Augmentation Phalloplasty Surgery for Penile Dysmorphophobia in Young Adults: Considerations Regarding Patient Selection, Outcome Evaluation and Techniques Applied

To report on the efficacy and safety of augmentation phalloplasty procedures in physically normal young men, to introduce a patient selection and outcome evaluation questionnaire as well as, to propose a surgical technique modification. Eleven (11) out of 28 psychosomatically normal men (25–35 years...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urology 2005-07, Vol.48 (1), p.121-128
Hauptverfasser: Spyropoulos, Evangelos, Christoforidis, Charalambos, Borousas, Dimitrios, Mavrikos, Stamatios, Bourounis, Michael, Athanasiadis, Sotirios
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 128
container_issue 1
container_start_page 121
container_title European urology
container_volume 48
creator Spyropoulos, Evangelos
Christoforidis, Charalambos
Borousas, Dimitrios
Mavrikos, Stamatios
Bourounis, Michael
Athanasiadis, Sotirios
description To report on the efficacy and safety of augmentation phalloplasty procedures in physically normal young men, to introduce a patient selection and outcome evaluation questionnaire as well as, to propose a surgical technique modification. Eleven (11) out of 28 psychosomatically normal men (25–35 years) who presented complaining of penile dysmorphophobia (subjective perception of small penis), were subjected to: (a) penile lengthening (suprapubic skin advancement – ligamentolysis): n = 5, (b) penile lengthening and shaft thickening (free dermal-fat graft shaft coverage): n = 3 and (c) panniculectomy – suprapubic lipectomy and penile lengthening: n = 2. A self administered questionnaire was employed in order to facilitate selection of the patients qualifying for the operation as well as to evaluate the outcome. In addition, a technical modification regarding dermal-fat graft handling was applied. The postoperative course was uneventful with minor complications. The mean penile length gain (flaccid - stretched penis) was 1.6 cm (1–2.3 cm) [ p = 0.0014], the mean circumference gain was 2.3 cm [ p = 0.003] at the base and 2.6 cm [ p = 0.0012] subcoronaly. Significant (20%–53%) [ p < 0.0001] sexual self-esteem and functioning improvement was reported by the majority (91%) of patients. Although penile size alteration was not spectacular or satisfying the patients’ “great” expectations, the substantially uneventful clinical course coupled with the significant improvement in sexual self-esteem and function and the highly accepted outcome by the patients, render augmentation phalloplasty reasonable treatment modality for the management of strictly selected and thoroughly informed young adults who suffer from penile dysmorphophobia.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.02.021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67953547</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S030228380500093X</els_id><sourcerecordid>67953547</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-9562c288d6be9ab3adc4474769f98efaec1030380be05abefd2edc9243300ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1rGzEUFKWhcdP-g1J06inr6GM_eygYN2kDgZjGl56EVnpry2hXW2kV8O_pH62cNfQWGHjwNG8GzSD0iZIlJbS8OSwh-ujdkhFSLAlLoG_QgtYVz6qiJG_RgnDCMlbz-hK9D-FACOFFw9-hS1o0ZcVKukB_V3HXwzDJybgBb_bSWjdaGaYjfop-B_6IO-fxBgZjAX8_ht75ce8SWiOxGfBvF4cdXulop_AVr90QjAb_IhfwL9hJr00ibNIm2eAnsKBOj9f4MU7K9YBvn6WNs78cNN6C2g_mT4SAV-NoDegP6KKTNsDH87xC27vb7fpn9vD44369esgUL8mUNUXJFKtrXbbQyJZLrfK8yquy6ZoaOgmKpkB4TVoghWyh0wy0aljOOSFS8yv0ZZYdvTvZT6I3QYG1cgAXgyirpuBFXiViPhOVdyF46MToTS_9UVAiTt2Ig5i7EaduBGEJNJ19PuvHtgf9_-hcRiJ8mwmQPvlswIugUmgKtPEpNKGded3hH8sipz4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67953547</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Augmentation Phalloplasty Surgery for Penile Dysmorphophobia in Young Adults: Considerations Regarding Patient Selection, Outcome Evaluation and Techniques Applied</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Spyropoulos, Evangelos ; Christoforidis, Charalambos ; Borousas, Dimitrios ; Mavrikos, Stamatios ; Bourounis, Michael ; Athanasiadis, Sotirios</creator><creatorcontrib>Spyropoulos, Evangelos ; Christoforidis, Charalambos ; Borousas, Dimitrios ; Mavrikos, Stamatios ; Bourounis, Michael ; Athanasiadis, Sotirios</creatorcontrib><description>To report on the efficacy and safety of augmentation phalloplasty procedures in physically normal young men, to introduce a patient selection and outcome evaluation questionnaire as well as, to propose a surgical technique modification. Eleven (11) out of 28 psychosomatically normal men (25–35 years) who presented complaining of penile dysmorphophobia (subjective perception of small penis), were subjected to: (a) penile lengthening (suprapubic skin advancement – ligamentolysis): n = 5, (b) penile lengthening and shaft thickening (free dermal-fat graft shaft coverage): n = 3 and (c) panniculectomy – suprapubic lipectomy and penile lengthening: n = 2. A self administered questionnaire was employed in order to facilitate selection of the patients qualifying for the operation as well as to evaluate the outcome. In addition, a technical modification regarding dermal-fat graft handling was applied. The postoperative course was uneventful with minor complications. The mean penile length gain (flaccid - stretched penis) was 1.6 cm (1–2.3 cm) [ p = 0.0014], the mean circumference gain was 2.3 cm [ p = 0.003] at the base and 2.6 cm [ p = 0.0012] subcoronaly. Significant (20%–53%) [ p &lt; 0.0001] sexual self-esteem and functioning improvement was reported by the majority (91%) of patients. Although penile size alteration was not spectacular or satisfying the patients’ “great” expectations, the substantially uneventful clinical course coupled with the significant improvement in sexual self-esteem and function and the highly accepted outcome by the patients, render augmentation phalloplasty reasonable treatment modality for the management of strictly selected and thoroughly informed young adults who suffer from penile dysmorphophobia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-2838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.02.