How well do paediatric residency programmes prepare residents for clinical practice and their future careers?

Context  Educators across Canada are presently discussing whether the current 4‐year residency programmes adequately prepare paediatricians for their future careers. Studies carried out in the USA have repeatedly shown areas of weakness in residency training, but there are no studies looking at the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical education 2006-06, Vol.40 (6), p.539-546
Hauptverfasser: Lieberman, Lani, Hilliard, Robert I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 546
container_issue 6
container_start_page 539
container_title Medical education
container_volume 40
creator Lieberman, Lani
Hilliard, Robert I
description Context  Educators across Canada are presently discussing whether the current 4‐year residency programmes adequately prepare paediatricians for their future careers. Studies carried out in the USA have repeatedly shown areas of weakness in residency training, but there are no studies looking at the overall adequacy of training across Canada. Objectives  To assess practising paediatricians' perceptions of the adequacy of their residency training as preparation for clinical practice and to assess practising paediatricians' opinions about the required mandatory length of training. Methods  A questionnaire based on previous studies was sent to 434 paediatricians certified between 1999 and 2003, asking for their opinions of their preparedness for practice in the broad areas of paediatrics and in the professional roles of the doctor‐specialist. Results  Overall, 239 (55%) paediatricians replied, 96% of whom indicated they were ‘adequately’ or ‘very well’ trained. Areas in which opinions on training were positive included emergency medicine, neonatology, endocrinology, haematology/oncology, neurology, infectious diseases and respirology. Areas where preparation was considered to have been less adequate included gynaecology, child psychiatry, behavioural psychology, surgical specialties, orthopaedics and adolescents. With respect to the roles of the doctor‐specialist, strengths of training included the areas of medical expert, collaborator, ethics and professionalism, and communicator. Respondents felt they were less adequately prepared for the role of a medical expert dealing with palliative care, for dealing with bereaved parents and as manager of an office practice. Despite these weaknesses, 80% felt that 4 years of training was sufficient. Discussion  The results of the study are comparable with those of previous studies carried out in the USA and reinforce the need for regular programme assessment. This study will hopefully lead to the improvement of current paediatric residency programmes and enhanced education and training of future paediatricians. Although overall satisfaction with training was high, paediatric programmes need to make some changes by providing more appropriate training with less tertiary care, hospital‐based training and more community and ambulatory‐based experiences.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02479.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67972791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67972791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4639-51016602eb219923d8105983d3005393df343bbd42fa0a1fa96fe233042446183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCV0AWEtwSxnbixBcQKu0WKHChKjfL64zBS_4sdqLd_fY47JZKnPDFI81vnp_nEUIZ5CydV-ucCVlmXHGVcwCZAy8qle8ekMVdQzwkCxBQZ8AYnJDTGNcAUJVF_ZicMFmlWqoF6a6GLd1i29JmoBuDjTdj8JYGjL7B3u7pJgzfg-k6jKnEjQl41xwjdUOgtvW9t6ZNbWNHb5GavqHjD_SBummc0oBNUxjimyfkkTNtxKfH-4zcXF58Pb_Krr8s35-_vc5sIYXKSgZMSuC44kylrzQ1g1LVohEApVCicaIQq1VTcGfAMGeUdMiFgIIXhWS1OCMvD7rJ_K8J46g7H236pelxmKKWlap4pVgCn_8Drocp9Mmb5sBVekuVCaoPkA1DjAGd3gTfmbDXDPSch17ree16zkPPeeg_eehdGn121J9WHTb3g8cAEvDiCJiYduiC6a2P91xV1VIVs4fXB27rW9z_twH96eLdzVwmgewg4OOIu78CJvxM2xBVqW8_L_VS1R_lt-Wt_iB-A0FttMY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>202939395</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How well do paediatric residency programmes prepare residents for clinical practice and their future careers?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lieberman, Lani ; Hilliard, Robert I</creator><creatorcontrib>Lieberman, Lani ; Hilliard, Robert I</creatorcontrib><description>Context  Educators across Canada are presently discussing whether the current 4‐year residency programmes adequately prepare paediatricians for their future careers. Studies carried out in the USA have repeatedly shown areas of weakness in residency training, but there are no studies looking at the overall adequacy of training across Canada. Objectives  To assess practising paediatricians' perceptions of the adequacy of their residency training as preparation for clinical practice and to assess practising paediatricians' opinions about the required mandatory length of training. Methods  A questionnaire based on previous studies was sent to 434 paediatricians certified between 1999 and 2003, asking for their opinions of their preparedness for practice in the broad areas of paediatrics and in the professional roles of the doctor‐specialist. Results  Overall, 239 (55%) paediatricians replied, 96% of whom indicated they were ‘adequately’ or ‘very well’ trained. Areas in which opinions on training were positive included emergency medicine, neonatology, endocrinology, haematology/oncology, neurology, infectious diseases and respirology. Areas where preparation was considered to have been less adequate included gynaecology, child psychiatry, behavioural psychology, surgical specialties, orthopaedics and adolescents. With respect to the roles of the doctor‐specialist, strengths of training included the areas of medical expert, collaborator, ethics and professionalism, and communicator. Respondents felt they were less adequately