Methane emissions from beef cattle: Effects of fumaric acid, essential oil, and canola oil

The objective of this study was to identify feed additives that reduce enteric methane emissions from cattle. We measured methane emissions, total tract digestibility (using chromic oxide), and ruminal fermentation (4 h after feeding) in growing beef cattle fed a diet supplemented with various addit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2006-06, Vol.84 (6), p.1489-1496
Hauptverfasser: Beauchemin, K.A, McGinn, S.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1496
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1489
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 84
creator Beauchemin, K.A
McGinn, S.M
description The objective of this study was to identify feed additives that reduce enteric methane emissions from cattle. We measured methane emissions, total tract digestibility (using chromic oxide), and ruminal fermentation (4 h after feeding) in growing beef cattle fed a diet supplemented with various additives. The experiment was designed as a replicated 4 x 4 Latin square with 21-d periods and was conducted using 16 Angus heifers (initial BW of 260 ± 32 kg). Treatments were: control (no additive), fumaric acid (175 g/d) with sodium bicarbonate (75 g/d), essential oil and spice extract (1 g/d), or canola oil (4.6% of DMI). The basal diet consisted of 75% whole-crop barley silage, 19% steam-rolled barley, and 6% supplement (DM basis). Four large chambers (2 animals fed the same diet per chamber) were equipped to measure methane emissions for 3 d each period. Adding canola oil to the diet decreased (P = 0.009) total daily methane emissions by 32% and tended (P = 0.09) to decrease methane emissions as a percentage of gross energy intake by 21%. However, much of the reduction in methane emissions was due to decreased (P < 0.05) feed intake and lower (P < 0.05) total tract digestibility of DM and fiber. Digestibility of all nutrients was also lowered (P < 0.05) by feeding essential oil, but there were no effects on ruminal fermentation or methane emissions. In contrast, adding fumaric acid to the diet increased total VFA concentration (P = 0.03), increased propionate proportions (P = 0.01), and decreased the acetate:propionate ratio (P = 0.002), but there was no measurable effect on methane emissions. The study demonstrates that canola oil can be used to reduce methane losses from cattle, but animal performance may be compromised due to lower feed intake and decreased fiber digestibility. Essential oils had no effect on methane emissions, whereas fumaric acid caused potentially beneficial changes in ruminal fermentation but no measurable reductions in methane emissions.
doi_str_mv 10.2527/2006.8461489x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67969068</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67969068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f325t-75b86c3934f5966b2291da6c5b4f2c2dec6f7ef3867d2af55d58bdb35576c5ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0T1P3TAUBmCrApVbyti19UInAv6Iv9gQoi0SVQfKwmKdOMdcIyeBOFct_75G3IqRybL0-LXfY0I-cXYslDAngjF9bFvNW-v-viMrroRqJNdyh6wYE7yxlos98qGUe8a4UE69J3tca-c4Uyty-xOXNYxIcUilpGksNM7TQDvESAMsS8ZTehEjhqXQKdK4GWBOgUJI_RHFUnBcEmQ6pXxEYezrmXHK8Lz_SHYj5IIH23Wf3Hy7-H3-o7n69f3y_OyqiVKopTGqszpIJ9uonNadEI73oIPq2iiC6DHoaDBKq00vICrVK9v1nVTKVAQo98nXl9yHeXrcYFl8rRIw51pr2hSvjdOOafsmFExIZgyv8PMWbroBe_8wp9r6yf8fWwWHWwAlQI4zjCGVV2dsnbVpX29cp7v1nzSjLwPkXGO5v4diW6_988dV-OUFRpg83M017OZaMC4Zry-q3eU_t2uRGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20230771</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methane emissions from beef cattle: Effects of fumaric acid, essential oil, and canola oil</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Beauchemin, K.A ; McGinn, S.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Beauchemin, K.A ; McGinn, S.M</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to identify feed additives that reduce enteric methane emissions from cattle. We measured methane emissions, total tract digestibility (using chromic oxide), and ruminal fermentation (4 h after feeding) in growing beef cattle fed a diet supplemented with various additives. The experiment was designed as a replicated 4 x 4 Latin square with 21-d periods and was conducted using 16 Angus heifers (initial BW of 260 ± 32 kg). Treatments were: control (no additive), fumaric acid (175 g/d) with sodium bicarbonate (75 g/d), essential oil and spice extract (1 g/d), or canola oil (4.6% of DMI). The basal diet consisted of 75% whole-crop barley silage, 19% steam-rolled