The interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
Pretest probability assessment and objective testing are combined to appropriately manage patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment has not been investigated. We sought to determine (for patients with suspected PE) the i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Thrombosis research 2005, Vol.116 (2), p.101-107 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 107 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 101 |
container_title | Thrombosis research |
container_volume | 116 |
creator | Rodger, Marc A. Maser, Elana Stiell, Ian Howley, Heather E.A. Wells, Philip S. |
description | Pretest probability assessment and objective testing are combined to appropriately manage patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment has not been investigated. We sought to determine (for patients with suspected PE) the interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment (by overall impression (gestalt) versus an explicit clinical model).
A prospective cohort study was conducted at an urban university hospital. For patients referred for ventilation and perfusion (V/Q) scanning for suspected PE, structured assessments (11 history and 4 physical examination parameters) were performed by a referring physician and a designated thrombosis physician. The referring and thrombosis physicians also assigned a pretest probability for PE (low, moderate, or high) by gestalt. An explicit seven-point clinical model for suspected PE was later applied to each structured assessment to determine the pretest probability. Assessments were performed independently and prior to diagnostic test results. Interobserver reliability (two rater unweighted Kappa (
κ) statistic) was determined for each parameter on the structured assessment and the pretest probability assessments (gestalt vs. explicit clinical model).
One hundred and ten patients with suspected PE received duplicate assessments. Historical features demonstrated substantial to almost perfect interobserver reliability (
κ=0.60–0.95). For the physical findings, only heart rate had substantial interobserver reliability (
κ=0.60). Pretest probability assessment was not reliable when using physician's gestalt (
κ=0.33), but produced substantial interobserver reliability using the explicit clinical model (
κ=0.62).
Given the inadequate interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment by overall impression (or gestalt), physicians should use explicit clinical models in the diagnostic management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.thromres.2004.10.011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67847969</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0049384804005493</els_id><sourcerecordid>67847969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-f017849134560457f696bdb0de64a5843bb65b9b50307df4d193df310edd06633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1vFDEMhiMEokvLX6hygdssySaTmdxAVVuQKnFpz1Ey8Wizmi_iTFH_PV7tVj1ycuQ8tl89jF1LsZVCmm-HbdnnecyA250QmppbIeU7tpFtY6udbnbv2YY-bKVa3V6wT4gHIWQjbf2RXcjaiqbeqQ0bH_fA01QgzwEhP0PmGYbkQxpSeeFzz5cMBbBQncNr2yMC4ghToVm--JLoifxvKnuOKy7QFYh8WYdxnnx-4TCGeUg4XrEPvR8QPp_rJXu6u328-Vk9_L7_dfPjoeqUNaXqKWirrVS6NkLXTW-sCTGICEb7utUqBFMHG2qhRBN7HaVVsVdSQIzCGKUu2dfTXgr9Z6X0bkzYwTD4CeYVnaH1jTWWQHMCuzwjZujdktNIkZ0U7ijaHdyraHcUfeyTaBq8Pl9YwwjxbexsloAvZ8Bj54c--6lL-MaZltaJlrjvJw7Ix3OC7LAjmx3ElEmji3P6X5Z_ODqiWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67847969</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rodger, Marc A. ; Maser, Elana ; Stiell, Ian ; Howley, Heather E.A. ; Wells, Philip S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodger, Marc A. ; Maser, Elana ; Stiell, Ian ; Howley, Heather E.A. ; Wells, Philip S.</creatorcontrib><description>Pretest probability assessment and objective testing are combined to appropriately manage patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment has not been investigated. We sought to determine (for patients with suspected PE) the interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment (by overall impression (gestalt) versus an explicit clinical model).
A prospective cohort study was conducted at an urban university hospital. For patients referred for ventilation and perfusion (V/Q) scanning for suspected PE, structured assessments (11 history and 4 physical examination parameters) were performed by a referring physician and a designated thrombosis physician. The referring and thrombosis physicians also assigned a pretest probability for PE (low, moderate, or high) by gestalt. An explicit seven-point clinical model for suspected PE was later applied to each structured assessment to determine the pretest probability. Assessments were performed independently and prior to diagnostic test results. Interobserver reliability (two rater unweighted Kappa (
κ) statistic) was determined for each parameter on the structured assessment and the pretest probability assessments (gestalt vs. explicit clinical model).
