Kinematic and EMG characteristics of simple shoulder movements with proprioception and visual feedback
The objective of this study was to determine if simple, shoulder movements use the dual control hypothesis strategy, previously demonstrated with elbow movements, and to see if this strategy also applies in the absence of visual feedback. Twenty subjects were seated with their right arm abducted to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of electromyography and kinesiology 2006-06, Vol.16 (3), p.236-249 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 249 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 236 |
container_title | Journal of electromyography and kinesiology |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Brindle, Timothy J. Nitz, Arthur J. Uhl, Tim L. Kifer, Edward Shapiro, Robert |
description | The objective of this study was to determine if simple, shoulder movements use the dual control hypothesis strategy, previously demonstrated with elbow movements, and to see if this strategy also applies in the absence of visual feedback. Twenty subjects were seated with their right arm abducted to 90° and externally rotated in the scapular plane. Subjects internally rotated to a target position using a custom shoulder wheel at three different speeds with and without visual feedback. Kinematics were collected with a motion analysis system and electromyographic (EMG) recordings of the pectoralis major (PECT), infraspinatus (INFRA), anterior and posterior (ADELT, PDELT) deltoid muscles were used to evaluate muscle activity patterns during movements. Kinematics changed as movement speed increased with less accuracy (
p
<
0.01). Greater EMG activity was observed in the PECT, PDELT, and INFRA with shorter durations for the ADELT, PDELT and INFRA. Movements with only kinesthetic feedback were less accurate (
p
<
0.01) and performed faster (
p
<
0.01) than movements with visual feedback. EMG activity suggests no major difference in CNS control strategies in movements with and without visual feedback. Greater resolution with visual feedback enables the implementation of a dual control strategy, allowing greater movement velocity while maintaining accuracy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.06.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67954623</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1050641105000842</els_id><sourcerecordid>771737906</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-7e02bf177eb0dc72b861d3e5e6123d0fc4c7fb51e2ff9b7f19937b79cd1a62f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQQC0EoqXwE0A-wSlhxknszQmhqhREERc4W4491nqbxIudLOq_x8uuxI2eZjR686F5jL1GqBFQvt_VOxrpPsy1AOhqkDWgeMIucaOaqlOIT0sOHVSyRbxgL3LeAaCCDTxnFygRcdPLS-a_hpkmswTLzez4zbdbbrcmGbtQCrmUM4-e5zDtR-J5G9fRUeJTPNBE85L577Bs-T7FfQrR0n4Jcf476BDyakbuidxg7P1L9sybMdOrc7xiPz_d_Lj-XN19v_1y_fGusq2QS6UIxOBRKRrAWSWGjUTXUEcSRePA29YqP3RIwvt-UB77vlGD6q1DI4UXzRV7d5pbTvq1Ul70FLKlcTQzxTVrpVA1qgdZyLf_JaXqu1aK5lEQFXYtyiPYnUCbYs6JvC5PmUx60Aj66Ezv9NmZPjrTIHVxVvrenBesw0TuX9dZUgE-nAAqnzsESjrbQLMlFxLZRbsYHlnxB_SNrBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17154163</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Kinematic and EMG characteristics of simple shoulder movements with proprioception and visual feedback</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Brindle, Timothy J. ; Nitz, Arthur J. ; Uhl, Tim L. ; Kifer, Edward ; Shapiro, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Brindle, Timothy J. ; Nitz, Arthur J. ; Uhl, Tim L. ; Kifer, Edward ; Shapiro, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to determine if simple, shoulder movements use the dual control hypothesis strategy, previously demonstrated with elbow movements, and to see if this strategy also applies in the absence of visual feedback. Twenty subjects were seated with their right arm abducted to 90° and externally rotated in the scapular plane. Subjects internally rotated to a target position using a custom shoulder wheel at three different speeds with and without visual feedback. Kinematics were collected with a motion analysis system and electromyographic (EMG) recordings of the pectoralis major (PECT), infraspinatus (INFRA), anterior and posterior (ADELT, PDELT) deltoid muscles were used to evaluate muscle activity patterns during movements. Kinematics changed as movement speed increased with less accuracy (
p
<
0.01). Greater EMG activity was observed in the PECT, PDELT, and INFRA with shorter durations for the ADELT, PDELT and INFRA. Movements with only kinesthetic feedback were less accurate (
p
<
0.01) and performed faster (
p
<
