Risk Perception and Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) on Work and Personal Lives of Healthcare Workers in Singapore What Can We Learn?

Introduction: Healthcare workers (HCWs) were at the frontline during the battle against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Understanding their fears and anxieties may hold lessons for handling future outbreaks, including acts of bioterrorism. Method: We measured risk perception and impact on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical care 2005-07, Vol.43 (7), p.676-682
Hauptverfasser: Koh, David, Lim, Meng Kin, Chia, Sin Eng, Ko, Soo Meng, Qian, Feng, Ng, Vivian, Tan, Ban Hock, Wong, Kok Seng, Chew, Wuen Ming, Tang, Hui Kheng, Ng, Winston, Muttakin, Zainal, Emmanuel, Shanta, Fong, Ngan Phoon, Koh, Gerald, Kwa, Chong Teck, Tan, Keson Beng-Choon, Fones, Calvin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 682
container_issue 7
container_start_page 676
container_title Medical care
container_volume 43
creator Koh, David
Lim, Meng Kin
Chia, Sin Eng
Ko, Soo Meng
Qian, Feng
Ng, Vivian
Tan, Ban Hock
Wong, Kok Seng
Chew, Wuen Ming
Tang, Hui Kheng
Ng, Winston
Muttakin, Zainal
Emmanuel, Shanta
Fong, Ngan Phoon
Koh, Gerald
Kwa, Chong Teck
Tan, Keson Beng-Choon
Fones, Calvin
description Introduction: Healthcare workers (HCWs) were at the frontline during the battle against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Understanding their fears and anxieties may hold lessons for handling future outbreaks, including acts of bioterrorism. Method: We measured risk perception and impact on personal and work life of 15,025 HCWs from 9 major healthcare institutions during the SARS epidemic in Singapore using a self-administered questionnaire and Impact of Events Scale and analyzed the results with bivariate and multivariate statistics. Results: From 10,511 valid questionnaires (70% response), we found that although the majority (76%) perceived a great personal risk of falling ill with SARS, they (69.5%) also accepted the risk as part of their job. Clinical staff (doctors and nurses), staff in daily contact with SARS patients, and staff from SARS-affected institutions expressed significantly higher levels of anxiety. More than half reported increased work stress (56%) and work load (53%). Many experienced social stigmatization (49%) and ostracism by family members (31%), but most (77%) felt appreciated by society. Most felt that the personal protective measures implemented were effective (96%) and that the institutional policies and protocols were clear (93%) and timely (90%). Conclusion: During epidemics, healthcare institutions have a duty to protect HCWs and help them cope with their personal fears and the very stressful work situation. Singapore's experience shows that simple protective measures based on sound epidemiological principles, when implemented in a timely manner, go a long way to reassure HCWs.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.mlr.0000167181.36730.cc
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67960722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3768367</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3768367</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-9b64906d43f95a64049c5b683109da93dafa3229445dda396dc052ec06dd2c4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd9u0zAUxiMEYt3gDRCydoHgIsF_YrveDaqqwSZVAjUgLi3XcWjaJA52sqlPwuty0lZMwjeWj3_fd-zzJck1wRnBSn7EJGubkGFYREgyJxkTkuHM2mfJjHAmU6Ly-fNkhjHlqcRSXSSXMe4Al4zTl8kF4QrKczpL_qzruEffXLCuH2rfIdOV6L7tjR2Qr1DhHlxwaGHHwaG1i30dzODDARWHrgy-deh9sVgXHxAof_qwP8rBLfrONGhVP7g42dw50wxba8BqouAe1R0q6u6X6f1U3JoBLQ14OLRyJnSfXiUvKtNE9_q8XyU_Pt9-X96lq69f7peLVWoZZyJVG5ErLMqcVYobkeNcWb4RcwaDKo1ipakMo1TlOS9Lw5QoLebUWZCU1OaWXSXvTr598L9HFwfd1tG6pjGd82PUQiqBJaUAXv8H7vwY4JdRUyxzLhifA3RzgmzwMQZX6T7UrQkHTbCestOYaMhOP2Wnj9lpOz3l7bnDuGld-SQ9hwVAfgIefTPADPfN-OiC3h6He7TkguOUwo4lnNKpJED25iTbRYjuny2TMCbo_RdE1K8b</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>207456358</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk Perception and Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) on Work and Personal Lives of Healthcare Workers in Singapore What Can We Learn?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Koh, David ; Lim, Meng Kin ; Chia, Sin Eng ; Ko, Soo Meng ; Qian, Feng ; Ng, Vivian ; Tan, Ban Hock ; Wong, Kok Seng ; Chew, Wuen Ming ; Tang, Hui Kheng ; Ng, Winston ; Muttakin, Zainal ; Emmanuel, Shanta ; Fong, Ngan Phoon ; Koh, Gerald ; Kwa, Chong Teck ; Tan, Keson Beng-Choon ; Fones, Calvin</creator><creatorcontrib>Koh, David ; Lim, Meng Kin ; Chia, Sin Eng ; Ko, Soo Meng ; Qian, Feng ; Ng, Vivian ; Tan, Ban Hock ; Wong, Kok Seng ; Chew, Wuen Ming ; Tang, Hui Kheng ; Ng, Winston ; Muttakin, Zainal ; Emmanuel, Shanta ; Fong, Ngan Phoon ; Koh, Gerald ; Kwa, Chong Teck ; Tan, Keson Beng-Choon ; Fones, Calvin</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Healthcare workers (HCWs) were at the frontline