In vivo short-term precision of hip structure analysis variables in comparison with bone mineral density using paired dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans from multi-center clinical trials

Hip structural analysis (HSA) is a technique for extracting strength-related structural dimensions of bone cross-sections from two-dimensional hip scan images acquired by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners. Heretofore the precision of the method has not been thoroughly tested in the cli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bone (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2005-07, Vol.37 (1), p.112-121
Hauptverfasser: Khoo, Benjamin C.C., Beck, Thomas J., Qiao, Qi-Hong, Parakh, Pallav, Semanick, Lisa, Prince, Richard L., Singer, Kevin P., Price, Roger I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 121
container_issue 1
container_start_page 112
container_title Bone (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 37
creator Khoo, Benjamin C.C.
Beck, Thomas J.
Qiao, Qi-Hong
Parakh, Pallav
Semanick, Lisa
Prince, Richard L.
Singer, Kevin P.
Price, Roger I.
description Hip structural analysis (HSA) is a technique for extracting strength-related structural dimensions of bone cross-sections from two-dimensional hip scan images acquired by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners. Heretofore the precision of the method has not been thoroughly tested in the clinical setting. Using paired scans from two large clinical trials involving a range of different DXA machines, this study reports the first precision analysis of HSA variables, in comparison with that of conventional bone mineral density (BMD) on the same scans. A key HSA variable, section modulus ( Z), biomechanically indicative of bone strength during bending, had a short-term precision percentage coefficient of variation (CV%) in the femoral neck of 3.4–10.1%, depending on the manufacturer or model of the DXA equipment. Cross-sectional area (CSA), a determinant of bone strength during axial loading and closely aligned with conventional DXA bone mineral content, had a range of CV% from 2.8% to 7.9%. Poorer precision was associated with inadequate inclusion of the femoral shaft or femoral head in the DXA-scanned hip region. Precision of HSA-derived BMD varied between 2.4% and 6.4%. Precision of DXA manufacturer-derived BMD varied between 1.9% and 3.4%, arising from the larger analysis region of interest (ROI). The precision of HSA variables was not generally dependent on magnitude, subject height, weight, or conventional femoral neck densitometric variables. The generally poorer precision of key HSA variables in comparison with conventional DXA-derived BMD highlights the critical roles played by correct limb repositioning and choice of an adequate and appropriately positioned ROI.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bone.2005.03.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67970341</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S8756328205000931</els_id><sourcerecordid>17502974</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-318c6f0fc428116cf024ea218b5567df1397dbda92b90f6150a1ce572e05a4023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks9u1DAQxiMEokvhBTigucAtwXZiO5G4oIo_lSpxAYmb5TiTrleJHWxnq7wcz4ZXu1Jv9DSy9PvG33wzRfGWkooSKj4eqt47rBghvCJ1RYh8VuxoK-uSSVE_L3at5KKsWcuuilcxHgghdSfpy-KK8lZ0HZW74u-tg6M9eoh7H1KZMMywBDQ2Wu_Aj7C3C8QUVpPWgKCdnrZoIxx1sLqfMIJ1YPy85HfMigeb9nCyBbN1GPQEA7po0wZrtO4eFm0DDjCseioxA_cb_C6D3kD30YclWT9jChtEo12EMfgZ5nVKtjTosjkwk3XW5LYp_z_F18WLMRd8c6nXxa-vX37efC_vfny7vfl8V5pa0FTWtDViJKNpWEupMCNhDWpG255zIYeR5lyGftAd6zsyCsqJpga5ZEi4bgirr4sP575L8H9WjEnNNhqcJu3Qr1EJ2UlSN_RJkBFJ247zJ0EqOWGdbDLIzqAJPsaAo1qCnXXYFCXqdAfqoE6Bq9MdKFKrfAdZ9O7Sfe1nHB4ll8Vn4P0F0DnqaQza5Z0_cqITXR4nc5_OHOZ0jxaDisaiMzjkPZqkBm__5-MfIkLVzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17502974</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vivo short-term precision of hip structure analysis variables in comparison with bone mineral density using paired dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans from multi-center clinical trials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Khoo, Benjamin C.C. ; Beck, Thomas J. ; Qiao, Qi-Hong ; Parakh, Pallav ; Semanick, Lisa ; Prince, Richard L. ; Singer, Kevin P. ; Price, Roger I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Khoo, Benjamin C.C. ; Beck, Thomas J. ; Qiao, Qi-Hong ; Parakh, Pallav ; Semanick, Lisa ; Prince, Richard L. ; Singer, Kevin P. ; Price, Roger I.</creatorcontrib><description>Hip structural analysis (HSA) is a technique for extracting strength-related structural dimensions of bone cross-sections from two-dimensional hip scan images acquired by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners. Heretofore the precision of the method has not been thoroughly tested in the clinical setting. Using paired scans from two large clinical trials involving a range of different DXA machines, this study reports the first precision analysis of HSA variables, in comparison with that of conventional bone mineral density (BMD) on the same scans. A key HSA variable, section modulus ( Z), biomechanically indicative of bone strength during bending, had a short-term precision percentage coefficient of variation (CV%) in the femoral neck of 3.4–10.1%, depending on the manufacturer or model of the DXA equipment. Cross-sectional area (CSA), a determinant of bone strength during axial loading and closely aligned with conventional DXA bone mineral content, had a range of CV% from 2.8% to 7.9%. Poorer precision was associated with inadequate inclusion of the femoral shaft or femoral head in the DXA-scanned hip region. Precision of HSA-derived BMD varied between 2.4% and 6.4%. Precision of DXA manufacturer-derived BMD varied between 1.9% and 3.4%, arising from the larger analysis region of interest (ROI). The precision of HSA variables was not generally dependent on magnitude, subject height, weight, or conventional femoral neck densitometric variables. The generally poorer precision of key HSA variables in comparison with conventional DXA-derived BMD highlights the critical roles played by correct limb repositioning and choice of an adequate and appropriately positioned ROI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8756-3282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2763</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.03.