Satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women
Prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction is a risk-reducing strategy for women at increased risk of breast cancer. It remains a very radical intervention, and long-term data on satisfaction are insufficiently available. In the present follow-up study, the authors assess satisfaction with p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2006-05, Vol.117 (6), p.1675-1682 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1682 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1675 |
container_title | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) |
container_volume | 117 |
creator | Bresser, Paula J C Seynaeve, Caroline Van Gool, Arthur R Brekelmans, Cecile T Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne van Geel, Albert N Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B Duivenvoorden, Hugo J Klijn, Jan G M Tibben, Aad |
description | Prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction is a risk-reducing strategy for women at increased risk of breast cancer. It remains a very radical intervention, and long-term data on satisfaction are insufficiently available. In the present follow-up study, the authors assess satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction and its impact on sexual relationships.
The authors conducted a retrospective study using a short self-report questionnaire administered to 114 genetically predisposed women who underwent prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction mainly by subpectorally implanted silicone prostheses performed at one institution.
The median follow-up time between prophylactic mastectomy/breast reconstruction and completion of the questionnaire was 3 years. Sixty percent of all participants were satisfied with the result of prophylactic mastectomy/breast reconstruction. Satisfaction was significantly and negatively correlated with perceived lack of information, experienced complications, ongoing complaints, whether or not the reconstructed breasts feel "like your own," and not choosing this type of breast reconstruction again. Adverse effects in the patient's sexual relationship were strongly correlated with perceived lack of information, discrepant expectations, ongoing complaints and limitations, whether or not the reconstructed breasts feel "like your own," altered feelings of femininity, partner's negative perception on femininity and sexuality, and not choosing this type of breast reconstruction again.
A majority of women would choose the procedure again, but adverse effects and untoward changes in the perception of the sexual relationship need to be addressed in the counselling of women at high risk, to optimize an informed choice and enable adequate adjustment postoperatively. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/01.prs.0000217383.99038.f5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67928817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67928817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-a73829dd39e96ffbe1c287a9f06a9b7168c3bc3835b2ba9afc2b40e97dd490d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkElLBDEQhYMozjj6FyR48NZtlt7iTcQNBjyo55Cl4rT0ZtLN0P_ejDMwdSl4vFfF-xC6oSSlRJR3hKaDDymJw2jJK54KQXiVuvwELWnORJKxjJ2iJSGcJZTkbIEuQvghJLqL_BwtaFHkVPBsieyHGuvglBnrvsPbetzgwffDZm52ksGtCiOYsW9nrDqLtYcoYA-m78Lop32s7vA3dBD9qmnmeABsHYY-gMXbvoXuEp051QS4OuwV-np--nx8TdbvL2-PD-vEcFqOiYpdmLCWCxCFcxqoYVWphCOFErqkRWW4NrFvrplWQjnDdEZAlNZmgljOV-h2fzdW-J0gjLKtg4GmUR30U5BFKVhVRQgrdL83Gt-H4MHJwdet8rOkRO4YS0KjFOSRsfxnLF0ew9eHL5NuwR6jB6j8D4UmfOU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67928817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Bresser, Paula J C ; Seynaeve, Caroline ; Van Gool, Arthur R ; Brekelmans, Cecile T ; Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne ; van Geel, Albert N ; Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B ; Duivenvoorden, Hugo J ; Klijn, Jan G M ; Tibben, Aad</creator><creatorcontrib>Bresser, Paula J C ; Seynaeve, Caroline ; Van Gool, Arthur R ; Brekelmans, Cecile T ; Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne ; van Geel, Albert N ; Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B ; Duivenvoorden, Hugo J ; Klijn, Jan G M ; Tibben, Aad</creatorcontrib><description>Prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction is a risk-reducing strategy for women at increased risk of breast cancer. It remains a very radical intervention, and long-term data on satisfaction are insufficiently available. In the present follow-up study, the authors assess satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction and its impact on sexual relationships.
The authors conducted a retrospective study using a short self-report questionnaire administered to 114 genetically predisposed women who underwent prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction mainly by subpectorally implanted silicone prostheses performed at one institution.