prepared for the role of a medical expert dealing with palliative care, for dealing with bereaved parents and as manager of an office practice. Despite these weaknesses, 80% felt that 4 years of training was sufficient. Discussion  The results of the study are comparable with those of previous studies carried out in the USA and reinforce the need for regular programme assessment. This study will hopefully lead to the improvement of current paediatric residency programmes and enhanced education and training of future paediatricians. Although overall satisfaction with training was high, paediatric programmes need to make some changes by providing more appropriate training with less tertiary care, hospital‐based training and more community and ambulatory‐based experiences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-0110</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2923</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02479.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16700769</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Biological and medical sciences ; career choice ; Clinical Competence - standards ; cohort studies ; Female ; Health participants ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; interprofessional relations ; longitudinal studies ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; paediatrics/education ; Pediatrics - education ; Perception ; pharmacy/education ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; rural health ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States</subject><ispartof>Medical education, 2006-06, Vol.40 (6), p.539-546</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Jun 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4639-51016602eb219923d8105983d3005393df343bbd42fa0a1fa96fe233042446183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4639-51016602eb219923d8105983d3005393df343bbd42fa0a1fa96fe233042446183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2929.2006.02479.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2929.2006.02479.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17786945$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16700769$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lieberman, Lani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilliard, Robert I</creatorcontrib><title>How well do paediatric residency programmes prepare residents for clinical practice and their future careers?</title><title>Medical education</title><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><description>Context  Educators across Canada are presently discussing whether the current 4‐year residency programmes adequately prepare paediatricians for their future careers. Studies carried out in the USA have repeatedly shown areas of weakness in residency training, but there are no studies looking at the overall adequacy of training across Canada. Objectives  To assess practising paediatricians' perceptions of the adequacy of their residency training as preparation for clinical practice and to assess practising paediatricians' opinions about the required mandatory length of training. Methods  A questionnaire based on previous studies was sent to 434 paediatricians certified between 1999 and 2003, asking for their opinions of their preparedness for practice in the broad areas of paediatrics and in the professional roles of the doctor‐specialist. Results  Overall, 239 (55%) paediatricians replied, 96% of whom indicated they were ‘adequately’ or ‘very well’ trained. Areas in which opinions on training were positive included emergency medicine, neonatology, endocrinology, haematology/oncology, neurology, infectious diseases and respirology. Areas where preparation was considered to have been less adequate included gynaecology, child psychiatry, behavioural psychology, surgical specialties, orthopaedics and adolescents. With respect to the roles of the doctor‐specialist, strengths of training included the areas of medical expert, collaborator, ethics and professionalism, and communicator. Respondents felt they were less adequately prepared for the role of a medical expert dealing with palliative care, for dealing with bereaved parents and as manager of an office practice. Despite these weaknesses, 80% felt that 4 years of training was sufficient. Discussion  The results of the study are comparable with those of previous studies carried out in the USA and reinforce the need for regular programme assessment. This study will hopefully lead to the improvement of current paediatric residency programmes and enhanced education and training of future paediatricians. Although overall satisfaction with training was high, paediatric programmes need to make some changes by providing more appropriate training with less tertiary care, hospital‐based training and more community and ambulatory‐based experiences.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>career choice</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>cohort studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health participants</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>interprofessional relations</subject><subject>longitudinal studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>paediatrics/education</subject><subject>Pediatrics - education</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>pharmacy/education</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>rural health</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0308-0110</issn><issn>1365-2923</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCV0AWEtwSxnbixBcQKu0WKHChKjfL64zBS_4sdqLd_fY47JZKnPDFI81vnp_nEUIZ5CydV-ucCVlmXHGVcwCZAy8qle8ekMVdQzwkCxBQZ8AYnJDTGNcAUJVF_ZicMFmlWqoF6a6GLd1i29JmoBuDjTdj8JYGjL7B3u7pJgzfg-k6jKnEjQl41xwjdUOgtvW9t6ZNbWNHb5GavqHjD_SBummc0oBNUxjimyfkkTNtxKfH-4zcXF58Pb_Krr8s35-_vc5sIYXKSgZMSuC44kylrzQ1g1LVohEApVCicaIQq1VTcGfAMGeUdMiFgIIXhWS1OCMvD7rJ_K8J46g7H236pelxmKKWlap4pVgCn_8Drocp9Mmb5sBVekuVCaoPkA1DjAGd3gTfmbDXDPSch17ree16zkPPeeg_eehdGn121J9WHTb3g8cAEvDiCJiYduiC6a2P91xV1VIVs4fXB27rW9z_twH96eLdzVwmgewg4OOIu78CJvxM2xBVqW8_L_VS1R_lt-Wt_iB-A0FttMY</recordid><startdate>200606</startdate><enddate>200606</enddate><creator>Lieberman, Lani</creator><creator>Hilliard, Robert I</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200606</creationdate><title>How well do paediatric residency programmes prepare residents for clinical practice and their future careers?