Comparison of agar plate and real-time PCR on enumeration of Lactobacillus, Clostridium perfringens and total anaerobic bacteria in dog faeces
To compare agar plate and real-time PCR methods on enumeration of total anaerobic bacteria, Lactobacillus and Clostridium perfringens in dog faeces. Thirty-two faecal specimens from Labrador retriever dogs were used to compare agar plate and real-time PCR enumeration methods for Lactobacillus, C. pe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Letters in applied microbiology 2006-05, Vol.42 (5), p.490-494 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 494 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 490 |
container_title | Letters in applied microbiology |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Fu, C.J Carter, J.N Li, Y Porter, J.H Kerley, M.S |
description | To compare agar plate and real-time PCR methods on enumeration of total anaerobic bacteria, Lactobacillus and Clostridium perfringens in dog faeces. Thirty-two faecal specimens from Labrador retriever dogs were used to compare agar plate and real-time PCR enumeration methods for Lactobacillus, C. perfringens and total anaerobic bacteria. Total anaerobic bacteria, C. perfringens and Lactobacillus of faeces were counted (as CFU g[superscript [-]1] faeces) for 48-h incubation at 37°C in an anaerobic gas chamber on genus-selective media. Total genomic DNA from samples was extracted by the QIAamp[superscript ®] DNA stool mini kit. The quantification of DNA (as DNA copy per gram faeces) by real-time PCR was performed with a LightCycler system with the QuantiTect[superscript TM] SYBR[superscript ®] green PCR kit for PCR amplification. The results indicated that there was a significant correlation between CFU and DNA copy of Lactobacillus (R² = 0·78, P < 0·01) and total anaerobic bacteria (R² = 0·21, P < 0·05); but no correlation was found between CFU and DNA copy of C. perfringens. The regression equations for Lactobacillus and total anaerobic bacteria were log(DNA copy) = 0·83 [multiplication] log(CFU) + 1·43 and log(DNA copy) = 1·62 [multiplication] log(CFU) [-] 6·32 respectively. The real-time PCR method could be used to enumerate Lactobacillus within 2 days when compared with plating method which requires 5-6 days. The real-time PCR method and the primer set for Lactobacillus spp. harboured in the dog intestine can be used for rapid enumeration of lactobacilli and monitoring of the faecal Lactobacillus community. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01893.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67879697</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17203889</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5073-32fa66b4109b23a8e75a4833d334744f9227c0dac7a458d2a314f16887c6de273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk2P1SAUhonRONerf0HZOCtb-WiBLlxMGr-SazTqJO7IKaU33NBSoY0zf8LfbDu9cZbKhpPwvAdyHhDClOR0Wa9POS0ky6Qof-SMEJETqiqe3zxAu78HD9GOMCEyxcriAj1J6UQIUZRVj9EFFYIRRtQO_a5DP0J0KQw4dBiOEPHoYbIYhhZHCz6bXG_xl_orXhA7zL2NMLkNP4CZQgPGeT-nV7j2IU3RtW7u8WhjF91wtEO6azWFCfxSgY2hcQYvqclGB9gNuA1H3IE1Nj1FjzrwyT4773t0_e7t9_pDdvj8_mN9dchMSSTPOOtAiKagpGoYB2VlCYXivOW8kEXRVYxJQ1owEopStQw4LToqlJJGtJZJvkeXW98xhp-zTZPuXTLWexhsmJMWUslKVP8GqWSEq2X4e6Q20MSQUrSdHqPrId5qSvQqTZ_06kavbvQqTd9J0zdL9Pn5jrnpbXsfPFtagJdnAJIB30UYjEv3nBRSELVybzbul_P29r8foA9Xn9Zqyb_Y8h0EDcflV-jrb4xQTihZhlcQ_gcPCrzO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17203889</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of agar plate and real-time PCR on enumeration of Lactobacillus, Clostridium perfringens and total anaerobic bacteria in dog faeces</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fu, C.J ; Carter, J.N ; Li, Y ; Porter, J.H ; Kerley, M.S</creator><creatorcontrib>Fu, C.J ; Carter, J.N ; Li, Y ; Porter, J.H ; Kerley, M.S</creatorcontrib><description>To compare agar plate and real-time PCR methods on enumeration of total anaerobic bacteria, Lactobacillus and Clostridium perfringens in dog faeces. Thirty-two faecal specimens from Labrador retriever dogs were used to compare agar plate and real-time PCR enumeration methods for Lactobacillus, C. perfringens and total anaerobic bacteria. Total anaerobic bacteria, C. perfringens and Lactobacillus of faeces were counted (as CFU g[superscript [-]1] faeces) for 48-h incubation at 37°C in an anaerobic gas chamber on genus-selective media. Total genomic DNA from samples was extracted by the QIAamp[superscript ®] DNA stool mini kit. The quantification of DNA (as DNA copy per gram faeces) by real-time PCR was performed with a LightCycler