Prognostic factors after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in cervical cancers. A retrospective analysis of 298 patients after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy
To determine prognostic factors in patients with cervical cancer treated with surgery followed by radiotherapy. In a retrospective analysis, patients treated at the Department of Radiotherapy, University of Halle-Wittenberg, Germany, from 1980 through 1993 were evaluated for local control, survival...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 2005-05, Vol.181 (5), p.285-292 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | ger |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 292 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 285 |
container_title | Strahlentherapie und Onkologie |
container_volume | 181 |
creator | Hänsgen, Gabriele Richter, Konstanze Gerlach, Reinhard Kuhnt, Thomas Dunst, Jürgen |
description | To determine prognostic factors in patients with cervical cancer treated with surgery followed by radiotherapy.
In a retrospective analysis, patients treated at the Department of Radiotherapy, University of Halle-Wittenberg, Germany, from 1980 through 1993 were evaluated for local control, survival and treatment sequelae with special emphasis on prognostic factors. 298 patients (age 23-81 years, median 46 years) with cervical cancers were treated with surgery followed by radiotherapy to a minimum of 50 Gy. 250 patients received radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy and 48 patients after hysterectomy. Most of the cancers were squamous cell carcinomas (81%) with few adenocarcinomas (12.4%). Grading was G1/G2 in 28.9% of the patients and G3/G4 in 39.6%.
The 5-year overall survival was 68.8% for the whole group, 70.5% for squamous cell carcinomas (n = 241), 64.4% for adenocarcinomas (n = 37; not significant), 80% for G1/G2 tumors (n = 86), and 69% for G3/G4 carcinomas (n = 118; p = 0.074). Survival dependent on tumor size and positive nodes was 76.2% (n = 94) for pT1N0, 65.8% for pT1N+ (n = 31), 68.2% for pT2N0 (n = 62), and 41.4% for pT2N+ (n = 35). An impact of grading on 5-year survival was only found in patients with positive nodes: G1/G2N0 84% (n = 62) versus G1/G2N+ 64.8% (n = 23); G3/G4N0 79.6% (n = 71) versus G3/G4N+ 39.9% (n = 31). The number of positive nodes was the strongest prognostic factor. Multivariate analysis (Cox regression) established a risk factor of 3.06 (p < 0.01) for positive nodes, of 1.7 for grading G1/G2 versus G3/G4 (p = 0.087), and of 1.3 for tumor size (pT1 vs. pT2; p = 0.079). There were no differences in the clinical outcome between patients in stage pT1 with or without lymphadenectomy (75% [n = 130] vs. 79% [n = 39]).
In patients with cervical cancers treated with surgery and radiotherapy, positive nodes were an independent prognostic factor for local control and survival and should be an indication for additional chemotherapy. A value of lymphadenectomy for survival in this group of irradiated patients could not be established. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00066-005-1281-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67844971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67844971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p139t-997ad98ef1156b831a75dc11d875a5d69f5e908398b4623e42418ce254846dae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUL1OwzAY9ACipfAALMgTW4qd2I49VhV_UiUYYI6-2l-KqzQJtlMpb8OjEomyM90N96M7Qm44W3LGyvvIGFMqY0xmPNc8y8_InPHSZCWXekYuY9wzxpUw4oLMuDSMiVzMyfdb6HZtF5O3tAabuhAp1AkDjUPYYRgptI6C2w9HaBMN4HyXPjFAP1LfUovh6C001EI78bikKxowhS72aJM_4mSHZow-0q6mudG0h-SxTf9uuSLnNTQRr0-4IB-PD-_r52zz-vSyXm2ynhcmZcaU4IzGmnOptrrgUEpnOXe6lCCdMrVEw3Rh9FaovMBpPNcWcym0UA6wWJC739w-dF8DxlQdfLTYNNBiN8RKlVoIU_JJeHsSDtsDuqoP_gBhrP4-LX4AaPd6yA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67844971</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prognostic factors after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in cervical cancers. A retrospective analysis of 298 patients after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Hänsgen, Gabriele ; Richter, Konstanze ; Gerlach, Reinhard ; Kuhnt, Thomas ; Dunst, Jürgen</creator><creatorcontrib>Hänsgen, Gabriele ; Richter, Konstanze ; Gerlach, Reinhard ; Kuhnt, Thomas ; Dunst, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><description>To determine prognostic factors in patients with cervical cancer treated with surgery followed by radiotherapy.
In a retrospective analysis, patients treated at the Department of Radiotherapy, University of Halle-Wittenberg, Germany, from 1980 through 1993 were evaluated for local control, survival and treatment sequelae with special emphasis on prognostic factors. 298 patients (age 23-81 years, median 46 years) with cervical cancers were treated with surgery followed by radiotherapy to a minimum of 50 Gy. 250 patients received radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy and 48 patients after hysterectomy. Most of the cancers were squamous cell carcinomas (81%) with few adenocarcinomas (12.4%). Grading was G1/G2 in 28.9% of the patients and G3/G4 in 39.6%.