</title><author>Lieberman, Lani ; Hilliard, Robert I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4639-51016602eb219923d8105983d3005393df343bbd42fa0a1fa96fe233042446183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>career choice</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>cohort studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health participants</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>interprofessional relations</topic><topic>longitudinal studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>paediatrics/education</topic><topic>Pediatrics - education</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>pharmacy/education</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>rural health</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lieberman, Lani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilliard, Robert I</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lieberman, Lani</au><au>Hilliard, Robert I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How well do paediatric residency programmes prepare residents for clinical practice and their future careers?</atitle><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><date>2006-06</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>539</spage><epage>546</epage><pages>539-546</pages><issn>0308-0110</issn><eissn>1365-2923</eissn><abstract>Context  Educators across Canada are presently discussing whether the current 4‐year residency programmes adequately prepare paediatricians for their future careers. Studies carried out in the USA have repeatedly shown areas of weakness in residency training, but there are no studies looking at the overall adequacy of training across Canada. Objectives  To assess practising paediatricians' perceptions of the adequacy of their residency training as preparation for clinical practice and to assess practising paediatricians' opinions about the required mandatory length of training. Methods  A questionnaire based on previous studies was sent to 434 paediatricians certified between 1999 and 2003, asking for their opinions of their preparedness for practice in the broad areas of paediatrics and in the professional roles of the doctor‐specialist. Results  Overall, 239 (55%) paediatricians replied, 96% of whom indicated they were ‘adequately’ or ‘very well’ trained. Areas in which opinions on training were positive included emergency medicine, neonatology, endocrinology, haematology/oncology, neurology, infectious diseases and respirology. Areas where preparation was considered to have been less adequate included gynaecology, child psychiatry, behavioural psychology, surgical specialties, orthopaedics and adolescents. With respect to the roles of the doctor‐specialist, strengths of training included the areas of medical expert, collaborator, ethics and professionalism, and communicator. Respondents felt they were less adequately prepared for the role of a medical expert dealing with palliative care, for dealing with bereaved parents and as manager of an office practice. Despite these weaknesses, 80% felt that 4 years of training was sufficient. Discussion  The results of the study are comparable with those of previous studies carried out in the USA and reinforce the need for regular programme assessment. This study will hopefully lead to the improvement of current paediatric residency programmes and enhanced education and training of future paediatricians. Although overall satisfaction with training was high, paediatric programmes need to make some changes by providing more appropriate training with less tertiary care, hospital‐based training and more community and ambulatory‐based experiences.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>16700769</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02479.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0308-0110
ispartof Medical education, 2006-06, Vol.40 (6), p.539-546
issn 0308-0110
1365-2923
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67972791
source MEDLINE; Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Attitude of Health Personnel
Biological and medical sciences
career choice
Clinical Competence - standards
cohort studies
Female
Health participants
Humans
Internship and Residency
interprofessional relations
longitudinal studies
Male
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous
paediatrics/education
Pediatrics - education
Perception
pharmacy/education
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
rural health
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
title How well do paediatric residency programmes prepare residents for clinical practice and their future careers?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T17%3A16%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20well%20do%20paediatric%20residency%20programmes%20prepare%20residents%20for%20clinical%20practice%20and%20their%20future%20careers?&rft.jtitle=Medical%20education&rft.au=Lieberman,%20Lani&rft.date=2006-06&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=539&rft.epage=546&rft.pages=539-546&rft.issn=0308-0110&rft.eissn=1365-2923&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02479.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67972791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=202939395&rft_id=info:pmid/16700769&rfr_iscdi=true