Interposition arthroplasty for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis: comparison of results using the technique of Epping and Weilby

We compare clinically and radiologically two groups of total trapezectomy performed as treatment for the primary osteoarthritis of trapeziometacarpal joint combined in 83 cases (2000 to 2003) with tendon interposition arthroplasty type Weilby, in 51 cases (1987 to 1991) with Epping tendon interposit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie, 2006-04, Vol.38 (2), p.90-97
Hauptverfasser: Angly, B, Steiger, R, Stober, R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; ger
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 97
container_issue 2
container_start_page 90
container_title Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie
container_volume 38
creator Angly, B
Steiger, R
Stober, R
description We compare clinically and radiologically two groups of total trapezectomy performed as treatment for the primary osteoarthritis of trapeziometacarpal joint combined in 83 cases (2000 to 2003) with tendon interposition arthroplasty type Weilby, in 51 cases (1987 to 1991) with Epping tendon interposition and ligament reconstruction arthroplasty in a retrospective study. In both groups we used a strip of the flexor carpi radialis tendon. The mean follow-up time in both groups is 33 months. Overall, both methods achieved similar results. The relief of pain and the patient satisfaction are better, stability and grip force are worse in the Weilby group. At least one year (12 to 57 months) after operation with the technique of Weilby, 88 % of the patients would prefer this method for the other side. It appears that there is no clinical and radiological benefit of ligament reconstruction. However, the two procedures studied yield equally good results in most cases, but we prefer the simple technique of Weilby and guess that the (missing) long-term results would be superior to the results after trapezectomy alone. Long-term results need to be evaluated.
doi_str_mv 10.1055/s-2006-924041
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67941970</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67941970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p139t-3d74f2bcdadaab385f1f3e09ceeaab89d166066fb3510b1ea6cd8e76428482693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kD9PwzAQxT2AaCmMrMgTW8D_4sRsqGqhUiUWEGPkJBdqlMTGdoZ-AT43Li3T6e5-9_TeIXRDyT0lef4QMkaIzBQTRNAzNCcFYxktqZqhyxC-CCFcSHaBZlTKkkgp5uhnM0bwzgYTjR2x9nHnret1iHvcWY_jDnD0oOMAY8S2w86bQfs9tiGC_cPTZXjEjR2c9iYkkUR5CFMfA56CGT-PItDsRvM9wWG9cu4w12OLP8D09f4KnXe6D3B9qgv0vl69LV-y7evzZvm0zRzlKma8LUTH6qbVrdY1L_OOdhyIagBSX6o2BUu5uprnlNQUtGzaEgopWClKJhVfoLujrvM2eQmxGkxooO_1CHYKlSyUoKogCbw9gVM9QFudYlf_n-O_HKlyUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67941970</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interposition arthroplasty for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis: comparison of results using the technique of Epping and Weilby</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>Angly, B ; Steiger, R ; Stober, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Angly, B ; Steiger, R ; Stober, R</creatorcontrib><description>We compare clinically and radiologically two groups of total trapezectomy performed as treatment for the primary osteoarthritis of trapeziometacarpal joint combined in 83 cases (2000 to 2003) with tendon interposition arthroplasty type Weilby, in 51 cases (1987 to 1991) with Epping tendon interposition and ligament reconstruction arthroplasty in a retrospective study. In both groups we used a strip of the flexor carpi radialis tendon. The mean follow-up time in both groups is 33 months. Overall, both methods achieved similar results. The relief of pain and the patient satisfaction are better, stability and grip force are worse in the Weilby group. At least one year (12 to 57 months) after operation with the technique of Weilby, 88 % of the patients would prefer this method for the other side. It appears that there is no clinical and radiological benefit of ligament reconstruction. However, the two procedures studied yield equally good results in most cases, but we prefer the simple technique of Weilby and guess that the (missing) long-term results would be superior to the results after trapezectomy alone. Long-term results need to be evaluated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0722-1819</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-924041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16680664</identifier><language>eng ; ger</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Arthroplasty - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Ligaments, Articular - surgery ; Male ; Metacarpal Bones - diagnostic imaging ; Metacarpal Bones - surgery ; Middle Aged ; Motor Skills - physiology ; Osteoarthritis - diagnostic imaging ; Osteoarthritis - surgery ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) ; Pain Measurement ; Panniculitis, Peritoneal ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Radiography ; Reoperation ; Tendon Transfer ; Thumb - diagnostic imaging ; Thumb - surgery ; Trapezoid Bone - diagnostic imaging ; Trapezoid Bone - surgery ; Wrist Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Wrist Joint - surgery</subject><ispartof>Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie, 2006-04, Vol.38 (2), p.90-97</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16680664$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Angly, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiger, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stober, R</creatorcontrib><title>Interposition arthroplasty for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis: comparison of results using the technique of Epping and Weilby</title><title>Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie</title><addtitle>Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir</addtitle><description>We compare clinically and radiologically two groups of total trapezectomy performed as treatment for the primary osteoarthritis of trapeziometacarpal joint combined in 83 cases (2000 to 2003) with tendon interposition arthroplasty type Weilby, in 51 cases (1987 to 1991) with Epping tendon interposition and ligament reconstruction arthroplasty in a retrospective study. In both groups we used a strip of the flexor carpi radialis tendon. The mean follow-up time in both groups is 33 months. Overall, both methods achieved similar results. The relief of pain and the patient satisfaction are better, stability and grip force are worse in the Weilby group. At least one year (12 to 57 months) after operation with the technique of Weilby, 88 % of the patients would prefer this method for the other side. It appears that there is no clinical and radiological benefit of ligament reconstruction. However, the two procedures studied yield equally good results in most cases, but we prefer the simple technique of Weilby and guess that the (missing) long-term results would be superior to the results after trapezectomy alone. Long-term results need to be evaluated.