barley, and 6% supplement (DM basis). Four large chambers (2 animals fed the same diet per chamber) were equipped to measure methane emissions for 3 d each period. Adding canola oil to the diet decreased (P = 0.009) total daily methane emissions by 32% and tended (P = 0.09) to decrease methane emissions as a percentage of gross energy intake by 21%. However, much of the reduction in methane emissions was due to decreased (P &lt; 0.05) feed intake and lower (P &lt; 0.05) total tract digestibility of DM and fiber. Digestibility of all nutrients was also lowered (P &lt; 0.05) by feeding essential oil, but there were no effects on ruminal fermentation or methane emissions. In contrast, adding fumaric acid to the diet increased total VFA concentration (P = 0.03), increased propionate proportions (P = 0.01), and decreased the acetate:propionate ratio (P = 0.002), but there was no measurable effect on methane emissions. The study demonstrates that canola oil can be used to reduce methane losses from cattle, but animal performance may be compromised due to lower feed intake and decreased fiber digestibility. Essential oils had no effect on methane emissions, whereas fumaric acid caused potentially beneficial changes in ruminal fermentation but no measurable reductions in methane emissions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/2006.8461489x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16699105</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: American Society of Animal Science</publisher><subject>acetic acid ; Animal Feed ; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Animal productions ; Animals ; beef cattle ; Biological and medical sciences ; canola oil ; Cattle - metabolism ; cattle feeding ; Diet ; dietary fiber ; digestibility ; Digestion - drug effects ; Digestion - physiology ; energy intake ; essential oils ; Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated - metabolism ; Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated - pharmacology ; feed additives ; feed intake ; Female ; Fermentation ; food animals ; Fumarates - metabolism ; Fumarates - pharmacology ; fumaric acid ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; gas emissions ; greenhouse gases ; Hordeum vulgare ; methane ; Methane - biosynthesis ; nutrient availability ; Oils, Volatile - metabolism ; Oils, Volatile - pharmacology ; propionic acid ; Rapeseed Oil ; rumen fermentation ; sodium bicarbonate ; spices ; Terrestrial animal productions ; total tract digestibility ; Vertebrates ; volatile fatty acids</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2006-06, Vol.84 (6), p.1489-1496</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17800174$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16699105$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beauchemin, K.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGinn, S.M</creatorcontrib><title>Methane emissions from beef cattle: Effects of fumaric acid, essential oil, and canola oil</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to identify feed additives that reduce enteric methane emissions from cattle. We measured methane emissions, total tract digestibility (using chromic oxide), and ruminal fermentation (4 h after feeding) in growing beef cattle fed a diet supplemented with various additives. The experiment was designed as a replicated 4 x 4 Latin square with 21-d periods and was conducted using 16 Angus heifers (initial BW of 260 ± 32 kg). Treatments were: control (no additive), fumaric acid (175 g/d) with sodium bicarbonate (75 g/d), essential oil and spice extract (1 g/d), or canola oil (4.6% of DMI). The basal diet consisted of 75% whole-crop barley silage, 19% steam-rolled barley, and 6% supplement (DM basis). Four large chambers (2 animals fed the same diet per chamber) were equipped to measure methane emissions for 3 d each period. Adding canola oil to the diet decreased (P = 0.009) total daily methane emissions by 32% and tended (P = 0.09) to decrease methane emissions as a percentage of gross energy intake by 21%. However, much of the reduction in methane emissions was due to decreased (P &lt; 0.05) feed intake and lower (P &lt; 0.05) total tract digestibility of DM and fiber. Digestibility of all nutrients was also lowered (P &lt; 0.05) by feeding essential oil, but there were no effects on ruminal fermentation or methane emissions. In contrast, adding fumaric acid to the diet increased total VFA concentration (P = 0.03), increased propionate proportions (P = 0.01), and decreased the acetate:propionate ratio (P = 0.002), but there was no measurable effect on methane emissions. The study demonstrates that canola oil can be used to reduce methane losses from cattle, but animal performance may be compromised due to lower feed intake and decreased fiber digestibility. Essential oils had no effect on methane emissions, whereas fumaric acid caused potentially beneficial changes in ruminal fermentation but no measurable reductions in methane emissions.