In vivo short-term precision of hip structure analysis variables in comparison with bone mineral density using paired dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans from multi-center clinical trials
Hip structural analysis (HSA) is a technique for extracting strength-related structural dimensions of bone cross-sections from two-dimensional hip scan images acquired by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners. Heretofore the precision of the method has not been thoroughly tested in the cli...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bone (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2005-07, Vol.37 (1), p.112-121 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 121 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 112 |
container_title | Bone (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Khoo, Benjamin C.C. Beck, Thomas J. Qiao, Qi-Hong Parakh, Pallav Semanick, Lisa Prince, Richard L. Singer, Kevin P. Price, Roger I. |
description | Hip structural analysis (HSA) is a technique for extracting strength-related structural dimensions of bone cross-sections from two-dimensional hip scan images acquired by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners. Heretofore the precision of the method has not been thoroughly tested in the clinical setting. Using paired scans from two large clinical trials involving a range of different DXA machines, this study reports the first precision analysis of HSA variables, in comparison with that of conventional bone mineral density (BMD) on the same scans. A key HSA variable, section modulus (
Z), biomechanically indicative of bone strength during bending, had a short-term precision percentage coefficient of variation (CV%) in the femoral neck of 3.4–10.1%, depending on the manufacturer or model of the DXA equipment. Cross-sectional area (CSA), a determinant of bone strength during axial loading and closely aligned with conventional DXA bone mineral content, had a range of CV% from 2.8% to 7.9%. Poorer precision was associated with inadequate inclusion of the femoral shaft or femoral head in the DXA-scanned hip region. Precision of HSA-derived BMD varied between 2.4% and 6.4%. Precision of DXA manufacturer-derived BMD varied between 1.9% and 3.4%, arising from the larger analysis region of interest (ROI). The precision of HSA variables was not generally dependent on magnitude, subject height, weight, or conventional femoral neck densitometric variables. The generally poorer precision of key HSA variables in comparison with conventional DXA-derived BMD highlights the critical roles played by correct limb repositioning and choice of an adequate and appropriately positioned ROI. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bone.2005.03.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67970341</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S8756328205000931</els_id><sourcerecordid>17502974</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-318c6f0fc428116cf024ea218b5567df1397dbda92b90f6150a1ce572e05a4023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks9u1DAQxiMEokvhBTigucAtwXZiO5G4oIo_lSpxAYmb5TiTrleJHWxnq7wcz4ZXu1Jv9DSy9PvG33wzRfGWkooSKj4eqt47rBghvCJ1RYh8VuxoK-uSSVE_L3at5KKsWcuuilcxHgghdSfpy-KK8lZ0HZW74u-tg6M9eoh7H1KZMMywBDQ2Wu_Aj7C3C8QUVpPWgKCdnrZoIxx1sLqfMIJ1YPy85HfMigeb9nCyBbN1GPQEA7po0wZrtO4eFm0DDjCseioxA_cb_C6D3kD30YclWT9jChtEo12EMfgZ5nVKtjTosjkwk3XW5LYp_z_F18WLMRd8c6nXxa-vX37efC_vfny7vfl8V5pa0FTWtDViJKNpWEupMCNhDWpG255zIYeR5lyGftAd6zsyCsqJpga5ZEi4bgirr4sP575L8H9WjEnNNhqcJu3Qr1EJ2UlSN_RJkBFJ247zJ0EqOWGdbDLIzqAJPsaAo1qCnXXYFCXqdAfqoE6Bq9MdKFKrfAdZ9O7Sfe1nHB4ll8Vn4P0F0DnqaQza5Z0_cqITXR4nc5_OHOZ0jxaDisaiMzjkPZqkBm__5-MfIkLVzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17502974</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vivo short-term precision of hip structure analysis variables in comparison with bone mineral density using paired dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans from multi-center clinical trials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Khoo, Benjamin C.C. ; Beck, Thomas J. ; Qiao, Qi-Hong ; Parakh, Pallav ; Semanick, Lisa ; Prince, Richard L. ; Singer, Kevin P. ; Price, Roger I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Khoo, Benjamin C.C. ; Beck, Thomas J. ; Qiao, Qi-Hong ; Parakh, Pallav ; Semanick, Lisa ; Prince, Richard L. ; Singer, Kevin P. ; Price, Roger I.</creatorcontrib><description>Hip structural analysis (HSA) is a technique for extracting strength-related structural dimensions of bone cross-sections from two-dimensional hip scan images acquired by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners. Heretofore the precision of the method has not been thoroughly tested in the clinical setting. Using paired scans from two large clinical trials involving a range of different DXA machines, this study reports the first precision analysis of HSA variables, in comparison with that of conventional bone mineral density (BMD) on the same scans. A key HSA variable, section modulus (
Z), biomechanically indicative of bone strength during bending, had a short-term precision percentage coefficient of variation (CV%) in the femoral neck of 3.4–10.1%, depending on the manufacturer or model of the DXA equipment. Cross-sectional area (CSA), a determinant of bone strength during axial loading and closely aligned with conventional DXA bone mineral content, had a range of CV% from 2.8% to 7.9%. Poorer precision was associated with inadequate inclusion of the femoral shaft or femoral head in the DXA-scanned hip region. Precision of HSA-derived BMD varied between 2.4% and 6.4%. Precision of DXA manufacturer-derived BMD varied between 1.9% and 3.4%, arising from the larger analysis region of interest (ROI). The precision of HSA variables was not generally dependent on magnitude, subject height, weight, or conventional femoral neck densitometric variables. The generally poorer precision of key HSA variables in comparison with conventional DXA-derived BMD highlights the critical roles played by correct limb repositioning and choice of an adequate and appropriately positioned ROI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8756-3282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2763</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.03.