The median follow-up time between prophylactic mastectomy/breast reconstruction and completion of the questionnaire was 3 years. Sixty percent of all participants were satisfied with the result of prophylactic mastectomy/breast reconstruction. Satisfaction was significantly and negatively correlated with perceived lack of information, experienced complications, ongoing complaints, whether or not the reconstructed breasts feel "like your own," and not choosing this type of breast reconstruction again. Adverse effects in the patient's sexual relationship were strongly correlated with perceived lack of information, discrepant expectations, ongoing complaints and limitations, whether or not the reconstructed breasts feel "like your own," altered feelings of femininity, partner's negative perception on femininity and sexuality, and not choosing this type of breast reconstruction again.
A majority of women would choose the procedure again, but adverse effects and untoward changes in the perception of the sexual relationship need to be addressed in the counselling of women at high risk, to optimize an informed choice and enable adequate adjustment postoperatively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000217383.99038.f5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16651934</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Adult ; Body Image ; Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control ; Breast Neoplasms - psychology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Genes, BRCA1 ; Genes, BRCA2 ; Genetic Predisposition to Disease ; Hormone Replacement Therapy ; Humans ; Mammaplasty - psychology ; Mastectomy - psychology ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms, Second Primary - prevention & control ; Ovariectomy ; Patient Education as Topic ; Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - psychology ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensation Disorders - etiology ; Sensation Disorders - psychology ; Sexual Behavior - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2006-05, Vol.117 (6), p.1675-1682</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-a73829dd39e96ffbe1c287a9f06a9b7168c3bc3835b2ba9afc2b40e97dd490d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-a73829dd39e96ffbe1c287a9f06a9b7168c3bc3835b2ba9afc2b40e97dd490d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16651934$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bresser, Paula J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seynaeve, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Gool, Arthur R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brekelmans, Cecile T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Geel, Albert N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duivenvoorden, Hugo J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klijn, Jan G M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tibben, Aad</creatorcontrib><title>Satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>Prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction is a risk-reducing strategy for women at increased risk of breast cancer. It remains a very radical intervention, and long-term data on satisfaction are insufficiently available. In the present follow-up study, the authors assess satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction and its impact on sexual relationships.
The authors conducted a retrospective study using a short self-report questionnaire administered to 114 genetically predisposed women who underwent prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction mainly by subpectorally implanted silicone prostheses performed at one institution.
The median follow-up time between prophylactic mastectomy/breast reconstruction and completion of the questionnaire was 3 years. Sixty percent of all participants were satisfied with the result of prophylactic mastectomy/breast reconstruction. Satisfaction was significantly and negatively correlated with perceived lack of information, experienced complications, ongoing complaints, whether or not the reconstructed breasts feel "like your own," and not choosing this type of breast reconstruction again. Adverse effects in the patient's sexual relationship were strongly correlated with perceived lack of information, discrepant expectations, ongoing complaints and limitations, whether or not the reconstructed breasts feel "like your own," altered feelings of femininity, partner's negative perception on femininity and sexuality, and not choosing this type of breast reconstruction again.
A majority of women would choose the procedure again, but adverse effects and untoward changes in the perception of the sexual relationship need to be addressed in the counselling of women at high risk, to optimize an informed choice and enable adequate adjustment postoperatively.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Body Image</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Genes, BRCA1</subject><subject>Genes, BRCA2</subject><subject>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</subject><subject>Hormone Replacement Therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - psychology</subject><subject>Mastectomy - psychology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Second Primary - prevention & control</subject><subject>Ovariectomy</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - psychology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensation Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Sensation Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkElLBDEQhYMozjj6FyR48NZtlt7iTcQNBjyo55Cl4rT0ZtLN0P_ejDMwdSl4vFfF-xC6oSSlRJR3hKaDDymJw2jJK54KQXiVuvwELWnORJKxjJ2iJSGcJZTkbIEuQvghJLqL_BwtaFHkVPBsieyHGuvglBnrvsPbetzgwffDZm52ksGtCiOYsW9nrDqLtYcoYA-m78Lop32s7vA3dBD9qmnmeABsHYY-gMXbvoXuEp051QS4OuwV-np--nx8TdbvL2-PD-vEcFqOiYpdmLCWCxCFcxqoYVWphCOFErqkRWW4NrFvrplWQjnDdEZAlNZmgljOV-h2fzdW-J0gjLKtg4GmUR30U5BFKVhVRQgrdL83Gt-H4MHJwdet8rOkRO4YS0KjFOSRsfxnLF0ew9eHL5NuwR6jB6j8D4UmfOU</recordid><startdate>200605</startdate><enddate>200605</enddate><creator>Bresser, Paula J C</creator><creator>Seynaeve, Caroline</creator><creator>Van Gool, Arthur R</creator><creator>Brekelmans, Cecile