Lower target blood pressures are safe and effective for the prevention of recurrent stroke: the PROGRESS trial

OBJECTIVETo explore the likely optimum blood pressure (BP) level for patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease. METHODSThe Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS) was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial that established the beneficial effects of BP lowering in 61...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hypertension 2006-06, Vol.24 (6), p.1201-1208
Hauptverfasser: Arima, Hisatomi, Chalmers, John, Woodward, Mark, Anderson, Craig, Rodgers, Anthony, Davis, Stephen, MacMahon, Stephen, Neal, Bruce
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1208
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1201
container_title Journal of hypertension
container_volume 24
creator Arima, Hisatomi
Chalmers, John
Woodward, Mark
Anderson, Craig
Rodgers, Anthony
Davis, Stephen
MacMahon, Stephen
Neal, Bruce
description OBJECTIVETo explore the likely optimum blood pressure (BP) level for patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease. METHODSThe Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS) was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial that established the beneficial effects of BP lowering in 6105 patients with cerebrovascular disease. The present study comprises two series of post hoc analyses. The first was designed to investigate the effects of randomized treatment on recurrent stroke by baseline BP levels, and the second was a corresponding observational analysis investigating the association between achieved follow-up BP levels and recurrent stroke risk. RESULTSAnalyses of the randomized treatment comparisons showed that BP lowering with combination therapy produced similar risk reductions in each of four subgroups defined by baseline BP of less than 120, 120–139, 140–159, and 160 mmHg or greater (P homogeneity = 0.5). The effects of single-drug therapy were also comparable across these subgroups (P homogeneity = 0.2), but consistently greater benefits were observed with combination compared to single-drug therapy. The analyses of achieved follow-up BP showed that the lowest risk of recurrence was among the one-quarter of participants with the lowest follow-up BP levels (median 112/72 mmHg), and that risks rose progressively with higher follow-up BP levels. Minor side-effects were progressively more common at lower BP levels (P homogeneity = 0.04), but there was no excess of serious complications (all P homogeneity > 0.2). CONCLUSIONThese analyses provide no evidence of a J-curve relationship between BP level and stroke risk among patients with cerebrovascular disease, and identify no patient group among whom more intensive BP lowering would not be expected to produce greater risk reductions.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.hjh.0000226212.34055.86
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67953013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67953013</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4581-b46ec37bd9a8a26c362762c2be88bd13ddae6059dd0642542b13e9d14194edd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkV1rHCEUhqW0NJu0f6FIobmbqd86uSshTQoLKUl7LY6e6U7ijludSei_r8kurAc9CM_rgUeEPlPSUtLpr4S2m4dNS-piTDHKWi6IlK1Rb9CKCs0bKTvzFq0IU7xRXLITdFrKQ-VNp_l7dEKVMpIxukLTOj1DxrPLf2DGfUwp4F2GUpZ6YJcBFzcAdlPAMAzg5_EJ8JBqYgMv4BNM85gmnAacwS851zsuc06PcPHK_Ly7vb67ur_Hcx5d_IDeDS4W-HjoZ-j396tflzfN-vb6x-W3deOFNLTphQLPdR86ZxxTniumFfOsB2P6QHkIDhSRXQhECSYF6ymHLlBBOwEhdPwMne_f3eX0d4Ey2-1YPMToJkhLsUp3khPKK3ixB31OpWQY7C6PW5f_WUrsi21LqK227dG2fbVtjarhT4cpS7-FcIwe9FbgywFwxbs4ZDf5sRw5rY0USldO7LnnFGfI5TEu9VfsBlyc96OF0axhhKhahDR1c8r_A5kkmSQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67953013</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lower target blood pressures are safe and effective for the prevention of recurrent stroke: the PROGRESS trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Arima, Hisatomi ; Chalmers, John ; Woodward, Mark ; Anderson, Craig ; Rodgers, Anthony ; Davis, Stephen ; MacMahon, Stephen ; Neal, Bruce</creator><creatorcontrib>Arima, Hisatomi ; Chalmers, John ; Woodward, Mark ; Anderson, Craig ; Rodgers, Anthony ; Davis, Stephen ; MacMahon, Stephen ; Neal, Bruce ; PROGRESS Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVETo explore the likely optimum blood pressure (BP) level for patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease. METHODSThe Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS) was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial that established the beneficial effects of BP lowering in 6105 patients with cerebrovascular disease. The present study comprises two series of post hoc analyses. The first was designed to investigate the effects of randomized treatment on recurrent stroke by baseline BP levels, and the second was a corresponding observational analysis investigating the association between achieved follow-up BP levels and recurrent stroke risk. RESULTSAnalyses of the randomized treatment comparisons showed that BP lowering with combination therapy produced similar risk reductions in each of four subgroups defined by baseline BP of less than 120, 120–139, 140–159, and 160 mmHg or greater (P homogeneity = 0.5). The effects of single-drug therapy were also comparable across these subgroups (P homogeneity = 0.2), but consistently greater benefits were observed with combination compared to single-drug therapy. The analyses of achieved follow-up BP showed that the lowest risk of recurrence was among the one-quarter of participants with the lowest follow-up BP levels (median 112/72 mmHg), and that risks rose progressively with higher follow-up BP levels. Minor side-effects were progressively more common at lower BP levels (P homogeneity = 0.04), but there was no excess of serious complications (all P homogeneity &gt; 0.2). CONCLUSIONThese analyses provide no evidence of a J-curve relationship between BP level and stroke risk among patients