One hundred and ten patients with suspected PE received duplicate assessments. Historical features demonstrated substantial to almost perfect interobserver reliability (
κ=0.60–0.95). For the physical findings, only heart rate had substantial interobserver reliability (
κ=0.60). Pretest probability assessment was not reliable when using physician's gestalt (
κ=0.33), but produced substantial interobserver reliability using the explicit clinical model (
κ=0.62).
Given the inadequate interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment by overall impression (or gestalt), physicians should use explicit clinical models in the diagnostic management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-3848</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2472</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2004.10.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15907523</identifier><identifier>CODEN: THBRAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood and lymphatic vessels ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation ; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous ; Disorders ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Interobserver reliability ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; Physical examination ; Pneumology ; Pretest probability ; Probability ; Pulmonary embolism ; Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis ; Pulmonary hypertension. Acute cor pulmonale. Pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary vascular diseases</subject><ispartof>Thrombosis research, 2005, Vol.116 (2), p.101-107</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-f017849134560457f696bdb0de64a5843bb65b9b50307df4d193df310edd06633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-f017849134560457f696bdb0de64a5843bb65b9b50307df4d193df310edd06633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049384804005493$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,4009,27902,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16820008$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15907523$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodger, Marc A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maser, Elana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiell, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howley, Heather E.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, Philip S.</creatorcontrib><title>The interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism</title><title>Thrombosis research</title><addtitle>Thromb Res</addtitle><description>Pretest probability assessment and objective testing are combined to appropriately manage patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment has not been investigated. We sought to determine (for patients with suspected PE) the interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment (by overall impression (gestalt) versus an explicit clinical model).
A prospective cohort study was conducted at an urban university hospital. For patients referred for ventilation and perfusion (V/Q) scanning for suspected PE, structured assessments (11 history and 4 physical examination parameters) were performed by a referring physician and a designated thrombosis physician. The referring and thrombosis physicians also assigned a pretest probability for PE (low, moderate, or high) by gestalt. An explicit seven-point clinical model for suspected PE was later applied to each structured assessment to determine the pretest probability. Assessments were performed independently and prior to diagnostic test results. Interobserver reliability (two rater unweighted Kappa (
κ) statistic) was determined for each parameter on the structured assessment and the pretest probability assessments (gestalt vs. explicit clinical model).
One hundred and ten patients with suspected PE received duplicate assessments. Historical features demonstrated substantial to almost perfect interobserver reliability (
κ=0.60–0.95). For the physical findings, only heart rate had substantial interobserver reliability (
κ=0.60). Pretest probability assessment was not reliable when using physician's gestalt (
κ=0.33), but produced substantial interobserver reliability using the explicit clinical model (
κ=0.62).