during the battle against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Understanding their fears and anxieties may hold lessons for handling future outbreaks, including acts of bioterrorism. Method: We measured risk perception and impact on personal and work life of 15,025 HCWs from 9 major healthcare institutions during the SARS epidemic in Singapore using a self-administered questionnaire and Impact of Events Scale and analyzed the results with bivariate and multivariate statistics. Results: From 10,511 valid questionnaires (70% response), we found that although the majority (76%) perceived a great personal risk of falling ill with SARS, they (69.5%) also accepted the risk as part of their job. Clinical staff (doctors and nurses), staff in daily contact with SARS patients, and staff from SARS-affected institutions expressed significantly higher levels of anxiety. More than half reported increased work stress (56%) and work load (53%). Many experienced social stigmatization (49%) and ostracism by family members (31%), but most (77%) felt appreciated by society. Most felt that the personal protective measures implemented were effective (96%) and that the institutional policies and protocols were clear (93%) and timely (90%). Conclusion: During epidemics, healthcare institutions have a duty to protect HCWs and help them cope with their personal fears and the very stressful work situation. Singapore's experience shows that simple protective measures based on sound epidemiological principles, when implemented in a timely manner, go a long way to reassure HCWs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-1948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000167181.36730.cc</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15970782</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MELAAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: J. B. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Inc</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Adult ; Anxiety ; Children ; Disease Outbreaks - prevention &amp; control ; Emotions ; Epidemics ; Female ; Health care industry ; Health Personnel - psychology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Nurses ; Operating rooms ; Patient care ; Questionnaires ; Risk ; SARS ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome ; Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - epidemiology ; Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - psychology ; Singapore - epidemiology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Workload ; Workloads</subject><ispartof>Medical care, 2005-07, Vol.43 (7), p.676-682</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>2005 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Jul 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-9b64906d43f95a64049c5b683109da93dafa3229445dda396dc052ec06dd2c4c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3768367$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3768367$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57996,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15970782$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koh, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Meng Kin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chia, Sin Eng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Soo Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Vivian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Ban Hock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Kok Seng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chew, Wuen Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Hui Kheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Winston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muttakin, Zainal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emmanuel, Shanta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fong, Ngan Phoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koh, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwa, Chong Teck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Keson Beng-Choon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fones, Calvin</creatorcontrib><title>Risk Perception and Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) on Work and Personal Lives of Healthcare Workers in Singapore What Can We Learn?