with cerebrovascular disease, and identify no patient group among whom more intensive BP lowering would not be expected to produce greater risk reductions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-6352</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-5598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000226212.34055.86</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16685221</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOHYD3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors - pharmacology ; Arterial hypertension. Arterial hypotension ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood and lymphatic vessels ; Blood Pressure - drug effects ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Clinical manifestations. Epidemiology. Investigative techniques. Etiology ; Diuretics - pharmacology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hemodynamics. Rheology ; Humans ; Indapamide - pharmacology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Perindopril - pharmacology ; Risk Factors ; Stroke - prevention &amp; control ; Vertebrates: cardiovascular system</subject><ispartof>Journal of hypertension, 2006-06, Vol.24 (6), p.1201-1208</ispartof><rights>2006 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4581-b46ec37bd9a8a26c362762c2be88bd13ddae6059dd0642542b13e9d14194edd93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4581-b46ec37bd9a8a26c362762c2be88bd13ddae6059dd0642542b13e9d14194edd93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17785467$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16685221$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arima, Hisatomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalmers, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodward, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodgers, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacMahon, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PROGRESS Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><title>Lower target blood pressures are safe and effective for the prevention of recurrent stroke: the PROGRESS trial</title><title>Journal of hypertension</title><addtitle>J Hypertens</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVETo explore the likely optimum blood pressure (BP) level for patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease. METHODSThe Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS) was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial that established the beneficial effects of BP lowering in 6105 patients with cerebrovascular disease. The present study comprises two series of post hoc analyses. The first was designed to investigate the effects of randomized treatment on recurrent stroke by baseline BP levels, and the second was a corresponding observational analysis investigating the association between achieved follow-up BP levels and recurrent stroke risk. RESULTSAnalyses of the randomized treatment comparisons showed that BP lowering with combination therapy produced similar risk reductions in each of four subgroups defined by baseline BP of less than 120, 120–139, 140–159, and 160 mmHg or greater (P homogeneity = 0.5). The effects of single-drug therapy were also comparable across these subgroups (P homogeneity = 0.2), but consistently greater benefits were observed with combination compared to single-drug therapy. The analyses of achieved follow-up BP showed that the lowest risk of recurrence was among the one-quarter of participants with the lowest follow-up BP levels (median 112/72 mmHg), and that risks rose progressively with higher follow-up BP levels. Minor side-effects were progressively more common at lower BP levels (P homogeneity = 0.04), but there was no excess of serious complications (all P homogeneity &gt; 0.2). CONCLUSIONThese analyses provide no evidence of a J-curve relationship between BP level and stroke risk among patients with cerebrovascular disease, and identify no patient group among whom more intensive BP lowering would not be expected to produce greater risk reductions.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors - pharmacology</subject><subject>Arterial hypertension. Arterial hypotension</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood and lymphatic vessels</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - drug effects</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Clinical manifestations. Epidemiology. Investigative techniques. Etiology</subject><subject>Diuretics - pharmacology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hemodynamics. Rheology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indapamide - pharmacology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Perindopril - pharmacology</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Stroke - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Vertebrates: cardiovascular system</subject><issn>0263-6352</issn><issn>1473-5598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkV1rHCEUhqW0NJu0f6FIobmbqd86uSshTQoLKUl7LY6e6U7ijludSei_r8kurAc9CM_rgUeEPlPSUtLpr4S2m4dNS-piTDHKWi6IlK1Rb9CKCs0bKTvzFq0IU7xRXLITdFrKQ-VNp_l7dEKVMpIxukLTOj1DxrPLf2DGfUwp4F2GUpZ6YJcBFzcAdlPAMAzg5_EJ8JBqYgMv4BNM85gmnAacwS851zsuc06PcPHK_Ly7vb67ur_Hcx5d_IDeDS4W-HjoZ-j396tflzfN-vb6x-W3deOFNLTphQLPdR86ZxxTniumFfOsB2P6QHkIDhSRXQhECSYF6ymHLlBBOwEhdPwMne_f3eX0d4Ey2-1YPMToJkhLsUp3khPKK3ixB31OpWQY7C6PW5f_WUrsi21LqK227dG2fbVtjarhT4cpS7-FcIwe9FbgywFwxbs4ZDf5sRw5rY0USldO7LnnFGfI5TEu9VfsBlyc96OF0axhhKhahDR1c8r_A5kkmSQ</recordid><startdate>200606</startdate><enddate>200606</enddate><creator>Arima, Hisatomi</creator><creator>Chalmers, John</creator><creator>Woodward, Mark</creator><creator>Anderson, Craig</creator><creator>Rodgers, Anthony</creator><creator>Davis, Stephen</creator><creator>MacMahon, Stephen</creator><creator>Neal, Bruce</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200606</creationdate><title>Lower target blood pressures are safe and effective for the prevention of recurrent stroke: the PROGRESS