Reevaluation of dominance hierarchy in bonobos (Pan paniscus)
While dominance relationships have been widely studied in chimpanzees, in bonobos, dominance style and linearity of hierarchy are still under debate. In fact, some authors stated that bonobo hierarchy is nonlinear/ill‐defined, while others claimed that it is fairly linear. In this paper, we test the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of physical anthropology 2006-05, Vol.130 (1), p.116-122 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 122 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 116 |
container_title | American journal of physical anthropology |
container_volume | 130 |
creator | Paoli, T. Palagi, E. Tarli, S.M. Borgognini |
description | While dominance relationships have been widely studied in chimpanzees, in bonobos, dominance style and linearity of hierarchy are still under debate. In fact, some authors stated that bonobo hierarchy is nonlinear/ill‐defined, while others claimed that it is fairly linear. In this paper, we test the hypothesis that a shift in group composition determines changes in linearity of hierarchy. To test this hypothesis, we collected data on one of the largest captive groups in the world, in the Apenheul Primate Park (The Netherlands). We investigated the linearity of the hierarchy in two different periods, with a shifting group composition. We used the corrected Landau's index and David's scores to estimate which animals were most dominant. The major overall result of our study is that hierarchy is fairly nonlinear in this group: during the first study period (eight adults), the hierarchy was nonlinear, whereas during the second one (six adults), it failed to reach statistical linearity. We argue that the reduction of the number of adults is the principal factor affecting linearity. We also found that dominance interactions were evenly distributed across sex classes in both study periods. Furthermore, no correlation was observed between age/body weight and rank. As for the overall dominance relationship between males and females, our results suggest that there is no exclusive female dominance in the Apenheul group. The dominance style of bonobos may be loose and differentially expressed in diverse groups or in the same group, along with shifting conditions. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2006. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ajpa.20345 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67841490</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>36458749</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4925-81b6b2fc542950fb02335604504e11a60a0de5612863b8d5ee5b4b554679817f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0MtKAzEUBuAgitbLxgeQ2SgqjOY-ycJF8S5FRRTFTUimGYxOJzXpqH17U1t1pxAIId85J_kBWEdwD0GI9_XzUO9hSCibAx0EJc8Fp3QedGC6zSUVZAksx_icjjytRbCEOGEEY9oBBzfWvum61SPnm8xXWd8PXKOb0mZPzgYdyqdx5prM-MYbH7Pta91kQ924WLZxZxUsVLqOdm22r4C7k-Pbw7O8d3V6ftjt5SWVmOUCGW5wVTKKJYOVgZgQxiFlkFqENIca9i3jCAtOjOgza5mhhjHKCylQUZEVsDXtOwz-tbVxpAbpAbaudWN9GxUvBEVUwn8h4ZSJgsoEd6ewDD7GYCs1DG6gw1ghqCapqkmq6ivVhDdmXVszsP1fOosxgc0Z0LHUdRVSgC7-uoJLwsTEoal7d7Ud_zFSdS-uu9_D82mNiyP78VOjw0v6NimYur88VRLfHvUeH84UJ599vpth</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>36458749</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reevaluation of dominance hierarchy in bonobos (Pan paniscus)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Paoli, T. ; Palagi, E. ; Tarli, S.M. Borgognini</creator><creatorcontrib>Paoli, T. ; Palagi, E. ; Tarli, S.M. Borgognini</creatorcontrib><description>While dominance relationships have been widely studied in chimpanzees, in bonobos, dominance style and linearity of hierarchy are still under debate. In fact, some authors stated that bonobo hierarchy is nonlinear/ill‐defined, while others claimed that it is fairly linear. In this paper, we test the hypothesis that a shift in group composition determines changes in linearity of hierarchy. To test this hypothesis, we collected data on one of the largest captive groups in the world, in the Apenheul Primate Park (The Netherlands). We investigated the linearity of the hierarchy in two different periods, with a shifting group composition. We used the corrected Landau's index and David's scores to estimate which animals were most dominant. The major overall result of our study is that hierarchy is fairly nonlinear in this group: during the first study period (eight adults), the hierarchy was nonlinear, whereas during the second one (six adults), it failed to reach statistical linearity. We argue that the reduction of the number of adults is the principal factor affecting linearity. We also found that dominance interactions were evenly distributed across sex classes in both study periods. Furthermore, no correlation was observed between age/body weight and rank. As for the overall dominance relationship between males and females, our results suggest that there is no exclusive female dominance in the Apenheul group. The dominance style of bonobos may be loose and differentially expressed in diverse groups or in the same group, along with shifting conditions. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2006. