Negative and positive eugenics: meanings and contradictions

Eugenics constitutes an important subject of debate, associated with current biogenetics improvements. Considering that the central point in eugenics has always been the preoccupation with future generations' health and constitution, and that the use of scientific means and knowledge for the bi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista latino-americana de enfermagem 2006-03, Vol.14 (2), p.251-258
Hauptverfasser: Mai, Lilian Denise, Angerami, Emília Luigia Saporiti
Format: Artikel
Sprache:por
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 258
container_issue 2
container_start_page 251
container_title Revista latino-americana de enfermagem
container_volume 14
creator Mai, Lilian Denise
Angerami, Emília Luigia Saporiti
description Eugenics constitutes an important subject of debate, associated with current biogenetics improvements. Considering that the central point in eugenics has always been the preoccupation with future generations' health and constitution, and that the use of scientific means and knowledge for the birth of a physically and mentally healthy child can be considered a eugenic action, this paper tries to analyze the meanings and contradictions of negative and positive eugenics actions, constructed concomitantly with 20th-century technical-scientific improvements. The meanings range, respectively, between limiting or stimulating human reproduction, at the beginning of this century, and preventing diseases or improving physical and mental characteristics, nowadays. In the implantation of actions, contradictions were produced, such as the discrimination and elimination of many people in view of one ideal man, the biologization of eminently social factors, the defense of a supposed scientific neutrality and the indiscriminate use of the reproductive choice right.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67970947</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67970947</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p540-750ec9e9681648b75478dcfe7cd30347ba643654a95a4ea156316cf70143a0773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j0tLxDAUhbNQnHH0L0hX7go35tXoSgZfMOhm9uU2uS2RNqlNK_jv1XFcHQ7n48B3wtbAQZaca7ti5zm_A9xYDvyMrbjW1hqANbt7pQ7n8EkFRl-MKYdDoaWjGFy-LQbCGGKXD7tLcZ7QBzeHFPMFO22xz3R5zA3bPz7st8_l7u3pZXu_K0cloTQKyFmyuuJaVo1R0lTetWScFyCkaVBLoZVEq1AScqUF1641wKVAMEZs2PXf7Tilj4XyXA8hO-p7jJSWXGvzo2LlL3h1BJdmIF-PUxhw-qr_bcU3K-tOtQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67970947</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Negative and positive eugenics: meanings and contradictions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Mai, Lilian Denise ; Angerami, Emília Luigia Saporiti</creator><creatorcontrib>Mai, Lilian Denise ; Angerami, Emília Luigia Saporiti</creatorcontrib><description>Eugenics constitutes an important subject of debate, associated with current biogenetics improvements. Considering that the central point in eugenics has always been the preoccupation with future generations' health and constitution, and that the use of scientific means and knowledge for the birth of a physically and mentally healthy child can be considered a eugenic action, this paper tries to analyze the meanings and contradictions of negative and positive eugenics actions, constructed concomitantly with 20th-century technical-scientific improvements. The meanings range, respectively, between limiting or stimulating human reproduction, at the beginning of this century, and preventing diseases or improving physical and mental characteristics, nowadays. In the implantation of actions, contradictions were produced, such as the discrimination and elimination of many people in view of one ideal man, the biologization of eminently social factors, the defense of a supposed scientific neutrality and the indiscriminate use of the reproductive choice right.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0104-1169</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16699700</identifier><language>por</language><publisher>Brazil</publisher><subject>Eugenics - trends ; Genetics ; Humans ; Nursing</subject><ispartof>Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2006-03, Vol.14 (2), p.251-258</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16699700$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mai, Lilian Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angerami, Emília Luigia Saporiti</creatorcontrib><title>Negative and positive eugenics: meanings and contradictions</title><title>Revista latino-americana de enfermagem</title><addtitle>Rev Lat Am Enfermagem</addtitle><description>Eugenics constitutes an important subject of debate, associated with current biogenetics improvements. Considering that the central point