system with the QuantiTect[superscript TM] SYBR[superscript ®] green PCR kit for PCR amplification. The results indicated that there was a significant correlation between CFU and DNA copy of Lactobacillus (R² = 0·78, P < 0·01) and total anaerobic bacteria (R² = 0·21, P < 0·05); but no correlation was found between CFU and DNA copy of C. perfringens. The regression equations for Lactobacillus and total anaerobic bacteria were log(DNA copy) = 0·83 [multiplication] log(CFU) + 1·43 and log(DNA copy) = 1·62 [multiplication] log(CFU) [-] 6·32 respectively. The real-time PCR method could be used to enumerate Lactobacillus within 2 days when compared with plating method which requires 5-6 days. The real-time PCR method and the primer set for Lactobacillus spp. harboured in the dog intestine can be used for rapid enumeration of lactobacilli and monitoring of the faecal Lactobacillus community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-8254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-765X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2673</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01893.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16620208</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LAMIE7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject><![CDATA[anaerobes ; Animals ; Bacteria, Anaerobic - genetics ; Bacteria, Anaerobic - growth & development ; Bacteria, Anaerobic - isolation & purification ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clostridium perfringens ; Clostridium perfringens - genetics ; Clostridium perfringens - growth & development ; Clostridium perfringens - isolation & purification ; Colony Count, Microbial - methods ; DNA, Bacterial - analysis ; DNA, Bacterial - genetics ; dogs ; Dogs - microbiology ; Face - microbiology ; feces ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; intestinal microorganisms ; Lactobacillus ; Lactobacillus - genetics ; Lactobacillus - growth & development ; Lactobacillus - isolation & purification ; Microbiology ; plate count ; plate counting ; polymerase chain reaction ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods ; real time polymerase chain reaction enumeration ; real‐time PCR ; Statistics as Topic ; total anaerobic bacteria]]></subject><ispartof>Letters in applied microbiology, 2006-05, Vol.42 (5), p.490-494</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5073-32fa66b4109b23a8e75a4833d334744f9227c0dac7a458d2a314f16887c6de273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5073-32fa66b4109b23a8e75a4833d334744f9227c0dac7a458d2a314f16887c6de273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1472-765X.2006.01893.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1472-765X.2006.01893.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17676088$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16620208$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fu, C.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, J.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, J.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerley, M.S</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of agar plate and real-time PCR on enumeration of Lactobacillus, Clostridium perfringens and total anaerobic bacteria in dog faeces</title><title>Letters in applied microbiology</title><addtitle>Lett Appl Microbiol</addtitle><description>To compare agar plate and real-time PCR methods on enumeration of total anaerobic bacteria, Lactobacillus and Clostridium perfringens in dog faeces. Thirty-two faecal specimens from Labrador retriever dogs were used to compare agar plate and real-time PCR enumeration methods for Lactobacillus, C. perfringens and total anaerobic bacteria. Total anaerobic bacteria, C. perfringens and Lactobacillus of faeces were counted (as CFU g[superscript [-]1] faeces) for 48-h incubation at 37°C in an anaerobic gas chamber on genus-selective media. Total genomic DNA from samples was extracted by the QIAamp[superscript ®] DNA stool mini kit. The quantification of DNA (as DNA copy per gram faeces) by real-time PCR was performed with a LightCycler system with the QuantiTect[superscript TM] SYBR[superscript ®] green PCR kit for PCR amplification. The results indicated that there was a significant correlation between CFU and DNA copy of Lactobacillus (R² = 0·78, P < 0·01) and total anaerobic bacteria (R² = 0·21, P < 0·05); but no correlation was found between CFU and DNA copy of C. perfringens. The regression equations for Lactobacillus and total anaerobic bacteria were log(DNA copy) = 0·83 [multiplication] log(CFU) + 1·43 and log(DNA copy) = 1·62 [multiplication] log(CFU) [-] 6·32 respectively. The real-time PCR method could be used to enumerate Lactobacillus within 2 days when compared with plating method which requires 5-6 days. The real-time PCR method and the primer set for Lactobacillus spp. harboured in the dog intestine can be used for rapid enumeration of lactobacilli and monitoring of the faecal Lactobacillus community.