0.01) than movements with visual feedback. EMG activity suggests no major difference in CNS control strategies in movements with and without visual feedback. Greater resolution with visual feedback enables the implementation of a dual control strategy, allowing greater movement velocity while maintaining accuracy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-6411</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.06.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16111896</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biomechanical Phenomena - methods ; Electromyography ; EMG ; Feedback - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Kinematics ; Kinesthesia ; Male ; Motor Skills - physiology ; Movement - physiology ; Muscle Contraction - physiology ; Proprioception - physiology ; Shoulder Joint - physiology ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Upper extremity ; Upper Extremity - physiology ; Visual Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology, 2006-06, Vol.16 (3), p.236-249</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-7e02bf177eb0dc72b861d3e5e6123d0fc4c7fb51e2ff9b7f19937b79cd1a62f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-7e02bf177eb0dc72b861d3e5e6123d0fc4c7fb51e2ff9b7f19937b79cd1a62f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641105000842$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16111896$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brindle, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nitz, Arthur J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uhl, Tim L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kifer, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Kinematic and EMG characteristics of simple shoulder movements with proprioception and visual feedback</title><title>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</title><addtitle>J Electromyogr Kinesiol</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to determine if simple, shoulder movements use the dual control hypothesis strategy, previously demonstrated with elbow movements, and to see if this strategy also applies in the absence of visual feedback. Twenty subjects were seated with their right arm abducted to 90° and externally rotated in the scapular plane. Subjects internally rotated to a target position using a custom shoulder wheel at three different speeds with and without visual feedback. Kinematics were collected with a motion analysis system and electromyographic (EMG) recordings of the pectoralis major (PECT), infraspinatus (INFRA), anterior and posterior (ADELT, PDELT) deltoid muscles were used to evaluate muscle activity patterns during movements. Kinematics changed as movement speed increased with less accuracy (
p
<
0.01). Greater EMG activity was observed in the PECT, PDELT, and INFRA with shorter durations for the ADELT, PDELT and INFRA. Movements with only kinesthetic feedback were less accurate (
p
<
0.01) and performed faster (
p
<
0.01) than movements with visual feedback. EMG activity suggests no major difference in CNS control strategies in movements with and without visual feedback. Greater resolution with visual feedback enables the implementation of a dual control strategy, allowing greater movement velocity while maintaining accuracy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena - methods</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>EMG</subject><subject>Feedback - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Kinesthesia</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motor Skills - physiology</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Proprioception - physiology</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Upper extremity</subject><subject>Upper Extremity - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><issn>1050-6411</issn><issn>1873-5711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQQC0EoqXwE0A-wSlhxknszQmhqhREERc4W4491nqbxIudLOq_x8uuxI2eZjR686F5jL1GqBFQvt_VOxrpPsy1AOhqkDWgeMIucaOaqlOIT0sOHVSyRbxgL3LeAaCCDTxnFygRcdPLS-a_hpkmswTLzez4zbdbbrcmGbtQCrmUM4-e5zDtR-J5G9fRUeJTPNBE85L577Bs-T7FfQrR0n4Jcf476BDyakbuidxg7P1L9sybMdOrc7xiPz_d_Lj-XN19v_1y_fGusq2QS6UIxOBRKRrAWSWGjUTXUEcSRePA29YqP3RIwvt-UB77vlGD6q1DI4UXzRV7d5pbTvq1Ul70FLKlcTQzxTVrpVA1qgdZyLf_JaXqu1aK5lEQFXYtyiPYnUCbYs6JvC5PmUx60Aj66Ezv9NmZPjrTIHVxVvrenBesw0TuX9dZUgE-nAAqnzsESjrbQLMlFxLZRbsYHlnxB_SNrBQ</recordid><startdate>20060601</startdate><enddate>20060601</enddate><creator>Brindle, Timothy J.</creator><creator>Nitz, Arthur J.</creator><creator>Uhl, Tim L.