Criterion validity study of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for rotational range of motion on healthy adults
This study compared range of motion (ROM) measurements using a cervical range of motion device (CROM) and an optoelectronic system (OPTOTRAK). To examine the criterion validity of the CROM for the measurement of cervical ROM on healthy adults. Whereas measurements of cervical ROM are recognized as p...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy 2006-04, Vol.36 (4), p.242-248 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 248 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 242 |
| container_title | The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy |
| container_volume | 36 |
| creator | Tousignant, Michel Smeesters, Cécil Breton, Anne-Marie Breton, Emilie Corriveau, Hélène |
| description | This study compared range of motion (ROM) measurements using a cervical range of motion device (CROM) and an optoelectronic system (OPTOTRAK).
To examine the criterion validity of the CROM for the measurement of cervical ROM on healthy adults.
Whereas measurements of cervical ROM are recognized as part of the assessment of patients with neck pain, few devices are available in clinical settings. Two papers published previously showed excellent criterion validity for measurements of cervical flexion/extension and lateral flexion using the CROM.
Subjects performed neck rotation, flexion/extension, and lateral flexion while sitting on a wooden chair. The ROM values were measured by the CROM as well as the OPTOTRAK.
The cervical rotational ROM values using the CROM demonstrated a good to excellent linear relationship with those using the OPTOTRAK: right rotation, r = 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.94), and left rotation, r = 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.90-0.97). Similar results were also obtained for flexion/extension and lateral flexion ROM values.
The CROM showed excellent criterion validity for measurements of cervical rotation. We propose using ROM values measured by the CROM as outcome measures for patients with neck pain. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2519/jospt.2006.2148 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67939320</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19291642</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1714-d4691a1440b1a586ed59af961f5988746a64cbf8a57cbe4311bf2ef98ac0373e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1Lw0AQQPeg2Fo9e5M9iR7S7iSbTfYowS9QCqLnsElmbUrSrbubSv69iS14ERwGBmbeDAyPkAtg8zAGuVgbt_XzkDExD4GnR2TKQLJAMIAJOXVuzYbgjJ-QCQiRiDThU_KV2dqjrc2G7lRTV7XvqfNd1VOjqV8hLdHu6lI11KrNB47d1vgRv85ely83tMJhjFQbS63xahz9AQ-5QtX4VU9V1TXenZFjrRqH54c6I-_3d2_ZY_C8fHjKbp-DEhLgQcWFBAWcswJUnAqsYqm0FKBjmQ4PCCV4WehUxUlZII8ACh2ilqkqWZREGM3I1f7u1prPDp3P29qV2DRqg6ZzuUhkJKOQ_QuCDCUIHg7gYg-W1jhnUedbW7fK9jmwfBSR_4jIRxH5KGLYuDyc7ooWq1_-YCH6Bjhnh-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19291642</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Criterion validity study of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for rotational range of motion on healthy adults</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Tousignant, Michel ; Smeesters, Cécil ; Breton, Anne-Marie ; Breton, Emilie ; Corriveau, Hélène</creator><creatorcontrib>Tousignant, Michel ; Smeesters, Cécil ; Breton, Anne-Marie ; Breton, Emilie ; Corriveau, Hélène</creatorcontrib><description>This study compared range of motion (ROM) measurements using a cervical range of motion device (CROM) and an optoelectronic system (OPTOTRAK).
To examine the criterion validity of the CROM for the measurement of cervical ROM on healthy adults.
Whereas measurements of cervical ROM are recognized as part of the assessment of patients with neck pain, few devices are available in clinical settings. Two papers published previously showed excellent criterion validity for measurements of cervical flexion/extension and lateral flexion using the CROM.
Subjects performed neck rotation, flexion/extension, and lateral flexion while sitting on a wooden chair. The ROM values were measured by the CROM as well as the OPTOTRAK.
The cervical rotational ROM values using the CROM demonstrated a good to excellent linear relationship with those using the OPTOTRAK: right rotation, r = 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.94), and left rotation, r = 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.90-0.97). Similar results were also obtained for flexion/extension and lateral flexion ROM values.
The CROM showed excellent criterion validity for measurements of cervical rotation. We propose using ROM values measured by the CROM as outcome measures for patients with neck pain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-6011</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2006.2148</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16676874</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Equipment Design - instrumentation ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neck - physiology ; Quebec ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><ispartof>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 2006-04, Vol.36 (4), p.242-248</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1714-d4691a1440b1a586ed59af961f5988746a64cbf8a57cbe4311bf2ef98ac0373e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16676874$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tousignant, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smeesters, Cécil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breton, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breton, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corriveau, Hélène</creatorcontrib><title>Criterion validity study of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for rotational range of motion on healthy adults</title><title>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy</title><addtitle>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther</addtitle><description>This study compared range of motion (ROM) measurements using a cervical range of motion device (CROM) and an optoelectronic system (OPTOTRAK).
To examine the criterion validity of the CROM for the measurement of cervical ROM on healthy adults.
