Negative and positive eugenics: meanings and contradictions
Eugenics constitutes an important subject of debate, associated with current biogenetics improvements. Considering that the central point in eugenics has always been the preoccupation with future generations' health and constitution, and that the use of scientific means and knowledge for the bi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Revista latino-americana de enfermagem 2006-03, Vol.14 (2), p.251-258 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | por |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 258 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 251 |
container_title | Revista latino-americana de enfermagem |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Mai, Lilian Denise Angerami, Emília Luigia Saporiti |
description | Eugenics constitutes an important subject of debate, associated with current biogenetics improvements. Considering that the central point in eugenics has always been the preoccupation with future generations' health and constitution, and that the use of scientific means and knowledge for the birth of a physically and mentally healthy child can be considered a eugenic action, this paper tries to analyze the meanings and contradictions of negative and positive eugenics actions, constructed concomitantly with 20th-century technical-scientific improvements. The meanings range, respectively, between limiting or stimulating human reproduction, at the beginning of this century, and preventing diseases or improving physical and mental characteristics, nowadays. In the implantation of actions, contradictions were produced, such as the discrimination and elimination of many people in view of one ideal man, the biologization of eminently social factors, the defense of a supposed scientific neutrality and the indiscriminate use of the reproductive choice right. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67970947</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67970947</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p540-750ec9e9681648b75478dcfe7cd30347ba643654a95a4ea156316cf70143a0773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j0tLxDAUhbNQnHH0L0hX7go35tXoSgZfMOhm9uU2uS2RNqlNK_jv1XFcHQ7n48B3wtbAQZaca7ti5zm_A9xYDvyMrbjW1hqANbt7pQ7n8EkFRl-MKYdDoaWjGFy-LQbCGGKXD7tLcZ7QBzeHFPMFO22xz3R5zA3bPz7st8_l7u3pZXu_K0cloTQKyFmyuuJaVo1R0lTetWScFyCkaVBLoZVEq1AScqUF1641wKVAMEZs2PXf7Tilj4XyXA8hO-p7jJSWXGvzo2LlL3h1BJdmIF-PUxhw-qr_bcU3K-tOtQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67970947</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Negative and positive eugenics: meanings and contradictions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Mai, Lilian Denise ; Angerami, Emília Luigia Saporiti</creator><creatorcontrib>Mai, Lilian Denise ; Angerami, Emília Luigia Saporiti</creatorcontrib><description>Eugenics constitutes an important subject of debate, associated with current biogenetics improvements. Considering that the central point in eugenics has always been the preoccupation with future generations' health and constitution, and that the use of scientific means and knowledge for the birth of a physically and mentally healthy child can be considered a eugenic action, this paper tries to analyze the meanings and contradictions of negative and positive eugenics actions, constructed concomitantly with 20th-century technical-scientific improvements. The meanings range, respectively, between limiting or stimulating human reproduction, at the beginning of this century, and preventing diseases or improving physical and mental characteristics, nowadays. In the implantation of actions, contradictions were produced, such as the discrimination and elimination of many people in view of one ideal man, the biologization of eminently social factors, the defense of a supposed scientific neutrality and the indiscriminate use of the reproductive choice right.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0104-1169</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16699700</identifier><language>por</language><publisher>Brazil</publisher><subject>Eugenics - trends ; Genetics ; Humans ; Nursing</subject><ispartof>Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2006-03, Vol.14 (2), p.251-258</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16699700$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mai, Lilian Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angerami, Emília Luigia Saporiti</creatorcontrib><title>Negative and positive eugenics: meanings and contradictions</title><title>Revista latino-americana de enfermagem</title><addtitle>Rev Lat Am Enfermagem</addtitle><description>Eugenics constitutes an important subject of debate, associated with current biogenetics improvements. Considering that the central point in eugenics has always been the preoccupation with future generations' health and constitution, and that the use of scientific means and knowledge for the birth of a physically and mentally healthy child can be considered a eugenic action, this paper tries to analyze the meanings and contradictions of negative and positive eugenics actions, constructed concomitantly with 20th-century technical-scientific improvements. The meanings range, respectively, between limiting or stimulating human reproduction, at the beginning of this century, and preventing diseases or improving physical and mental characteristics, nowadays. In the implantation of actions, contradictions were produced, such as the discrimination and elimination of many people in view of one ideal man, the biologization of eminently social factors, the defense of a supposed scientific neutrality and the indiscriminate use of the reproductive choice right.</description><subject>Eugenics - trends</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><issn>0104-1169</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j0tLxDAUhbNQnHH0L0hX7go35tXoSgZfMOhm9uU2uS2RNqlNK_jv1XFcHQ7n48B3wtbAQZaca7ti5zm_A9xYDvyMrbjW1hqANbt7pQ7n8EkFRl-MKYdDoaWjGFy-LQbCGGKXD7tLcZ7QBzeHFPMFO22xz3R5zA3bPz7st8_l7u3pZXu_K0cloTQKyFmyuuJaVo1R0lTetWScFyCkaVBLoZVEq1AScqUF1641wKVAMEZs2PXf7Tilj4XyXA8hO-p7jJSWXGvzo2LlL3h1BJdmIF-PUxhw-qr_bcU3K-tOtQ</recordid><startdate>200603</startdate><enddate>200603</enddate><creator>Mai, Lilian Denise</creator><creator>Angerami, Emília Luigia Saporiti</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200603</creationdate><title>Negative and positive eugenics: meanings and contradictions</title><author>Mai, Lilian Denise ; Angerami, Emília Luigia Saporiti</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p540-750ec9e9681648b75478dcfe7cd30347ba643654a95a4ea156316cf70143a0773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>por</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Eugenics - trends</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mai, Lilian Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angerami, Emília Luigia Saporiti</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Revista latino-americana de enfermagem</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mai, Lilian Denise</au><au>Angerami, Emília Luigia Saporiti</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Negative and positive eugenics: meanings and contradictions</atitle><jtitle>Revista latino-americana de enfermagem</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Lat Am Enfermagem</addtitle><date>2006-03</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>258</epage><pages>251-258</pages><issn>0104-1169</issn><abstract>Eugenics constitutes an important subject of debate, associated with current biogenetics improvements. Considering that the central point in eugenics has always been the preoccupation with future generations' health and constitution, and that the use of scientific means and knowledge for the birth of a physically and mentally healthy child can be considered a eugenic action, this paper tries to analyze the meanings and contradictions of negative and positive eugenics actions, constructed concomitantly with 20th-century technical-scientific improvements. The meanings range, respectively, between limiting or stimulating human reproduction, at the beginning of this century, and preventing diseases or improving physical and mental characteristics, nowadays. In the implantation of actions, contradictions were produced, such as the discrimination and elimination of many people in view of one ideal man, the biologization of eminently social factors, the defense of a supposed scientific neutrality and the indiscriminate use of the reproductive choice right.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pmid>16699700</pmid><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0104-1169 |
ispartof | Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2006-03, Vol.14 (2), p.251-258 |
issn | 0104-1169 |
language | por |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67970947 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Eugenics - trends Genetics Humans Nursing |
title | Negative and positive eugenics: meanings and contradictions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T06%3A30%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Negative%20and%20positive%20eugenics:%20meanings%20and%20contradictions&rft.jtitle=Revista%20latino-americana%20de%20enfermagem&rft.au=Mai,%20Lilian%20Denise&rft.date=2006-03&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=258&rft.pages=251-258&rft.issn=0104-1169&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67970947%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67970947&rft_id=info:pmid/16699700&rfr_iscdi=true |