Characterization of Solid Breast Masses: Use of the Sonographic Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Lexicon

The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of sonographic American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System (BI-RADS) classification in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses. One hundred seventy-eight breast masses studied by sonography with a known...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of ultrasound in medicine 2006-05, Vol.25 (5), p.649-659
Hauptverfasser: Costantini, Melania, Belli, Paolo, Lombardi, Roberta, Franceschini, Gianluca, Mule, Antonino, Bonomo, Lorenzo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 659
container_issue 5
container_start_page 649
container_title Journal of ultrasound in medicine
container_volume 25
creator Costantini, Melania
Belli, Paolo
Lombardi, Roberta
Franceschini, Gianluca
Mule, Antonino
Bonomo, Lorenzo
description The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of sonographic American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System (BI-RADS) classification in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses. One hundred seventy-eight breast masses studied by sonography with a known diagnosis were reviewed. All lesions were classified according to the sonographic BI-RADS lexicon. Pathologic results were compared with sonographic features. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for the sonographic BI-RADS lexicon were calculated. Twenty-six cases were assigned to class 3, 73 to class 4, and 79 to class 5. Pathologic results revealed 105 malignant and 73 benign lesions. The sonographic BI-RADS lexicon showed 71.3% accuracy, 98.1% sensitivity, 32.9% specificity, 67.8% PPV, and 92.3% NPV. The NPV for class 3 was 92.3%. The PPVs for classes 4 and 5 were 46.6% and 87.3%. Typical signs of malignancy were irregular shape, antiparallel orientation, noncircumscribed margin, echogenic halo, and decreased sound transmission. Typical signs of benignity were oval shape and circumscribed margin. The sonographic BI-RADS lexicon is an important system for describing and classifying breast lesions.
doi_str_mv 10.7863/jum.2006.25.5.649
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67890561</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67890561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-cd4b2bae400abb5631089db7c62e8e0a5203a0769871c047aadba9da6be3c3613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE2P0zAQhi0EYrsLP4AL8gVuCWMnthNuUBZYqQiJZc_WxJk2XuUL21VZfj0pLXCakeZ5X2kexl4IyE2lizf3-yGXADqXKle5LutHbCWUgqzWonjMViBNlZWyNhfsMsZ7AAnClE_ZhdC6kKaGFZvXHQZ0iYL_hclPI5-2_HbqfcvfB8KY-BeMkeJbfhfpeEsdLfdx2gWcO-_-UjcD7vy4499onkI6bji2_AMm5LcPMdHAN_TTu2l8xp5ssY_0_Dyv2N3H6-_rz9nm66eb9btN5mQlUubaspENUgmATaN0IaCq28Y4LakiQCWhQDC6roxwUBrEtsG6Rd1Q4Yrl_Sv2-tQ7h-nHnmKyg4-O-h5HmvbRalPVoP6A4gS6MMUYaGvn4AcMD1aAPWq2i2Z71GylssoumpfMy3P5vhmo_Z84e12AVyeg87vu4APZOGDfL7iwh8PhX9FvwmGHdg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67890561</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterization of Solid Breast Masses: Use of the Sonographic Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Lexicon</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Costantini, Melania ; Belli, Paolo ; Lombardi, Roberta ; Franceschini, Gianluca ; Mule, Antonino ; Bonomo, Lorenzo</creator><creatorcontrib>Costantini, Melania ; Belli, Paolo ; Lombardi, Roberta ; Franceschini, Gianluca ; Mule, Antonino ; Bonomo, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of sonographic American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System (BI-RADS) classification in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses. One hundred seventy-eight breast masses studied by sonography with a known diagnosis were reviewed. All lesions were classified according to the sonographic BI-RADS lexicon. Pathologic results were compared with sonographic features. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for the sonographic BI-RADS lexicon were calculated. Twenty-six cases were assigned to class 3, 73 to class 4, and 79 to class 5. Pathologic results revealed 105 malignant and 73 benign lesions. The sonographic BI-RADS lexicon showed 71.3% accuracy, 98.1% sensitivity, 32.9% specificity, 67.8% PPV, and 92.3% NPV. The NPV for class 3 was 92.3%. The PPVs for classes 4 and 5 were 46.6% and 87.3%. Typical signs of malignancy were irregular shape, antiparallel orientation, noncircumscribed margin, echogenic halo, and decreased sound transmission. Typical signs of benignity were oval shape and circumscribed margin. The sonographic BI-RADS lexicon is an important system for describing and classifying breast lesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-4297</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-9613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7863/jum.2006.25.5.649</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16632790</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Am inst Ulrrasound Med</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Breast Neoplasms - classification ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Maryland - epidemiology ; Middle Aged ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Severity of Illness Index ; Terminology as Topic ; Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods ; Ultrasonography, Mammary - standards ; Ultrasonography, Mammary - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><ispartof>Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2006-05, Vol.25 (5), p.649-659</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-cd4b2bae400abb5631089db7c62e8e0a5203a0769871c047aadba9da6be3c3613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16632790$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Costantini, Melania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belli, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franceschini, Gianluca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mule, Antonino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonomo, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><title>Characterization of Solid Breast Masses: Use of the Sonographic Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Lexicon</title><title>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</title><addtitle>J Ultrasound Med</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of sonographic American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System (BI-RADS) classification in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses. One hundred seventy-eight breast masses studied by sonography with a known diagnosis were reviewed. All lesions were classified according to the sonographic BI-RADS lexicon. Pathologic results were compared with sonographic features. