Kinematic and EMG characteristics of simple shoulder movements with proprioception and visual feedback

The objective of this study was to determine if simple, shoulder movements use the dual control hypothesis strategy, previously demonstrated with elbow movements, and to see if this strategy also applies in the absence of visual feedback. Twenty subjects were seated with their right arm abducted to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of electromyography and kinesiology 2006-06, Vol.16 (3), p.236-249
Hauptverfasser: Brindle, Timothy J., Nitz, Arthur J., Uhl, Tim L., Kifer, Edward, Shapiro, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 249
container_issue 3
container_start_page 236
container_title Journal of electromyography and kinesiology
container_volume 16
creator Brindle, Timothy J.
Nitz, Arthur J.
Uhl, Tim L.
Kifer, Edward
Shapiro, Robert
description The objective of this study was to determine if simple, shoulder movements use the dual control hypothesis strategy, previously demonstrated with elbow movements, and to see if this strategy also applies in the absence of visual feedback. Twenty subjects were seated with their right arm abducted to 90° and externally rotated in the scapular plane. Subjects internally rotated to a target position using a custom shoulder wheel at three different speeds with and without visual feedback. Kinematics were collected with a motion analysis system and electromyographic (EMG) recordings of the pectoralis major (PECT), infraspinatus (INFRA), anterior and posterior (ADELT, PDELT) deltoid muscles were used to evaluate muscle activity patterns during movements. Kinematics changed as movement speed increased with less accuracy ( p < 0.01). Greater EMG activity was observed in the PECT, PDELT, and INFRA with shorter durations for the ADELT, PDELT and INFRA. Movements with only kinesthetic feedback were less accurate ( p < 0.01) and performed faster ( p < 0.01) than movements with visual feedback. EMG activity suggests no major difference in CNS control strategies in movements with and without visual feedback. Greater resolution with visual feedback enables the implementation of a dual control strategy, allowing greater movement velocity while maintaining accuracy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.06.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67954623</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1050641105000842</els_id><sourcerecordid>771737906</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-7e02bf177eb0dc72b861d3e5e6123d0fc4c7fb51e2ff9b7f19937b79cd1a62f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQQC0EoqXwE0A-wSlhxknszQmhqhREERc4W4491nqbxIudLOq_x8uuxI2eZjR686F5jL1GqBFQvt_VOxrpPsy1AOhqkDWgeMIucaOaqlOIT0sOHVSyRbxgL3LeAaCCDTxnFygRcdPLS-a_hpkmswTLzez4zbdbbrcmGbtQCrmUM4-e5zDtR-J5G9fRUeJTPNBE85L577Bs-T7FfQrR0n4Jcf476BDyakbuidxg7P1L9sybMdOrc7xiPz_d_Lj-XN19v_1y_fGusq2QS6UIxOBRKRrAWSWGjUTXUEcSRePA29YqP3RIwvt-UB77vlGD6q1DI4UXzRV7d5pbTvq1Ul70FLKlcTQzxTVrpVA1qgdZyLf_JaXqu1aK5lEQFXYtyiPYnUCbYs6JvC5PmUx60Aj66Ezv9NmZPjrTIHVxVvrenBesw0TuX9dZUgE-nAAqnzsESjrbQLMlFxLZRbsYHlnxB_SNrBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17154163</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Kinematic and EMG characteristics of simple shoulder movements with proprioception and visual feedback</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Brindle, Timothy J. ; Nitz, Arthur J. ; Uhl, Tim L. ; Kifer, Edward ; Shapiro, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Brindle, Timothy J. ; Nitz, Arthur J. ; Uhl, Tim L. ; Kifer, Edward ; Shapiro, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to determine if simple, shoulder movements use the dual control hypothesis strategy, previously demonstrated with elbow movements, and to see if this strategy also applies in the absence of visual feedback. Twenty subjects were seated with their right arm abducted to 90° and externally rotated in the scapular plane. Subjects internally rotated to a target position using a custom shoulder wheel at three different speeds with and without visual feedback. Kinematics were collected with a motion analysis system and electromyographic (EMG) recordings of the pectoralis major (PECT), infraspinatus (INFRA), anterior and posterior (ADELT, PDELT) deltoid muscles were used to evaluate muscle activity patterns during movements. Kinematics changed as movement speed increased with less accuracy ( p &lt; 0.01). Greater EMG activity was observed in the PECT, PDELT, and INFRA with shorter durations for the ADELT, PDELT and INFRA. Movements with only kinesthetic feedback were less accurate ( p &lt; 0.01) and performed faster ( p &lt; 0.01) than movements with visual feedback. EMG activity suggests no major difference in CNS control strategies in movements with and without visual feedback. Greater resolution with visual feedback enables the implementation of a dual control strategy, allowing greater movement velocity while maintaining accuracy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-6411</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.06.