Trends in postpartum haemorrhage

Objective: To assess trends and outcomes of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) in New South Wales (NSW). Methods: A population‐based descriptive study of all 52,151 women who had a PPH either during the hospital stay for the birth of their baby or requiring a re‐admission to hospital between 1994 and 2002...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australian and New Zealand journal of public health 2006-04, Vol.30 (2), p.151-156
Hauptverfasser: Cameron, Carolyn A., Roberts, Christine L., Olive, Emily C., Ford, Jane B., Fischer, Wendy E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 156
container_issue 2
container_start_page 151
container_title Australian and New Zealand journal of public health
container_volume 30
creator Cameron, Carolyn A.
Roberts, Christine L.
Olive, Emily C.
Ford, Jane B.
Fischer, Wendy E.
description Objective: To assess trends and outcomes of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) in New South Wales (NSW). Methods: A population‐based descriptive study of all 52,151 women who had a PPH either during the hospital stay for the birth of their baby or requiring a re‐admission to hospital between 1994 and 2002. Data were obtained from the de‐identified computerised census of NSW hospital in‐patients and analysed to examine trends over time. The outcome measures included maternal death, hysterectomy, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), transfusion and major maternal morbidity, including procedures to reduce blood supply to the uterus, acute renal failure and postpartum coaqulation defects. Results: From 1994 to 2002 both the number and adjusted (for under‐reporting) rate of PPH during the birth admission increased from 8.3% of deliveries to 10.7%. The rate of PPH adjusted for maternal age and mode of delivery was similar to the unadjusted rate. There was a sixfold increase in the rate of transfusions from 1.9% of women who haemorrhaged to 11.7%. Hospital readmissions for PPH declined from 1.2% of deliveries to 0.9%. These were statistically significant changes. There were no significant changes in the rate of hysterectomies, procedures to reduce blood supply to the uterus, admissions to ICU, acute renal failure or coagulation defects. Conclusion: The increased rate of PPH during the birth admission is concerning. The increase in PPH could not be explained by increasing maternal age or caesarean sections. Linked birth and hospital discharge data could determine whether the increase in PPH is caused by other changes in obstetric practices or population.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2006.tb00109.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67945909</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1326020023047076</els_id><sourcerecordid>67945909</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5851-1fca7e5f8ca89b2a805d5c86059a7c2b4fd444c5daa3696bebc5e714a5f9887b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkU1v1DAQhi0Eoh_wF9AKJNRLgp34kwuqCjSgqvRQRMVl5DgT6mWTLHYC23-Po6xA4oDAF1vWM-94HhPylNGcpfVinTMuVaZ5cZMXlMp8rCll1OS7e-SQKVFmklNxP53LQmY0IQfkKMY1TVS6ekgOmJSalaU6JKvrgH0TV75fbYc4bm0Yp251a7EbQri1X_ARedDaTcTH-_2YfHz75vqsyi4-nL87O73InNCCZax1VqFotbPa1IXVVDTCaUmFscoVNW8bzrkTjbWlNLLG2glUjFvRGq1VXR6T50vuNgzfJowjdD463Gxsj8MUQSrDhaEmgSd_BZk2TCum2Yw--wNdD1Po0xhQUikpNekpiXq5UC4MMQZsYRt8Z8MdMAqzcFjDLBxm4TALh71w2KXiJ_sWU91h87t0bzgBrxbgh9_g3X9Ew-nnq4oJlhKyJcHHEXe_Emz4mqSUSsCny3O4uuHVZVUpeJ_41wuP6bu-ewwQncfeYeMDuhGawf_LZD8BqOS0LA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3066009696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trends in postpartum haemorrhage</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cameron, Carolyn A. ; Roberts, Christine L. ; Olive, Emily C. ; Ford, Jane B. ; Fischer, Wendy E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Carolyn A. ; Roberts, Christine L. ; Olive, Emily C. ; Ford, Jane B. ; Fischer, Wendy E.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To assess trends and outcomes of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) in New South Wales (NSW). Methods: A population‐based descriptive study of all 52,151 women who had a PPH either during the hospital stay for the birth of their baby or requiring a re‐admission to hospital between 1994 and 2002. Data were obtained from the de‐identified computerised census of NSW hospital in‐patients and analysed to examine trends over time. The outcome measures included maternal death, hysterectomy, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), transfusion and major maternal morbidity, including procedures to reduce blood supply to the uterus, acute renal failure and postpartum coaqulation defects. Results: From 1994 to 2002 both the number and adjusted (for under‐reporting) rate of PPH during the birth admission increased from 8.3% of deliveries to 10.7%. The rate of PPH adjusted for maternal age and mode of delivery was similar to the unadjusted rate. There was a sixfold increase in the rate of transfusions from 1.9% of women who haemorrhaged to 11.7%. Hospital readmissions for PPH declined from 1.2% of deliveries to 0.9%. These were statistically significant changes. There were no significant changes in the rate of hysterectomies, procedures to reduce blood supply to the uterus, admissions to ICU, acute renal failure or coagulation defects. Conclusion: The increased rate of PPH during the birth admission is concerning. The increase in PPH could not be explained by increasing maternal age or caesarean sections. Linked birth and hospital discharge data could determine whether the increase in PPH is caused by other changes in obstetric practices or population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1326-0200</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1753-6405</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2006.tb00109.