How well do paediatric residency programmes prepare residents for clinical practice and their future careers?
Context Educators across Canada are presently discussing whether the current 4‐year residency programmes adequately prepare paediatricians for their future careers. Studies carried out in the USA have repeatedly shown areas of weakness in residency training, but there are no studies looking at the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical education 2006-06, Vol.40 (6), p.539-546 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 546 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 539 |
container_title | Medical education |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Lieberman, Lani Hilliard, Robert I |
description | Context Educators across Canada are presently discussing whether the current 4‐year residency programmes adequately prepare paediatricians for their future careers. Studies carried out in the USA have repeatedly shown areas of weakness in residency training, but there are no studies looking at the overall adequacy of training across Canada.
Objectives To assess practising paediatricians' perceptions of the adequacy of their residency training as preparation for clinical practice and to assess practising paediatricians' opinions about the required mandatory length of training.
Methods A questionnaire based on previous studies was sent to 434 paediatricians certified between 1999 and 2003, asking for their opinions of their preparedness for practice in the broad areas of paediatrics and in the professional roles of the doctor‐specialist.
Results Overall, 239 (55%) paediatricians replied, 96% of whom indicated they were ‘adequately’ or ‘very well’ trained. Areas in which opinions on training were positive included emergency medicine, neonatology, endocrinology, haematology/oncology, neurology, infectious diseases and respirology. Areas where preparation was considered to have been less adequate included gynaecology, child psychiatry, behavioural psychology, surgical specialties, orthopaedics and adolescents. With respect to the roles of the doctor‐specialist, strengths of training included the areas of medical expert, collaborator, ethics and professionalism, and communicator. Respondents felt they were less adequately prepared for the role of a medical expert dealing with palliative care, for dealing with bereaved parents and as manager of an office practice. Despite these weaknesses, 80% felt that 4 years of training was sufficient.
Discussion The results of the study are comparable with those of previous studies carried out in the USA and reinforce the need for regular programme assessment. This study will hopefully lead to the improvement of current paediatric residency programmes and enhanced education and training of future paediatricians. Although overall satisfaction with training was high, paediatric programmes need to make some changes by providing more appropriate training with less tertiary care, hospital‐based training and more community and ambulatory‐based experiences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02479.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67972791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67972791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4639-51016602eb219923d8105983d3005393df343bbd42fa0a1fa96fe233042446183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCV0AWEtwSxnbixBcQKu0WKHChKjfL64zBS_4sdqLd_fY47JZKnPDFI81vnp_nEUIZ5CydV-ucCVlmXHGVcwCZAy8qle8ekMVdQzwkCxBQZ8AYnJDTGNcAUJVF_ZicMFmlWqoF6a6GLd1i29JmoBuDjTdj8JYGjL7B3u7pJgzfg-k6jKnEjQl41xwjdUOgtvW9t6ZNbWNHb5GavqHjD_SBummc0oBNUxjimyfkkTNtxKfH-4zcXF58Pb_Krr8s35-_vc5sIYXKSgZMSuC44kylrzQ1g1LVohEApVCicaIQq1VTcGfAMGeUdMiFgIIXhWS1OCMvD7rJ_K8J46g7H236pelxmKKWlap4pVgCn_8Drocp9Mmb5sBVekuVCaoPkA1DjAGd3gTfmbDXDPSch17ree16zkPPeeg_eehdGn121J9WHTb3g8cAEvDiCJiYduiC6a2P91xV1VIVs4fXB27rW9z_twH96eLdzVwmgewg4OOIu78CJvxM2xBVqW8_L_VS1R_lt-Wt_iB-A0FttMY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>202939395</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How well do paediatric residency programmes prepare residents for clinical practice and their future careers?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lieberman, Lani ; Hilliard, Robert I</creator><creatorcontrib>Lieberman, Lani ; Hilliard, Robert I</creatorcontrib><description>Context Educators across Canada are presently discussing whether the current 4‐year residency programmes adequately prepare paediatricians for their future careers. Studies carried out in the USA have repeatedly shown areas of weakness in residency training, but there are no studies looking at the overall adequacy of training across Canada.
Objectives To assess practising paediatricians' perceptions of the adequacy of their residency training as preparation for clinical practice and to assess practising paediatricians' opinions about the required mandatory length of training.
Methods A questionnaire based on previous studies was sent to 434 paediatricians certified between 1999 and 2003, asking for their opinions of their preparedness for practice in the broad areas of paediatrics and in the professional roles of the doctor‐specialist.
