Precordial Doppler Probe Placement for Optimal Detection of Venous Air Embolism During Craniotomy

Verification of appropriate precordial Doppler probe position over the anterior chest wall is crucial for early detection of venous air embolism. We studied responses to normal saline (NS) and carbon dioxide (CO2) test injections at various probe locations during elective craniotomy. All patients re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia and analgesia 2006-05, Vol.102 (5), p.1543-1547
Hauptverfasser: Schubert, Armin, Deogaonkar, Anupa, Drummond, John C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1547
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1543
container_title Anesthesia and analgesia
container_volume 102
creator Schubert, Armin
Deogaonkar, Anupa
Drummond, John C.
description Verification of appropriate precordial Doppler probe position over the anterior chest wall is crucial for early detection of venous air embolism. We studied responses to normal saline (NS) and carbon dioxide (CO2) test injections at various probe locations during elective craniotomy. All patients received four IV injections (10 mL of NS and 1 mL of CO2 via central and peripheral venous catheters). Doppler sounds were simultaneously recorded with two separate probes. In Group A, probes were placed in left and right parasternal positions. In Group B, the left probe was intentionally malpositioned as far laterally over the left precordium as was compatible with an audible signal. In Group A (n = 23), a left parasternal Doppler signal was easily obtainable in 23 of 23 patients, versus 18 of 23 patients for the right parasternal probe (P < 0.05). In Group B (n = 17), central CO2 injection yielded a positive right parasternal response rate of 88% compared with 29% over the far left precordium (P < 0.015), where central NS injections yielded a 76% response rate (P < 0.015 versus central CO2 injection). Left parasternal placement is at least as sensitive to clinical venous air embolism events as right parasternal placement. Peripheral saline injection represents a viable alternative (83% response rate). Vigorous central injection of 10 mL of NS however, risks false positive verification of left lateral precordial probe placement.
doi_str_mv 10.1213/01.ane.0000198665.84248.61
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67881707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67881707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4441-8300a802b5d920425d74eea79d9bd74341c253ac4f721542c09bc10cc96b4a3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkF1rHCEUhqW0JNskf6FIobmbqV_jaO_CJv2AQPaiza04zpnG1hmnOkPIv6-bXVhBVHhezzkPQh8pqSmj_DOhtZ2gJmVRraRsaiWYULWkb9CGNkxWbaPVW7QpAK-Y1vocvc_5z54nSp6hcyolZ4rrDbK7BC6m3tuAb-M8B0h4l2IHeBesgxGmBQ8x4Yd58eOegQXc4uOE44AfYYprxjc-4buxi8HnEd-uyU-_8TbZycclji-X6N1gQ4ar43mBfn29-7n9Xt0_fPuxvbmvnBCCVooTYhVhXdNrRgRr-lYA2Fb3uitXLqhjDbdODC2jjWCO6M5R4pyWnbDc8Qt0ffh3TvHfCnkxo88OQiiuSpdGtkrRlrQF_HIAXYo5JxjMnMps6cVQYvaCDaGmhMxJsHkVbCQt4Q_HKms3Qn-KHo0W4NMRsNnZMBQPzucT17ZESyEKJw7ccwwLpPw3rM-QzBPYsDy9liYN1xUjRJKmPKqyBeX_Af8kk-8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67881707</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Precordial Doppler Probe Placement for Optimal Detection of Venous Air Embolism During Craniotomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Schubert, Armin ; Deogaonkar, Anupa ; Drummond, John C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Armin ; Deogaonkar, Anupa ; Drummond, John C.</creatorcontrib><description>Verification of appropriate precordial Doppler probe position over the anterior chest wall is crucial for early detection of venous air embolism. We studied responses to normal saline (NS) and carbon dioxide (CO2) test injections at various probe locations during elective craniotomy. All patients received four IV injections (10 mL of NS and 1 mL of CO2 via central and peripheral venous catheters). Doppler sounds were simultaneously recorded with two separate probes. In Group A, probes were placed in left and right parasternal positions. In Group B, the left probe was intentionally malpositioned as far laterally over the left precordium as was compatible with an audible signal. In Group A (n = 23), a left parasternal Doppler signal was easily obtainable in 23 of 23 patients, versus 18 of 23 patients for the right parasternal probe (P &lt; 0.05). In Group B (n = 17), central CO2 injection yielded a positive right parasternal response rate of 88% compared with 29% over the far left precordium (P &lt; 0.015), where central NS injections