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15869917</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation ; Absorptiometry, Photon - methods ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Algorithms ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Density ; Bone mineral density ; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry ; Female ; Femur - diagnostic imaging ; Femur - pathology ; Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging ; Femur Neck - pathology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hip - diagnostic imaging ; Hip - pathology ; Hip structural analysis ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Multicenter Studies as Topic ; Osteoarticular system. Muscles ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - pathology ; Precision ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sample Size ; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><ispartof>Bone (New York, N.Y.), 2005-07, Vol.37 (1), p.112-121</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-318c6f0fc428116cf024ea218b5567df1397dbda92b90f6150a1ce572e05a4023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-318c6f0fc428116cf024ea218b5567df1397dbda92b90f6150a1ce572e05a4023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8756328205000931$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16969413$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15869917$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khoo, Benjamin C.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Qi-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parakh, Pallav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semanick, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prince, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Kevin P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Roger I.</creatorcontrib><title>In vivo short-term precision of hip structure analysis variables in comparison with bone mineral density using paired dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans from multi-center clinical trials</title><title>Bone (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Bone</addtitle><description>Hip structural analysis (HSA) is a technique for extracting strength-related structural dimensions of bone cross-sections from two-dimensional hip scan images acquired by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners. Heretofore the precision of the method has not been thoroughly tested in the clinical setting. Using paired scans from two large clinical trials involving a range of different DXA machines, this study reports the first precision analysis of HSA variables, in comparison with that of conventional bone mineral density (BMD) on the same scans. A key HSA variable, section modulus (
Z), biomechanically indicative of bone strength during bending, had a short-term precision percentage coefficient of variation (CV%) in the femoral neck of 3.4–10.1%, depending on the manufacturer or model of the DXA equipment. Cross-sectional area (CSA), a determinant of bone strength during axial loading and closely aligned with conventional DXA bone mineral content, had a range of CV% from 2.8% to 7.9%. Poorer precision was associated with inadequate inclusion of the femoral shaft or femoral head in the DXA-scanned hip region. Precision of HSA-derived BMD varied between 2.4% and 6.4%. Precision of DXA manufacturer-derived BMD varied between 1.9% and 3.4%, arising from the larger analysis region of interest (ROI). The precision of HSA variables was not generally dependent on magnitude, subject height, weight, or conventional femoral neck densitometric variables. The generally poorer precision of key HSA variables in comparison with conventional DXA-derived BMD highlights the critical roles played by correct limb repositioning and choice of an adequate and appropriately positioned ROI.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation</subject><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - methods</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Bone mineral density</subject><subject>Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femur - pathology</subject><subject>Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femur Neck - pathology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hip - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hip - pathology</subject><subject>Hip structural analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multicenter Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Osteoarticular system. Muscles</subject><subject>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - pathology</subject><subject>Precision</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><subject>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><issn>8756-3282</issn><issn>1873-2763</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks9u1DAQxiMEokvhBTigucAtwXZiO5G4oIo_lSpxAYmb5TiTrleJHWxnq7wcz4ZXu1Jv9DSy9PvG33wzRfGWkooSKj4eqt47rBghvCJ1RYh8VuxoK-uSSVE_L3at5KKsWcuuilcxHgghdSfpy-KK8lZ0HZW74u-tg6M9eoh7H1KZMMywBDQ2Wu_Aj7C3C8QUVpPWgKCdnrZoIxx1sLqfMIJ1YPy85HfMigeb9nCyBbN1GPQEA7po0wZrtO4eFm0DDjCseioxA_cb_C6D3kD30YclWT9jChtEo12EMfgZ5nVKtjTosjkwk3XW5LYp_z_F18WLMRd8c6nXxa-vX37efC_vfny7vfl8V5pa0FTWtDViJKNpWEupMCNhDWpG255zIYeR5lyGftAd6zsyCsqJpga5ZEi4bgirr4sP575L8H9WjEnNNhqcJu3Qr1EJ2UlSN_RJkBFJ247zJ0EqOWGdbDLIzqAJPsaAo1qCnXXYFCXqdAfqoE6Bq9MdKFKrfAdZ9O7Sfe1nHB4ll8Vn4P0F0DnqaQza5Z0_cqITXR4nc5_OHOZ0jxaDisaiMzjkPZqkBm__5-MfIkLVzg</recordid><startdate>200507</startdate><enddate>200507</enddate><creator>Khoo, Benjamin C.C.</creator><creator>Beck, Thomas J.</creator><creator>Qiao, Qi-Hong</creator><creator>Parakh, Pallav</creator><creator>Semanick, Lisa</creator><creator>Prince, Richard L.</creator><creator>Singer, Kevin P.</creator><creator>Price, Roger I.