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16111896</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biomechanical Phenomena - methods ; Electromyography ; EMG ; Feedback - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Kinematics ; Kinesthesia ; Male ; Motor Skills - physiology ; Movement - physiology ; Muscle Contraction - physiology ; Proprioception - physiology ; Shoulder Joint - physiology ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Upper extremity ; Upper Extremity - physiology ; Visual Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology, 2006-06, Vol.16 (3), p.236-249</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-7e02bf177eb0dc72b861d3e5e6123d0fc4c7fb51e2ff9b7f19937b79cd1a62f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-7e02bf177eb0dc72b861d3e5e6123d0fc4c7fb51e2ff9b7f19937b79cd1a62f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641105000842$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16111896$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brindle, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nitz, Arthur J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uhl, Tim L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kifer, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Kinematic and EMG characteristics of simple shoulder movements with proprioception and visual feedback</title><title>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</title><addtitle>J Electromyogr Kinesiol</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to determine if simple, shoulder movements use the dual control hypothesis strategy, previously demonstrated with elbow movements, and to see if this strategy also applies in the absence of visual feedback. Twenty subjects were seated with their right arm abducted to 90° and externally rotated in the scapular plane. Subjects internally rotated to a target position using a custom shoulder wheel at three different speeds with and without visual feedback. Kinematics were collected with a motion analysis system and electromyographic (EMG) recordings of the pectoralis major (PECT), infraspinatus (INFRA), anterior and posterior (ADELT, PDELT) deltoid muscles were used to evaluate muscle activity patterns during movements. Kinematics changed as movement speed increased with less accuracy ( p &lt; 0.01). Greater EMG activity was observed in the PECT, PDELT, and INFRA with shorter durations for the ADELT, PDELT and INFRA. Movements with only kinesthetic feedback were less accurate ( p &lt; 0.01) and performed faster ( p &lt; 0.01) than movements with visual feedback. EMG activity suggests no major difference in CNS control strategies in movements with and without visual feedback. Greater resolution with visual feedback enables the implementation of a dual control strategy, allowing greater movement velocity while maintaining accuracy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena - methods</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>EMG</subject><subject>Feedback - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Kinesthesia</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motor Skills - physiology</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Proprioception - physiology</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Upper extremity</subject><subject>Upper Extremity - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><issn>1050-6411</issn><issn>1873-5711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQQC0EoqXwE0A-wSlhxknszQmhqhREERc4W4491nqbxIudLOq_x8uuxI2eZjR686F5jL1GqBFQvt_VOxrpPsy1AOhqkDWgeMIucaOaqlOIT0sOHVSyRbxgL3LeAaCCDTxnFygRcdPLS-a_hpkmswTLzez4zbdbbrcmGbtQCrmUM4-e5zDtR-J5G9fRUeJTPNBE85L577Bs-T7FfQrR0n4Jcf476BDyakbuidxg7P1L9sybMdOrc7xiPz_d_Lj-XN19v_1y_fGusq2QS6UIxOBRKRrAWSWGjUTXUEcSRePA29YqP3RIwvt-UB77vlGD6q1DI4UXzRV7d5pbTvq1Ul70FLKlcTQzxTVrpVA1qgdZyLf_JaXqu1aK5lEQFXYtyiPYnUCbYs6JvC5PmUx60Aj66Ezv9NmZPjrTIHVxVvrenBesw0TuX9dZUgE-nAAqnzsESjrbQLMlFxLZRbsYHlnxB_SNrBQ</recordid><startdate>20060601</startdate><enddate>20060601</enddate><creator>Brindle, Timothy J.</creator><creator>Nitz, Arthur J.</creator><creator>Uhl, Tim L.