How do mental health professionals evaluate candidates for bariatric surgery? Survey results

The prevalence of extreme obesity and the popularity of bariatric surgery have increased dramatically in recent years. Many surgery programs require that candidates undergo a preoperative psychological evaluation, but no consensus exists for guiding mental health professionals in the conduct of thes...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obesity surgery 2006-05, Vol.16 (5), p.567-573
Hauptverfasser: Fabricatore, Anthony N, Crerand, Canice E, Wadden, Thomas A, Sarwer, David B, Krasucki, Jennifer L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 573
container_issue 5
container_start_page 567
container_title Obesity surgery
container_volume 16
creator Fabricatore, Anthony N
Crerand, Canice E
Wadden, Thomas A
Sarwer, David B
Krasucki, Jennifer L
description The prevalence of extreme obesity and the popularity of bariatric surgery have increased dramatically in recent years. Many surgery programs require that candidates undergo a preoperative psychological evaluation, but no consensus exists for guiding mental health professionals in the conduct of these evaluations. A survey was sent to bariatric surgeons, who were asked to distribute the surveys to the mental health professionals to whom they refer surgery candidates for preoperative evaluations. 194 respondents provided information on the assessment methods they use, which psychosocial domains are the focus of their evaluations, and what they consider to be contraindications to surgery. Responses to open-ended questions were coded for content. Most respondents reported using clinical interviews (98.5%), symptom inventories (68.6%), and objective personality/psychopathology tests (63.4%). A minority used tests of cognitive function (38.1%) and projective personality tests (3.6%). Over 90% of respondents listed mental health issues among the most important areas to assess. Similarly, 92.3% listed psychiatric issues as "clear contraindications" to surgery, but no specific disorder was listed by a majority of respondents. Issues related to informed consent and treatment adherence were the non-psychiatric domains most frequently listed as important areas to assess and as contraindications to surgery. The assessment practices of mental health professionals who evaluate bariatric surgery candidates vary widely. No consensus is likely to emerge until large long-term studies identify consistent psychosocial predictors of poor postoperative outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1381/096089206776944986
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67962777</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2221478391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-ef2e54614471a8695e262ad9edba929253d810da2940e8267f860957635a8a033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkM1Lw0AQxRdRbK3-Ax5k8eAtujub7MdJpPgFBQ_qTQjb7MSmJNm6m1T635vSgqCnmcPvvZn3CDnn7JoLzW-YkUwbYFIpadLUaHlAxlwxnbAU9CEZb4FkIMSInMS4ZAy4BDgmIy6lVgzEmHw8-W_qPG2w7WxNF2jrbkFXwZcYY-VbW0eKa1v3tkNa2NZVbtgiLX2gcxsq24WqoLEPnxg2t_S1D2vc0ICxr7t4So7KwQDP9nNC3h_u36ZPyezl8Xl6N0sKAbpLsATMUsnTVHGrpckQJFhn0M2tAQOZcJozZ8GkDDVIVWrJTKakyKy2TIgJudr5Dn9_9Ri7vKligXVtW_R9zKUyEpRSA3j5B1z6PmxD5ho4Zykfjk0I7KAi-BgDlvkqVI0Nm5yzfFt8_r_4QXSxd-7nDbpfyb5p8QP4331J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>821104125</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How do mental health professionals evaluate candidates for bariatric surgery? Survey results</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Fabricatore, Anthony N ; Crerand, Canice E ; Wadden, Thomas A ; Sarwer, David B ; Krasucki, Jennifer L</creator><creatorcontrib>Fabricatore, Anthony N ; Crerand, Canice E ; Wadden, Thomas A ; Sarwer, David B ; Krasucki, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><description>The prevalence of extreme obesity and the popularity of bariatric surgery have increased dramatically in recent years. Many surgery programs require that candidates undergo a preoperative psychological evaluation, but no consensus exists for guiding mental health professionals in the conduct of these evaluations. A survey was sent to bariatric surgeons, who were asked to distribute the surveys to the mental health professionals to whom they refer surgery candidates for preoperative evaluations. 