Risk Perception and Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) on Work and Personal Lives of Healthcare Workers in Singapore What Can We Learn?
Introduction: Healthcare workers (HCWs) were at the frontline during the battle against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Understanding their fears and anxieties may hold lessons for handling future outbreaks, including acts of bioterrorism. Method: We measured risk perception and impact on...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical care 2005-07, Vol.43 (7), p.676-682 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 682 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 676 |
container_title | Medical care |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Koh, David Lim, Meng Kin Chia, Sin Eng Ko, Soo Meng Qian, Feng Ng, Vivian Tan, Ban Hock Wong, Kok Seng Chew, Wuen Ming Tang, Hui Kheng Ng, Winston Muttakin, Zainal Emmanuel, Shanta Fong, Ngan Phoon Koh, Gerald Kwa, Chong Teck Tan, Keson Beng-Choon Fones, Calvin |
description | Introduction: Healthcare workers (HCWs) were at the frontline during the battle against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Understanding their fears and anxieties may hold lessons for handling future outbreaks, including acts of bioterrorism. Method: We measured risk perception and impact on personal and work life of 15,025 HCWs from 9 major healthcare institutions during the SARS epidemic in Singapore using a self-administered questionnaire and Impact of Events Scale and analyzed the results with bivariate and multivariate statistics. Results: From 10,511 valid questionnaires (70% response), we found that although the majority (76%) perceived a great personal risk of falling ill with SARS, they (69.5%) also accepted the risk as part of their job. Clinical staff (doctors and nurses), staff in daily contact with SARS patients, and staff from SARS-affected institutions expressed significantly higher levels of anxiety. More than half reported increased work stress (56%) and work load (53%). Many experienced social stigmatization (49%) and ostracism by family members (31%), but most (77%) felt appreciated by society. Most felt that the personal protective measures implemented were effective (96%) and that the institutional policies and protocols were clear (93%) and timely (90%). Conclusion: During epidemics, healthcare institutions have a duty to protect HCWs and help them cope with their personal fears and the very stressful work situation. Singapore's experience shows that simple protective measures based on sound epidemiological principles, when implemented in a timely manner, go a long way to reassure HCWs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/01.mlr.0000167181.36730.cc |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67960722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3768367</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3768367</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-9b64906d43f95a64049c5b683109da93dafa3229445dda396dc052ec06dd2c4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd9u0zAUxiMEYt3gDRCydoHgIsF_YrveDaqqwSZVAjUgLi3XcWjaJA52sqlPwuty0lZMwjeWj3_fd-zzJck1wRnBSn7EJGubkGFYREgyJxkTkuHM2mfJjHAmU6Ly-fNkhjHlqcRSXSSXMe4Al4zTl8kF4QrKczpL_qzruEffXLCuH2rfIdOV6L7tjR2Qr1DhHlxwaGHHwaG1i30dzODDARWHrgy-deh9sVgXHxAof_qwP8rBLfrONGhVP7g42dw50wxba8BqouAe1R0q6u6X6f1U3JoBLQ14OLRyJnSfXiUvKtNE9_q8XyU_Pt9-X96lq69f7peLVWoZZyJVG5ErLMqcVYobkeNcWb4RcwaDKo1ipakMo1TlOS9Lw5QoLebUWZCU1OaWXSXvTr598L9HFwfd1tG6pjGd82PUQiqBJaUAXv8H7vwY4JdRUyxzLhifA3RzgmzwMQZX6T7UrQkHTbCestOYaMhOP2Wnj9lpOz3l7bnDuGld-SQ9hwVAfgIefTPADPfN-OiC3h6He7TkguOUwo4lnNKpJED25iTbRYjuny2TMCbo_RdE1K8b</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>207456358</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk Perception and Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) on Work and Personal Lives of Healthcare Workers in Singapore What Can We Learn?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Koh, David ; Lim, Meng Kin ; Chia, Sin Eng ; Ko, Soo Meng ; Qian, Feng ; Ng, Vivian ; Tan, Ban Hock ; Wong, Kok Seng ; Chew, Wuen Ming ; Tang, Hui Kheng ; Ng, Winston ; Muttakin, Zainal ; Emmanuel, Shanta ; Fong, Ngan Phoon ; Koh, Gerald ; Kwa, Chong Teck ; Tan, Keson Beng-Choon ; Fones, Calvin</creator><creatorcontrib>Koh, David ; Lim, Meng Kin ; Chia, Sin Eng ; Ko, Soo Meng ; Qian, Feng ; Ng, Vivian ; Tan, Ban Hock ; Wong, Kok Seng ; Chew, Wuen Ming ; Tang, Hui Kheng ; Ng, Winston ; Muttakin, Zainal ; Emmanuel, Shanta ; Fong, Ngan Phoon ; Koh, Gerald ; Kwa, Chong Teck ; Tan, Keson Beng-Choon ; Fones, Calvin</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Healthcare workers (HCWs) were at the frontline during the battle against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Understanding their fears and anxieties may hold lessons for handling future outbreaks, including acts