Augmentation Phalloplasty Surgery for Penile Dysmorphophobia in Young Adults: Considerations Regarding Patient Selection, Outcome Evaluation and Techniques Applied
To report on the efficacy and safety of augmentation phalloplasty procedures in physically normal young men, to introduce a patient selection and outcome evaluation questionnaire as well as, to propose a surgical technique modification. Eleven (11) out of 28 psychosomatically normal men (25–35 years...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European urology 2005-07, Vol.48 (1), p.121-128 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 128 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 121 |
container_title | European urology |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Spyropoulos, Evangelos Christoforidis, Charalambos Borousas, Dimitrios Mavrikos, Stamatios Bourounis, Michael Athanasiadis, Sotirios |
description | To report on the efficacy and safety of augmentation phalloplasty procedures in physically normal young men, to introduce a patient selection and outcome evaluation questionnaire as well as, to propose a surgical technique modification.
Eleven (11) out of 28 psychosomatically normal men (25–35 years) who presented complaining of penile dysmorphophobia (subjective perception of small penis), were subjected to: (a) penile lengthening (suprapubic skin advancement – ligamentolysis):
n
=
5, (b) penile lengthening and shaft thickening (free dermal-fat graft shaft coverage):
n
=
3 and (c) panniculectomy – suprapubic lipectomy and penile lengthening:
n
=
2. A self administered questionnaire was employed in order to facilitate selection of the patients qualifying for the operation as well as to evaluate the outcome. In addition, a technical modification regarding dermal-fat graft handling was applied.
The postoperative course was uneventful with minor complications. The mean penile length gain (flaccid - stretched penis) was 1.6
cm (1–2.3
cm) [
p
=
0.0014], the mean circumference gain was 2.3
cm [
p
=
0.003] at the base and 2.6
cm [
p
=
0.0012] subcoronaly. Significant (20%–53%) [
p
<
0.0001] sexual self-esteem and functioning improvement was reported by the majority (91%) of patients.
Although penile size alteration was not spectacular or satisfying the patients’ “great” expectations, the substantially uneventful clinical course coupled with the significant improvement in sexual self-esteem and function and the highly accepted outcome by the patients, render augmentation phalloplasty reasonable treatment modality for the management of strictly selected and thoroughly informed young adults who suffer from penile dysmorphophobia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.02.021 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67953547</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S030228380500093X</els_id><sourcerecordid>67953547</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-9562c288d6be9ab3adc4474769f98efaec1030380be05abefd2edc9243300ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1rGzEUFKWhcdP-g1J06inr6GM_eygYN2kDgZjGl56EVnpry2hXW2kV8O_pH62cNfQWGHjwNG8GzSD0iZIlJbS8OSwh-ujdkhFSLAlLoG_QgtYVz6qiJG_RgnDCMlbz-hK9D-FACOFFw9-hS1o0ZcVKukB_V3HXwzDJybgBb_bSWjdaGaYjfop-B_6IO-fxBgZjAX8_ht75ce8SWiOxGfBvF4cdXulop_AVr90QjAb_IhfwL9hJr00ibNIm2eAnsKBOj9f4MU7K9YBvn6WNs78cNN6C2g_mT4SAV-NoDegP6KKTNsDH87xC27vb7fpn9vD44369esgUL8mUNUXJFKtrXbbQyJZLrfK8yquy6ZoaOgmKpkB4TVoghWyh0wy0aljOOSFS8yv0ZZYdvTvZT6I3QYG1cgAXgyirpuBFXiViPhOVdyF46MToTS_9UVAiTt2Ig5i7EaduBGEJNJ19PuvHtgf9_-hcRiJ8mwmQPvlswIugUmgKtPEpNKGded3hH8sipz4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67953547</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Augmentation Phalloplasty Surgery for Penile Dysmorphophobia in Young Adults: Considerations Regarding Patient Selection, Outcome Evaluation and Techniques Applied</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Spyropoulos, Evangelos ; Christoforidis, Charalambos ; Borousas, Dimitrios ; Mavrikos, Stamatios ; Bourounis, Michael ; Athanasiadis, Sotirios</creator><creatorcontrib>Spyropoulos, Evangelos ; Christoforidis, Charalambos ; Borousas, Dimitrios ; Mavrikos, Stamatios ; Bourounis, Michael ; Athanasiadis, Sotirios</creatorcontrib><description>To report on the efficacy and safety of augmentation phalloplasty procedures in physically normal young men, to introduce a patient selection and outcome evaluation questionnaire as well as, to propose a surgical technique modification.
Eleven (11) out of 28 psychosomatically normal men (25–35 years) who presented complaining of penile dysmorphophobia (subjective perception of small penis), were subjected to: (a) penile lengthening (suprapubic skin advancement – ligamentolysis):
n
=
5, (b) penile lengthening and shaft thickening (free dermal-fat graft shaft coverage):
n
=
3 and (c) panniculectomy – suprapubic lipectomy and penile lengthening:
n
=
2. A self administered questionnaire was employed in order to facilitate selection of the patients qualifying for the operation as well as to evaluate the outcome. In addition, a technical modification regarding dermal-fat graft handling was applied.