Results Overall, 239 (55%) paediatricians replied, 96% of whom indicated they were ‘adequately’ or ‘very well’ trained. Areas in which opinions on training were positive included emergency medicine, neonatology, endocrinology, haematology/oncology, neurology, infectious diseases and respirology. Areas where preparation was considered to have been less adequate included gynaecology, child psychiatry, behavioural psychology, surgical specialties, orthopaedics and adolescents. With respect to the roles of the doctor‐specialist, strengths of training included the areas of medical expert, collaborator, ethics and professionalism, and communicator. Respondents felt they were less adequately prepared for the role of a medical expert dealing with palliative care, for dealing with bereaved parents and as manager of an office practice. Despite these weaknesses, 80% felt that 4 years of training was sufficient.
Discussion The results of the study are comparable with those of previous studies carried out in the USA and reinforce the need for regular programme assessment. This study will hopefully lead to the improvement of current paediatric residency programmes and enhanced education and training of future paediatricians. Although overall satisfaction with training was high, paediatric programmes need to make some changes by providing more appropriate training with less tertiary care, hospital‐based training and more community and ambulatory‐based experiences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-0110</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2923</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02479.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16700769</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Biological and medical sciences ; career choice ; Clinical Competence - standards ; cohort studies ; Female ; Health participants ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; interprofessional relations ; longitudinal studies ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; paediatrics/education ; Pediatrics - education ; Perception ; pharmacy/education ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; rural health ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States</subject><ispartof>Medical education, 2006-06, Vol.40 (6), p.539-546</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Jun 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4639-51016602eb219923d8105983d3005393df343bbd42fa0a1fa96fe233042446183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4639-51016602eb219923d8105983d3005393df343bbd42fa0a1fa96fe233042446183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2929.2006.02479.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2929.2006.02479.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17786945$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16700769$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lieberman, Lani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilliard, Robert I</creatorcontrib><title>How well do paediatric residency programmes prepare residents for clinical practice and their future careers?</title><title>Medical education</title><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><description>Context Educators across Canada are presently discussing whether the current 4‐year residency programmes adequately prepare paediatricians for their future careers. Studies carried out in the USA have repeatedly shown areas of weakness in residency training, but there are no studies looking at the overall adequacy of training across Canada.
Objectives To assess practising paediatricians' perceptions of the adequacy of their residency training as preparation for clinical practice and to assess practising paediatricians' opinions about the required mandatory length of training.
Methods A questionnaire based on previous studies was sent to 434 paediatricians certified between 1999 and 2003, asking for their opinions of their preparedness for practice in the broad areas of paediatrics and in the professional roles of the doctor‐specialist.
Results Overall, 239 (55%) paediatricians replied, 96% of whom indicated they were ‘adequately’ or ‘very well’ trained. Areas in which opinions on training were positive included emergency medicine, neonatology, endocrinology, haematology/oncology, neurology, infectious diseases and respirology. Areas where preparation was considered to have been less adequate included gynaecology, child psychiatry, behavioural psychology, surgical specialties, orthopaedics and adolescents. With respect to the roles of the doctor‐specialist, strengths of training included the areas of medical expert, collaborator, ethics and professionalism, and communicator. Respondents felt they were less adequately prepared for the role of a medical expert dealing with palliative care, for dealing with bereaved parents and as manager of an office practice. Despite these weaknesses, 80% felt that 4 years of training was sufficient.