</description><subject>anaerobes</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria, Anaerobic - genetics</subject><subject>Bacteria, Anaerobic - growth & development</subject><subject>Bacteria, Anaerobic - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clostridium perfringens</subject><subject>Clostridium perfringens - genetics</subject><subject>Clostridium perfringens - growth & development</subject><subject>Clostridium perfringens - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial - methods</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - analysis</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>dogs</subject><subject>Dogs - microbiology</subject><subject>Face - microbiology</subject><subject>feces</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>intestinal microorganisms</subject><subject>Lactobacillus</subject><subject>Lactobacillus - genetics</subject><subject>Lactobacillus - growth & development</subject><subject>Lactobacillus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>plate count</subject><subject>plate counting</subject><subject>polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</subject><subject>real time polymerase chain reaction enumeration</subject><subject>real‐time PCR</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><subject>total anaerobic bacteria</subject><issn>0266-8254</issn><issn>1472-765X</issn><issn>1365-2673</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk2P1SAUhonRONerf0HZOCtb-WiBLlxMGr-SazTqJO7IKaU33NBSoY0zf8LfbDu9cZbKhpPwvAdyHhDClOR0Wa9POS0ky6Qof-SMEJETqiqe3zxAu78HD9GOMCEyxcriAj1J6UQIUZRVj9EFFYIRRtQO_a5DP0J0KQw4dBiOEPHoYbIYhhZHCz6bXG_xl_orXhA7zL2NMLkNP4CZQgPGeT-nV7j2IU3RtW7u8WhjF91wtEO6azWFCfxSgY2hcQYvqclGB9gNuA1H3IE1Nj1FjzrwyT4773t0_e7t9_pDdvj8_mN9dchMSSTPOOtAiKagpGoYB2VlCYXivOW8kEXRVYxJQ1owEopStQw4LToqlJJGtJZJvkeXW98xhp-zTZPuXTLWexhsmJMWUslKVP8GqWSEq2X4e6Q20MSQUrSdHqPrId5qSvQqTZ_06kavbvQqTd9J0zdL9Pn5jrnpbXsfPFtagJdnAJIB30UYjEv3nBRSELVybzbul_P29r8foA9Xn9Zqyb_Y8h0EDcflV-jrb4xQTihZhlcQ_gcPCrzO</recordid><startdate>200605</startdate><enddate>200605</enddate><creator>Fu, C.J</creator><creator>Carter, J.N</creator><creator>Li, Y</creator><creator>Porter, J.H</creator><creator>Kerley, M.S</creator><general>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200605</creationdate><title>Comparison of agar plate and real-time PCR on enumeration of Lactobacillus, Clostridium perfringens and total anaerobic bacteria in dog faeces</title><author>Fu, C.J ; Carter, J.N ; Li, Y ; Porter, J.H ; Kerley, M.S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5073-32fa66b4109b23a8e75a4833d334744f9227c0dac7a458d2a314f16887c6de273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>anaerobes</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria, Anaerobic - genetics</topic><topic>Bacteria, Anaerobic - growth & development</topic><topic>Bacteria, Anaerobic - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clostridium perfringens</topic><topic>Clostridium perfringens - genetics</topic><topic>Clostridium perfringens - growth & development</topic><topic>Clostridium perfringens - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial - methods</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - analysis</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>dogs</topic><topic>Dogs - microbiology</topic><topic>Face - microbiology</topic><topic>feces</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>intestinal microorganisms</topic><topic>Lactobacillus</topic><topic>Lactobacillus - genetics</topic><topic>Lactobacillus - growth & development</topic><topic>Lactobacillus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>plate count</topic><topic>plate counting</topic><topic>polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods</topic><topic>real time polymerase chain reaction enumeration</topic><topic>real‐time PCR</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><topic>total anaerobic bacteria</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fu, C.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, J.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, J.