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-8644</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20345</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16353224</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>"egalitarian" society ; Age Factors ; Animals ; Body Size ; codominance ; Domination ; Egalitarianism ; Environmental studies ; Excavation and methods ; Fauna ; Female ; Hierarchy ; Hierarchy, Social ; Human paleontology ; Laboratory methods ; Male ; Mankind origin and evolution ; Methodology and general studies ; Models, Theoretical ; Pan paniscus ; Physical and chemical analysis ; Physical anthropology ; Prehistory and protohistory ; Primatology ; rank order linearity ; Scientific research ; Sex Factors ; Sexual Behavior, Animal ; Social structure ; Society</subject><ispartof>American journal of physical anthropology, 2006-05, Vol.130 (1), p.116-122</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4925-81b6b2fc542950fb02335604504e11a60a0de5612863b8d5ee5b4b554679817f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4925-81b6b2fc542950fb02335604504e11a60a0de5612863b8d5ee5b4b554679817f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fajpa.20345$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fajpa.20345$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17693584$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16353224$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paoli, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palagi, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarli, S.M. Borgognini</creatorcontrib><title>Reevaluation of dominance hierarchy in bonobos (Pan paniscus)</title><title>American journal of physical anthropology</title><addtitle>Am. J. Phys. Anthropol</addtitle><description>While dominance relationships have been widely studied in chimpanzees, in bonobos, dominance style and linearity of hierarchy are still under debate. In fact, some authors stated that bonobo hierarchy is nonlinear/ill‐defined, while others claimed that it is fairly linear. In this paper, we test the hypothesis that a shift in group composition determines changes in linearity of hierarchy. To test this hypothesis, we collected data on one of the largest captive groups in the world, in the Apenheul Primate Park (The Netherlands). We investigated the linearity of the hierarchy in two different periods, with a shifting group composition. We used the corrected Landau's index and David's scores to estimate which animals were most dominant. The major overall result of our study is that hierarchy is fairly nonlinear in this group: during the first study period (eight adults), the hierarchy was nonlinear, whereas during the second one (six adults), it failed to reach statistical linearity. We argue that the reduction of the number of adults is the principal factor affecting linearity. We also found that dominance interactions were evenly distributed across sex classes in both study periods. Furthermore, no correlation was observed between age/body weight and rank. As for the overall dominance relationship between males and females, our results suggest that there is no exclusive female dominance in the Apenheul group. The dominance style of bonobos may be loose and differentially expressed in diverse groups or in the same group, along with shifting conditions. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2006. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>"egalitarian" society</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Body Size</subject><subject>codominance</subject><subject>Domination</subject><subject>Egalitarianism</subject><subject>Environmental studies</subject><subject>Excavation and methods</subject><subject>Fauna</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hierarchy</subject><subject>Hierarchy, Social</subject><subject>Human paleontology</subject><subject>Laboratory methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mankind origin and evolution</subject><subject>Methodology and general studies</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Pan paniscus</subject><subject>Physical and chemical analysis</subject><subject>Physical anthropology</subject><subject>Prehistory and protohistory</subject><subject>Primatology</subject><subject>rank order linearity</subject><subject>Scientific research</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Social structure</subject><subject>Society</subject><issn>0002-9483</issn><issn>1096-8644</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0MtKAzEUBuAgitbLxgeQ2SgqjOY-ycJF8S5FRRTFTUimGYxOJzXpqH17U1t1pxAIId85J_kBWEdwD0GI9_XzUO9hSCibAx0EJc8Fp3QedGC6zSUVZAksx_icjjytRbCEOGEEY9oBBzfWvum61SPnm8xXWd8PXKOb0mZPzgYdyqdx5prM-MYbH7Pta91kQ924WLZxZxUsVLqOdm22r4C7k-Pbw7O8d3V6ftjt5SWVmOUCGW5wVTKKJYOVgZgQxiFlkFqENIca9i3jCAtOjOgza5mhhjHKCylQUZEVsDXtOwz-tbVxpAbpAbaudWN9GxUvBEVUwn8h4ZSJgsoEd6ewDD7GYCs1DG6gw1ghqCapqkmq6ivVhDdmXVszsP1fOosxgc0Z0LHUdRVSgC7-uoJLwsTEoal7d7Ud_zFSdS-uu9_D82mNiyP78VOjw0v6NimYur88VRLfHvUeH84UJ599vpth</recordid><startdate>200605</startdate><enddate>200605</enddate><creator>Paoli, T.</creator><creator>Palagi, E.