in eugenics has always been the preoccupation with future generations' health and constitution, and that the use of scientific means and knowledge for the birth of a physically and mentally healthy child can be considered a eugenic action, this paper tries to analyze the meanings and contradictions of negative and positive eugenics actions, constructed concomitantly with 20th-century technical-scientific improvements. The meanings range, respectively, between limiting or stimulating human reproduction, at the beginning of this century, and preventing diseases or improving physical and mental characteristics, nowadays. In the implantation of actions, contradictions were produced, such as the discrimination and elimination of many people in view of one ideal man, the biologization of eminently social factors, the defense of a supposed scientific neutrality and the indiscriminate use of the reproductive choice right.</description><subject>Eugenics - trends</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><issn>0104-1169</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j0tLxDAUhbNQnHH0L0hX7go35tXoSgZfMOhm9uU2uS2RNqlNK_jv1XFcHQ7n48B3wtbAQZaca7ti5zm_A9xYDvyMrbjW1hqANbt7pQ7n8EkFRl-MKYdDoaWjGFy-LQbCGGKXD7tLcZ7QBzeHFPMFO22xz3R5zA3bPz7st8_l7u3pZXu_K0cloTQKyFmyuuJaVo1R0lTetWScFyCkaVBLoZVEq1AScqUF1641wKVAMEZs2PXf7Tilj4XyXA8hO-p7jJSWXGvzo2LlL3h1BJdmIF-PUxhw-qr_bcU3K-tOtQ</recordid><startdate>200603</startdate><enddate>200603</enddate><creator>Mai, Lilian Denise</creator><creator>Angerami, Emília Luigia Saporiti</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200603</creationdate><title>Negative and positive eugenics: meanings and contradictions</title><author>Mai, Lilian Denise ; Angerami, Emília Luigia Saporiti</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p540-750ec9e9681648b75478dcfe7cd30347ba643654a95a4ea156316cf70143a0773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>por</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Eugenics - trends</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mai, Lilian Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angerami, Emília Luigia Saporiti</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Revista latino-americana de enfermagem</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mai, Lilian Denise</au><au>Angerami, Emília Luigia Saporiti</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Negative and positive eugenics: meanings and contradictions</atitle><jtitle>Revista latino-americana de enfermagem</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Lat Am Enfermagem</addtitle><date>2006-03</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>258</epage><pages>251-258</pages><issn>0104-1169</issn><abstract>Eugenics constitutes an important subject of debate, associated with current biogenetics improvements. Considering that the central point in eugenics has always been the preoccupation with future generations' health and constitution, and that the use of scientific means and knowledge for the birth of a physically and mentally healthy child can be considered a eugenic action, this paper tries to analyze the meanings and contradictions of negative and positive eugenics actions, constructed concomitantly with 20th-century technical-scientific improvements. The meanings range, respectively, between limiting or stimulating human reproduction, at the beginning of this century, and preventing diseases or improving physical and mental characteristics, nowadays. In the implantation of actions, contradictions were produced, such as the discrimination and elimination of many people in view of one ideal man, the biologization of eminently social factors, the defense of a supposed scientific neutrality and the indiscriminate use of the reproductive choice right.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pmid>16699700</pmid><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0104-1169
ispartof Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2006-03, Vol.14 (2), p.251-258
issn 0104-1169
language por
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67970947
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Eugenics - trends
Genetics
Humans
Nursing
title Negative and positive eugenics: meanings and contradictions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T06%3A30%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Negative%20and%20positive%20eugenics:%20meanings%20and%20contradictions&rft.jtitle=Revista%20latino-americana%20de%20enfermagem&rft.au=Mai,%20Lilian%20Denise&rft.date=2006-03&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=258&rft.pages=251-258&rft.issn=0104-1169&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67970947%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67970947&rft_id=info:pmid/16699700&rfr_iscdi=true