</creator><creator>Kifer, Edward</creator><creator>Shapiro, Robert</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060601</creationdate><title>Kinematic and EMG characteristics of simple shoulder movements with proprioception and visual feedback</title><author>Brindle, Timothy J. ; Nitz, Arthur J. ; Uhl, Tim L. ; Kifer, Edward ; Shapiro, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-7e02bf177eb0dc72b861d3e5e6123d0fc4c7fb51e2ff9b7f19937b79cd1a62f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena - methods</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>EMG</topic><topic>Feedback - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Kinesthesia</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motor Skills - physiology</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Proprioception - physiology</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Upper extremity</topic><topic>Upper Extremity - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brindle, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nitz, Arthur J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uhl, Tim L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kifer, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brindle, Timothy J.</au><au>Nitz, Arthur J.</au><au>Uhl, Tim L.</au><au>Kifer, Edward</au><au>Shapiro, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Kinematic and EMG characteristics of simple shoulder movements with proprioception and visual feedback</atitle><jtitle>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Electromyogr Kinesiol</addtitle><date>2006-06-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>236</spage><epage>249</epage><pages>236-249</pages><issn>1050-6411</issn><eissn>1873-5711</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to determine if simple, shoulder movements use the dual control hypothesis strategy, previously demonstrated with elbow movements, and to see if this strategy also applies in the absence of visual feedback. Twenty subjects were seated with their right arm abducted to 90° and externally rotated in the scapular plane. Subjects internally rotated to a target position using a custom shoulder wheel at three different speeds with and without visual feedback. Kinematics were collected with a motion analysis system and electromyographic (EMG) recordings of the pectoralis major (PECT), infraspinatus (INFRA), anterior and posterior (ADELT, PDELT) deltoid muscles were used to evaluate muscle activity patterns during movements. Kinematics changed as movement speed increased with less accuracy ( p &lt; 0.01). Greater EMG activity was observed in the PECT, PDELT, and INFRA with shorter durations for the ADELT, PDELT and INFRA. Movements with only kinesthetic feedback were less accurate ( p &lt; 0.01) and performed faster ( p &lt; 0.01) than movements with visual feedback. EMG activity suggests no major difference in CNS control strategies in movements with and without visual feedback. Greater resolution with visual feedback enables the implementation of a dual control strategy, allowing greater movement velocity while maintaining accuracy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16111896</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.06.012</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1050-6411
ispartof Journal of electromyography and kinesiology, 2006-06, Vol.16 (3), p.236-249
issn 1050-6411
1873-5711
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67954623
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Biomechanical Phenomena - methods
Electromyography
EMG
Feedback - physiology
Female
Humans
Kinematics
Kinesthesia
Male
Motor Skills - physiology
Movement - physiology
Muscle Contraction - physiology
Proprioception - physiology
Shoulder Joint - physiology
Task Performance and Analysis
Upper extremity
Upper Extremity - physiology
Visual Perception - physiology
title Kinematic and EMG characteristics of simple shoulder movements with proprioception and visual feedback
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T17%3A35%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Kinematic%20and%20EMG%20characteristics%20of%20simple%20shoulder%20movements%20with%20proprioception%20and%20visual%20feedback&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20electromyography%20and%20kinesiology&rft.au=Brindle,%20Timothy%20J.&rft.date=2006-06-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=236&rft.epage=249&rft.pages=236-249&rft.issn=1050-6411&rft.eissn=1873-5711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.06.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E771737906%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17154163&rft_id=info:pmid/16111896&rft_els_id=S1050641105000842&rfr_iscdi=true