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerley, M.S</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Letters in applied microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fu, C.J</au><au>Carter, J.N</au><au>Li, Y</au><au>Porter, J.H</au><au>Kerley, M.S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of agar plate and real-time PCR on enumeration of Lactobacillus, Clostridium perfringens and total anaerobic bacteria in dog faeces</atitle><jtitle>Letters in applied microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Lett Appl Microbiol</addtitle><date>2006-05</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>490</spage><epage>494</epage><pages>490-494</pages><issn>0266-8254</issn><eissn>1472-765X</eissn><eissn>1365-2673</eissn><coden>LAMIE7</coden><abstract>To compare agar plate and real-time PCR methods on enumeration of total anaerobic bacteria, Lactobacillus and Clostridium perfringens in dog faeces. Thirty-two faecal specimens from Labrador retriever dogs were used to compare agar plate and real-time PCR enumeration methods for Lactobacillus, C. perfringens and total anaerobic bacteria. Total anaerobic bacteria, C. perfringens and Lactobacillus of faeces were counted (as CFU g[superscript [-]1] faeces) for 48-h incubation at 37°C in an anaerobic gas chamber on genus-selective media. Total genomic DNA from samples was extracted by the QIAamp[superscript ®] DNA stool mini kit. The quantification of DNA (as DNA copy per gram faeces) by real-time PCR was performed with a LightCycler system with the QuantiTect[superscript TM] SYBR[superscript ®] green PCR kit for PCR amplification. The results indicated that there was a significant correlation between CFU and DNA copy of Lactobacillus (R² = 0·78, P < 0·01) and total anaerobic bacteria (R² = 0·21, P < 0·05); but no correlation was found between CFU and DNA copy of C. perfringens. The regression equations for Lactobacillus and total anaerobic bacteria were log(DNA copy) = 0·83 [multiplication] log(CFU) + 1·43 and log(DNA copy) = 1·62 [multiplication] log(CFU) [-] 6·32 respectively. The real-time PCR method could be used to enumerate Lactobacillus within 2 days when compared with plating method which requires 5-6 days. The real-time PCR method and the primer set for Lactobacillus spp. harboured in the dog intestine can be used for rapid enumeration of lactobacilli and monitoring of the faecal Lactobacillus community.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>16620208</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01893.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-8254 |
ispartof | Letters in applied microbiology, 2006-05, Vol.42 (5), p.490-494 |
issn | 0266-8254 1472-765X 1365-2673 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67879697 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | anaerobes Animals Bacteria, Anaerobic - genetics Bacteria, Anaerobic - growth & development Bacteria, Anaerobic - isolation & purification Biological and medical sciences Clostridium perfringens Clostridium perfringens - genetics Clostridium perfringens - growth & development Clostridium perfringens - isolation & purification Colony Count, Microbial - methods DNA, Bacterial - analysis DNA, Bacterial - genetics dogs Dogs - microbiology Face - microbiology feces Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology intestinal microorganisms Lactobacillus Lactobacillus - genetics Lactobacillus - growth & development Lactobacillus - isolation & purification Microbiology plate count plate counting polymerase chain reaction Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods real time polymerase chain reaction enumeration real‐time PCR Statistics as Topic total anaerobic bacteria |
title | Comparison of agar plate and real-time PCR on enumeration of Lactobacillus, Clostridium perfringens and total anaerobic bacteria in dog faeces |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T02%3A55%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20agar%20plate%20and%20real-time%20PCR%20on%20enumeration%20of%20Lactobacillus,%20Clostridium%20perfringens%20and%20total%20anaerobic%20bacteria%20in%20dog%20faeces&rft.jtitle=Letters%20in%20applied%20microbiology&rft.au=Fu,%20C.J&rft.date=2006-05&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=490&rft.epage=494&rft.pages=490-494&rft.issn=0266-8254&rft.eissn=1472-765X&rft.coden=LAMIE7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01893.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17203889%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17203889&rft_id=info:pmid/16620208&rfr_iscdi=true |