The 5-year overall survival was 68.8% for the whole group, 70.5% for squamous cell carcinomas (n = 241), 64.4% for adenocarcinomas (n = 37; not significant), 80% for G1/G2 tumors (n = 86), and 69% for G3/G4 carcinomas (n = 118; p = 0.074). Survival dependent on tumor size and positive nodes was 76.2% (n = 94) for pT1N0, 65.8% for pT1N+ (n = 31), 68.2% for pT2N0 (n = 62), and 41.4% for pT2N+ (n = 35). An impact of grading on 5-year survival was only found in patients with positive nodes: G1/G2N0 84% (n = 62) versus G1/G2N+ 64.8% (n = 23); G3/G4N0 79.6% (n = 71) versus G3/G4N+ 39.9% (n = 31). The number of positive nodes was the strongest prognostic factor. Multivariate analysis (Cox regression) established a risk factor of 3.06 (p < 0.01) for positive nodes, of 1.7 for grading G1/G2 versus G3/G4 (p = 0.087), and of 1.3 for tumor size (pT1 vs. pT2; p = 0.079). There were no differences in the clinical outcome between patients in stage pT1 with or without lymphadenectomy (75% [n = 130] vs. 79% [n = 39]).
In patients with cervical cancers treated with surgery and radiotherapy, positive nodes were an independent prognostic factor for local control and survival and should be an indication for additional chemotherapy. A value of lymphadenectomy for survival in this group of irradiated patients could not be established.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0179-7158</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00066-005-1281-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15900424</identifier><language>ger</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - mortality ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</subject><ispartof>Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2005-05, Vol.181 (5), p.285-292</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15900424$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hänsgen, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Konstanze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerlach, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhnt, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunst, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><title>Prognostic factors after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in cervical cancers. A retrospective analysis of 298 patients after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy</title><title>Strahlentherapie und Onkologie</title><addtitle>Strahlenther Onkol</addtitle><description>To determine prognostic factors in patients with cervical cancer treated with surgery followed by radiotherapy.
In a retrospective analysis, patients treated at the Department of Radiotherapy, University of Halle-Wittenberg, Germany, from 1980 through 1993 were evaluated for local control, survival and treatment sequelae with special emphasis on prognostic factors. 298 patients (age 23-81 years, median 46 years) with cervical cancers were treated with surgery followed by radiotherapy to a minimum of 50 Gy. 250 patients received radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy and 48 patients after hysterectomy. Most of the cancers were squamous cell carcinomas (81%) with few adenocarcinomas (12.4%). Grading was G1/G2 in 28.9% of the patients and G3/G4 in 39.6%.
The 5-year overall survival was 68.8% for the whole group, 70.5% for squamous cell carcinomas (n = 241), 64.4% for adenocarcinomas (n = 37; not significant), 80% for G1/G2 tumors (n = 86), and 69% for G3/G4 carcinomas (n = 118; p = 0.074). Survival dependent on tumor size and positive nodes was 76.2% (n = 94) for pT1N0, 65.8% for pT1N+ (n = 31), 68.2% for pT2N0 (n = 62), and 41.4% for pT2N+ (n = 35). An impact of grading on 5-year survival was only found in patients with positive nodes: G1/G2N0 84% (n = 62) versus G1/G2N+ 64.8% (n = 23); G3/G4N0 79.6% (n = 71) versus G3/G4N+ 39.9% (n = 31). The number of positive nodes was the strongest prognostic factor. Multivariate analysis (Cox regression) established a risk factor of 3.06 (p < 0.01) for positive nodes, of 1.7 for grading G1/G2 versus G3/G4 (p = 0.087), and of 1.3 for tumor size (pT1 vs. pT2; p = 0.079). There were no differences in the clinical outcome between patients in stage pT1 with or without lymphadenectomy (75% [n = 130] vs. 79% [n = 39]).
