Satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women

Prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction is a risk-reducing strategy for women at increased risk of breast cancer. It remains a very radical intervention, and long-term data on satisfaction are insufficiently available. In the present follow-up study, the authors assess satisfaction with p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2006-05, Vol.117 (6), p.1675-1682
Hauptverfasser: Bresser, Paula J C, Seynaeve, Caroline, Van Gool, Arthur R, Brekelmans, Cecile T, Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne, van Geel, Albert N, Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B, Duivenvoorden, Hugo J, Klijn, Jan G M, Tibben, Aad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1682
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1675
container_title Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)
container_volume 117
creator Bresser, Paula J C
Seynaeve, Caroline
Van Gool, Arthur R
Brekelmans, Cecile T
Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne
van Geel, Albert N
Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B
Duivenvoorden, Hugo J
Klijn, Jan G M
Tibben, Aad
description Prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction is a risk-reducing strategy for women at increased risk of breast cancer. It remains a very radical intervention, and long-term data on satisfaction are insufficiently available. In the present follow-up study, the authors assess satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction and its impact on sexual relationships. The authors conducted a retrospective study using a short self-report questionnaire administered to 114 genetically predisposed women who underwent prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction mainly by subpectorally implanted silicone prostheses performed at one institution. The median follow-up time between prophylactic mastectomy/breast reconstruction and completion of the questionnaire was 3 years. Sixty percent of all participants were satisfied with the result of prophylactic mastectomy/breast reconstruction. Satisfaction was significantly and negatively correlated with perceived lack of information, experienced complications, ongoing complaints, whether or not the reconstructed breasts feel "like your own," and not choosing this type of breast reconstruction again. Adverse effects in the patient's sexual relationship were strongly correlated with perceived lack of information, discrepant expectations, ongoing complaints and limitations, whether or not the reconstructed breasts feel "like your own," altered feelings of femininity, partner's negative perception on femininity and sexuality, and not choosing this type of breast reconstruction again. A majority of women would choose the procedure again, but adverse effects and untoward changes in the perception of the sexual relationship need to be addressed in the counselling of women at high risk, to optimize an informed choice and enable adequate adjustment postoperatively.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.prs.0000217383.99038.f5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67928817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67928817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-a73829dd39e96ffbe1c287a9f06a9b7168c3bc3835b2ba9afc2b40e97dd490d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkElLBDEQhYMozjj6FyR48NZtlt7iTcQNBjyo55Cl4rT0ZtLN0P_ejDMwdSl4vFfF-xC6oSSlRJR3hKaDDymJw2jJK54KQXiVuvwELWnORJKxjJ2iJSGcJZTkbIEuQvghJLqL_BwtaFHkVPBsieyHGuvglBnrvsPbetzgwffDZm52ksGtCiOYsW9nrDqLtYcoYA-m78Lop32s7vA3dBD9qmnmeABsHYY-gMXbvoXuEp051QS4OuwV-np--nx8TdbvL2-PD-vEcFqOiYpdmLCWCxCFcxqoYVWphCOFErqkRWW4NrFvrplWQjnDdEZAlNZmgljOV-h2fzdW-J0gjLKtg4GmUR30U5BFKVhVRQgrdL83Gt-H4MHJwdet8rOkRO4YS0KjFOSRsfxnLF0ew9eHL5NuwR6jB6j8D4UmfOU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67928817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Bresser, Paula J C ; Seynaeve, Caroline ; Van Gool, Arthur R ; Brekelmans, Cecile T ; Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne ; van Geel, Albert N ; Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B ; Duivenvoorden, Hugo J ; Klijn, Jan G M ; Tibben, Aad</creator><creatorcontrib>Bresser, Paula J C ; Seynaeve, Caroline ; Van Gool, Arthur R ; Brekelmans, Cecile T ; Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne ; van Geel, Albert N ; Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B ; Duivenvoorden, Hugo J ; Klijn, Jan G M ; Tibben, Aad</creatorcontrib><description>Prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction is a risk-reducing strategy for women at increased risk of breast cancer. It remains a very radical intervention, and long-term data on satisfaction are insufficiently available. In the present follow-up study, the authors assess satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction and its impact on sexual relationships. The authors conducted a retrospective study using a short self-report questionnaire administered to 114 genetically predisposed women who underwent prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction mainly by subpectorally implanted silicone prostheses performed at one institution. The median follow-up time between prophylactic mastectomy/breast reconstruction and completion of the questionnaire was 3 years. Sixty percent of all participants were satisfied with the result of prophylactic mastectomy/breast reconstruction. Satisfaction was significantly and negatively correlated with perceived lack of information, experienced complications, ongoing complaints, whether or not the reconstructed breasts feel "like your own," and not choosing this type of breast reconstruction again. Adverse effects in the patient's sexual relationship were strongly correlated with perceived lack of information, discrepant expectations, ongoing complaints and limitations, whether