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for the sonographic BI-RADS lexicon were calculated. Twenty-six cases were assigned to class 3, 73 to class 4, and 79 to class 5. Pathologic results revealed 105 malignant and 73 benign lesions. The sonographic BI-RADS lexicon showed 71.3% accuracy, 98.1% sensitivity, 32.9% specificity, 67.8% PPV, and 92.3% NPV. The NPV for class 3 was 92.3%. The PPVs for classes 4 and 5 were 46.6% and 87.3%. Typical signs of malignancy were irregular shape, antiparallel orientation, noncircumscribed margin, echogenic halo, and decreased sound transmission. Typical signs of benignity were oval shape and circumscribed margin. The sonographic BI-RADS lexicon is an important system for describing and classifying breast lesions.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - classification</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maryland - epidemiology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Terminology as Topic</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Mammary - standards</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Mammary - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>0278-4297</issn><issn>1550-9613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE2P0zAQhi0EYrsLP4AL8gVuCWMnthNuUBZYqQiJZc_WxJk2XuUL21VZfj0pLXCakeZ5X2kexl4IyE2lizf3-yGXADqXKle5LutHbCWUgqzWonjMViBNlZWyNhfsMsZ7AAnClE_ZhdC6kKaGFZvXHQZ0iYL_hclPI5-2_HbqfcvfB8KY-BeMkeJbfhfpeEsdLfdx2gWcO-_-UjcD7vy4499onkI6bji2_AMm5LcPMdHAN_TTu2l8xp5ssY_0_Dyv2N3H6-_rz9nm66eb9btN5mQlUubaspENUgmATaN0IaCq28Y4LakiQCWhQDC6roxwUBrEtsG6Rd1Q4Yrl_Sv2-tQ7h-nHnmKyg4-O-h5HmvbRalPVoP6A4gS6MMUYaGvn4AcMD1aAPWq2i2Z71GylssoumpfMy3P5vhmo_Z84e12AVyeg87vu4APZOGDfL7iwh8PhX9FvwmGHdg</recordid><startdate>20060501</startdate><enddate>20060501</enddate><creator>Costantini, Melania</creator><creator>Belli, Paolo</creator><creator>Lombardi, Roberta</creator><creator>Franceschini, Gianluca</creator><creator>Mule, Antonino</creator><creator>Bonomo, Lorenzo</creator><general>Am inst Ulrrasound Med</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060501</creationdate><title>Characterization of Solid Breast Masses: Use of the Sonographic Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Lexicon</title><author>Costantini, Melania ; Belli, Paolo ; Lombardi, Roberta ; Franceschini, Gianluca ; Mule, Antonino ; Bonomo, Lorenzo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-cd4b2bae400abb5631089db7c62e8e0a5203a0769871c047aadba9da6be3c3613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - classification</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maryland - epidemiology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Terminology as Topic</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Mammary - standards</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Mammary - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Costantini, Melania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belli, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franceschini, Gianluca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mule, Antonino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonomo, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Costantini, Melania</au><au>Belli, Paolo</au><au>Lombardi, Roberta</au><au>Franceschini, Gianluca</au><au>Mule, Antonino</au><au>Bonomo, Lorenzo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterization of Solid Breast Masses: Use of the Sonographic Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Lexicon</atitle><jtitle>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Ultrasound Med</addtitle><date>2006-05-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>649</spage><epage>659</epage><pages>649-659</pages><issn>0278-4297</issn><eissn>1550-9613</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of sonographic American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting And Data System (BI-RADS) classification in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses. One hundred seventy-eight breast masses studied by sonography with a known diagnosis were reviewed. All lesions were classified according to the sonographic BI-RADS lexicon. Pathologic results were compared with sonographic features. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for the sonographic BI-RADS lexicon were calculated. Twenty-six cases were assigned to class 3, 73 to class 4, and 79 to class 5. Pathologic results revealed 105 malignant and 73 benign lesions. The sonographic BI-RADS lexicon showed 71.3% accuracy, 98.1% sensitivity, 32.9% specificity, 67.8% PPV, and 92.3% NPV. The NPV for class 3 was 92.3%. The PPVs for classes 4 and 5 were 46.6% and 87.3%. Typical signs of malignancy were irregular shape, antiparallel orientation, noncircumscribed margin, echogenic halo, and decreased sound transmission. Typical signs of benignity were oval shape and circumscribed margin. The sonographic BI-RADS lexicon is an important system for describing and classifying breast lesions.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Am inst Ulrrasound Med</pub><pmid>16632790</pmid><doi>10.7863/jum.2006.25.5.649</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-4297
ispartof Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2006-05, Vol.25 (5), p.649-659
issn 0278-4297
1550-9613
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67890561
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Adult
Aged
Breast Neoplasms - classification
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Female
Humans
Maryland - epidemiology
Middle Aged
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Severity of Illness Index
Terminology as Topic
Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods
Ultrasonography, Mammary - standards
Ultrasonography, Mammary - statistics & numerical data
title Characterization of Solid Breast Masses: Use of the Sonographic Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Lexicon
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T05%3A18%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterization%20of%20Solid%20Breast%20Masses:%20Use%20of%20the%20Sonographic%20Breast%20Imaging%20Reporting%20and%20Data%20System%20Lexicon&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20ultrasound%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Costantini,%20Melania&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=649&rft.epage=659&rft.pages=649-659&rft.issn=0278-4297&rft.eissn=1550-9613&rft_id=info:doi/10.7863/jum.2006.25.5.649&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67890561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67890561&rft_id=info:pmid/16632790&rfr_iscdi=true