How to define a Minimal Clinically Individual State (MCIS) with pain VAS in daily practice for patients suffering from musculoskeletal disorders

Pain is frequently the primary variable in symptomatic clinical trials for the evaluation of rheumatological disorders. The protocol of such trials mention a minimum level of pain as an entry criterion [e.g. a level above the Patient Acceptable Symptoms State (PASS)] and the changes in pain as the p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical and experimental rheumatology 2005-03, Vol.23 (2), p.235-238
Hauptverfasser: Falgarone, G, Zerkak, D, Bauer, C, Messow, M, Dougados, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 238
container_issue 2
container_start_page 235
container_title Clinical and experimental rheumatology
container_volume 23
creator Falgarone, G
Zerkak, D
Bauer, C
Messow, M
Dougados, M
description Pain is frequently the primary variable in symptomatic clinical trials for the evaluation of rheumatological disorders. The protocol of such trials mention a minimum level of pain as an entry criterion [e.g. a level above the Patient Acceptable Symptoms State (PASS)] and the changes in pain as the primary variable. Usually, the results are expressed at a group level as the mean changes in pain. However, the presentation at an individual level and, in particular, the percentage of patients with a Low Disease Activity State at the end of the study seems more clinically relevant. Pain is usually evaluated using a continuous variable such as a 0-100 visual analogue scale. The cut-offs permitting one to define both the entry criterion and the LDAS are not well established. The objective of this study was to evaluate such cut-offs using a patient-derived perspective. cross-sectional study. consecutive out patients suffering from chronic rheumatic diseases familiar with the use of a VAS to evaluate their level of pain. two questions were asked the patients at the end of the visit: "Based on the experience you have because of your chronic rheumatic disorder, could you please specify the level of pain below which you consider your disease as inactive ? Moreover, could you please also specify the level of pain above which you consider taking a pain killer?" Before answering the second question, it was explained to the patient that their answer to the second question could be similar to their response to the first one. For the two questions, the cumulative percentage of patients (disease inactive and pain killer intake) were calculated for each level of pain. The underlying disease of the 137 evaluated patients (mean age: 57+/-16 and female sex: 76%) was rheumatoid arthritis (n = 59), ankylosing spondylitis (n = 19), SLE (n = 2), back pain (n = 20), or peripheral osteoarthritis (n = 37). The mean disease duration was 12+/-10 years. At the time of the study, the current level of pain evaluated on a 0-100 VAS was 33+/-22. The LDAS was 49, 36 and 25 for our patient population at the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles, respectively. The pain killer intake level was 32, 48, 64 at the 25th, 50th, 75th percentile respectively. This study suggests that LDAS and PASS may be distinct concepts. The methodological approach adopted here could be of interest for specifying the minimum level of symptoms at entry in a symptomatic trial (PASS) and also to present results in terms of the
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67833213</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67833213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p139t-ac1760a907935363666ca816b5e01f31efaf6655550c82a0197fd76ba1b860013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kM1OwzAQhHMA0VJ4BeQTgkMkO1ac5FhFQCu14lBA3CLHXoPBiYN_qPoWPDKWKKuVZrT7aQ5zks0xbYq8LtnrLDv3_gPjgpWsOstmpKybtGye_azsHgWLJCg9AuJoq0c9cINak4zgxhzQepT6W8uYrrvAA6Cbbbve3aK9Du9o4npEL8sdSiK5TvjkuAhaAFLWpXfQMAaPfFQKnB7fkHJ2QEP0IhrrP8FASMFSe-skOH-RnSpuPFwedZE93989tat88_iwbpebfCK0CTkXpGKYN7hqaEkZZYwJXhPWl4CJogQUV4yVabCoC45JUylZsZ6TvmYYE7rIrv9yJ2e_IvjQDdoLMIaPYKPvWFVTWhCawKsjGPsBZDe51I87dP8d0l8q9G2t</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67833213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How to define a Minimal Clinically Individual State (MCIS) with pain VAS in daily practice for patients suffering from musculoskeletal disorders</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Falgarone, G ; Zerkak, D ; Bauer, C ; Messow, M ; Dougados, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Falgarone, G ; Zerkak, D ; Bauer, C ; Messow, M ; Dougados, M</creatorcontrib><description>Pain is frequently the primary variable in symptomatic clinical trials for the evaluation of rheumatological disorders. The protocol of such trials mention a minimum level of pain as an entry criterion [e.g. a level above the Patient Acceptable Symptoms State (PASS)] and the changes in pain as the primary variable. Usually, the results are expressed at a group level as the mean changes in pain. However, the presentation at an individual level and, in particular, the percentage of patients with a Low Disease Activity State at the end of the study seems more clinically relevant. Pain is usually evaluated using a continuous variable such as a 0-100 visual analogue scale. The cut-offs permitting one to define both the entry criterion and the LDAS are not well established. The objective of this study was to evaluate such cut-offs using a patient-derived perspective. cross-sectional study. consecutive out patients suffering from chronic rheumatic diseases familiar with the use of a VAS to evaluate their level of pain. two questions were asked the patients at the end of the visit: "Based on the experience you have because of your chronic rheumatic disorder, could you please specify the level of pain below which you consider your disease as inactive ? Moreover, could you please also specify the level of pain above which you consider taking a pain killer?" Before answering the second question, it was explained to the patient that their answer to the second question could be similar to their response to the first one. For the two questions, the cumulative percentage of patients (disease inactive and pain killer intake) were