trial</title><author>Arima, Hisatomi ; Chalmers, John ; Woodward, Mark ; Anderson, Craig ; Rodgers, Anthony ; Davis, Stephen ; MacMahon, Stephen ; Neal, Bruce</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4581-b46ec37bd9a8a26c362762c2be88bd13ddae6059dd0642542b13e9d14194edd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors - pharmacology</topic><topic>Arterial hypertension. Arterial hypotension</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood and lymphatic vessels</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - drug effects</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Clinical manifestations. Epidemiology. Investigative techniques. Etiology</topic><topic>Diuretics - pharmacology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hemodynamics. Rheology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indapamide - pharmacology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Perindopril - pharmacology</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Stroke - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Vertebrates: cardiovascular system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arima, Hisatomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalmers, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodward, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodgers, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacMahon, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PROGRESS Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of hypertension</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arima, Hisatomi</au><au>Chalmers, John</au><au>Woodward, Mark</au><au>Anderson, Craig</au><au>Rodgers, Anthony</au><au>Davis, Stephen</au><au>MacMahon, Stephen</au><au>Neal, Bruce</au><aucorp>PROGRESS Collaborative Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lower target blood pressures are safe and effective for the prevention of recurrent stroke: the PROGRESS trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hypertension</jtitle><addtitle>J Hypertens</addtitle><date>2006-06</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1201</spage><epage>1208</epage><pages>1201-1208</pages><issn>0263-6352</issn><eissn>1473-5598</eissn><coden>JOHYD3</coden><abstract>OBJECTIVETo explore the likely optimum blood pressure (BP) level for patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease. METHODSThe Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS) was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial that established the beneficial effects of BP lowering in 6105 patients with cerebrovascular disease. The present study comprises two series of post hoc analyses. The first was designed to investigate the effects of randomized treatment on recurrent stroke by baseline BP levels, and the second was a corresponding observational analysis investigating the association between achieved follow-up BP levels and recurrent stroke risk. RESULTSAnalyses of the randomized treatment comparisons showed that BP lowering with combination therapy produced similar risk reductions in each of four subgroups defined by baseline BP of less than 120, 120–139, 140–159, and 160 mmHg or greater (P homogeneity = 0.5). The effects of single-drug therapy were also comparable across these subgroups (P homogeneity = 0.2), but consistently greater benefits were observed with combination compared to single-drug therapy. The analyses of achieved follow-up BP showed that the lowest risk of recurrence was among the one-quarter of participants with the lowest follow-up BP levels (median 112/72 mmHg), and that risks rose progressively with higher follow-up BP levels. Minor side-effects were progressively more common at lower BP levels (P homogeneity = 0.04), but there was no excess of serious complications (all P homogeneity &gt; 0.2). CONCLUSIONThese analyses provide no evidence of a J-curve relationship between BP level and stroke risk among patients with cerebrovascular disease, and identify no patient group among whom more intensive BP lowering would not be expected to produce greater risk reductions.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>16685221</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.hjh.0000226212.34055.86</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0263-6352
ispartof Journal of hypertension, 2006-06, Vol.24 (6), p.1201-1208
issn 0263-6352
1473-5598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67953013
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
subjects Aged
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors - pharmacology
Arterial hypertension. Arterial hypotension
Biological and medical sciences
Blood and lymphatic vessels
Blood Pressure - drug effects
Cardiology. Vascular system
Clinical manifestations. Epidemiology. Investigative techniques. Etiology
Diuretics - pharmacology
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hemodynamics. Rheology
Humans
Indapamide - pharmacology
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Perindopril - pharmacology
Risk Factors
Stroke - prevention & control
Vertebrates: cardiovascular system
title Lower target blood pressures are safe and effective for the prevention of recurrent stroke: the PROGRESS trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T01%3A20%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lower%20target%20blood%20pressures%20are%20safe%20and%20effective%20for%20the%20prevention%20of%20recurrent%20stroke:%20the%20PROGRESS%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hypertension&rft.au=Arima,%20Hisatomi&rft.aucorp=PROGRESS%20Collaborative%20Group&rft.date=2006-06&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1201&rft.epage=1208&rft.pages=1201-1208&rft.issn=0263-6352&rft.eissn=1473-5598&rft.coden=JOHYD3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.hjh.0000226212.34055.86&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67953013%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67953013&rft_id=info:pmid/16685221&rfr_iscdi=true