A clinical investigation of the fit of removable partial dental prosthesis clasp assemblies

Removable partial denture frameworks are complex castings fabricated from high-shrinkage alloys. This may result in difficulty in achieving accurate fit. The purpose of this study was to evaluate which component(s) of the clasp assembly contact the abutment tooth clinically. New and existing framewo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2006-04, Vol.95 (4), p.323-326
Hauptverfasser: Dunham, Daniel, Brudvik, James S., Morris, W. Jack, Plummer, Kevin D., Cameron, Stephen M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 326
container_issue 4
container_start_page 323
container_title The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
container_volume 95
creator Dunham, Daniel
Brudvik, James S.
Morris, W. Jack
Plummer, Kevin D.
Cameron, Stephen M.
description Removable partial denture frameworks are complex castings fabricated from high-shrinkage alloys. This may result in difficulty in achieving accurate fit. The purpose of this study was to evaluate which component(s) of the clasp assembly contact the abutment tooth clinically. New and existing frameworks with at least 1 conventional prepared occlusal rest were evaluated for fit. The spacing between the bottom of each of the rests of the 50 clasp assemblies and the corresponding rest seat were recorded with vinyl polysiloxane. The fit of each rest was determined with the use of a dial caliper by measuring, in micrometers, the thickness of the record between the rest and the bottom of the rest seat. The Kennedy classification was also recorded. A 2-sample t test was used to evaluate the difference in fit between tooth-tissue supported and tooth-supported designs (α=.05). The average space between the rest and prepared rest seat was 193 ± 203 μm, with a range of 0 to 828 μm. Twenty tooth-tissue frameworks had an average space of 136 ± 160 μm and 30 tooth-supported frameworks had an average space of 230 ± 222 μm. The 2-sample t test showed no significant difference for fit between tooth-tissue supported and tooth-supported frameworks ( P=.1081). Twenty-four percent of rests had contact in the prepared rest seat. The majority of rests evaluated did not contact the intended surfaces.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67860335</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022391306000576</els_id><sourcerecordid>67860335</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cc472a89fa13dce650167b052f0e661a85d3cc59cf0093bda8e6d017162b65183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EoqXwF6qcuCXs2o2T3KgqXlIlLnDiYDnOBlzlUWK3Ev8eRy3i2NPu4duZnWFsjpAgoLzbJNuhdxV1PuEAMgGeAOAZmyIUWSzzBZ6zKQDnsShQTNiVcxsAyNMML9kEpUSJAqfsYxmZxnbW6Cay3Z6ct5_a276L-jryXxTV1o_rQG2_12VD0VYP3gZ69A5jfCNwzrogpN020s5RWzaW3DW7qHXj6OY4Z-z98eFt9RyvX59eVst1bBZS-NiYRcZ1XtQaRWVIpiFfVkLKa6Dwp87TShiTFqYGKERZ6ZxkBZih5KVMMRczdnvQDb9870IE1VpnqGl0R_3OKZnlEoRIT4K8SEUQ5gGUB9CEdG6gWm0H2-rhRyGosX-1UX_9q7F_BVyF_sPh_OiwK1uq_s-OhQfg_gBQKGRvaVDOWOoMVXYg41XV21MevzX_mvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>29530172</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A clinical investigation of the fit of removable partial dental prosthesis clasp assemblies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Dunham, Daniel ; Brudvik, James S. ; Morris, W. Jack ; Plummer, Kevin D. ; Cameron, Stephen M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dunham, Daniel ; Brudvik, James S. ; Morris, W. Jack ; Plummer, Kevin D. ; Cameron, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><description>Removable partial denture frameworks are complex castings fabricated from high-shrinkage alloys. This may result in difficulty in achieving accurate fit. The purpose of this study was to evaluate which component(s) of the clasp assembly contact the abutment tooth clinically. New and existing frameworks with at least 1 conventional prepared occlusal rest were evaluated for fit. The spacing between the bottom of each of the rests of the 50 clasp assemblies and the corresponding rest seat were recorded with vinyl polysiloxane. The fit of each rest was determined with the use of a dial caliper by measuring, in micrometers, the thickness of the record between the rest and the bottom of the rest seat. The Kennedy classification was also recorded. A 2-sample t test was used to evaluate the difference in fit between tooth-tissue supported and tooth-supported designs (α=.05). The average space between the rest and prepared rest seat was 193 ± 203 μm, with a range of 0 to 828 μm. Twenty tooth-tissue frameworks had an average space of 136 ± 160 μm and 30 tooth-supported frameworks had an average space of 230 ± 222 μm. The 2-sample t test showed no significant difference for fit between tooth-tissue supported and tooth-supported frameworks ( P=.1081). Twenty-four percent of rests had contact in the prepared rest seat. The majority of rests evaluated did not contact the intended surfaces.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3913</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16616131</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Dental Abutments ; Dental Prosthesis Retention - methods ; Dentistry ; Denture Design ; Denture, Partial, Removable ; Humans</subject><ispartof>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2006-04, Vol.95 (4), p.323-326</ispartof><rights>2006 The Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cc472a89fa13dce650167b052f0e661a85d3cc59cf0093bda8e6d017162b65183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cc472a89fa13dce650167b052f0e661a85d3cc59cf0093bda8e6d017162b65183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391306000576$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16616131$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dunham, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brudvik, James S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, W. Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plummer, Kevin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><title>A clinical investigation of the fit of removable partial dental prosthesis clasp assemblies</title><title>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</title><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><description>Removable partial denture frameworks are complex castings fabricated from high-shrinkage alloys. This may result in difficulty in achieving accurate fit. The purpose of this study was to evaluate which component(s) of the clasp assembly contact the abutment tooth clinically. New and existing frameworks with at least 1 conventional prepared occlusal rest were evaluated for fit. The spacing between the bottom of each of the rests of the 50 clasp assemblies and the corresponding rest seat were recorded with vinyl polysiloxane. The fit of each rest was determined with the use of a dial caliper by measuring, in micrometers, the thickness of the record between the rest and the bottom of the rest seat. The Kennedy classification was also recorded. A 2-sample t test was used to evaluate the difference in fit between tooth-tissue supported and tooth-supported designs (α=.05). The average space between the rest and prepared rest seat was 193 ± 203 μm, with a range of 0 to 828 μm. Twenty tooth-tissue frameworks had an average space of 136 ± 160 μm and 30 tooth-supported frameworks had an average space of 230 ± 222 μm. The 2-sample t test showed no significant difference for fit between tooth-tissue supported and tooth-supported frameworks ( P=.1081). Twenty-four percent of rests had contact in the prepared rest seat. The majority of rests evaluated did not contact the intended surfaces.</description><subject>Dental Abutments</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Retention - methods</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Denture Design</subject><subject>Denture, Partial, Removable</subject><subject>Humans</subject><issn>0022-3913</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EoqXwF6qcuCXs2o2T3KgqXlIlLnDiYDnOBlzlUWK3Ev8eRy3i2NPu4duZnWFsjpAgoLzbJNuhdxV1PuEAMgGeAOAZmyIUWSzzBZ6zKQDnsShQTNiVcxsAyNMML9kEpUSJAqfsYxmZxnbW6Cay3Z6ct5_a276L-jryXxTV1o_rQG2_12VD0VYP3gZ69A5jfCNwzrogpN020s5RWzaW3DW7qHXj6OY4Z-z98eFt9RyvX59eVst1bBZS-NiYRcZ1XtQaRWVIpiFfVkLKa6Dwp87TShiTFqYGKERZ6ZxkBZih5KVMMRczdnvQDb9870IE1VpnqGl0R_3OKZnlEoRIT4K8SEUQ5gGUB9CEdG6gWm0H2-rhRyGosX-1UX_9q7F_BVyF_sPh_OiwK1uq_s-OhQfg_gBQKGRvaVDOWOoMVXYg41XV21MevzX_mvg</recordid><startdate>20060401</startdate><enddate>20060401</enddate><creator>Dunham, Daniel</creator><creator>Brudvik, James S.</creator><creator>Morris, W. Jack</creator><creator>Plummer, Kevin D.</creator><creator>Cameron, Stephen M.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060401</creationdate><title>A clinical investigation of the fit of removable partial dental prosthesis clasp assemblies</title><author>Dunham, Daniel ; Brudvik, James S. ; Morris, W. Jack ; Plummer, Kevin D. ; Cameron, Stephen M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cc472a89fa13dce650167b052f0e661a85d3cc59cf0093bda8e6d017162b65183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Dental Abutments</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Retention - methods</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Denture Design</topic><topic>Denture, Partial, Removable</topic><topic>Humans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dunham, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brudvik, James S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, W. Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plummer, Kevin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dunham, Daniel</au><au>Brudvik, James S.</au><au>Morris, W. Jack</au><au>Plummer, Kevin D.</au><au>Cameron, Stephen M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A clinical investigation of the fit of removable partial dental prosthesis clasp assemblies</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><date>2006-04-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>326</epage><pages>323-326</pages><issn>0022-3913</issn><eissn>1097-6841</eissn><abstract>Removable partial denture frameworks are complex castings fabricated from high-shrinkage alloys. This may result in difficulty in achieving accurate fit. The purpose of this study was to evaluate which component(s) of the clasp assembly contact the abutment tooth clinically. New and existing frameworks with at least 1 conventional prepared occlusal rest were evaluated for fit. The spacing between the bottom of each of the rests of the 50 clasp assemblies and the corresponding rest seat were recorded with vinyl polysiloxane. The fit of each rest was determined with the use of a dial caliper by measuring, in micrometers, the thickness of the record between the rest and the bottom of the rest seat. The Kennedy classification was also recorded. A 2-sample t test was used to evaluate the difference in fit between tooth-tissue supported and tooth-supported designs (α=.05). The average space between the rest and prepared rest seat was 193 ± 203 μm, with a range of 0 to 828 μm. Twenty tooth-tissue frameworks had an average space of 136 ± 160 μm and 30 tooth-supported frameworks had an average space of 230 ± 222 μm. The 2-sample t test showed no significant difference for fit between tooth-tissue supported and tooth-supported frameworks ( P=.1081). Twenty-four percent of rests had contact in the prepared rest seat. The majority of rests evaluated did not contact the intended surfaces.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>16616131</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.001</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3913
ispartof The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2006-04, Vol.95 (4), p.323-326
issn 0022-3913
1097-6841
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67860335
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Dental Abutments
Dental Prosthesis Retention - methods
Dentistry
Denture Design
Denture, Partial, Removable
Humans
title A clinical investigation of the fit of removable partial dental prosthesis clasp assemblies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T16%3A36%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20clinical%20investigation%20of%20the%20fit%20of%20removable%20partial%20dental%20prosthesis%20clasp%20assemblies&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20prosthetic%20dentistry&rft.au=Dunham,%20Daniel&rft.date=2006-04-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=326&rft.pages=323-326&rft.issn=0022-3913&rft.eissn=1097-6841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67860335%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=29530172&rft_id=info:pmid/16616131&rft_els_id=S0022391306000576&rfr_iscdi=true