yielded a 76% response rate (P &lt; 0.015 versus central CO2 injection). Left parasternal placement is at least as sensitive to clinical venous air embolism events as right parasternal placement. Peripheral saline injection represents a viable alternative (83% response rate). Vigorous central injection of 10 mL of NS however, risks false positive verification of left lateral precordial probe placement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-7598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000198665.84248.61</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16632839</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AACRAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: International Anethesia Research Society</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Craniotomy - methods ; Echocardiography, Doppler - methods ; Embolism, Air - diagnostic imaging ; Embolism, Air - prevention &amp; control ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 2006-05, Vol.102 (5), p.1543-1547</ispartof><rights>International Anethesia Research Society</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4441-8300a802b5d920425d74eea79d9bd74341c253ac4f721542c09bc10cc96b4a3c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4441-8300a802b5d920425d74eea79d9bd74341c253ac4f721542c09bc10cc96b4a3c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf><![CDATA[$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&PDF=y&D=ovft&AN=00000539-200605000-00041$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H]]></linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;NEWS=n&amp;CSC=Y&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;D=ovft&amp;AN=00000539-200605000-00041$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4609,27924,27925,64666,65461</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17709644$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16632839$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Armin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deogaonkar, Anupa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drummond, John C.</creatorcontrib><title>Precordial Doppler Probe Placement for Optimal Detection of Venous Air Embolism During Craniotomy</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><description>Verification of appropriate precordial Doppler probe position over the anterior chest wall is crucial for early detection of venous air embolism. We studied responses to normal saline (NS) and carbon dioxide (CO2) test injections at various probe locations during elective craniotomy. All patients received four IV injections (10 mL of NS and 1 mL of CO2 via central and peripheral venous catheters). Doppler sounds were simultaneously recorded with two separate probes. In Group A, probes were placed in left and right parasternal positions. In Group B, the left probe was intentionally malpositioned as far laterally over the left precordium as was compatible with an audible signal. In Group A (n = 23), a left parasternal Doppler signal was easily obtainable in 23 of 23 patients, versus 18 of 23 patients for the right parasternal probe (P &lt; 0.05). In Group B (n = 17), central CO2 injection yielded a positive right parasternal response rate of 88% compared with 29% over the far left precordium (P &lt; 0.015), where central NS injections yielded a 76% response rate (P &lt; 0.015 versus central CO2 injection). Left parasternal placement is at least as sensitive to clinical venous air embolism events as right parasternal placement. Peripheral saline injection represents a viable alternative (83% response rate). Vigorous central injection of 10 mL of NS however, risks false positive verification of left lateral precordial probe placement.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Craniotomy - methods</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Doppler - methods</subject><subject>Embolism, Air - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Embolism, Air - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</subject><issn>0003-2999</issn><issn>1526-7598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkF1rHCEUhqW0JNskf6FIobmbqV_jaO_CJv2AQPaiza04zpnG1hmnOkPIv6-bXVhBVHhezzkPQh8pqSmj_DOhtZ2gJmVRraRsaiWYULWkb9CGNkxWbaPVW7QpAK-Y1vocvc_5z54nSp6hcyolZ4rrDbK7BC6m3tuAb-M8B0h4l2IHeBesgxGmBQ8x4Yd58eOegQXc4uOE44AfYYprxjc-4buxi8HnEd-uyU-_8TbZycclji-X6N1gQ4ar43mBfn29-7n9Xt0_fPuxvbmvnBCCVooTYhVhXdNrRgRr-lYA2Fb3uitXLqhjDbdODC2jjWCO6M5R4pyWnbDc8Qt0ffh3TvHfCnkxo88OQiiuSpdGtkrRlrQF_HIAXYo5JxjMnMps6cVQYvaCDaGmhMxJsHkVbCQt4Q_HKms3Qn-KHo0W4NMRsNnZMBQPzucT17ZESyEKJw7ccwwLpPw3rM-QzBPYsDy9liYN1xUjRJKmPKqyBeX_Af8kk-8</recordid><startdate>20060501</startdate><enddate>20060501</enddate><creator>Schubert, Armin</creator><creator>Deogaonkar, Anupa</creator><creator>Drummond, John C.