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16681337</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Birth ; Blood ; Blood transfusions ; Censuses ; Changes ; Childbirth &amp; labor ; Coagulation ; Defects ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Hemorrhage ; Hormones ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Incidence ; Maternal mortality ; Morbidity ; New South Wales - epidemiology ; Obstetrics ; Obstetrics - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Population studies ; Population Surveillance - methods ; Postpartum ; Postpartum Hemorrhage - epidemiology ; Postpartum Hemorrhage - therapy ; Pregnancy ; Public health ; Renal failure ; Software ; Statistical analysis ; Survival Rate ; Trends ; Uterus</subject><ispartof>Australian and New Zealand journal of public health, 2006-04, Vol.30 (2), p.151-156</ispartof><rights>2006 Copyright 2006 THE AUTHORS.</rights><rights>2006. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5851-1fca7e5f8ca89b2a805d5c86059a7c2b4fd444c5daa3696bebc5e714a5f9887b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5851-1fca7e5f8ca89b2a805d5c86059a7c2b4fd444c5daa3696bebc5e714a5f9887b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1467-842X.2006.tb00109.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1467-842X.2006.tb00109.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27843,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16681337$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Carolyn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Christine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olive, Emily C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, Jane B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Wendy E.</creatorcontrib><title>Trends in postpartum haemorrhage</title><title>Australian and New Zealand journal of public health</title><addtitle>Aust N Z J Public Health</addtitle><description>Objective: To assess trends and outcomes of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) in New South Wales (NSW). Methods: A population‐based descriptive study of all 52,151 women who had a PPH either during the hospital stay for the birth of their baby or requiring a re‐admission to hospital between 1994 and 2002. Data were obtained from the de‐identified computerised census of NSW hospital in‐patients and analysed to examine trends over time. The outcome measures included maternal death, hysterectomy, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), transfusion and major maternal morbidity, including procedures to reduce blood supply to the uterus, acute renal failure and postpartum coaqulation defects. Results: From 1994 to 2002 both the number and adjusted (for under‐reporting) rate of PPH during the birth admission increased from 8.3% of deliveries to 10.7%. The rate of PPH adjusted for maternal age and mode of delivery was similar to the unadjusted rate. There was a sixfold increase in the rate of transfusions from 1.9% of women who haemorrhaged to 11.7%. Hospital readmissions for PPH declined from 1.2% of deliveries to 0.9%. These were statistically significant changes. There were no significant changes in the rate of hysterectomies, procedures to reduce blood supply to the uterus, admissions to ICU, acute renal failure or coagulation defects. Conclusion: The increased rate of PPH during the birth admission is concerning. The increase in PPH could not be explained by increasing maternal age or caesarean sections. Linked birth and hospital discharge data could determine whether the increase in PPH is caused by other changes in obstetric practices or population.</description><subject>Birth</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood transfusions</subject><subject>Censuses</subject><subject>Changes</subject><subject>Childbirth &amp; labor</subject><subject>Coagulation</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemorrhage</subject><subject>Hormones</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Maternal mortality</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>New South Wales - epidemiology</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Obstetrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Population Surveillance - methods</subject><subject>Postpartum</subject><subject>Postpartum Hemorrhage - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postpartum Hemorrhage - therapy</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Renal failure</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Uterus</subject><issn>1326-0200</issn><issn>1753-6405</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkU1v1DAQhi0Eoh_wF9AKJNRLgp34kwuqCjSgqvRQRMVl5DgT6mWTLHYC23-Po6xA4oDAF1vWM-94HhPylNGcpfVinTMuVaZ5cZMXlMp8rCll1OS7e-SQKVFmklNxP53LQmY0IQfkKMY1TVS6ekgOmJSalaU6JKvrgH0TV75fbYc4bm0Yp251a7EbQri1X_ARedDaTcTH-_2YfHz75vqsyi4-nL87O73InNCCZax1VqFotbPa1IXVVDTCaUmFscoVNW8bzrkTjbWlNLLG2glUjFvRGq1VXR6T50vuNgzfJowjdD463Gxsj8MUQSrDhaEmgSd_BZk2TCum2Yw--wNdD1Po0xhQUikpNekpiXq5UC4MMQZsYRt8Z8MdMAqzcFjDLBxm4TALh71w2KXiJ_sWU91h87t0bzgBrxbgh9_g3X9Ew-nnq4oJlhKyJcHHEXe_Emz4mqSUSsCny3O4uuHVZVUpeJ_41wuP6bu-ewwQncfeYeMDuhGawf_LZD8BqOS0LA</recordid><startdate>200604</startdate><enddate>200604</enddate><creator>Cameron, Carolyn A.</creator><creator>Roberts, Christine L.</creator><creator>Olive, Emily C.</creator><creator>Ford, Jane B.