of bioterrorism. Method: We measured risk perception and impact on personal and work life of 15,025 HCWs from 9 major healthcare institutions during the SARS epidemic in Singapore using a self-administered questionnaire and Impact of Events Scale and analyzed the results with bivariate and multivariate statistics. Results: From 10,511 valid questionnaires (70% response), we found that although the majority (76%) perceived a great personal risk of falling ill with SARS, they (69.5%) also accepted the risk as part of their job. Clinical staff (doctors and nurses), staff in daily contact with SARS patients, and staff from SARS-affected institutions expressed significantly higher levels of anxiety. More than half reported increased work stress (56%) and work load (53%). Many experienced social stigmatization (49%) and ostracism by family members (31%), but most (77%) felt appreciated by society. Most felt that the personal protective measures implemented were effective (96%) and that the institutional policies and protocols were clear (93%) and timely (90%). Conclusion: During epidemics, healthcare institutions have a duty to protect HCWs and help them cope with their personal fears and the very stressful work situation. Singapore's experience shows that simple protective measures based on sound epidemiological principles, when implemented in a timely manner, go a long way to reassure HCWs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-1948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000167181.36730.cc</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15970782</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MELAAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: J. B. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Inc</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Adult ; Anxiety ; Children ; Disease Outbreaks - prevention & control ; Emotions ; Epidemics ; Female ; Health care industry ; Health Personnel - psychology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Nurses ; Operating rooms ; Patient care ; Questionnaires ; Risk ; SARS ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome ; Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - epidemiology ; Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - psychology ; Singapore - epidemiology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Workload ; Workloads</subject><ispartof>Medical care, 2005-07, Vol.43 (7), p.676-682</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</rights><rights>2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Jul 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-9b64906d43f95a64049c5b683109da93dafa3229445dda396dc052ec06dd2c4c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3768367$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3768367$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57996,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15970782$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koh, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Meng Kin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chia, Sin Eng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Soo Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Vivian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Ban Hock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Kok Seng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chew, Wuen Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Hui Kheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Winston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muttakin, Zainal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emmanuel, Shanta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fong, Ngan Phoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koh, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwa, Chong Teck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Keson Beng-Choon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fones, Calvin</creatorcontrib><title>Risk Perception and Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) on Work and Personal Lives of Healthcare Workers in Singapore What Can We Learn?