</description><subject>acetic acid</subject><subject>Animal Feed</subject><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>beef cattle</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>canola oil</subject><subject>Cattle - metabolism</subject><subject>cattle feeding</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>dietary fiber</subject><subject>digestibility</subject><subject>Digestion - drug effects</subject><subject>Digestion - physiology</subject><subject>energy intake</subject><subject>essential oils</subject><subject>Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated - metabolism</subject><subject>Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated - pharmacology</subject><subject>feed additives</subject><subject>feed intake</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>food animals</subject><subject>Fumarates - metabolism</subject><subject>Fumarates - pharmacology</subject><subject>fumaric acid</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>gas emissions</subject><subject>greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Hordeum vulgare</subject><subject>methane</subject><subject>Methane - biosynthesis</subject><subject>nutrient availability</subject><subject>Oils, Volatile - metabolism</subject><subject>Oils, Volatile - pharmacology</subject><subject>propionic acid</subject><subject>Rapeseed Oil</subject><subject>rumen fermentation</subject><subject>sodium bicarbonate</subject><subject>spices</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>total tract digestibility</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>volatile fatty acids</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0T1P3TAUBmCrApVbyti19UInAv6Iv9gQoi0SVQfKwmKdOMdcIyeBOFct_75G3IqRybL0-LXfY0I-cXYslDAngjF9bFvNW-v-viMrroRqJNdyh6wYE7yxlos98qGUe8a4UE69J3tca-c4Uyty-xOXNYxIcUilpGksNM7TQDvESAMsS8ZTehEjhqXQKdK4GWBOgUJI_RHFUnBcEmQ6pXxEYezrmXHK8Lz_SHYj5IIH23Wf3Hy7-H3-o7n69f3y_OyqiVKopTGqszpIJ9uonNadEI73oIPq2iiC6DHoaDBKq00vICrVK9v1nVTKVAQo98nXl9yHeXrcYFl8rRIw51pr2hSvjdOOafsmFExIZgyv8PMWbroBe_8wp9r6yf8fWwWHWwAlQI4zjCGVV2dsnbVpX29cp7v1nzSjLwPkXGO5v4diW6_988dV-OUFRpg83M017OZaMC4Zry-q3eU_t2uRGw</recordid><startdate>20060601</startdate><enddate>20060601</enddate><creator>Beauchemin, K.A</creator><creator>McGinn, S.M</creator><general>American Society of Animal Science</general><general>Am Soc Animal Sci</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060601</creationdate><title>Methane emissions from beef cattle: Effects of fumaric acid, essential oil, and canola oil</title><author>Beauchemin, K.A ; McGinn, S.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f325t-75b86c3934f5966b2291da6c5b4f2c2dec6f7ef3867d2af55d58bdb35576c5ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>acetic acid</topic><topic>Animal Feed</topic><topic>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>beef cattle</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>canola oil</topic><topic>Cattle - metabolism</topic><topic>cattle feeding</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>dietary fiber</topic><topic>digestibility</topic><topic>Digestion - drug effects</topic><topic>Digestion - physiology</topic><topic>energy intake</topic><topic>essential oils</topic><topic>Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated - metabolism</topic><topic>Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated - pharmacology</topic><topic>feed additives</topic><topic>feed intake</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>food animals</topic><topic>Fumarates - metabolism</topic><topic>Fumarates - pharmacology</topic><topic>fumaric acid</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>gas emissions</topic><topic>greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Hordeum vulgare</topic><topic>methane</topic><topic>Methane - biosynthesis</topic><topic>nutrient availability</topic><topic>Oils, Volatile - metabolism</topic><topic>Oils, Volatile - pharmacology</topic><topic>propionic acid</topic><topic>Rapeseed Oil</topic><topic>rumen fermentation</topic><topic>sodium bicarbonate</topic><topic>spices</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>total tract digestibility</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>volatile fatty acids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beauchemin, K.