calculated for each level of pain. The underlying disease of the 137 evaluated patients (mean age: 57+/-16 and female sex: 76%) was rheumatoid arthritis (n = 59), ankylosing spondylitis (n = 19), SLE (n = 2), back pain (n = 20), or peripheral osteoarthritis (n = 37). The mean disease duration was 12+/-10 years. At the time of the study, the current level of pain evaluated on a 0-100 VAS was 33+/-22. The LDAS was 49, 36 and 25 for our patient population at the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles, respectively. The pain killer intake level was 32, 48, 64 at the 25th, 50th, 75th percentile respectively. This study suggests that LDAS and PASS may be distinct concepts. The methodological approach adopted here could be of interest for specifying the minimum level of symptoms at entry in a symptomatic trial (PASS) and also to present results in terms of the percentage of patients in good condition (LDAS) at the end of a trial.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0392-856X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15895896</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy</publisher><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - complications ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - physiopathology ; Clinical Trials as Topic - methods ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Health Status Indicators ; Humans ; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - complications ; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Musculoskeletal Diseases - complications ; Musculoskeletal Diseases - physiopathology ; Pain - etiology ; Pain - physiopathology ; Pain Measurement ; Severity of Illness Index ; Spondylarthropathies - complications ; Spondylarthropathies - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Clinical and experimental rheumatology, 2005-03, Vol.23 (2), p.235-238</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15895896$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Falgarone, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zerkak, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messow, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dougados, M</creatorcontrib><title>How to define a Minimal Clinically Individual State (MCIS) with pain VAS in daily practice for patients suffering from musculoskeletal disorders</title><title>Clinical and experimental rheumatology</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Rheumatol</addtitle><description>Pain is frequently the primary variable in symptomatic clinical trials for the evaluation of rheumatological disorders. The protocol of such trials mention a minimum level of pain as an entry criterion [e.g. a level above the Patient Acceptable Symptoms State (PASS)] and the changes in pain as the primary variable. Usually, the results are expressed at a group level as the mean changes in pain. However, the presentation at an individual level and, in particular, the percentage of patients with a Low Disease Activity State at the end of the study seems more clinically relevant. Pain is usually evaluated using a continuous variable such as a 0-100 visual analogue scale. The cut-offs permitting one to define both the entry criterion and the LDAS are not well established. The objective of this study was to evaluate such cut-offs using a patient-derived perspective. cross-sectional study. consecutive out patients suffering from chronic rheumatic diseases familiar with the use of a VAS to evaluate their level of pain. two questions were asked the patients at the end of the visit: "Based on the experience you have because of your chronic rheumatic disorder, could you please specify the level of pain below which you consider your disease as inactive ? Moreover, could you please also specify the level of pain above which you consider taking a pain killer?" Before answering the second question, it was explained to the patient that their answer to the second question could be similar to their response to the first one. For the two questions, the cumulative percentage of patients (disease inactive and pain killer intake) were calculated for each level of pain. The underlying disease of the 137 evaluated patients (mean age: 57+/-16 and female sex: 76%) was rheumatoid arthritis (n = 59), ankylosing spondylitis (n = 19), SLE (n = 2), back pain (n = 20), or peripheral osteoarthritis (n = 37). The mean disease duration was 12+/-10 years. At the time of the study, the current level of pain evaluated on a 0-100 VAS was 33+/-22. The LDAS was 49, 36 and 25 for our patient population at the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles, respectively. The pain killer intake level was 32, 48, 64 at the 25th, 50th, 75th percentile respectively. This study suggests that LDAS and PASS may be distinct concepts. The methodological approach adopted here could be of interest for specifying the minimum level of symptoms at entry in a symptomatic trial (PASS) and also to present results in terms of the percentage of patients in good condition (LDAS) at the end of a trial.</description><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - complications</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - physiopathology</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Status Indicators</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - complications</subject><subject>Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - physiopathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Spondylarthropathies - complications</subject><subject>Spondylarthropathies - physiopathology</subject><issn>0392-856X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kM1OwzAQhHMA0VJ4BeQTgkMkO1ac5FhFQCu14lBA3CLHXoPBiYN_qPoWPDKWKKuVZrT7aQ5zks0xbYq8LtnrLDv3_gPjgpWsOstmpKybtGye_azsHgWLJCg9AuJoq0c9cINak4zgxhzQepT6W8uYrrvAA6Cbbbve3aK9Du9o4npEL8sdSiK5TvjkuAhaAFLWpXfQMAaPfFQKnB7fkHJ2QEP0IhrrP8FASMFSe-skOH-RnSpuPFwedZE93989tat88_iwbpebfCK0CTkXpGKYN7hqaEkZZYwJXhPWl4CJogQUV4yVabCoC45JUylZsZ6TvmYYE7rIrv9yJ2e_IvjQDdoLMIaPYKPvWFVTWhCawKsjGPsBZDe51I87dP8d0l8q9G2t</recordid><startdate>200503</startdate><enddate>200503</enddate><creator>Falgarone, G</creator><creator>Zerkak, D</creator><creator>Bauer, C</creator><creator>Messow, M</creator><creator>Dougados, M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200503</creationdate><title>How