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15869917</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation ; Absorptiometry, Photon - methods ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Algorithms ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Density ; Bone mineral density ; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry ; Female ; Femur - diagnostic imaging ; Femur - pathology ; Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging ; Femur Neck - pathology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hip - diagnostic imaging ; Hip - pathology ; Hip structural analysis ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Multicenter Studies as Topic ; Osteoarticular system. Muscles ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - pathology ; Precision ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sample Size ; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><ispartof>Bone (New York, N.Y.), 2005-07, Vol.37 (1), p.112-121</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-318c6f0fc428116cf024ea218b5567df1397dbda92b90f6150a1ce572e05a4023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-318c6f0fc428116cf024ea218b5567df1397dbda92b90f6150a1ce572e05a4023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8756328205000931$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16969413$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15869917$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khoo, Benjamin C.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Qi-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parakh, Pallav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semanick, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prince, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Kevin P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Roger I.</creatorcontrib><title>In vivo short-term precision of hip structure analysis variables in comparison with bone mineral density using paired dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans from multi-center clinical trials</title><title>Bone (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Bone</addtitle><description>Hip structural analysis (HSA) is a technique for extracting strength-related structural dimensions of bone cross-sections from two-dimensional hip scan images acquired by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners. Heretofore the precision of the method has not been thoroughly tested in the clinical setting. Using paired scans from two large clinical trials involving a range of different DXA machines, this study reports the first precision analysis of HSA variables, in comparison with that of conventional bone mineral density (BMD) on the same scans. A key HSA variable, section modulus ( Z), biomechanically indicative of bone strength during bending, had a short-term precision percentage coefficient of variation (CV%) in the femoral neck of 3.4–10.1%, depending on the manufacturer or model of the DXA equipment. Cross-sectional area (CSA), a determinant of bone strength during axial loading and closely aligned with conventional DXA bone mineral content, had a range of CV% from 2.8% to 7.9%. Poorer precision was associated with inadequate inclusion of the femoral shaft or femoral head in the DXA-scanned hip region. Precision of HSA-derived BMD varied between 2.4% and 6.4%. Precision of DXA manufacturer-derived BMD varied between 1.9% and 3.4%, arising from the larger analysis region of interest (ROI). The precision of HSA variables was not generally dependent on magnitude, subject height, weight, or conventional femoral neck densitometric variables. The generally poorer precision of key HSA variables in comparison with conventional DXA-derived BMD highlights the critical roles played by correct limb repositioning and choice of an adequate and appropriately positioned ROI.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation</subject><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - methods</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Bone mineral density</subject><subject>Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femur - pathology</subject><subject>Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femur Neck - pathology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hip - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hip - pathology</subject><subject>Hip structural analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multicenter Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Osteoarticular system. Muscles</subject><subject>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - pathology</subject><subject>Precision</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><subject>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><issn>8756-3282</issn><issn>1873-2763</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks9u1DAQxiMEokvhBTigucAtwXZiO5G4oIo_lSpxAYmb5TiTrleJHWxnq7wcz4ZXu1Jv9DSy9PvG33wzRfGWkooSKj4eqt47rBghvCJ1RYh8VuxoK-uSSVE_L3at5KKsWcuuilcxHgghdSfpy-KK8lZ0HZW74u-tg6M9eoh7H1KZMMywBDQ2Wu_Aj7C3C8QUVpPWgKCdnrZoIxx1sLqfMIJ1YPy85HfMigeb9nCyBbN1GPQEA7po0wZrtO4eFm0DDjCseioxA_cb_C6D3kD30YclWT9jChtEo12EMfgZ5nVKtjTosjkwk3XW5LYp_z_F18WLMRd8c6nXxa-vX37efC_vfny7vfl8V5pa0FTWtDViJKNpWEupMCNhDWpG255zIYeR5lyGftAd6zsyCsqJpga5ZEi4bgirr4sP575L8H9WjEnNNhqcJu3Qr1EJ2UlSN_RJkBFJ247zJ0EqOWGdbDLIzqAJPsaAo1qCnXXYFCXqdAfqoE6Bq9MdKFKrfAdZ9O7Sfe1nHB4ll8Vn4P0F0DnqaQza5Z0_cqITXR4nc5_OHOZ0jxaDisaiMzjkPZqkBm__5-MfIkLVzg</recordid><startdate>200507</startdate><enddate>200507</enddate><creator>Khoo, Benjamin C.C.</creator><creator>Beck, Thomas J.</creator><creator>Qiao, Qi-Hong</creator><creator>Parakh, Pallav</creator><creator>Semanick, Lisa</creator><creator>Prince, Richard L.</creator><creator>Singer, Kevin P.</creator><creator>Price, Roger I.