</title><title>Medical care</title><addtitle>Med Care</addtitle><description>Introduction: Healthcare workers (HCWs) were at the frontline during the battle against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Understanding their fears and anxieties may hold lessons for handling future outbreaks, including acts of bioterrorism. Method: We measured risk perception and impact on personal and work life of 15,025 HCWs from 9 major healthcare institutions during the SARS epidemic in Singapore using a self-administered questionnaire and Impact of Events Scale and analyzed the results with bivariate and multivariate statistics. Results: From 10,511 valid questionnaires (70% response), we found that although the majority (76%) perceived a great personal risk of falling ill with SARS, they (69.5%) also accepted the risk as part of their job. Clinical staff (doctors and nurses), staff in daily contact with SARS patients, and staff from SARS-affected institutions expressed significantly higher levels of anxiety. More than half reported increased work stress (56%) and work load (53%). Many experienced social stigmatization (49%) and ostracism by family members (31%), but most (77%) felt appreciated by society. Most felt that the personal protective measures implemented were effective (96%) and that the institutional policies and protocols were clear (93%) and timely (90%). Conclusion: During epidemics, healthcare institutions have a duty to protect HCWs and help them cope with their personal fears and the very stressful work situation. Singapore's experience shows that simple protective measures based on sound epidemiological principles, when implemented in a timely manner, go a long way to reassure HCWs.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Disease Outbreaks - prevention & control</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Health Personnel - psychology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Operating rooms</subject><subject>Patient care</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>SARS</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome</subject><subject>Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - epidemiology</subject><subject>Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - psychology</subject><subject>Singapore - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Workload</subject><subject>Workloads</subject><issn>0025-7079</issn><issn>1537-1948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd9u0zAUxiMEYt3gDRCydoHgIsF_YrveDaqqwSZVAjUgLi3XcWjaJA52sqlPwuty0lZMwjeWj3_fd-zzJck1wRnBSn7EJGubkGFYREgyJxkTkuHM2mfJjHAmU6Ly-fNkhjHlqcRSXSSXMe4Al4zTl8kF4QrKczpL_qzruEffXLCuH2rfIdOV6L7tjR2Qr1DhHlxwaGHHwaG1i30dzODDARWHrgy-deh9sVgXHxAof_qwP8rBLfrONGhVP7g42dw50wxba8BqouAe1R0q6u6X6f1U3JoBLQ14OLRyJnSfXiUvKtNE9_q8XyU_Pt9-X96lq69f7peLVWoZZyJVG5ErLMqcVYobkeNcWb4RcwaDKo1ipakMo1TlOS9Lw5QoLebUWZCU1OaWXSXvTr598L9HFwfd1tG6pjGd82PUQiqBJaUAXv8H7vwY4JdRUyxzLhifA3RzgmzwMQZX6T7UrQkHTbCestOYaMhOP2Wnj9lpOz3l7bnDuGld-SQ9hwVAfgIefTPADPfN-OiC3h6He7TkguOUwo4lnNKpJED25iTbRYjuny2TMCbo_RdE1K8b</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>Koh, David</creator><creator>Lim, Meng Kin</creator><creator>Chia, Sin Eng</creator><creator>Ko, Soo Meng</creator><creator>Qian, Feng</creator><creator>Ng, Vivian</creator><creator>Tan, Ban Hock</creator><creator>Wong, Kok Seng</creator><creator>Chew, Wuen Ming</creator><creator>Tang, Hui Kheng</creator><creator>Ng, Winston</creator><creator>Muttakin, Zainal</creator><creator>Emmanuel, Shanta</creator><creator>Fong, Ngan Phoon</creator><creator>Koh, Gerald</creator><creator>Kwa, Chong Teck</creator><creator>Tan, Keson Beng-Choon</creator><creator>Fones, Calvin</creator><general>J. B. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>Risk Perception and Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) on Work and Personal Lives of Healthcare Workers in Singapore What Can We Learn?</title><author>Koh, David ; Lim, Meng Kin ; Chia, Sin Eng ; Ko, Soo Meng ; Qian, Feng ; Ng, Vivian ; Tan, Ban Hock ; Wong, Kok Seng ; Chew, Wuen Ming ; Tang, Hui Kheng ; Ng, Winston ; Muttakin, Zainal ; Emmanuel, Shanta ; Fong, Ngan Phoon ; Koh, Gerald ; Kwa, Chong Teck ; Tan, Keson Beng-Choon ; Fones, Calvin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-9b64906d43f95a64049c5b683109da93dafa3229445dda396dc052ec06dd2c4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Disease Outbreaks - prevention & control</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Health Personnel - psychology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Operating rooms</topic><topic>Patient care</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>SARS</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome</topic><topic>Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - epidemiology</topic><topic>Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - psychology</topic><topic>Singapore - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Workload</topic><topic>Workloads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koh, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Meng Kin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chia, Sin Eng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Soo Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Vivian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Ban Hock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Kok Seng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chew, Wuen Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Hui Kheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Winston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muttakin, Zainal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emmanuel, Shanta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fong, Ngan Phoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koh, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwa, Chong Teck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Keson Beng-Choon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fones, Calvin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koh, David</au><au>Lim, Meng Kin</au><au>Chia, Sin Eng</au><au>Ko, Soo Meng</au><au>Qian, Feng</au><au>Ng, Vivian</au><au>Tan, Ban Hock</au><au>Wong, Kok Seng</au><au>Chew, Wuen Ming</au><au>Tang, Hui Kheng</au><au>Ng, Winston</au><au>Muttakin, Zainal</au><au>Emmanuel, Shanta</au><au>Fong, Ngan Phoon</au><au>Koh, Gerald</au><au>Kwa, Chong Teck</au><au>Tan, Keson Beng-Choon</au><au>Fones, Calvin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk Perception and Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) on Work and Personal Lives of Healthcare Workers in Singapore What Can We Learn?</atitle><jtitle>Medical care</jtitle><addtitle>Med Care</addtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>676</spage><epage>682</epage><pages>676-682</pages><issn>0025-7079</issn><eissn>1537-1948</eissn><coden>MELAAD</coden><abstract>Introduction: Healthcare workers (HCWs) were at the frontline during the battle against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Understanding their fears and anxieties may hold lessons for handling future outbreaks, including acts of bioterrorism. Method: We measured risk perception and impact on personal and work life of 15,025 HCWs from 9 major healthcare institutions during the SARS epidemic in Singapore using a self-administered questionnaire and Impact of Events Scale and analyzed the results with bivariate and multivariate statistics. Results: From 10,511 valid questionnaires (70% response), we found that although the majority (76%) perceived a great personal risk of falling ill with SARS, they (69.5%) also accepted the risk as part of their job. Clinical staff (doctors and nurses), staff in daily contact with SARS patients, and staff from SARS-affected institutions expressed significantly higher levels of anxiety. More than half reported increased work stress (56%) and work load (53%). Many experienced social stigmatization (49%) and ostracism by family members (31%), but most (77%) felt appreciated by society. Most felt that the personal protective measures implemented were effective (96%) and that the institutional policies and protocols were clear (93%) and timely (90%). Conclusion: During epidemics, healthcare institutions have a duty to protect HCWs and help them cope with their personal fears and the very stressful work situation. Singapore's experience shows that simple protective measures based on sound epidemiological principles, when implemented in a timely manner, go a long way to reassure HCWs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>J. B. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Inc</pub><pmid>15970782</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.mlr.0000167181.36730.cc</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-7079 |
ispartof | Medical care, 2005-07, Vol.43 (7), p.676-682 |
issn | 0025-7079 1537-1948 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67960722 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Adaptation, Psychological Adult Anxiety Children Disease Outbreaks - prevention & control Emotions Epidemics Female Health care industry Health Personnel - psychology Hospitals Humans Logistic Models Male Medical personnel Nurses Operating rooms Patient care Questionnaires Risk SARS Severe acute respiratory syndrome Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - epidemiology Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - psychology Singapore - epidemiology Surveys and Questionnaires Workload Workloads |
title | Risk Perception and Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) on Work and Personal Lives of Healthcare Workers in Singapore What Can We Learn? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T06%3A14%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20Perception%20and%20Impact%20of%20Severe%20Acute%20Respiratory%20Syndrome%20(SARS)%20on%20Work%20and%20Personal%20Lives%20of%20Healthcare%20Workers%20in%20Singapore%20What%20Can%20We%20Learn?&rft.jtitle=Medical%20care&rft.au=Koh,%20David&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=676&rft.epage=682&rft.pages=676-682&rft.issn=0025-7079&rft.eissn=1537-1948&rft.coden=MELAAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.mlr.0000167181.36730.cc&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3768367%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=207456358&rft_id=info:pmid/15970782&rft_jstor_id=3768367&rfr_iscdi=true |