Given the inadequate interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment by overall impression (or gestalt), physicians should use explicit clinical models in the diagnostic management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood and lymphatic vessels</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Disorders</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interobserver reliability</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Physical examination</subject><subject>Pneumology</subject><subject>Pretest probability</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Pulmonary embolism</subject><subject>Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pulmonary hypertension. Acute cor pulmonale. Pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary vascular diseases</subject><issn>0049-3848</issn><issn>1879-2472</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1vFDEMhiMEokvLX6hygdssySaTmdxAVVuQKnFpz1Ey8Wizmi_iTFH_PV7tVj1ycuQ8tl89jF1LsZVCmm-HbdnnecyA250QmppbIeU7tpFtY6udbnbv2YY-bKVa3V6wT4gHIWQjbf2RXcjaiqbeqQ0bH_fA01QgzwEhP0PmGYbkQxpSeeFzz5cMBbBQncNr2yMC4ghToVm--JLoifxvKnuOKy7QFYh8WYdxnnx-4TCGeUg4XrEPvR8QPp_rJXu6u328-Vk9_L7_dfPjoeqUNaXqKWirrVS6NkLXTW-sCTGICEb7utUqBFMHG2qhRBN7HaVVsVdSQIzCGKUu2dfTXgr9Z6X0bkzYwTD4CeYVnaH1jTWWQHMCuzwjZujdktNIkZ0U7ijaHdyraHcUfeyTaBq8Pl9YwwjxbexsloAvZ8Bj54c--6lL-MaZltaJlrjvJw7Ix3OC7LAjmx3ElEmji3P6X5Z_ODqiWw</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Rodger, Marc A.</creator><creator>Maser, Elana</creator><creator>Stiell, Ian</creator><creator>Howley, Heather E.A.</creator><creator>Wells, Philip S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>The interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism</title><author>Rodger, Marc A. ; Maser, Elana ; Stiell, Ian ; Howley, Heather E.A. ; Wells, Philip S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-f017849134560457f696bdb0de64a5843bb65b9b50307df4d193df310edd06633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood and lymphatic vessels</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Disorders</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interobserver reliability</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Physical examination</topic><topic>Pneumology</topic><topic>Pretest probability</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Pulmonary embolism</topic><topic>Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pulmonary hypertension. Acute cor pulmonale. Pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary vascular diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodger, Marc A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maser, Elana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiell, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howley, Heather E.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, Philip S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Thrombosis research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodger, Marc A.</au><au>Maser, Elana</au><au>Stiell, Ian</au><au>Howley, Heather E.A.</au><au>Wells, Philip S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism</atitle><jtitle>Thrombosis research</jtitle><addtitle>Thromb Res</addtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>101-107</pages><issn>0049-3848</issn><eissn>1879-2472</eissn><coden>THBRAA</coden><abstract>Pretest probability assessment and objective testing are combined to appropriately manage patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment has not been investigated. We sought to determine (for patients with suspected PE) the interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment (by overall impression (gestalt) versus an explicit clinical model).
A prospective cohort study was conducted at an urban university hospital. For patients referred for ventilation and perfusion (V/Q) scanning for suspected PE, structured assessments (11 history and 4 physical examination parameters) were performed by a referring physician and a designated thrombosis physician. The referring and thrombosis physicians also assigned a pretest probability for PE (low, moderate, or high) by gestalt. An explicit seven-point clinical model for suspected PE was later applied to each structured assessment to determine the pretest probability. Assessments were performed independently and prior to diagnostic test results. Interobserver reliability (two rater unweighted Kappa (
κ) statistic) was determined for each parameter on the structured assessment and the pretest probability assessments (gestalt vs. explicit clinical model).
One hundred and ten patients with suspected PE received duplicate assessments. Historical features demonstrated substantial to almost perfect interobserver reliability (
κ=0.60–0.95). For the physical findings, only heart rate had substantial interobserver reliability (
κ=0.60). Pretest probability assessment was not reliable when using physician's gestalt (
κ=0.33), but produced substantial interobserver reliability using the explicit clinical model (
κ=0.62).
Given the inadequate interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment by overall impression (or gestalt), physicians should use explicit clinical models in the diagnostic management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15907523</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.thromres.2004.10.011</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0049-3848 |
ispartof | Thrombosis research, 2005, Vol.116 (2), p.101-107 |
issn | 0049-3848 1879-2472 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67847969 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Blood and lymphatic vessels Cardiology. Vascular system Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted - methods Diseases of the peripheral vessels. Diseases of the vena cava. Miscellaneous Disorders Female Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Interobserver reliability Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Observer Variation Physical examination Pneumology Pretest probability Probability Pulmonary embolism Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis Pulmonary hypertension. Acute cor pulmonale. Pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary vascular diseases |
title | The interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T14%3A45%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20interobserver%20reliability%20of%20pretest%20probability%20assessment%20in%20patients%20with%20suspected%20pulmonary%20embolism&rft.jtitle=Thrombosis%20research&rft.au=Rodger,%20Marc%20A.&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=101-107&rft.issn=0049-3848&rft.eissn=1879-2472&rft.coden=THBRAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.thromres.2004.10.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67847969%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67847969&rft_id=info:pmid/15907523&rft_els_id=S0049384804005493&rfr_iscdi=true |