Auditory dominance in the error correction process: A synchronized tapping study

The goal of this study was to reveal auditory dominance in the error correction process that operates in the synchronized tapping paradigm. We presented six female subjects with a sound and a flash, alternately and successively. The subjects' task was to tap in synchrony with the sequence of th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brain research 2006-04, Vol.1084 (1), p.115-122
Hauptverfasser: Kato, Masaharu, Konishi, Yukuo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 122
container_issue 1
container_start_page 115
container_title Brain research
container_volume 1084
creator Kato, Masaharu
Konishi, Yukuo
description The goal of this study was to reveal auditory dominance in the error correction process that operates in the synchronized tapping paradigm. We presented six female subjects with a sound and a flash, alternately and successively. The subjects' task was to tap in synchrony with the sequence of the attended to modality (the target sequence). The inter-onset interval of the target sequence was 996 ms but varied irregularly between 996 −  α ms and 996 +  α ms for the distractor sequence. We found that tapping accuracy was influenced by the irregularity of the distractor sequence. As distractor stimuli were temporally separated from target stimuli, auditory–visual integration in timing did not occur in our experiment. Therefore, the irregularity of the distractor sequence must have directly influenced the error correction process in timing and not indirectly by affecting the target sequence to subsequently influence the error correction process. We also found that tapping accuracy was influenced by the irregularity of the auditory distractor, even when the irregularity was unnoticeable, but it was not affected by the irregularity of the visual distractor when the irregularity was unnoticeable, which suggests that the error correction process is located before, or is independent of, the perception of irregularity in timing. We conclude that the error correction process depends more on temporal information from the auditory system than on information from the visual system.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67974019</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006899306004409</els_id><sourcerecordid>17218785</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-51ff1798a56f7ad407949bd3bcf4b463e1c21974fc3f60be5f360c12e31490be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtvGyEQgFHUKHHT_oWIS3rbLSwsLD3FstKHFCk5tGfEwtBg2eDCbiTn1wfLrnLMaTSabx76BqFrSlpKqPi6bsdsQsxQ2o4Q0ZKuJVSdoQUdZNeIjpMPaEFqpRmUYpfoYynrmjKmyAW6pKLvBWdigR6XswtTynvs0jZEEy3gEPH0BBhyThnblDPYKaSIdzlZKOUbXuKyj_YppxhewOHJ7HYh_sVlmt3-Ezr3ZlPg8yleoT_f736vfjb3Dz9-rZb3jeWKTU1PvadSDaYXXhrHiVRcjY6N1vORCwbUdlRJ7i3zgozQeyaIpR0wylXN2RX6cpxbr_o3Q5n0NhQLm42JkOaihazdVcm7IJVddTb0FRRH0OZUSgavdzlsTd5rSvRBul7r_9L1QbomnT5uuD5tmMctuLe2k-UK3JwAU6zZ-Fw1h_LGSTkIQmXlbo8cVHHPAbIuNkB9iQuHH2iXwnu3vAKs8KP9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17218785</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Auditory dominance in the error correction process: A synchronized tapping study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kato, Masaharu ; Konishi, Yukuo</creator><creatorcontrib>Kato, Masaharu ; Konishi, Yukuo</creatorcontrib><description>The goal of this study was to reveal auditory dominance in the error correction process that operates in the synchronized tapping paradigm. We presented six female subjects with a sound and a flash, alternately and successively. The subjects' task was to tap in synchrony with the sequence of the attended to modality (the target sequence). The inter-onset interval of the target sequence was 996 ms but varied irregularly between 996 −  α ms and 996 +  α ms for the distractor sequence. We found that tapping accuracy was influenced by the irregularity of the distractor sequence. As distractor stimuli were temporally separated from target stimuli, auditory–visual integration in timing did not occur in our experiment. Therefore, the irregularity of the distractor sequence must have directly influenced the error correction process in timing and not indirectly by affecting the target sequence to subsequently influence the error correction process. We also found that tapping accuracy was influenced by the irregularity of the auditory distractor, even when the irregularity was unnoticeable, but it was not affected by the irregularity of the visual distractor when the irregularity was unnoticeable, which suggests that the error correction process is located before, or is independent of, the perception of irregularity in timing. We conclude that the error correction process depends more on temporal information from the auditory system than on information from the visual system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-8993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16556436</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRREAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods ; Adult ; Attention - physiology ; Audition ; Auditory Perception - ethics ; Biological and medical sciences ; Ear and associated structures. Auditory pathways and centers. Hearing. Vocal organ. Phonation. Sound production. Echolocation ; Error correction process ; Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Tapping ; Time Perception - physiology ; Timekeeping process ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs ; Vision</subject><ispartof>Brain research, 2006-04, Vol.1084 (1), p.115-122</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-51ff1798a56f7ad407949bd3bcf4b463e1c21974fc3f60be5f360c12e31490be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-51ff1798a56f7ad407949bd3bcf4b463e1c21974fc3f60be5f360c12e31490be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17786017$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16556436$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kato, Masaharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konishi, Yukuo</creatorcontrib><title>Auditory dominance in the error correction process: A synchronized tapping study</title><title>Brain research</title><addtitle>Brain Res</addtitle><description>The goal of this study was to reveal auditory dominance in the error correction process that operates in the synchronized tapping paradigm. We presented six female subjects with a sound and a flash, alternately and successively. The subjects' task was to tap in synchrony with the sequence of the attended to modality (the target sequence). The inter-onset interval of the target sequence was 996 ms but varied irregularly between 996 −  α ms and 996 +  α ms for the distractor sequence. We found that tapping accuracy was influenced by the irregularity of the distractor sequence. As distractor stimuli were temporally separated from target stimuli, auditory–visual integration in timing did not occur in our experiment. Therefore, the irregularity of the distractor sequence must have directly influenced the error correction process in timing and not indirectly by affecting the target sequence to subsequently influence the error correction process. We also found that tapping accuracy was influenced by the irregularity of the auditory distractor, even when the irregularity was unnoticeable, but it was not affected by the irregularity of the visual distractor when the irregularity was unnoticeable, which suggests that the error correction process is located before, or is independent of, the perception of irregularity in timing. We conclude that the error correction process depends more on temporal information from the auditory system than on information from the visual system.