject>Molothrus ater</subject><subject>Nematoda - classification</subject><subject>Nematoda - physiology</subject><subject>nest predation</subject><subject>Nesting Behavior</subject><subject>nesting success</subject><subject>Passerina cyanea</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Polioptila caerulea</subject><subject>population density</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>rural areas</subject><subject>shrubland</subject><subject>Shrublands</subject><subject>social parasitism</subject><subject>Songbirds</subject><subject>Songbirds - classification</subject><subject>Songbirds - physiology</subject><subject>Spizella</subject><subject>Spizella pusilla</subject><subject>urban</subject><subject>urban areas</subject><subject>Urban habitats</subject><subject>Vermivora pinus</subject><subject>wild birds</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtP3TAQha2qVXm04hdAs2pXKTNO4scSIUqrIhWJsrbGLwjKTW7tGyH-Pb7NFayqzsZj-TtnxoexI4SvqDScQluD5vIN20fd6LrrFH9beuiwBilwjx3k_AClOOfv2R4KCZ1Wap_9vJnGO9snX5GdR0-jCxWNvlpTotxv-ryqfB9jSJUNm8cQxmpOlsa_TJoTDVW-T7Mdyj1_YO8iDTl83J2H7Pbbxe_z7_XVr8sf52dXtWu0bmvunNWxtWQt-eAa8jFawX2UnROcq6CFVEJ42YgOVQgcI5JDImc7AhubQ_Z58V2n6c8c8sas-uzCUJYI05yNkFrKlqv_gqi1VFxiAb8soEtTzilEs079itKTQTDbgA20ZhtwIU92lrNdBf_K7RItAF-Ax34IT__yMRdn1xxAoMBGt0V0vIge8mZKL6J2SyjYTv20vEeaDN2lPpvbGw7YAEL5bdnrGRZfl7M</recordid><startdate>200602</startdate><enddate>200602</enddate><creator>Burhans, Dirk E.</creator><creator>Thompson, Frank R.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200602</creationdate><title>Songbird abundance and parasitism differ between urban and rural shrublands</title><author>Burhans, Dirk E. ; Thompson, Frank R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3994-2ccb9f4babbadec3adffb62df75c6228e967866d736518ee21f1ac1aacb5a0bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Brood parasitism</topic><topic>Brown-headed Cowbird</topic><topic>Cardinalis cardinalis</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Edge effects</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>landscape</topic><topic>landscape ecology</topic><topic>Landscapes</topic><topic>Missouri</topic><topic>Molothrus</topic><topic>Molothrus ater</topic><topic>Nematoda - classification</topic><topic>Nematoda - physiology</topic><topic>nest predation</topic><topic>Nesting Behavior</topic><topic>nesting success</topic><topic>Passerina cyanea</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Polioptila caerulea</topic><topic>population density</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>rural areas</topic><topic>shrubland</topic><topic>Shrublands</topic><topic>social parasitism</topic><topic>Songbirds</topic><topic>Songbirds - classification</topic><topic>Songbirds - physiology</topic><topic>Spizella</topic><topic>Spizella pusilla</topic><topic>urban</topic><topic>urban areas</topic><topic>Urban habitats</topic><topic>Vermivora pinus</topic><topic>wild birds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burhans, Dirk E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Frank R.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burhans, Dirk E.</au><au>Thompson, Frank R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Songbird abundance and parasitism differ between urban and rural shrublands</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><date>2006-02</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>394</spage><epage>405</epage><pages>394-405</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>Many studies have examined differences in avian community composition between urban and rural habitats, but few, if any, have looked at nesting success of urban shrubland birds in a replicated fashion while controlling for habitat. We tested factors affecting nest survival, parasitism by the Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater), and species abundance in shrubland habitat in rural and urban landscapes. We found no support for our hypothesis that nest survival was lower in urban landscapes, but strong support for the hypothesis that survival increased with nest height. We found strong support for our hypothesis that cowbird parasitism was greater in urban than rural landscapes; parasitism in urban sites was at least twice that of rural sites. We found strong support for an urban landscape effect on abundance for several species; Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) and Brown-headed Cowbirds were more abundant in urban landscapes, whereas Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla) and Blue-winged Warbler (Vermivora pinus) were more abundant in rural sites. There was support for lower abundances of Blue-gray Gnatcatcher (Polioptila caerulea) and Indigo Bunting (Passerina cyanea) with increased housing density. For six other species, edge and trail density or vegetation parameters best explained abundance. Lower abundances and greater parasitism in habitat patches in urban landscapes are evidence that, for some species, these urban landscapes do not fulfill the same role as comparable habitats in rural landscapes. Regional bird conservation planning and local habitat management in urban landscapes may need to consider these effects in efforts to sustain bird populations at regional and local scales.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><pmid>16705988</pmid><doi>10.1890/04-0927</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1051-0761 |
ispartof | Ecological applications, 2006-02, Vol.16 (1), p.394-405 |
issn | 1051-0761 1939-5582 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67977428 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection; JSTOR |
subjects | Animals Biodiversity Bird nesting Brood parasitism Brown-headed Cowbird Cardinalis cardinalis Cities Edge effects Environment Forest habitats Forestry Geography Habitat conservation landscape landscape ecology Landscapes Missouri Molothrus Molothrus ater Nematoda - classification Nematoda - physiology nest predation Nesting Behavior nesting success Passerina cyanea Phylogeny Polioptila caerulea population density Population Dynamics Predation Predatory Behavior rural areas shrubland Shrublands social parasitism Songbirds Songbirds - classification Songbirds - physiology Spizella Spizella pusilla urban urban areas Urban habitats Vermivora pinus wild birds |
title | Songbird abundance and parasitism differ between urban and rural shrublands |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T06%3A40%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Songbird%20abundance%20and%20parasitism%20differ%20between%20urban%20and%20rural%20shrublands&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Burhans,%20Dirk%20E.&rft.date=2006-02&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=394&rft.epage=405&rft.pages=394-405&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/04-0927&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40061807%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19978271&rft_id=info:pmid/16705988&rft_jstor_id=40061807&rfr_iscdi=true |