</title><title>Medical care</title><addtitle>Med Care</addtitle><description>Introduction: Healthcare workers (HCWs) were at the frontline during the battle against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Understanding their fears and anxieties may hold lessons for handling future outbreaks, including acts of bioterrorism. Method: We measured risk perception and impact on personal and work life of 15,025 HCWs from 9 major healthcare institutions during the SARS epidemic in Singapore using a self-administered questionnaire and Impact of Events Scale and analyzed the results with bivariate and multivariate statistics. Results: From 10,511 valid questionnaires (70% response), we found that although the majority (76%) perceived a great personal risk of falling ill with SARS, they (69.5%) also accepted the risk as part of their job. Clinical staff (doctors and nurses), staff in daily contact with SARS patients, and staff from SARS-affected institutions expressed significantly higher levels of anxiety. More than half reported increased work stress (56%) and work load (53%). Many experienced social stigmatization (49%) and ostracism by family members (31%), but most (77%) felt appreciated by society. Most felt that the personal protective measures implemented were effective (96%) and that the institutional policies and protocols were clear (93%) and timely (90%). Conclusion: During epidemics, healthcare institutions have a duty to protect HCWs and help them cope with their personal fears and the very stressful work situation. Singapore's experience shows that simple protective measures based on sound epidemiological principles, when implemented in a timely manner, go a long way to reassure HCWs.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Disease Outbreaks - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Health Personnel - psychology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Operating rooms</subject><subject>Patient care</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>SARS</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome</subject><subject>Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - epidemiology</subject><subject>Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - psychology</subject><subject>Singapore - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Workload</subject><subject>Workloads</subject><issn>0025-7079</issn><issn>1537-1948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd9u0zAUxiMEYt3gDRCydoHgIsF_YrveDaqqwSZVAjUgLi3XcWjaJA52sqlPwuty0lZMwjeWj3_fd-zzJck1wRnBSn7EJGubkGFYREgyJxkTkuHM2mfJjHAmU6Ly-fNkhjHlqcRSXSSXMe4Al4zTl8kF4QrKczpL_qzruEffXLCuH2rfIdOV6L7tjR2Qr1DhHlxwaGHHwaG1i30dzODDARWHrgy-deh9sVgXHxAof_qwP8rBLfrONGhVP7g42dw50wxba8BqouAe1R0q6u6X6f1U3JoBLQ14OLRyJnSfXiUvKtNE9_q8XyU_Pt9-X96lq69f7peLVWoZZyJVG5ErLMqcVYobkeNcWb4RcwaDKo1ipakMo1TlOS9Lw5QoLebUWZCU1OaWXSXvTr598L9HFwfd1tG6pjGd82PUQiqBJaUAXv8H7vwY4JdRUyxzLhifA3RzgmzwMQZX6T7UrQkHTbCestOYaMhOP2Wnj9lpOz3l7bnDuGld-SQ9hwVAfgIefTPADPfN-OiC3h6He7TkguOUwo4lnNKpJED25iTbRYjuny2TMCbo_RdE1K8b</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>Koh, David</creator><creator>Lim, Meng Kin</creator><creator>Chia, Sin Eng</creator><creator>Ko, Soo Meng</creator><creator>Qian, Feng</creator><creator>Ng, Vivian</creator><creator>Tan, Ban Hock</creator><creator>Wong, Kok Seng</creator><creator>Chew, Wuen Ming</creator><creator>Tang, Hui Kheng</creator><creator>Ng, Winston</creator><creator>Muttakin, Zainal</creator><creator>Emmanuel, Shanta</creator><creator>Fong, Ngan Phoon</creator><creator>Koh, Gerald</creator><creator>Kwa, Chong Teck</creator><creator>Tan, Keson Beng-Choon</creator><creator>Fones, Calvin</creator><general>J. B. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>Risk Perception and Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) on Work and Personal Lives of Healthcare Workers in Singapore What Can We Learn?</title><author>Koh, David ; Lim, Meng Kin ; Chia, Sin Eng ; Ko, Soo Meng ; Qian, Feng ; Ng, Vivian ; Tan, Ban Hock ; Wong, Kok Seng ; Chew, Wuen Ming ; Tang, Hui Kheng ; Ng, Winston ; Muttakin, Zainal ; Emmanuel, Shanta ; Fong, Ngan Phoon ; Koh, Gerald ; Kwa, Chong Teck ; Tan, Keson Beng-Choon ; Fones, Calvin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3536-9b64906d43f95a64049c5b683109da93dafa3229445dda396dc052ec06dd2c4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Disease Outbreaks - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Health Personnel - psychology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Operating rooms</topic><topic>Patient care</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>SARS</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome</topic><topic>Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - epidemiology</topic><topic>Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - psychology</topic><topic>Singapore - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Workload</topic><topic>Workloads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koh, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Meng Kin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chia, Sin Eng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Soo Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Vivian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Ban Hock</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Kok Seng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chew, Wuen Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Hui Kheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Winston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muttakin, Zainal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emmanuel, Shanta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fong, Ngan Phoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koh, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwa, Chong Teck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Keson Beng-Choon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fones, Calvin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koh, David</au><au>Lim, Meng Kin</au><au>Chia, Sin Eng</au><au>Ko, Soo Meng</au><au>Qian, Feng</au><au>Ng, Vivian</au><au>Tan, Ban Hock</au><au>Wong, Kok Seng</au><au>Chew, Wuen Ming</au><au>Tang, Hui Kheng</au><au>Ng, Winston</au><au>Muttakin, Zainal</au><au>Emmanuel, Shanta</au><au>Fong, Ngan Phoon</au><au>Koh, Gerald</au><au>Kwa, Chong Teck</au><au>Tan, Keson Beng-Choon</au><au>Fones, Calvin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk Perception and Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) on Work and Personal Lives of Healthcare Workers in Singapore What Can We Learn?</atitle><jtitle>Medical care</jtitle><addtitle>Med Care</addtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>676</spage><epage>682</epage><pages>676-682</pages><issn>0025-7079</issn><eissn>1537-1948</eissn><coden>MELAAD</coden><abstract>Introduction: Healthcare workers (HCWs) were at the frontline during the battle against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Understanding their fears and anxieties may hold lessons for handling future outbreaks, including acts of bioterrorism. Method: We measured risk perception and impact on personal and work life of 15,025 HCWs from 9 major healthcare institutions during the SARS epidemic in Singapore using a self-administered questionnaire and Impact of Events Scale and analyzed the results with bivariate and multivariate statistics. Results: From 10,511 valid questionnaires (70% response), we found that although the majority (76%) perceived a great personal risk of falling ill with SARS, they (69.5%) also accepted the risk as part of their job. Clinical staff (doctors and nurses), staff in daily contact with SARS patients, and staff from SARS-affected institutions expressed significantly higher levels of anxiety. More than half reported increased work stress (56%) and work load (53%). Many experienced social stigmatization (49%) and ostracism by family members (31%), but most (77%) felt appreciated by society. Most felt that the personal protective measures implemented were effective (96%) and that the institutional policies and protocols were clear (93%) and timely (90%). Conclusion: During epidemics, healthcare institutions have a duty to protect HCWs and help them cope with their personal fears and the very stressful work situation. Singapore's experience shows that simple protective measures based on sound epidemiological principles, when implemented in a timely manner, go a long way to reassure HCWs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>J. B. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Inc</pub><pmid>15970782</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.mlr.0000167181.36730.cc</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-7079
ispartof Medical care, 2005-07, Vol.43 (7), p.676-682
issn 0025-7079
1537-1948
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67960722
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Adaptation, Psychological
Adult
Anxiety
Children
Disease Outbreaks - prevention & control
Emotions
Epidemics
Female
Health care industry
Health Personnel - psychology
Hospitals
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Medical personnel
Nurses
Operating rooms
Patient care
Questionnaires
Risk
SARS
Severe acute respiratory syndrome
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - epidemiology
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - psychology
Singapore - epidemiology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Workload
Workloads
title Risk Perception and Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) on Work and Personal Lives of Healthcare Workers in Singapore What Can We Learn?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T06%3A14%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20Perception%20and%20Impact%20of%20Severe%20Acute%20Respiratory%20Syndrome%20(SARS)%20on%20Work%20and%20Personal%20Lives%20of%20Healthcare%20Workers%20in%20Singapore%20What%20Can%20We%20Learn?&rft.jtitle=Medical%20care&rft.au=Koh,%20David&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=676&rft.epage=682&rft.pages=676-682&rft.issn=0025-7079&rft.eissn=1537-1948&rft.coden=MELAAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.mlr.0000167181.36730.cc&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3768367%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=207456358&rft_id=info:pmid/15970782&rft_jstor_id=3768367&rfr_iscdi=true