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200507</creationdate><title>In vivo short-term precision of hip structure analysis variables in comparison with bone mineral density using paired dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans from multi-center clinical trials</title><author>Khoo, Benjamin C.C. ; Beck, Thomas J. ; Qiao, Qi-Hong ; Parakh, Pallav ; Semanick, Lisa ; Prince, Richard L. ; Singer, Kevin P. ; Price, Roger I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-318c6f0fc428116cf024ea218b5567df1397dbda92b90f6150a1ce572e05a4023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation</topic><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon - methods</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Bone mineral density</topic><topic>Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femur - pathology</topic><topic>Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femur Neck - pathology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hip - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hip - pathology</topic><topic>Hip structural analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multicenter Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Osteoarticular system. Muscles</topic><topic>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - pathology</topic><topic>Precision</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><topic>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khoo, Benjamin C.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Qi-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parakh, Pallav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semanick, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prince, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Kevin P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Roger I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bone (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khoo, Benjamin C.C.</au><au>Beck, Thomas J.</au><au>Qiao, Qi-Hong</au><au>Parakh, Pallav</au><au>Semanick, Lisa</au><au>Prince, Richard L.</au><au>Singer, Kevin P.</au><au>Price, Roger I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vivo short-term precision of hip structure analysis variables in comparison with bone mineral density using paired dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans from multi-center clinical trials</atitle><jtitle>Bone (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Bone</addtitle><date>2005-07</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>112</spage><epage>121</epage><pages>112-121</pages><issn>8756-3282</issn><eissn>1873-2763</eissn><abstract>Hip structural analysis (HSA) is a technique for extracting strength-related structural dimensions of bone cross-sections from two-dimensional hip scan images acquired by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners. Heretofore the precision of the method has not been thoroughly tested in the clinical setting. Using paired scans from two large clinical trials involving a range of different DXA machines, this study reports the first precision analysis of HSA variables, in comparison with that of conventional bone mineral density (BMD) on the same scans. A key HSA variable, section modulus ( Z), biomechanically indicative of bone strength during bending, had a short-term precision percentage coefficient of variation (CV%) in the femoral neck of 3.4–10.1%, depending on the manufacturer or model of the DXA equipment. Cross-sectional area (CSA), a determinant of bone strength during axial loading and closely aligned with conventional DXA bone mineral content, had a range of CV% from 2.8% to 7.9%. Poorer precision was associated with inadequate inclusion of the femoral shaft or femoral head in the DXA-scanned hip region. Precision of HSA-derived BMD varied between 2.4% and 6.4%. Precision of DXA manufacturer-derived BMD varied between 1.9% and 3.4%, arising from the larger analysis region of interest (ROI). The precision of HSA variables was not generally dependent on magnitude, subject height, weight, or conventional femoral neck densitometric variables. The generally poorer precision of key HSA variables in comparison with conventional DXA-derived BMD highlights the critical roles played by correct limb repositioning and choice of an adequate and appropriately positioned ROI.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15869917</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bone.2005.03.007</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 8756-3282
ispartof Bone (New York, N.Y.), 2005-07, Vol.37 (1), p.112-121
issn 8756-3282
1873-2763
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67970341
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation
Absorptiometry, Photon - methods
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Algorithms
Biological and medical sciences
Bone Density
Bone mineral density
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
Female
Femur - diagnostic imaging
Femur - pathology
Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging
Femur Neck - pathology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hip - diagnostic imaging
Hip - pathology
Hip structural analysis
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Osteoarticular system. Muscles
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - pathology
Precision
Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry
Reproducibility of Results
Sample Size
Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems
title In vivo short-term precision of hip structure analysis variables in comparison with bone mineral density using paired dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans from multi-center clinical trials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T12%3A11%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vivo%20short-term%20precision%20of%20hip%20structure%20analysis%20variables%20in%20comparison%20with%20bone%20mineral%20density%20using%20paired%20dual-energy%20X-ray%20absorptiometry%20scans%20from%20multi-center%20clinical%20trials&rft.jtitle=Bone%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Khoo,%20Benjamin%20C.C.&rft.date=2005-07&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=112&rft.epage=121&rft.pages=112-121&rft.issn=8756-3282&rft.eissn=1873-2763&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bone.2005.03.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17502974%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17502974&rft_id=info:pmid/15869917&rft_els_id=S8756328205000931&rfr_iscdi=true