</creator><creator>Kifer, Edward</creator><creator>Shapiro, Robert</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060601</creationdate><title>Kinematic and EMG characteristics of simple shoulder movements with proprioception and visual feedback</title><author>Brindle, Timothy J. ; Nitz, Arthur J. ; Uhl, Tim L. ; Kifer, Edward ; Shapiro, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-7e02bf177eb0dc72b861d3e5e6123d0fc4c7fb51e2ff9b7f19937b79cd1a62f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena - methods</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>EMG</topic><topic>Feedback - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Kinesthesia</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motor Skills - physiology</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Proprioception - physiology</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Upper extremity</topic><topic>Upper Extremity - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brindle, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nitz, Arthur J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uhl, Tim L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kifer, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brindle, Timothy J.</au><au>Nitz, Arthur J.</au><au>Uhl, Tim L.</au><au>Kifer, Edward</au><au>Shapiro, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Kinematic and EMG characteristics of simple shoulder movements with proprioception and visual feedback</atitle><jtitle>Journal of electromyography and kinesiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Electromyogr Kinesiol</addtitle><date>2006-06-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>236</spage><epage>249</epage><pages>236-249</pages><issn>1050-6411</issn><eissn>1873-5711</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to determine if simple, shoulder movements use the dual control hypothesis strategy, previously demonstrated with elbow movements, and to see if this strategy also applies in the absence of visual feedback. Twenty subjects were seated with their right arm abducted to 90° and externally rotated in the scapular plane. Subjects internally rotated to a target position using a custom shoulder wheel at three different speeds with and without visual feedback. Kinematics were collected with a motion analysis system and electromyographic (EMG) recordings of the pectoralis major (PECT), infraspinatus (INFRA), anterior and posterior (ADELT, PDELT) deltoid muscles were used to evaluate muscle activity patterns during movements. Kinematics changed as movement speed increased with less accuracy (
p
<
0.01). Greater EMG activity was observed in the PECT, PDELT, and INFRA with shorter durations for the ADELT, PDELT and INFRA. Movements with only kinesthetic feedback were less accurate (
p
<
0.01) and performed faster (
p
<
0.01) than movements with visual feedback. EMG activity suggests no major difference in CNS control strategies in movements with and without visual feedback. Greater resolution with visual feedback enables the implementation of a dual control strategy, allowing greater movement velocity while maintaining accuracy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16111896</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.06.012</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1050-6411 |
ispartof | Journal of electromyography and kinesiology, 2006-06, Vol.16 (3), p.236-249 |
issn | 1050-6411 1873-5711 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67954623 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adult Biomechanical Phenomena - methods Electromyography EMG Feedback - physiology Female Humans Kinematics Kinesthesia Male Motor Skills - physiology Movement - physiology Muscle Contraction - physiology Proprioception - physiology Shoulder Joint - physiology Task Performance and Analysis Upper extremity Upper Extremity - physiology Visual Perception - physiology |
title | Kinematic and EMG characteristics of simple shoulder movements with proprioception and visual feedback |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T17%3A35%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Kinematic%20and%20EMG%20characteristics%20of%20simple%20shoulder%20movements%20with%20proprioception%20and%20visual%20feedback&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20electromyography%20and%20kinesiology&rft.au=Brindle,%20Timothy%20J.&rft.date=2006-06-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=236&rft.epage=249&rft.pages=236-249&rft.issn=1050-6411&rft.eissn=1873-5711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.06.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E771737906%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17154163&rft_id=info:pmid/16111896&rft_els_id=S1050641105000842&rfr_iscdi=true |