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15967261</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Body Image ; Humans ; Male ; Outcome evaluation ; Patient Selection ; Penile dysmorphophobia ; Penile enlargement ; Penile lengthening ; Penis - surgery ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Safety ; Self Concept ; Small penis ; Somatoform Disorders - psychology ; Somatoform Disorders - surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male - methods</subject><ispartof>European urology, 2005-07, Vol.48 (1), p.121-128</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-9562c288d6be9ab3adc4474769f98efaec1030380be05abefd2edc9243300ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-9562c288d6be9ab3adc4474769f98efaec1030380be05abefd2edc9243300ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.02.021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15967261$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spyropoulos, Evangelos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christoforidis, Charalambos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borousas, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavrikos, Stamatios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourounis, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Athanasiadis, Sotirios</creatorcontrib><title>Augmentation Phalloplasty Surgery for Penile Dysmorphophobia in Young Adults: Considerations Regarding Patient Selection, Outcome Evaluation and Techniques Applied</title><title>European urology</title><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><description>To report on the efficacy and safety of augmentation phalloplasty procedures in physically normal young men, to introduce a patient selection and outcome evaluation questionnaire as well as, to propose a surgical technique modification. Eleven (11) out of 28 psychosomatically normal men (25–35 years) who presented complaining of penile dysmorphophobia (subjective perception of small penis), were subjected to: (a) penile lengthening (suprapubic skin advancement – ligamentolysis): n = 5, (b) penile lengthening and shaft thickening (free dermal-fat graft shaft coverage): n = 3 and (c) panniculectomy – suprapubic lipectomy and penile lengthening: n = 2. A self administered questionnaire was employed in order to facilitate selection of the patients qualifying for the operation as well as to evaluate the outcome. In addition, a technical modification regarding dermal-fat graft handling was applied. The postoperative course was uneventful with minor complications. The mean penile length gain (flaccid - stretched penis) was 1.6 cm (1–2.3 cm) [ p = 0.0014], the mean circumference gain was 2.3 cm [ p = 0.003] at the base and 2.6 cm [ p = 0.0012] subcoronaly. Significant (20%–53%) [ p &lt; 0.0001] sexual self-esteem and functioning improvement was reported by the majority (91%) of patients. Although penile size alteration was not spectacular or satisfying the patients’ “great” expectations, the substantially uneventful clinical course coupled with the significant improvement in sexual self-esteem and function and the highly accepted outcome by the patients, render augmentation phalloplasty reasonable treatment modality for the management of strictly selected and thoroughly informed young adults who suffer from penile dysmorphophobia.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Body Image</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Outcome evaluation</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Penile dysmorphophobia</subject><subject>Penile enlargement</subject><subject>Penile lengthening</subject><subject>Penis - surgery</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Small penis</subject><subject>Somatoform Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Somatoform Disorders - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male - methods</subject><issn>0302-2838</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1rGzEUFKWhcdP-g1J06inr6GM_eygYN2kDgZjGl56EVnpry2hXW2kV8O_pH62cNfQWGHjwNG8GzSD0iZIlJbS8OSwh-ujdkhFSLAlLoG_QgtYVz6qiJG_RgnDCMlbz-hK9D-FACOFFw9-hS1o0ZcVKukB_V3HXwzDJybgBb_bSWjdaGaYjfop-B_6IO-fxBgZjAX8_ht75ce8SWiOxGfBvF4cdXulop_AVr90QjAb_IhfwL9hJr00ibNIm2eAnsKBOj9f4MU7K9YBvn6WNs78cNN6C2g_mT4SAV-NoDegP6KKTNsDH87xC27vb7fpn9vD44369esgUL8mUNUXJFKtrXbbQyJZLrfK8yquy6ZoaOgmKpkB4TVoghWyh0wy0aljOOSFS8yv0ZZYdvTvZT6I3QYG1cgAXgyirpuBFXiViPhOVdyF46MToTS_9UVAiTt2Ig5i7EaduBGEJNJ19PuvHtgf9_-hcRiJ8mwmQPvlswIugUmgKtPEpNKGded3hH8sipz4</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>Spyropoulos, Evangelos</creator><creator>Christoforidis, Charalambos</creator><creator>Borousas, Dimitrios</creator><creator>Mavrikos, Stamatios</creator><creator>Bourounis, Michael</creator><creator>Athanasiadis, Sotirios</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>Augmentation