The postoperative course was uneventful with minor complications. The mean penile length gain (flaccid - stretched penis) was 1.6
cm (1–2.3
cm) [
p
=
0.0014], the mean circumference gain was 2.3
cm [
p
=
0.003] at the base and 2.6
cm [
p
=
0.0012] subcoronaly. Significant (20%–53%) [
p
<
0.0001] sexual self-esteem and functioning improvement was reported by the majority (91%) of patients.
Although penile size alteration was not spectacular or satisfying the patients’ “great” expectations, the substantially uneventful clinical course coupled with the significant improvement in sexual self-esteem and function and the highly accepted outcome by the patients, render augmentation phalloplasty reasonable treatment modality for the management of strictly selected and thoroughly informed young adults who suffer from penile dysmorphophobia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-2838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.02.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15967261</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Body Image ; Humans ; Male ; Outcome evaluation ; Patient Selection ; Penile dysmorphophobia ; Penile enlargement ; Penile lengthening ; Penis - surgery ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Safety ; Self Concept ; Small penis ; Somatoform Disorders - psychology ; Somatoform Disorders - surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male - methods</subject><ispartof>European urology, 2005-07, Vol.48 (1), p.121-128</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-9562c288d6be9ab3adc4474769f98efaec1030380be05abefd2edc9243300ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-9562c288d6be9ab3adc4474769f98efaec1030380be05abefd2edc9243300ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.02.021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15967261$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spyropoulos, Evangelos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christoforidis, Charalambos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borousas, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavrikos, Stamatios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourounis, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Athanasiadis, Sotirios</creatorcontrib><title>Augmentation Phalloplasty Surgery for Penile Dysmorphophobia in Young Adults: Considerations Regarding Patient Selection, Outcome Evaluation and Techniques Applied</title><title>European urology</title><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><description>To report on the efficacy and safety of augmentation phalloplasty procedures in physically normal young men, to introduce a patient selection and outcome evaluation questionnaire as well as, to propose a surgical technique modification.
Eleven (11) out of 28 psychosomatically normal men (25–35 years) who presented complaining of penile dysmorphophobia (subjective perception of small penis), were subjected to: (a) penile lengthening (suprapubic skin advancement – ligamentolysis):
n
=
5, (b) penile lengthening and shaft thickening (free dermal-fat graft shaft coverage):
n
=
3 and (c) panniculectomy – suprapubic lipectomy and penile lengthening:
n
=
2. A self administered questionnaire was employed in order to facilitate selection of the patients qualifying for the operation as well as to evaluate the outcome. In addition, a technical modification regarding dermal-fat graft handling was applied.
The postoperative course was uneventful with minor complications. The mean penile length gain (flaccid - stretched penis) was 1.6
cm (1–2.3
cm) [
p
=
0.0014], the mean circumference gain was 2.3
cm [
p
=
0.003] at the base and 2.6
cm [
p
=
0.0012] subcoronaly. Significant (20%–53%) [
p
<
0.0001] sexual self-esteem and functioning improvement was reported by the majority (91%) of patients.
Although penile size alteration was not spectacular or satisfying the patients’ “great” expectations, the substantially uneventful clinical course coupled with the significant improvement in sexual self-esteem and function and the highly accepted outcome by the patients, render augmentation phalloplasty reasonable treatment modality for the management of strictly selected and thoroughly informed young adults who suffer from penile dysmorphophobia.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Body Image</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Outcome evaluation</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Penile dysmorphophobia</subject><subject>Penile enlargement</subject><subject>Penile lengthening</subject><subject>Penis - surgery</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Small penis</subject><subject>Somatoform Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Somatoform Disorders - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male - methods</subject><issn>0302-2838</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1rGzEUFKWhcdP-g1J06inr6GM_eygYN2kDgZjGl56EVnpry2hXW2kV8O_pH62cNfQWGHjwNG8GzSD0iZIlJbS8OSwh-ujdkhFSLAlLoG_QgtYVz6qiJG_RgnDCMlbz-hK9D-FACOFFw9-hS1o0ZcVKukB_V3HXwzDJybgBb_bSWjdaGaYjfop-B_6IO-fxBgZjAX8_ht75ce8SWiOxGfBvF4cdXulop_AVr90QjAb_IhfwL9hJr00ibNIm2eAnsKBOj9f4MU7K9YBvn6WNs78cNN6C2g_mT4SAV-NoDegP6KKTNsDH87xC27vb7fpn9vD44369esgUL8mUNUXJFKtrXbbQyJZLrfK8yquy6ZoaOgmKpkB4TVoghWyh0wy0aljOOSFS8yv0ZZYdvTvZT6I3QYG1cgAXgyirpuBFXiViPhOVdyF46MToTS_9UVAiTt2Ig5i7EaduBGEJNJ19PuvHtgf9_-hcRiJ8mwmQPvlswIugUmgKtPEpNKGded3hH8sipz4</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>Spyropoulos, Evangelos</creator><creator>Christoforidis, Charalambos</creator><creator>Borousas, Dimitrios</creator><creator>Mavrikos, Stamatios</creator><creator>Bourounis, Michael</creator><creator>Athanasiadis, Sotirios</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>Augmentation