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Audition</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - ethics</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Ear and associated structures. Auditory pathways and centers. Hearing. Vocal organ. Phonation. Sound production. Echolocation</subject><subject>Error correction process</subject><subject>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Tapping</subject><subject>Time Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Timekeeping process</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><subject>Vision</subject><issn>0006-8993</issn><issn>1872-6240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtvGyEQgFHUKHHT_oWIS3rbLSwsLD3FstKHFCk5tGfEwtBg2eDCbiTn1wfLrnLMaTSabx76BqFrSlpKqPi6bsdsQsxQ2o4Q0ZKuJVSdoQUdZNeIjpMPaEFqpRmUYpfoYynrmjKmyAW6pKLvBWdigR6XswtTynvs0jZEEy3gEPH0BBhyThnblDPYKaSIdzlZKOUbXuKyj_YppxhewOHJ7HYh_sVlmt3-Ezr3ZlPg8yleoT_f736vfjb3Dz9-rZb3jeWKTU1PvadSDaYXXhrHiVRcjY6N1vORCwbUdlRJ7i3zgozQeyaIpR0wylXN2RX6cpxbr_o3Q5n0NhQLm42JkOaihazdVcm7IJVddTb0FRRH0OZUSgavdzlsTd5rSvRBul7r_9L1QbomnT5uuD5tmMctuLe2k-UK3JwAU6zZ-Fw1h_LGSTkIQmXlbo8cVHHPAbIuNkB9iQuHH2iXwnu3vAKs8KP9</recordid><startdate>20060421</startdate><enddate>20060421</enddate><creator>Kato, Masaharu</creator><creator>Konishi, Yukuo</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060421</creationdate><title>Auditory dominance in the error correction process: A synchronized tapping study</title><author>Kato, Masaharu ; Konishi, Yukuo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-51ff1798a56f7ad407949bd3bcf4b463e1c21974fc3f60be5f360c12e31490be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Audition</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - ethics</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Ear and associated structures. Auditory pathways and centers. Hearing. Vocal organ. Phonation. Sound production. Echolocation</topic><topic>Error correction process</topic><topic>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Tapping</topic><topic>Time Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Timekeeping process</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><topic>Vision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kato, Masaharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konishi, Yukuo</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kato, Masaharu</au><au>Konishi, Yukuo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Auditory dominance in the error correction process: A synchronized tapping study</atitle><jtitle>Brain research</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Res</addtitle><date>2006-04-21</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>1084</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>115-122</pages><issn>0006-8993</issn><eissn>1872-6240</eissn><coden>BRREAP</coden><abstract>The goal of this study was to reveal auditory dominance in the error correction process that operates in the synchronized tapping paradigm. We presented six female subjects with a sound and a flash, alternately and successively. The subjects' task was to tap in synchrony with the sequence of the attended to modality (the target sequence). The inter-onset interval of the target sequence was 996 ms but varied irregularly between 996 −  α ms and 996 +  α ms for the distractor sequence. We found that tapping accuracy was influenced by the irregularity of the distractor sequence. As distractor stimuli were temporally separated from target stimuli, auditory–visual integration in timing did not occur in our experiment. Therefore, the irregularity of the distractor sequence must have directly influenced the error correction process in timing and not indirectly by affecting the target sequence to subsequently influence the error correction process. We also found that tapping accuracy was influenced by the irregularity of the auditory distractor, even when the irregularity was unnoticeable, but it was not affected by the irregularity of the visual distractor when the irregularity was unnoticeable, which suggests that the error correction process is located before, or is independent of, the perception of irregularity in timing. We conclude that the error correction process depends more on temporal information from the auditory system than on information from the visual system.</abstract><cop>London</cop><cop>Amsterdam</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>16556436</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.019</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-8993
ispartof Brain research, 2006-04, Vol.1084 (1), p.115-122
issn 0006-8993
1872-6240
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67974019
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Acoustic Stimulation - methods
Adult
Attention - physiology
Audition
Auditory Perception - ethics
Biological and medical sciences
Ear and associated structures. Auditory pathways and centers. Hearing. Vocal organ. Phonation. Sound production. Echolocation
Error correction process
Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Photic Stimulation - methods
Psychomotor Performance - physiology
Reaction Time - physiology
Tapping
Time Perception - physiology
Timekeeping process
Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs
Vision
title Auditory dominance in the error correction process: A synchronized tapping study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T09%3A13%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Auditory%20dominance%20in%20the%20error%20correction%20process:%20A%20synchronized%20tapping%20study&rft.jtitle=Brain%20research&rft.au=Kato,%20Masaharu&rft.date=2006-04-21&rft.volume=1084&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=115-122&rft.issn=0006-8993&rft.eissn=1872-6240&rft.coden=BRREAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17218785%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17218785&rft_id=info:pmid/16556436&rft_els_id=S0006899306004409&rfr_iscdi=true