Phalloplasty Surgery for Penile Dysmorphophobia in Young Adults: Considerations Regarding Patient Selection, Outcome Evaluation and Techniques Applied</title><author>Spyropoulos, Evangelos ; Christoforidis, Charalambos ; Borousas, Dimitrios ; Mavrikos, Stamatios ; Bourounis, Michael ; Athanasiadis, Sotirios</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-9562c288d6be9ab3adc4474769f98efaec1030380be05abefd2edc9243300ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Body Image</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Outcome evaluation</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Penile dysmorphophobia</topic><topic>Penile enlargement</topic><topic>Penile lengthening</topic><topic>Penis - surgery</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Small penis</topic><topic>Somatoform Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Somatoform Disorders - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spyropoulos, Evangelos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christoforidis, Charalambos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borousas, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavrikos, Stamatios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourounis, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Athanasiadis, Sotirios</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spyropoulos, Evangelos</au><au>Christoforidis, Charalambos</au><au>Borousas, Dimitrios</au><au>Mavrikos, Stamatios</au><au>Bourounis, Michael</au><au>Athanasiadis, Sotirios</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Augmentation Phalloplasty Surgery for Penile Dysmorphophobia in Young Adults: Considerations Regarding Patient Selection, Outcome Evaluation and Techniques Applied</atitle><jtitle>European urology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>121-128</pages><issn>0302-2838</issn><eissn>1873-7560</eissn><abstract>To report on the efficacy and safety of augmentation phalloplasty procedures in physically normal young men, to introduce a patient selection and outcome evaluation questionnaire as well as, to propose a surgical technique modification. Eleven (11) out of 28 psychosomatically normal men (25–35 years) who presented complaining of penile dysmorphophobia (subjective perception of small penis), were subjected to: (a) penile lengthening (suprapubic skin advancement – ligamentolysis): n = 5, (b) penile lengthening and shaft thickening (free dermal-fat graft shaft coverage): n = 3 and (c) panniculectomy – suprapubic lipectomy and penile lengthening: n = 2. A self administered questionnaire was employed in order to facilitate selection of the patients qualifying for the operation as well as to evaluate the outcome. In addition, a technical modification regarding dermal-fat graft handling was applied. The postoperative course was uneventful with minor complications. The mean penile length gain (flaccid - stretched penis) was 1.6 cm (1–2.3 cm) [ p = 0.0014], the mean circumference gain was 2.3 cm [ p = 0.003] at the base and 2.6 cm [ p = 0.0012] subcoronaly. Significant (20%–53%) [ p &lt; 0.0001] sexual self-esteem and functioning improvement was reported by the majority (91%) of patients. Although penile size alteration was not spectacular or satisfying the patients’ “great” expectations, the substantially uneventful clinical course coupled with the significant improvement in sexual self-esteem and function and the highly accepted outcome by the patients, render augmentation phalloplasty reasonable treatment modality for the management of strictly selected and thoroughly informed young adults who suffer from penile dysmorphophobia.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>15967261</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.eururo.2005.02.021</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0302-2838
ispartof European urology, 2005-07, Vol.48 (1), p.121-128
issn 0302-2838
1873-7560
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67953547
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Body Image
Humans
Male
Outcome evaluation
Patient Selection
Penile dysmorphophobia
Penile enlargement
Penile lengthening
Penis - surgery
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods
Safety
Self Concept
Small penis
Somatoform Disorders - psychology
Somatoform Disorders - surgery
Treatment Outcome
Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male - methods
title Augmentation Phalloplasty Surgery for Penile Dysmorphophobia in Young Adults: Considerations Regarding Patient Selection, Outcome Evaluation and Techniques Applied
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A05%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Augmentation%20Phalloplasty%20Surgery%20for%20Penile%20Dysmorphophobia%20in%20Young%20Adults:%20Considerations%20Regarding%20Patient%20Selection,%20Outcome%20Evaluation%20and%20Techniques%20Applied&rft.jtitle=European%20urology&rft.au=Spyropoulos,%20Evangelos&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=121-128&rft.issn=0302-2838&rft.eissn=1873-7560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.02.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67953547%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67953547&rft_id=info:pmid/15967261&rft_els_id=S030228380500093X&rfr_iscdi=true