</creator><creator>Fischer, Wendy E.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200604</creationdate><title>Trends in postpartum haemorrhage</title><author>Cameron, Carolyn A. ; Roberts, Christine L. ; Olive, Emily C. ; Ford, Jane B. ; Fischer, Wendy E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5851-1fca7e5f8ca89b2a805d5c86059a7c2b4fd444c5daa3696bebc5e714a5f9887b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Birth</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood transfusions</topic><topic>Censuses</topic><topic>Changes</topic><topic>Childbirth &amp; labor</topic><topic>Coagulation</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemorrhage</topic><topic>Hormones</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Maternal mortality</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>New South Wales - epidemiology</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Obstetrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Population Surveillance - methods</topic><topic>Postpartum</topic><topic>Postpartum Hemorrhage - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postpartum Hemorrhage - therapy</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Renal failure</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Uterus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Carolyn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Christine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olive, Emily C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, Jane B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Wendy E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian and New Zealand journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cameron, Carolyn A.</au><au>Roberts, Christine L.</au><au>Olive, Emily C.</au><au>Ford, Jane B.</au><au>Fischer, Wendy E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trends in postpartum haemorrhage</atitle><jtitle>Australian and New Zealand journal of public health</jtitle><addtitle>Aust N Z J Public Health</addtitle><date>2006-04</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>156</epage><pages>151-156</pages><issn>1326-0200</issn><eissn>1753-6405</eissn><abstract>Objective: To assess trends and outcomes of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) in New South Wales (NSW). Methods: A population‐based descriptive study of all 52,151 women who had a PPH either during the hospital stay for the birth of their baby or requiring a re‐admission to hospital between 1994 and 2002. Data were obtained from the de‐identified computerised census of NSW hospital in‐patients and analysed to examine trends over time. The outcome measures included maternal death, hysterectomy, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), transfusion and major maternal morbidity, including procedures to reduce blood supply to the uterus, acute renal failure and postpartum coaqulation defects. Results: From 1994 to 2002 both the number and adjusted (for under‐reporting) rate of PPH during the birth admission increased from 8.3% of deliveries to 10.7%. The rate of PPH adjusted for maternal age and mode of delivery was similar to the unadjusted rate. There was a sixfold increase in the rate of transfusions from 1.9% of women who haemorrhaged to 11.7%. Hospital readmissions for PPH declined from 1.2% of deliveries to 0.9%. These were statistically significant changes. There were no significant changes in the rate of hysterectomies, procedures to reduce blood supply to the uterus, admissions to ICU, acute renal failure or coagulation defects. Conclusion: The increased rate of PPH during the birth admission is concerning. The increase in PPH could not be explained by increasing maternal age or caesarean sections. Linked birth and hospital discharge data could determine whether the increase in PPH is caused by other changes in obstetric practices or population.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>16681337</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1467-842X.2006.tb00109.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1326-0200
ispartof Australian and New Zealand journal of public health, 2006-04, Vol.30 (2), p.151-156
issn 1326-0200
1753-6405
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67945909
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Birth
Blood
Blood transfusions
Censuses
Changes
Childbirth & labor
Coagulation
Defects
Epidemiology
Female
Hemorrhage
Hormones
Hospitals
Humans
Hysterectomy
Incidence
Maternal mortality
Morbidity
New South Wales - epidemiology
Obstetrics
Obstetrics - statistics & numerical data
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Population studies
Population Surveillance - methods
Postpartum
Postpartum Hemorrhage - epidemiology
Postpartum Hemorrhage - therapy
Pregnancy
Public health
Renal failure
Software
Statistical analysis
Survival Rate
Trends
Uterus
title Trends in postpartum haemorrhage
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T05%3A24%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trends%20in%20postpartum%20haemorrhage&rft.jtitle=Australian%20and%20New%20Zealand%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Cameron,%20Carolyn%20A.&rft.date=2006-04&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=156&rft.pages=151-156&rft.issn=1326-0200&rft.eissn=1753-6405&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2006.tb00109.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67945909%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3066009696&rft_id=info:pmid/16681337&rft_els_id=S1326020023047076&rfr_iscdi=true