194 respondents provided information on the assessment methods they use, which psychosocial domains are the focus of their evaluations, and what they consider to be contraindications to surgery. Responses to open-ended questions were coded for content. Most respondents reported using clinical interviews (98.5%), symptom inventories (68.6%), and objective personality/psychopathology tests (63.4%). A minority used tests of cognitive function (38.1%) and projective personality tests (3.6%). Over 90% of respondents listed mental health issues among the most important areas to assess. Similarly, 92.3% listed psychiatric issues as "clear contraindications" to surgery, but no specific disorder was listed by a majority of respondents. Issues related to informed consent and treatment adherence were the non-psychiatric domains most frequently listed as important areas to assess and as contraindications to surgery. The assessment practices of mental health professionals who evaluate bariatric surgery candidates vary widely. No consensus is likely to emerge until large long-term studies identify consistent psychosocial predictors of poor postoperative outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-8923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-0428</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1381/096089206776944986</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16687023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bariatric Surgery - psychology ; Comorbidity ; Contraindications ; Female ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Humans ; Informed Consent ; Male ; Mental Disorders - epidemiology ; Mental health ; Mental Health Services ; Middle Aged ; Obesity, Morbid - epidemiology ; Obesity, Morbid - psychology ; Obesity, Morbid - surgery ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Patient Selection ; Social Support</subject><ispartof>Obesity surgery, 2006-05, Vol.16 (5), p.567-573</ispartof><rights>Springer 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-ef2e54614471a8695e262ad9edba929253d810da2940e8267f860957635a8a033</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16687023$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fabricatore, Anthony N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crerand, Canice E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wadden, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarwer, David B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krasucki, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><title>How do mental health professionals evaluate candidates for bariatric surgery? Survey results</title><title>Obesity surgery</title><addtitle>Obes Surg</addtitle><description>The prevalence of extreme obesity and the popularity of bariatric surgery have increased dramatically in recent years. Many surgery programs require that candidates undergo a preoperative psychological evaluation, but no consensus exists for guiding mental health professionals in the conduct of these evaluations. A survey was sent to bariatric surgeons, who were asked to distribute the surveys to the mental health professionals to whom they refer surgery candidates for preoperative evaluations. 194 respondents provided information on the assessment methods they use, which psychosocial domains are the focus of their evaluations, and what they consider to be contraindications to surgery. Responses to open-ended questions were coded for content. Most respondents reported using clinical interviews (98.5%), symptom inventories (68.6%), and objective personality/psychopathology tests (63.4%). A minority used tests of cognitive function (38.1%) and projective personality tests (3.6%). Over 90% of respondents listed mental health issues among the most important areas to assess. Similarly, 92.3% listed psychiatric issues as "clear contraindications" to surgery, but no specific disorder was listed by a majority of respondents. Issues related to informed consent and treatment adherence were the non-psychiatric domains most frequently listed as important areas to assess and as contraindications to surgery. The assessment practices of mental health professionals who evaluate bariatric surgery candidates vary widely. No consensus is likely to emerge until large long-term studies identify consistent psychosocial predictors of poor postoperative outcomes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bariatric Surgery - psychology</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Contraindications</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informed Consent</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mental Health Services</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - epidemiology</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - psychology</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><issn>0960-8923</issn><issn>1708-0428</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNplkM1Lw0AQxRdRbK3-Ax5k8eAtujub7MdJpPgFBQ_qTQjb7MSmJNm6m1T635vSgqCnmcPvvZn3CDnn7JoLzW-YkUwbYFIpadLUaHlAxlwxnbAU9CEZb4FkIMSInMS4ZAy4BDgmIy6lVgzEmHw8-W_qPG2w7WxNF2jrbkFXwZcYY-VbW0eKa1v3tkNa2NZVbtgiLX2gcxsq24WqoLEPnxg2t_S1D2vc0ICxr7t4So7KwQDP9nNC3h_u36ZPyezl8Xl6N0sKAbpLsATMUsnTVHGrpckQJFhn0M2tAQOZcJozZ8GkDDVIVWrJTKakyKy2TIgJudr5Dn9_9Ri7vKligXVtW_R9zKUyEpRSA3j5B1z6PmxD5ho4Zykfjk0I7KAi-BgDlvkqVI0Nm5yzfFt8_r_4QXSxd-7nDbpfyb5p8QP4331J</recordid><startdate>200605</startdate><enddate>200605</enddate><creator>Fabricatore, Anthony N</creator><creator>Crerand, Canice E</creator><creator>Wadden, Thomas