In patients with cervical cancers treated with surgery and radiotherapy, positive nodes were an independent prognostic factor for local control and survival and should be an indication for additional chemotherapy. A value of lymphadenectomy for survival in this group of irradiated patients could not be established.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</subject><issn>0179-7158</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUL1OwzAY9ACipfAALMgTW4qd2I49VhV_UiUYYI6-2l-KqzQJtlMpb8OjEomyM90N96M7Qm44W3LGyvvIGFMqY0xmPNc8y8_InPHSZCWXekYuY9wzxpUw4oLMuDSMiVzMyfdb6HZtF5O3tAabuhAp1AkDjUPYYRgptI6C2w9HaBMN4HyXPjFAP1LfUovh6C001EI78bikKxowhS72aJM_4mSHZow-0q6mudG0h-SxTf9uuSLnNTQRr0-4IB-PD-_r52zz-vSyXm2ynhcmZcaU4IzGmnOptrrgUEpnOXe6lCCdMrVEw3Rh9FaovMBpPNcWcym0UA6wWJC739w-dF8DxlQdfLTYNNBiN8RKlVoIU_JJeHsSDtsDuqoP_gBhrP4-LX4AaPd6yA</recordid><startdate>200505</startdate><enddate>200505</enddate><creator>Hänsgen, Gabriele</creator><creator>Richter, Konstanze</creator><creator>Gerlach, Reinhard</creator><creator>Kuhnt, Thomas</creator><creator>Dunst, Jürgen</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200505</creationdate><title>Prognostic factors after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in cervical cancers. A retrospective analysis of 298 patients after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy</title><author>Hänsgen, Gabriele ; Richter, Konstanze ; Gerlach, Reinhard ; Kuhnt, Thomas ; Dunst, Jürgen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p139t-997ad98ef1156b831a75dc11d875a5d69f5e908398b4623e42418ce254846dae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ger</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hänsgen, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Konstanze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerlach, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhnt, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunst, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Strahlentherapie und Onkologie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hänsgen, Gabriele</au><au>Richter, Konstanze</au><au>Gerlach, Reinhard</au><au>Kuhnt, Thomas</au><au>Dunst, Jürgen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prognostic factors after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in cervical cancers. A retrospective analysis of 298 patients after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy</atitle><jtitle>Strahlentherapie und Onkologie</jtitle><addtitle>Strahlenther Onkol</addtitle><date>2005-05</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>181</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>285</spage><epage>292</epage><pages>285-292</pages><issn>0179-7158</issn><abstract>To determine prognostic factors in patients with cervical cancer treated with surgery followed by radiotherapy.
In a retrospective analysis, patients treated at the Department of Radiotherapy, University of Halle-Wittenberg, Germany, from 1980 through 1993 were evaluated for local control, survival and treatment sequelae with special emphasis on prognostic factors. 298 patients (age 23-81 years, median 46 years) with cervical cancers were treated with surgery followed by radiotherapy to a minimum of 50 Gy. 250 patients received radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy and 48 patients after hysterectomy. Most of the cancers were squamous cell carcinomas (81%) with few adenocarcinomas (12.4%). Grading was G1/G2 in 28.9% of the patients and G3/G4 in 39.6%.
The 5-year overall survival was 68.8% for the whole group, 70.5% for squamous cell carcinomas (n = 241), 64.4% for adenocarcinomas (n = 37; not significant), 80% for G1/G2 tumors (n = 86), and 69% for G3/G4 carcinomas (n = 118; p = 0.074). Survival dependent on tumor size and positive nodes was 76.2% (n = 94) for pT1N0, 65.8% for pT1N+ (n = 31), 68.2% for pT2N0 (n = 62), and 41.4% for pT2N+ (n = 35). An impact of grading on 5-year survival was only found in patients with positive nodes: G1/G2N0 84% (n = 62) versus G1/G2N+ 64.8% (n = 23); G3/G4N0 79.6% (n = 71) versus G3/G4N+ 39.9% (n = 31). The number of positive nodes was the strongest prognostic factor. Multivariate analysis (Cox regression) established a risk factor of 3.06 (p < 0.01) for positive nodes, of 1.7 for grading G1/G2 versus G3/G4 (p = 0.087), and of 1.3 for tumor size (pT1 vs. pT2; p = 0.079). There were no differences in the clinical outcome between patients in stage pT1 with or without lymphadenectomy (75% [n = 130] vs. 79% [n = 39]).
In patients with cervical cancers treated with surgery and radiotherapy, positive nodes were an independent prognostic factor for local control and survival and should be an indication for additional chemotherapy. A value of lymphadenectomy for survival in this group of irradiated patients could not be established.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>15900424</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00066-005-1281-2</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0179-7158 |
ispartof | Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2005-05, Vol.181 (5), p.285-292 |
issn | 0179-7158 |
language | ger |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67844971 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Combined Modality Therapy Female Humans Middle Aged Neoplasm Staging Prognosis Retrospective Studies Survival Analysis Treatment Outcome Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - mortality Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - radiotherapy Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery |
title | Prognostic factors after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in cervical cancers. A retrospective analysis of 298 patients after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T00%3A26%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prognostic%20factors%20after%20surgery%20and%20adjuvant%20radiotherapy%20in%20cervical%20cancers.%20A%20retrospective%20analysis%20of%20298%20patients%20after%20surgery%20and%20adjuvant%20radiotherapy&rft.jtitle=Strahlentherapie%20und%20Onkologie&rft.au=H%C3%A4nsgen,%20Gabriele&rft.date=2005-05&rft.volume=181&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=292&rft.pages=285-292&rft.issn=0179-7158&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00066-005-1281-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67844971%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67844971&rft_id=info:pmid/15900424&rfr_iscdi=true |