Discussion The results of the study are comparable with those of previous studies carried out in the USA and reinforce the need for regular programme assessment. This study will hopefully lead to the improvement of current paediatric residency programmes and enhanced education and training of future paediatricians. Although overall satisfaction with training was high, paediatric programmes need to make some changes by providing more appropriate training with less tertiary care, hospital‐based training and more community and ambulatory‐based experiences.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>career choice</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>cohort studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health participants</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>interprofessional relations</subject><subject>longitudinal studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>paediatrics/education</subject><subject>Pediatrics - education</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>pharmacy/education</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>rural health</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0308-0110</issn><issn>1365-2923</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCV0AWEtwSxnbixBcQKu0WKHChKjfL64zBS_4sdqLd_fY47JZKnPDFI81vnp_nEUIZ5CydV-ucCVlmXHGVcwCZAy8qle8ekMVdQzwkCxBQZ8AYnJDTGNcAUJVF_ZicMFmlWqoF6a6GLd1i29JmoBuDjTdj8JYGjL7B3u7pJgzfg-k6jKnEjQl41xwjdUOgtvW9t6ZNbWNHb5GavqHjD_SBummc0oBNUxjimyfkkTNtxKfH-4zcXF58Pb_Krr8s35-_vc5sIYXKSgZMSuC44kylrzQ1g1LVohEApVCicaIQq1VTcGfAMGeUdMiFgIIXhWS1OCMvD7rJ_K8J46g7H236pelxmKKWlap4pVgCn_8Drocp9Mmb5sBVekuVCaoPkA1DjAGd3gTfmbDXDPSch17ree16zkPPeeg_eehdGn121J9WHTb3g8cAEvDiCJiYduiC6a2P91xV1VIVs4fXB27rW9z_twH96eLdzVwmgewg4OOIu78CJvxM2xBVqW8_L_VS1R_lt-Wt_iB-A0FttMY</recordid><startdate>200606</startdate><enddate>200606</enddate><creator>Lieberman, Lani</creator><creator>Hilliard, Robert I</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200606</creationdate><title>How well do paediatric residency programmes prepare residents for clinical practice and their future careers?</title><author>Lieberman, Lani ; Hilliard, Robert I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4639-51016602eb219923d8105983d3005393df343bbd42fa0a1fa96fe233042446183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>career choice</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>cohort studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health participants</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>interprofessional relations</topic><topic>longitudinal studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>paediatrics/education</topic><topic>Pediatrics - education</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>pharmacy/education</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>rural health</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lieberman, Lani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilliard, Robert I</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lieberman, Lani</au><au>Hilliard, Robert I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How well do paediatric residency programmes prepare residents for clinical practice and their future careers?</atitle><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><date>2006-06</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>539</spage><epage>546</epage><pages>539-546</pages><issn>0308-0110</issn><eissn>1365-2923</eissn><abstract>Context Educators across Canada are presently discussing whether the current 4‐year residency programmes adequately prepare paediatricians for their future careers. Studies carried out in the USA have repeatedly shown areas of weakness in residency training, but there are no studies looking at the overall adequacy of training across Canada.
Objectives To assess practising paediatricians' perceptions of the adequacy of their residency training as preparation for clinical practice and to assess practising paediatricians' opinions about the required mandatory length of training.
Methods A questionnaire based on previous studies was sent to 434 paediatricians certified between 1999 and 2003, asking for their opinions of their preparedness for practice in the broad areas of paediatrics and in the professional roles of the doctor‐specialist.
Results Overall, 239 (55%) paediatricians replied, 96% of whom indicated they were ‘adequately’ or ‘very well’ trained. Areas in which opinions on training were positive included emergency medicine, neonatology, endocrinology, haematology/oncology, neurology, infectious diseases and respirology. Areas where preparation was considered to have been less adequate included gynaecology, child psychiatry, behavioural psychology, surgical specialties, orthopaedics and adolescents. With respect to the roles of the doctor‐specialist, strengths of training included the areas of medical expert, collaborator, ethics and professionalism, and communicator. Respondents felt they were less adequately prepared for the role of a medical expert dealing with palliative care, for dealing with bereaved parents and as manager of an office practice. Despite these weaknesses, 80% felt that 4 years of training was sufficient.
Discussion The results of the study are comparable with those of previous studies carried out in the USA and reinforce the need for regular programme assessment. This study will hopefully lead to the improvement of current paediatric residency programmes and enhanced education and training of future paediatricians. Although overall satisfaction with training was high, paediatric programmes need to make some changes by providing more appropriate training with less tertiary care, hospital‐based training and more community and ambulatory‐based experiences.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>16700769</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02479.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0308-0110 |
ispartof | Medical education, 2006-06, Vol.40 (6), p.539-546 |
issn | 0308-0110 1365-2923 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67972791 |
source | MEDLINE; Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Attitude of Health Personnel Biological and medical sciences career choice Clinical Competence - standards cohort studies Female Health participants Humans Internship and Residency interprofessional relations longitudinal studies Male Medical sciences Miscellaneous paediatrics/education Pediatrics - education Perception pharmacy/education Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine rural health Surveys and Questionnaires United States |
title | How well do paediatric residency programmes prepare residents for clinical practice and their future careers? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T17%3A16%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20well%20do%20paediatric%20residency%20programmes%20prepare%20residents%20for%20clinical%20practice%20and%20their%20future%20careers?&rft.jtitle=Medical%20education&rft.au=Lieberman,%20Lani&rft.date=2006-06&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=539&rft.epage=546&rft.pages=539-546&rft.issn=0308-0110&rft.eissn=1365-2923&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02479.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67972791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=202939395&rft_id=info:pmid/16700769&rfr_iscdi=true |