or not the reconstructed breasts feel "like your own," altered feelings of femininity, partner's negative perception on femininity and sexuality, and not choosing this type of breast reconstruction again. A majority of women would choose the procedure again, but adverse effects and untoward changes in the perception of the sexual relationship need to be addressed in the counselling of women at high risk, to optimize an informed choice and enable adequate adjustment postoperatively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000217383.99038.f5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16651934</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Adult ; Body Image ; Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Breast Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control ; Breast Neoplasms - psychology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Genes, BRCA1 ; Genes, BRCA2 ; Genetic Predisposition to Disease ; Hormone Replacement Therapy ; Humans ; Mammaplasty - psychology ; Mastectomy - psychology ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms, Second Primary - prevention &amp; control ; Ovariectomy ; Patient Education as Topic ; Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - psychology ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensation Disorders - etiology ; Sensation Disorders - psychology ; Sexual Behavior - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2006-05, Vol.117 (6), p.1675-1682</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-a73829dd39e96ffbe1c287a9f06a9b7168c3bc3835b2ba9afc2b40e97dd490d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-a73829dd39e96ffbe1c287a9f06a9b7168c3bc3835b2ba9afc2b40e97dd490d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16651934$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bresser, Paula J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seynaeve, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Gool, Arthur R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brekelmans, Cecile T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Geel, Albert N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duivenvoorden, Hugo J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klijn, Jan G M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tibben, Aad</creatorcontrib><title>Satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>Prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction is a risk-reducing strategy for women at increased risk of breast cancer. It remains a very radical intervention, and long-term data on satisfaction are insufficiently available. In the present follow-up study, the authors assess satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction and its impact on sexual relationships. The authors conducted a retrospective study using a short self-report questionnaire administered to 114 genetically predisposed women who underwent prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction mainly by subpectorally implanted silicone prostheses performed at one institution. The median follow-up time between prophylactic mastectomy/breast reconstruction and completion of the questionnaire was 3 years. Sixty percent of all participants were satisfied with the result of prophylactic mastectomy/breast reconstruction. Satisfaction was significantly and negatively correlated with perceived lack of information, experienced complications, ongoing complaints, whether or not the reconstructed breasts feel "like your own," and not choosing this type of breast reconstruction again. Adverse effects in the patient's sexual relationship were strongly correlated with perceived lack of information, discrepant expectations, ongoing complaints and limitations, whether or not the reconstructed breasts feel "like your own," altered feelings of femininity, partner's negative perception on femininity and sexuality, and not choosing this type of breast reconstruction again. A majority of women would choose the procedure again, but adverse effects and untoward changes in the perception of the sexual relationship need to be addressed in the counselling of women at high risk, to optimize an informed choice and enable adequate adjustment postoperatively.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Body Image</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Genes, BRCA1</subject><subject>Genes, BRCA2</subject><subject>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</subject><subject>Hormone Replacement Therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - psychology</subject><subject>Mastectomy - psychology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Second Primary - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Ovariectomy</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - psychology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensation Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Sensation Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkElLBDEQhYMozjj6FyR48NZtlt7iTcQNBjyo55Cl4rT0ZtLN0P_ejDMwdSl4vFfF-xC6oSSlRJR3hKaDDymJw2jJK54KQXiVuvwELWnORJKxjJ2iJSGcJZTkbIEuQvghJLqL_BwtaFHkVPBsieyHGuvglBnrvsPbetzgwffDZm52ksGtCiOYsW9nrDqLtYcoYA-m78Lop32s7vA3dBD9qmnmeABsHYY-gMXbvoXuEp051QS4OuwV-np--nx8TdbvL2-PD-vEcFqOiYpdmLCWCxCFcxqoYVWphCOFErqkRWW4NrFvrplWQjnDdEZAlNZmgljOV-h2fzdW-J0gjLKtg4GmUR30U5BFKVhVRQgrdL83Gt-H4MHJwdet8rOkRO4YS0KjFOSRsfxnLF0ew9eHL5NuwR6jB6j8D4UmfOU</recordid><startdate>200605</startdate><enddate>200605</enddate><creator>Bresser, Paula J C</creator><creator>Seynaeve, Caroline</creator><creator>Van Gool, Arthur R</creator><creator>Brekelmans, Cecile T</creator><creator>Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne</creator><creator>van Geel, Albert N</creator><creator>Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B</creator><creator>Duivenvoorden, Hugo J</creator><creator>Klijn, Jan G