</creator><creator>Tarli, S.M. Borgognini</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200605</creationdate><title>Reevaluation of dominance hierarchy in bonobos (Pan paniscus)</title><author>Paoli, T. ; Palagi, E. ; Tarli, S.M. Borgognini</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4925-81b6b2fc542950fb02335604504e11a60a0de5612863b8d5ee5b4b554679817f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>"egalitarian" society</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Body Size</topic><topic>codominance</topic><topic>Domination</topic><topic>Egalitarianism</topic><topic>Environmental studies</topic><topic>Excavation and methods</topic><topic>Fauna</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hierarchy</topic><topic>Hierarchy, Social</topic><topic>Human paleontology</topic><topic>Laboratory methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mankind origin and evolution</topic><topic>Methodology and general studies</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Pan paniscus</topic><topic>Physical and chemical analysis</topic><topic>Physical anthropology</topic><topic>Prehistory and protohistory</topic><topic>Primatology</topic><topic>rank order linearity</topic><topic>Scientific research</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Social structure</topic><topic>Society</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paoli, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palagi, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarli, S.M. Borgognini</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of physical anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paoli, T.</au><au>Palagi, E.</au><au>Tarli, S.M. Borgognini</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reevaluation of dominance hierarchy in bonobos (Pan paniscus)</atitle><jtitle>American journal of physical anthropology</jtitle><addtitle>Am. J. Phys. Anthropol</addtitle><date>2006-05</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>116-122</pages><issn>0002-9483</issn><eissn>1096-8644</eissn><abstract>While dominance relationships have been widely studied in chimpanzees, in bonobos, dominance style and linearity of hierarchy are still under debate. In fact, some authors stated that bonobo hierarchy is nonlinear/ill‐defined, while others claimed that it is fairly linear. In this paper, we test the hypothesis that a shift in group composition determines changes in linearity of hierarchy. To test this hypothesis, we collected data on one of the largest captive groups in the world, in the Apenheul Primate Park (The Netherlands). We investigated the linearity of the hierarchy in two different periods, with a shifting group composition. We used the corrected Landau's index and David's scores to estimate which animals were most dominant. The major overall result of our study is that hierarchy is fairly nonlinear in this group: during the first study period (eight adults), the hierarchy was nonlinear, whereas during the second one (six adults), it failed to reach statistical linearity. We argue that the reduction of the number of adults is the principal factor affecting linearity. We also found that dominance interactions were evenly distributed across sex classes in both study periods. Furthermore, no correlation was observed between age/body weight and rank. As for the overall dominance relationship between males and females, our results suggest that there is no exclusive female dominance in the Apenheul group. The dominance style of bonobos may be loose and differentially expressed in diverse groups or in the same group, along with shifting conditions. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2006. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>16353224</pmid><doi>10.1002/ajpa.20345</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9483 |
ispartof | American journal of physical anthropology, 2006-05, Vol.130 (1), p.116-122 |
issn | 0002-9483 1096-8644 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67841490 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | "egalitarian" society Age Factors Animals Body Size codominance Domination Egalitarianism Environmental studies Excavation and methods Fauna Female Hierarchy Hierarchy, Social Human paleontology Laboratory methods Male Mankind origin and evolution Methodology and general studies Models, Theoretical Pan paniscus Physical and chemical analysis Physical anthropology Prehistory and protohistory Primatology rank order linearity Scientific research Sex Factors Sexual Behavior, Animal Social structure Society |
title | Reevaluation of dominance hierarchy in bonobos (Pan paniscus) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T16%3A32%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reevaluation%20of%20dominance%20hierarchy%20in%20bonobos%20(Pan%20paniscus)&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20physical%20anthropology&rft.au=Paoli,%20T.&rft.date=2006-05&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=116-122&rft.issn=0002-9483&rft.eissn=1096-8644&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ajpa.20345&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E36458749%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=36458749&rft_id=info:pmid/16353224&rfr_iscdi=true |