T</creator><creator>Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne</creator><creator>van Geel, Albert N</creator><creator>Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B</creator><creator>Duivenvoorden, Hugo J</creator><creator>Klijn, Jan G M</creator><creator>Tibben, Aad</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200605</creationdate><title>Satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women</title><author>Bresser, Paula J C ; Seynaeve, Caroline ; Van Gool, Arthur R ; Brekelmans, Cecile T ; Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne ; van Geel, Albert N ; Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B ; Duivenvoorden, Hugo J ; Klijn, Jan G M ; Tibben, Aad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-a73829dd39e96ffbe1c287a9f06a9b7168c3bc3835b2ba9afc2b40e97dd490d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Body Image</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Genes, BRCA1</topic><topic>Genes, BRCA2</topic><topic>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</topic><topic>Hormone Replacement Therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - psychology</topic><topic>Mastectomy - psychology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Second Primary - prevention & control</topic><topic>Ovariectomy</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - psychology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensation Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Sensation Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bresser, Paula J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seynaeve, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Gool, Arthur R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brekelmans, Cecile T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Geel, Albert N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duivenvoorden, Hugo J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klijn, Jan G M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tibben, Aad</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bresser, Paula J C</au><au>Seynaeve, Caroline</au><au>Van Gool, Arthur R</au><au>Brekelmans, Cecile T</au><au>Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne</au><au>van Geel, Albert N</au><au>Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B</au><au>Duivenvoorden, Hugo J</au><au>Klijn, Jan G M</au><au>Tibben, Aad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2006-05</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1675</spage><epage>1682</epage><pages>1675-1682</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>Prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction is a risk-reducing strategy for women at increased risk of breast cancer. It remains a very radical intervention, and long-term data on satisfaction are insufficiently available. In the present follow-up study, the authors assess satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction and its impact on sexual relationships.
The authors conducted a retrospective study using a short self-report questionnaire administered to 114 genetically predisposed women who underwent prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction mainly by subpectorally implanted silicone prostheses performed at one institution.
The median follow-up time between prophylactic mastectomy/breast reconstruction and completion of the questionnaire was 3 years. Sixty percent of all participants were satisfied with the result of prophylactic mastectomy/breast reconstruction. Satisfaction was significantly and negatively correlated with perceived lack of information, experienced complications, ongoing complaints, whether or not the reconstructed breasts feel "like your own," and not choosing this type of breast reconstruction again. Adverse effects in the patient's sexual relationship were strongly correlated with perceived lack of information, discrepant expectations, ongoing complaints and limitations, whether or not the reconstructed breasts feel "like your own," altered feelings of femininity, partner's negative perception on femininity and sexuality, and not choosing this type of breast reconstruction again.
A majority of women would choose the procedure again, but adverse effects and untoward changes in the perception of the sexual relationship need to be addressed in the counselling of women at high risk, to optimize an informed choice and enable adequate adjustment postoperatively.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>16651934</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.prs.0000217383.99038.f5</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-1052 |
ispartof | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2006-05, Vol.117 (6), p.1675-1682 |
issn | 0032-1052 1529-4242 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67928817 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Activities of Daily Living Adult Body Image Breast Neoplasms - genetics Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control Breast Neoplasms - psychology Female Follow-Up Studies Genes, BRCA1 Genes, BRCA2 Genetic Predisposition to Disease Hormone Replacement Therapy Humans Mammaplasty - psychology Mastectomy - psychology Middle Aged Neoplasms, Second Primary - prevention & control Ovariectomy Patient Education as Topic Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data Postoperative Complications - etiology Postoperative Complications - psychology Retrospective Studies Sensation Disorders - etiology Sensation Disorders - psychology Sexual Behavior - psychology Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T03%3A31%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Satisfaction%20with%20prophylactic%20mastectomy%20and%20breast%20reconstruction%20in%20genetically%20predisposed%20women&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Bresser,%20Paula%20J%20C&rft.date=2006-05&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1675&rft.epage=1682&rft.pages=1675-1682&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.prs.0000217383.99038.f5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67928817%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67928817&rft_id=info:pmid/16651934&rfr_iscdi=true |