to define a Minimal Clinically Individual State (MCIS) with pain VAS in daily practice for patients suffering from musculoskeletal disorders</title><author>Falgarone, G ; Zerkak, D ; Bauer, C ; Messow, M ; Dougados, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p139t-ac1760a907935363666ca816b5e01f31efaf6655550c82a0197fd76ba1b860013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - complications</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - physiopathology</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Status Indicators</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - complications</topic><topic>Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - physiopathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Spondylarthropathies - complications</topic><topic>Spondylarthropathies - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Falgarone, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zerkak, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messow, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dougados, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical and experimental rheumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Falgarone, G</au><au>Zerkak, D</au><au>Bauer, C</au><au>Messow, M</au><au>Dougados, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How to define a Minimal Clinically Individual State (MCIS) with pain VAS in daily practice for patients suffering from musculoskeletal disorders</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and experimental rheumatology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Rheumatol</addtitle><date>2005-03</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>238</epage><pages>235-238</pages><issn>0392-856X</issn><abstract>Pain is frequently the primary variable in symptomatic clinical trials for the evaluation of rheumatological disorders. The protocol of such trials mention a minimum level of pain as an entry criterion [e.g. a level above the Patient Acceptable Symptoms State (PASS)] and the changes in pain as the primary variable. Usually, the results are expressed at a group level as the mean changes in pain. However, the presentation at an individual level and, in particular, the percentage of patients with a Low Disease Activity State at the end of the study seems more clinically relevant. Pain is usually evaluated using a continuous variable such as a 0-100 visual analogue scale. The cut-offs permitting one to define both the entry criterion and the LDAS are not well established. The objective of this study was to evaluate such cut-offs using a patient-derived perspective. cross-sectional study. consecutive out patients suffering from chronic rheumatic diseases familiar with the use of a VAS to evaluate their level of pain. two questions were asked the patients at the end of the visit: "Based on the experience you have because of your chronic rheumatic disorder, could you please specify the level of pain below which you consider your disease as inactive ? Moreover, could you please also specify the level of pain above which you consider taking a pain killer?" Before answering the second question, it was explained to the patient that their answer to the second question could be similar to their response to the first one. For the two questions, the cumulative percentage of patients (disease inactive and pain killer intake) were calculated for each level of pain. The underlying disease of the 137 evaluated patients (mean age: 57+/-16 and female sex: 76%) was rheumatoid arthritis (n = 59), ankylosing spondylitis (n = 19), SLE (n = 2), back pain (n = 20), or peripheral osteoarthritis (n = 37). The mean disease duration was 12+/-10 years. At the time of the study, the current level of pain evaluated on a 0-100 VAS was 33+/-22. The LDAS was 49, 36 and 25 for our patient population at the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles, respectively. The pain killer intake level was 32, 48, 64 at the 25th, 50th, 75th percentile respectively. This study suggests that LDAS and PASS may be distinct concepts. The methodological approach adopted here could be of interest for specifying the minimum level of symptoms at entry in a symptomatic trial (PASS) and also to present results in terms of the percentage of patients in good condition (LDAS) at the end of a trial.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pmid>15895896</pmid><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0392-856X
ispartof Clinical and experimental rheumatology, 2005-03, Vol.23 (2), p.235-238
issn 0392-856X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67833213
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Arthritis, Rheumatoid - complications
Arthritis, Rheumatoid - physiopathology
Clinical Trials as Topic - methods
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Health Status Indicators
Humans
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - complications
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - physiopathology
Male
Middle Aged
Musculoskeletal Diseases - complications
Musculoskeletal Diseases - physiopathology
Pain - etiology
Pain - physiopathology
Pain Measurement
Severity of Illness Index
Spondylarthropathies - complications
Spondylarthropathies - physiopathology
title How to define a Minimal Clinically Individual State (MCIS) with pain VAS in daily practice for patients suffering from musculoskeletal disorders
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T06%3A33%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20to%20define%20a%20Minimal%20Clinically%20Individual%20State%20(MCIS)%20with%20pain%20VAS%20in%20daily%20practice%20for%20patients%20suffering%20from%20musculoskeletal%20disorders&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20experimental%20rheumatology&rft.au=Falgarone,%20G&rft.date=2005-03&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=238&rft.pages=235-238&rft.issn=0392-856X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E67833213%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67833213&rft_id=info:pmid/15895896&rfr_iscdi=true