Whereas measurements of cervical ROM are recognized as part of the assessment of patients with neck pain, few devices are available in clinical settings. Two papers published previously showed excellent criterion validity for measurements of cervical flexion/extension and lateral flexion using the CROM.
Subjects performed neck rotation, flexion/extension, and lateral flexion while sitting on a wooden chair. The ROM values were measured by the CROM as well as the OPTOTRAK.
The cervical rotational ROM values using the CROM demonstrated a good to excellent linear relationship with those using the OPTOTRAK: right rotation, r = 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.94), and left rotation, r = 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.90-0.97). Similar results were also obtained for flexion/extension and lateral flexion ROM values.
The CROM showed excellent criterion validity for measurements of cervical rotation. We propose using ROM values measured by the CROM as outcome measures for patients with neck pain.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Equipment Design - instrumentation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neck - physiology</subject><subject>Quebec</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><issn>0190-6011</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1Lw0AQQPeg2Fo9e5M9iR7S7iSbTfYowS9QCqLnsElmbUrSrbubSv69iS14ERwGBmbeDAyPkAtg8zAGuVgbt_XzkDExD4GnR2TKQLJAMIAJOXVuzYbgjJ-QCQiRiDThU_KV2dqjrc2G7lRTV7XvqfNd1VOjqV8hLdHu6lI11KrNB47d1vgRv85ely83tMJhjFQbS63xahz9AQ-5QtX4VU9V1TXenZFjrRqH54c6I-_3d2_ZY_C8fHjKbp-DEhLgQcWFBAWcswJUnAqsYqm0FKBjmQ4PCCV4WehUxUlZII8ACh2ilqkqWZREGM3I1f7u1prPDp3P29qV2DRqg6ZzuUhkJKOQ_QuCDCUIHg7gYg-W1jhnUedbW7fK9jmwfBSR_4jIRxH5KGLYuDyc7ooWq1_-YCH6Bjhnh-A</recordid><startdate>200604</startdate><enddate>200604</enddate><creator>Tousignant, Michel</creator><creator>Smeesters, Cécil</creator><creator>Breton, Anne-Marie</creator><creator>Breton, Emilie</creator><creator>Corriveau, Hélène</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200604</creationdate><title>Criterion validity study of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for rotational range of motion on healthy adults</title><author>Tousignant, Michel ; Smeesters, Cécil ; Breton, Anne-Marie ; Breton, Emilie ; Corriveau, Hélène</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1714-d4691a1440b1a586ed59af961f5988746a64cbf8a57cbe4311bf2ef98ac0373e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Equipment Design - instrumentation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neck - physiology</topic><topic>Quebec</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tousignant, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smeesters, Cécil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breton, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breton, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corriveau, Hélène</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tousignant, Michel</au><au>Smeesters, Cécil</au><au>Breton, Anne-Marie</au><au>Breton, Emilie</au><au>Corriveau, Hélène</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Criterion validity study of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for rotational range of motion on healthy adults</atitle><jtitle>The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther</addtitle><date>2006-04</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>242</spage><epage>248</epage><pages>242-248</pages><issn>0190-6011</issn><abstract>This study compared range of motion (ROM) measurements using a cervical range of motion device (CROM) and an optoelectronic system (OPTOTRAK).
To examine the criterion validity of the CROM for the measurement of cervical ROM on healthy adults.
Whereas measurements of cervical ROM are recognized as part of the assessment of patients with neck pain, few devices are available in clinical settings. Two papers published previously showed excellent criterion validity for measurements of cervical flexion/extension and lateral flexion using the CROM.
Subjects performed neck rotation, flexion/extension, and lateral flexion while sitting on a wooden chair. The ROM values were measured by the CROM as well as the OPTOTRAK.
The cervical rotational ROM values using the CROM demonstrated a good to excellent linear relationship with those using the OPTOTRAK: right rotation, r = 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.94), and left rotation, r = 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.90-0.97). Similar results were also obtained for flexion/extension and lateral flexion ROM values.
The CROM showed excellent criterion validity for measurements of cervical rotation. We propose using ROM values measured by the CROM as outcome measures for patients with neck pain.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>16676874</pmid><doi>10.2519/jospt.2006.2148</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0190-6011 |
| ispartof | The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 2006-04, Vol.36 (4), p.242-248 |
| issn | 0190-6011 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67939320 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Equipment Design - instrumentation Female Humans Male Middle Aged Neck - physiology Quebec Range of Motion, Articular - physiology |
| title | Criterion validity study of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for rotational range of motion on healthy adults |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T20%3A42%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Criterion%20validity%20study%20of%20the%20cervical%20range%20of%20motion%20(CROM)%20device%20for%20rotational%20range%20of%20motion%20on%20healthy%20adults&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20sports%20physical%20therapy&rft.au=Tousignant,%20Michel&rft.date=2006-04&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=242&rft.epage=248&rft.pages=242-248&rft.issn=0190-6011&rft_id=info:doi/10.2519/jospt.2006.2148&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19291642%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19291642&rft_id=info:pmid/16676874&rfr_iscdi=true |