A</creator><creator>Sarwer, David B</creator><creator>Krasucki, Jennifer L</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200605</creationdate><title>How do mental health professionals evaluate candidates for bariatric surgery? Survey results</title><author>Fabricatore, Anthony N ; Crerand, Canice E ; Wadden, Thomas A ; Sarwer, David B ; Krasucki, Jennifer L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-ef2e54614471a8695e262ad9edba929253d810da2940e8267f860957635a8a033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bariatric Surgery - psychology</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Contraindications</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informed Consent</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mental Health Services</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - epidemiology</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - psychology</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fabricatore, Anthony N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crerand, Canice E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wadden, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarwer, David B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krasucki, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fabricatore, Anthony N</au><au>Crerand, Canice E</au><au>Wadden, Thomas A</au><au>Sarwer, David B</au><au>Krasucki, Jennifer L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How do mental health professionals evaluate candidates for bariatric surgery? Survey results</atitle><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Obes Surg</addtitle><date>2006-05</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>567</spage><epage>573</epage><pages>567-573</pages><issn>0960-8923</issn><eissn>1708-0428</eissn><abstract>The prevalence of extreme obesity and the popularity of bariatric surgery have increased dramatically in recent years. Many surgery programs require that candidates undergo a preoperative psychological evaluation, but no consensus exists for guiding mental health professionals in the conduct of these evaluations. A survey was sent to bariatric surgeons, who were asked to distribute the surveys to the mental health professionals to whom they refer surgery candidates for preoperative evaluations. 194 respondents provided information on the assessment methods they use, which psychosocial domains are the focus of their evaluations, and what they consider to be contraindications to surgery. Responses to open-ended questions were coded for content. Most respondents reported using clinical interviews (98.5%), symptom inventories (68.6%), and objective personality/psychopathology tests (63.4%). A minority used tests of cognitive function (38.1%) and projective personality tests (3.6%). Over 90% of respondents listed mental health issues among the most important areas to assess. Similarly, 92.3% listed psychiatric issues as "clear contraindications" to surgery, but no specific disorder was listed by a majority of respondents. Issues related to informed consent and treatment adherence were the non-psychiatric domains most frequently listed as important areas to assess and as contraindications to surgery. The assessment practices of mental health professionals who evaluate bariatric surgery candidates vary widely. No consensus is likely to emerge until large long-term studies identify consistent psychosocial predictors of poor postoperative outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>16687023</pmid><doi>10.1381/096089206776944986</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-8923
ispartof Obesity surgery, 2006-05, Vol.16 (5), p.567-573
issn 0960-8923
1708-0428
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67962777
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Bariatric Surgery - psychology
Comorbidity
Contraindications
Female
Gastrointestinal surgery
Humans
Informed Consent
Male
Mental Disorders - epidemiology
Mental health
Mental Health Services
Middle Aged
Obesity, Morbid - epidemiology
Obesity, Morbid - psychology
Obesity, Morbid - surgery
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Patient Selection
Social Support
title How do mental health professionals evaluate candidates for bariatric surgery? Survey results
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T05%3A49%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20do%20mental%20health%20professionals%20evaluate%20candidates%20for%20bariatric%20surgery?%20Survey%20results&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20surgery&rft.au=Fabricatore,%20Anthony%20N&rft.date=2006-05&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=567&rft.epage=573&rft.pages=567-573&rft.issn=0960-8923&rft.eissn=1708-0428&rft_id=info:doi/10.1381/096089206776944986&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2221478391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=821104125&rft_id=info:pmid/16687023&rfr_iscdi=true