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200507</creationdate><title>In vivo short-term precision of hip structure analysis variables in comparison with bone mineral density using paired dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans from multi-center clinical trials</title><author>Khoo, Benjamin C.C. ; Beck, Thomas J. ; Qiao, Qi-Hong ; Parakh, Pallav ; Semanick, Lisa ; Prince, Richard L. ; Singer, Kevin P. ; Price, Roger I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-318c6f0fc428116cf024ea218b5567df1397dbda92b90f6150a1ce572e05a4023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation</topic><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon - methods</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Bone mineral density</topic><topic>Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femur - pathology</topic><topic>Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femur Neck - pathology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hip - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hip - pathology</topic><topic>Hip structural analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multicenter Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Osteoarticular system. Muscles</topic><topic>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - pathology</topic><topic>Precision</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><topic>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khoo, Benjamin C.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Qi-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parakh, Pallav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semanick, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prince, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Kevin P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Price, Roger I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bone (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khoo, Benjamin C.C.</au><au>Beck, Thomas J.</au><au>Qiao, Qi-Hong</au><au>Parakh, Pallav</au><au>Semanick, Lisa</au><au>Prince, Richard L.</au><au>Singer, Kevin P.</au><au>Price, Roger I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vivo short-term precision of hip structure analysis variables in comparison with bone mineral density using paired dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans from multi-center clinical trials</atitle><jtitle>Bone (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Bone</addtitle><date>2005-07</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>112</spage><epage>121</epage><pages>112-121</pages><issn>8756-3282</issn><eissn>1873-2763</eissn><abstract>Hip structural analysis (HSA) is a technique for extracting strength-related structural dimensions of bone cross-sections from two-dimensional hip scan images acquired by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners. Heretofore the precision of the method has not been thoroughly tested in the clinical setting. Using paired scans from two large clinical trials involving a range of different DXA machines, this study reports the first precision analysis of HSA variables, in comparison with that of conventional bone mineral density (BMD) on the same scans. A key HSA variable, section modulus (
Z), biomechanically indicative of bone strength during bending, had a short-term precision percentage coefficient of variation (CV%) in the femoral neck of 3.4–10.1%, depending on the manufacturer or model of the DXA equipment. Cross-sectional area (CSA), a determinant of bone strength during axial loading and closely aligned with conventional DXA bone mineral content, had a range of CV% from 2.8% to 7.9%. Poorer precision was associated with inadequate inclusion of the femoral shaft or femoral head in the DXA-scanned hip region. Precision of HSA-derived BMD varied between 2.4% and 6.4%. Precision of DXA manufacturer-derived BMD varied between 1.9% and 3.4%, arising from the larger analysis region of interest (ROI). The precision of HSA variables was not generally dependent on magnitude, subject height, weight, or conventional femoral neck densitometric variables. The generally poorer precision of key HSA variables in comparison with conventional DXA-derived BMD highlights the critical roles played by correct limb repositioning and choice of an adequate and appropriately positioned ROI.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15869917</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bone.2005.03.007</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 8756-3282 |
ispartof | Bone (New York, N.Y.), 2005-07, Vol.37 (1), p.112-121 |
issn | 8756-3282 1873-2763 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67970341 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation Absorptiometry, Photon - methods Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Algorithms Biological and medical sciences Bone Density Bone mineral density Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry Female Femur - diagnostic imaging Femur - pathology Femur Neck - diagnostic imaging Femur Neck - pathology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Hip - diagnostic imaging Hip - pathology Hip structural analysis Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Medical sciences Middle Aged Multicenter Studies as Topic Osteoarticular system. Muscles Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - pathology Precision Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry Reproducibility of Results Sample Size Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems |
title | In vivo short-term precision of hip structure analysis variables in comparison with bone mineral density using paired dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans from multi-center clinical trials |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T12%3A11%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vivo%20short-term%20precision%20of%20hip%20structure%20analysis%20variables%20in%20comparison%20with%20bone%20mineral%20density%20using%20paired%20dual-energy%20X-ray%20absorptiometry%20scans%20from%20multi-center%20clinical%20trials&rft.jtitle=Bone%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Khoo,%20Benjamin%20C.C.&rft.date=2005-07&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=112&rft.epage=121&rft.pages=112-121&rft.issn=8756-3282&rft.eissn=1873-2763&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bone.2005.03.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17502974%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17502974&rft_id=info:pmid/15869917&rft_els_id=S8756328205000931&rfr_iscdi=true |