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroplasty - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ligaments, Articular - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metacarpal Bones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Metacarpal Bones - surgery</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motor Skills - physiology</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis - surgery</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Panniculitis, Peritoneal</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Tendon Transfer</subject><subject>Thumb - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Thumb - surgery</subject><subject>Trapezoid Bone - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Trapezoid Bone - surgery</subject><subject>Wrist Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Wrist Joint - surgery</subject><issn>0722-1819</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kD9PwzAQxT2AaCmMrMgTW8D_4sRsqGqhUiUWEGPkJBdqlMTGdoZ-AT43Li3T6e5-9_TeIXRDyT0lef4QMkaIzBQTRNAzNCcFYxktqZqhyxC-CCFcSHaBZlTKkkgp5uhnM0bwzgYTjR2x9nHnret1iHvcWY_jDnD0oOMAY8S2w86bQfs9tiGC_cPTZXjEjR2c9iYkkUR5CFMfA56CGT-PItDsRvM9wWG9cu4w12OLP8D09f4KnXe6D3B9qgv0vl69LV-y7evzZvm0zRzlKma8LUTH6qbVrdY1L_OOdhyIagBSX6o2BUu5uprnlNQUtGzaEgopWClKJhVfoLujrvM2eQmxGkxooO_1CHYKlSyUoKogCbw9gVM9QFudYlf_n-O_HKlyUQ</recordid><startdate>200604</startdate><enddate>200604</enddate><creator>Angly, B</creator><creator>Steiger, R</creator><creator>Stober, R</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200604</creationdate><title>Interposition arthroplasty for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis: comparison of results using the technique of Epping and Weilby</title><author>Angly, B ; Steiger, R ; Stober, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p139t-3d74f2bcdadaab385f1f3e09ceeaab89d166066fb3510b1ea6cd8e76428482693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; ger</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroplasty - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ligaments, Articular - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metacarpal Bones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Metacarpal Bones - surgery</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motor Skills - physiology</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis - surgery</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Panniculitis, Peritoneal</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Tendon Transfer</topic><topic>Thumb - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Thumb - surgery</topic><topic>Trapezoid Bone - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Trapezoid Bone - surgery</topic><topic>Wrist Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Wrist Joint - surgery</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Angly, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiger, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stober, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Angly, B</au><au>Steiger, R</au><au>Stober, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interposition arthroplasty for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis: comparison of results using the technique of Epping and Weilby</atitle><jtitle>Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie</jtitle><addtitle>Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir</addtitle><date>2006-04</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>90</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>90-97</pages><issn>0722-1819</issn><abstract>We compare clinically and radiologically two groups of total trapezectomy performed as treatment for the primary osteoarthritis of trapeziometacarpal joint combined in 83 cases (2000 to 2003) with tendon interposition arthroplasty type Weilby, in 51 cases (1987 to 1991) with Epping tendon interposition and ligament reconstruction arthroplasty in a retrospective study. In both groups we used a strip of the flexor carpi radialis tendon. The mean follow-up time in both groups is 33 months. Overall, both methods achieved similar results. The relief of pain and the patient satisfaction are better, stability and grip force are worse in the Weilby group. At least one year (12 to 57 months) after operation with the technique of Weilby, 88 % of the patients would prefer this method for the other side. It appears that there is no clinical and radiological benefit of ligament reconstruction. However, the two procedures studied yield equally good results in most cases, but we prefer the simple technique of Weilby and guess that the (missing) long-term results would be superior to the results after trapezectomy alone. Long-term results need to be evaluated.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>16680664</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-2006-924041</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0722-1819
ispartof Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie, 2006-04, Vol.38 (2), p.90-97
issn 0722-1819
language eng ; ger
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67941970
source MEDLINE; Thieme Connect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Arthroplasty - methods
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Ligaments, Articular - surgery
Male
Metacarpal Bones - diagnostic imaging
Metacarpal Bones - surgery
Middle Aged
Motor Skills - physiology
Osteoarthritis - diagnostic imaging
Osteoarthritis - surgery
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)
Pain Measurement
Panniculitis, Peritoneal
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Postoperative Complications - surgery
Radiography
Reoperation
Tendon Transfer
Thumb - diagnostic imaging
Thumb - surgery
Trapezoid Bone - diagnostic imaging
Trapezoid Bone - surgery
Wrist Joint - diagnostic imaging
Wrist Joint - surgery
title Interposition arthroplasty for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis: comparison of results using the technique of Epping and Weilby
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T12%3A56%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interposition%20arthroplasty%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20primary%20osteoarthritis:%20comparison%20of%20results%20using%20the%20technique%20of%20Epping%20and%20Weilby&rft.jtitle=Handchirurgie,%20Mikrochirurgie,%20plastische%20Chirurgie&rft.au=Angly,%20B&rft.date=2006-04&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=90&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=90-97&rft.issn=0722-1819&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-2006-924041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67941970%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67941970&rft_id=info:pmid/16680664&rfr_iscdi=true