</creator><general>International Anethesia Research Society</general><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060501</creationdate><title>Precordial Doppler Probe Placement for Optimal Detection of Venous Air Embolism During Craniotomy</title><author>Schubert, Armin ; Deogaonkar, Anupa ; Drummond, John C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4441-8300a802b5d920425d74eea79d9bd74341c253ac4f721542c09bc10cc96b4a3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Craniotomy - methods</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Doppler - methods</topic><topic>Embolism, Air - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Embolism, Air - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Armin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deogaonkar, Anupa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drummond, John C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schubert, Armin</au><au>Deogaonkar, Anupa</au><au>Drummond, John C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Precordial Doppler Probe Placement for Optimal Detection of Venous Air Embolism During Craniotomy</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><date>2006-05-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1543</spage><epage>1547</epage><pages>1543-1547</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><eissn>1526-7598</eissn><coden>AACRAT</coden><abstract>Verification of appropriate precordial Doppler probe position over the anterior chest wall is crucial for early detection of venous air embolism. We studied responses to normal saline (NS) and carbon dioxide (CO2) test injections at various probe locations during elective craniotomy. All patients received four IV injections (10 mL of NS and 1 mL of CO2 via central and peripheral venous catheters). Doppler sounds were simultaneously recorded with two separate probes. In Group A, probes were placed in left and right parasternal positions. In Group B, the left probe was intentionally malpositioned as far laterally over the left precordium as was compatible with an audible signal. In Group A (n = 23), a left parasternal Doppler signal was easily obtainable in 23 of 23 patients, versus 18 of 23 patients for the right parasternal probe (P &lt; 0.05). In Group B (n = 17), central CO2 injection yielded a positive right parasternal response rate of 88% compared with 29% over the far left precordium (P &lt; 0.015), where central NS injections yielded a 76% response rate (P &lt; 0.015 versus central CO2 injection). Left parasternal placement is at least as sensitive to clinical venous air embolism events as right parasternal placement. Peripheral saline injection represents a viable alternative (83% response rate). Vigorous central injection of 10 mL of NS however, risks false positive verification of left lateral precordial probe placement.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>International Anethesia Research Society</pub><pmid>16632839</pmid><doi>10.1213/01.ane.0000198665.84248.61</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2999
ispartof Anesthesia and analgesia, 2006-05, Vol.102 (5), p.1543-1547
issn 0003-2999
1526-7598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67881707
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Chi-Square Distribution
Craniotomy - methods
Echocardiography, Doppler - methods
Embolism, Air - diagnostic imaging
Embolism, Air - prevention & control
Female
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods
title Precordial Doppler Probe Placement for Optimal Detection of Venous Air Embolism During Craniotomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T20%3A30%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Precordial%20Doppler%20Probe%20Placement%20for%20Optimal%20Detection%20of%20Venous%20Air%20Embolism%20During%20Craniotomy&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Schubert,%20Armin&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1543&rft.epage=1547&rft.pages=1543-1547&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft.eissn=1526-7598&rft.coden=AACRAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213/01.ane.0000198665.84248.61&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67881707%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67881707&rft_id=info:pmid/16632839&rfr_iscdi=true