M</creator><creator>Tibben, Aad</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200605</creationdate><title>Satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women</title><author>Bresser, Paula J C ; Seynaeve, Caroline ; Van Gool, Arthur R ; Brekelmans, Cecile T ; Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne ; van Geel, Albert N ; Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B ; Duivenvoorden, Hugo J ; Klijn, Jan G M ; Tibben, Aad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-a73829dd39e96ffbe1c287a9f06a9b7168c3bc3835b2ba9afc2b40e97dd490d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Body Image</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Genes, BRCA1</topic><topic>Genes, BRCA2</topic><topic>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</topic><topic>Hormone Replacement Therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - psychology</topic><topic>Mastectomy - psychology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Second Primary - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Ovariectomy</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - psychology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensation Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Sensation Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bresser, Paula J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seynaeve, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Gool, Arthur R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brekelmans, Cecile T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Geel, Albert N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duivenvoorden, Hugo J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klijn, Jan G M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tibben, Aad</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bresser, Paula J C</au><au>Seynaeve, Caroline</au><au>Van Gool, Arthur R</au><au>Brekelmans, Cecile T</au><au>Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne</au><au>van Geel, Albert N</au><au>Menke-Pluijmers, Marian B</au><au>Duivenvoorden, Hugo J</au><au>Klijn, Jan G M</au><au>Tibben, Aad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2006-05</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1675</spage><epage>1682</epage><pages>1675-1682</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>Prophylactic mastectomy with breast reconstruction is a risk-reducing strategy for women at increased risk of breast cancer. It remains a very radical intervention, and long-term data on satisfaction are insufficiently available. In the present follow-up study, the authors assess satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction and its impact on sexual relationships. The authors conducted a retrospective study using a short self-report questionnaire administered to 114 genetically predisposed women who underwent prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction mainly by subpectorally implanted silicone prostheses performed at one institution. The median follow-up time between prophylactic mastectomy/breast reconstruction and completion of the questionnaire was 3 years. Sixty percent of all participants were satisfied with the result of prophylactic mastectomy/breast reconstruction. Satisfaction was significantly and negatively correlated with perceived lack of information, experienced complications, ongoing complaints, whether or not the reconstructed breasts feel "like your own," and not choosing this type of breast reconstruction again. Adverse effects in the patient's sexual relationship were strongly correlated with perceived lack of information, discrepant expectations, ongoing complaints and limitations, whether or not the reconstructed breasts feel "like your own," altered feelings of femininity, partner's negative perception on femininity and sexuality, and not choosing this type of breast reconstruction again. A majority of women would choose the procedure again, but adverse effects and untoward changes in the perception of the sexual relationship need to be addressed in the counselling of women at high risk, to optimize an informed choice and enable adequate adjustment postoperatively.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>16651934</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.prs.0000217383.99038.f5</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-1052
ispartof Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2006-05, Vol.117 (6), p.1675-1682
issn 0032-1052
1529-4242
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67928817
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Activities of Daily Living
Adult
Body Image
Breast Neoplasms - genetics
Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control
Breast Neoplasms - psychology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Genes, BRCA1
Genes, BRCA2
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Hormone Replacement Therapy
Humans
Mammaplasty - psychology
Mastectomy - psychology
Middle Aged
Neoplasms, Second Primary - prevention & control
Ovariectomy
Patient Education as Topic
Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Postoperative Complications - psychology
Retrospective Studies
Sensation Disorders - etiology
Sensation Disorders - psychology
Sexual Behavior - psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T03%3A31%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Satisfaction%20with%20prophylactic%20mastectomy%20and%20breast%20reconstruction%20in%20genetically%20predisposed%20women&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Bresser,%20Paula%20J%20C&rft.date=2006-05&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1675&rft.epage=1682&rft.pages=1675-1682&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.prs.0000217383.99038.f5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67928817%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67928817&rft_id=info:pmid/16651934&rfr_iscdi=true