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGinn, S.M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beauchemin, K.A</au><au>McGinn, S.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methane emissions from beef cattle: Effects of fumaric acid, essential oil, and canola oil</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>2006-06-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1489</spage><epage>1496</epage><pages>1489-1496</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to identify feed additives that reduce enteric methane emissions from cattle. We measured methane emissions, total tract digestibility (using chromic oxide), and ruminal fermentation (4 h after feeding) in growing beef cattle fed a diet supplemented with various additives. The experiment was designed as a replicated 4 x 4 Latin square with 21-d periods and was conducted using 16 Angus heifers (initial BW of 260 ± 32 kg). Treatments were: control (no additive), fumaric acid (175 g/d) with sodium bicarbonate (75 g/d), essential oil and spice extract (1 g/d), or canola oil (4.6% of DMI). The basal diet consisted of 75% whole-crop barley silage, 19% steam-rolled barley, and 6% supplement (DM basis). Four large chambers (2 animals fed the same diet per chamber) were equipped to measure methane emissions for 3 d each period. Adding canola oil to the diet decreased (P = 0.009) total daily methane emissions by 32% and tended (P = 0.09) to decrease methane emissions as a percentage of gross energy intake by 21%. However, much of the reduction in methane emissions was due to decreased (P &lt; 0.05) feed intake and lower (P &lt; 0.05) total tract digestibility of DM and fiber. Digestibility of all nutrients was also lowered (P &lt; 0.05) by feeding essential oil, but there were no effects on ruminal fermentation or methane emissions. In contrast, adding fumaric acid to the diet increased total VFA concentration (P = 0.03), increased propionate proportions (P = 0.01), and decreased the acetate:propionate ratio (P = 0.002), but there was no measurable effect on methane emissions. The study demonstrates that canola oil can be used to reduce methane losses from cattle, but animal performance may be compromised due to lower feed intake and decreased fiber digestibility. Essential oils had no effect on methane emissions, whereas fumaric acid caused potentially beneficial changes in ruminal fermentation but no measurable reductions in methane emissions.</abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>American Society of Animal Science</pub><pmid>16699105</pmid><doi>10.2527/2006.8461489x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2006-06, Vol.84 (6), p.1489-1496
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67969068
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects acetic acid
Animal Feed
Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Animal productions
Animals
beef cattle
Biological and medical sciences
canola oil
Cattle - metabolism
cattle feeding
Diet
dietary fiber
digestibility
Digestion - drug effects
Digestion - physiology
energy intake
essential oils
Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated - metabolism
Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated - pharmacology
feed additives
feed intake
Female
Fermentation
food animals
Fumarates - metabolism
Fumarates - pharmacology
fumaric acid
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
gas emissions
greenhouse gases
Hordeum vulgare
methane
Methane - biosynthesis
nutrient availability
Oils, Volatile - metabolism
Oils, Volatile - pharmacology
propionic acid
Rapeseed Oil
rumen fermentation
sodium bicarbonate
spices
Terrestrial animal productions
total tract digestibility
Vertebrates
volatile fatty acids
title Methane emissions from beef cattle: Effects of fumaric acid, essential oil, and canola oil
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T05%3A02%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methane%20emissions%20from%20beef%20cattle:%20Effects%20of%20fumaric%20acid,%20essential%20oil,%20and%20canola%20oil&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Beauchemin,%20K.A&rft.date=2006-06-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1489&rft.epage=1496&rft.pages=1489-1496&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/2006.8461489x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67969068%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20230771&rft_id=info:pmid/16699105&rfr_iscdi=true