Phalloplasty Surgery for Penile Dysmorphophobia in Young Adults: Considerations Regarding Patient Selection, Outcome Evaluation and Techniques Applied</title><author>Spyropoulos, Evangelos ; Christoforidis, Charalambos ; Borousas, Dimitrios ; Mavrikos, Stamatios ; Bourounis, Michael ; Athanasiadis, Sotirios</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-9562c288d6be9ab3adc4474769f98efaec1030380be05abefd2edc9243300ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Body Image</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Outcome evaluation</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Penile dysmorphophobia</topic><topic>Penile enlargement</topic><topic>Penile lengthening</topic><topic>Penis - surgery</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Small penis</topic><topic>Somatoform Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Somatoform Disorders - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spyropoulos, Evangelos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christoforidis, Charalambos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borousas, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavrikos, Stamatios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourounis, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Athanasiadis, Sotirios</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spyropoulos, Evangelos</au><au>Christoforidis, Charalambos</au><au>Borousas, Dimitrios</au><au>Mavrikos, Stamatios</au><au>Bourounis, Michael</au><au>Athanasiadis, Sotirios</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Augmentation Phalloplasty Surgery for Penile Dysmorphophobia in Young Adults: Considerations Regarding Patient Selection, Outcome Evaluation and Techniques Applied</atitle><jtitle>European urology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>121-128</pages><issn>0302-2838</issn><eissn>1873-7560</eissn><abstract>To report on the efficacy and safety of augmentation phalloplasty procedures in physically normal young men, to introduce a patient selection and outcome evaluation questionnaire as well as, to propose a surgical technique modification.
Eleven (11) out of 28 psychosomatically normal men (25–35 years) who presented complaining of penile dysmorphophobia (subjective perception of small penis), were subjected to: (a) penile lengthening (suprapubic skin advancement – ligamentolysis):
n
=
5, (b) penile lengthening and shaft thickening (free dermal-fat graft shaft coverage):
n
=
3 and (c) panniculectomy – suprapubic lipectomy and penile lengthening:
n
=
2. A self administered questionnaire was employed in order to facilitate selection of the patients qualifying for the operation as well as to evaluate the outcome. In addition, a technical modification regarding dermal-fat graft handling was applied.
The postoperative course was uneventful with minor complications. The mean penile length gain (flaccid - stretched penis) was 1.6
cm (1–2.3
cm) [
p
=
0.0014], the mean circumference gain was 2.3
cm [
p
=
0.003] at the base and 2.6
cm [
p
=
0.0012] subcoronaly. Significant (20%–53%) [
p
<
0.0001] sexual self-esteem and functioning improvement was reported by the majority (91%) of patients.
Although penile size alteration was not spectacular or satisfying the patients’ “great” expectations, the substantially uneventful clinical course coupled with the significant improvement in sexual self-esteem and function and the highly accepted outcome by the patients, render augmentation phalloplasty reasonable treatment modality for the management of strictly selected and thoroughly informed young adults who suffer from penile dysmorphophobia.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>15967261</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.eururo.2005.02.021</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0302-2838 |
ispartof | European urology, 2005-07, Vol.48 (1), p.121-128 |
issn | 0302-2838 1873-7560 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67953547 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adult Body Image Humans Male Outcome evaluation Patient Selection Penile dysmorphophobia Penile enlargement Penile lengthening Penis - surgery Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods Safety Self Concept Small penis Somatoform Disorders - psychology Somatoform Disorders - surgery Treatment Outcome Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male - methods |
title | Augmentation Phalloplasty Surgery for Penile Dysmorphophobia in Young Adults: Considerations Regarding Patient Selection, Outcome Evaluation and Techniques Applied |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A05%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Augmentation%20Phalloplasty%20Surgery%20for%20Penile%20Dysmorphophobia%20in%20Young%20Adults:%20Considerations%20Regarding%20Patient%20Selection,%20Outcome%20Evaluation%20and%20Techniques%20Applied&rft.jtitle=European%20urology&rft.au=Spyropoulos,%20Evangelos&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=121-128&rft.issn=0302-2838&rft.eissn=1873-7560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.02.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67953547%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67953547&rft_id=info:pmid/15967261&rft_els_id=S030228380500093X&rfr_iscdi=true |