Guided tissue regeneration enhances bone formation in a rat model of failed osteogenesis
Guided tissue regeneration is a technique that uses barrier materials to enhance tissue regeneration. Although previously demonstrated to be an effective way of enhancing craniofacial osteogenesis in several animal models, the ability of guided tissue regeneration to augment bone formation in the co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2006-04, Vol.117 (4), p.1177-1185 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1185 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1177 |
container_title | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) |
container_volume | 117 |
creator | FANG, Tony D NACAMULI, Randall P SONG, Han Joon M FONG, Kenton D SHI, Yun-Ymg LONGAKER, Michael T |
description | Guided tissue regeneration is a technique that uses barrier materials to enhance tissue regeneration. Although previously demonstrated to be an effective way of enhancing craniofacial osteogenesis in several animal models, the ability of guided tissue regeneration to augment bone formation in the context of distraction osteogenesis is unknown. In the current study, the authors applied the principle of guided tissue regeneration to their rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis model in an attempt to enhance bone regeneration.
Twelve (n = 6 per group) adult Sprague-Dawley rats underwent routine gradual distraction (5 days' latency, 4-mm distraction over 8 days, 4 to 6 weeks of consolidation) and acute distraction (immediate lengthening to 4 mm, 6 to 8 weeks of consolidation). An additional 10 animals underwent acute distraction followed by application of bioabsorbable Gore Resolut XT membranes (acute distraction plus guided tissue regeneration). Membranes were completely wrapped around the distraction gap. Animals were killed 6 and 8 weeks postoperatively and mandibles analyzed radiographically and histologically.
Quantitative histomorphometric analyses were performed to compare relative bone formation between all three groups. Gradual distraction mandibles achieved bony union by 6 weeks with 86 percent bone formation, which increased to 98 percent by 8 weeks. Acute distraction mandibles healed with a fibrous nonunion and only 37 percent bone formation by 8 weeks. In contrast, acute distraction plus guided tissue regeneration-treated mandibles formed significantly more bone than acute distraction mandibles by 6 weeks (57 percent) and achieved bony bridging by 8 weeks, with 88 percent new bone formation.
The authors' data demonstrate that guided tissue regeneration can significantly enhance bone formation in a fibrous nonunion model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/01.prs.0000204581.59190.53 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67824761</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67824761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-549d6996cf1d20d809579ecf6afb450dadcb484ec58bce4d64e7452b5f9538db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE2LFDEQhoMo7uzqX5Ag6K3bJJ1Pb7LorrDgRcFbk04qGunujKnug_9-s87A1KWgeOqt4iHkLWc9Z858YLw_VuxZK8GksrxXjjvWq-EZOXAlXCeFFM_JgbFBdJwpcUWuEf8wxs2g1UtyxbWywlh5ID_v9hwh0i0j7kAr_IIVqt9yWSmsv_0aAOlUVqCp1OU0zyv1tDF0KRFmWhJNPs8tpOAG5SkAM74iL5KfEV6f-w358eXz99v77uHb3dfbTw9dGKTZOiVd1M7pkHgULFrmlHEQkvZpkopFH8MkrYSg7BRARi3BSCUmlZwabJyGG_L-lHus5e8OuI1LxgDz7FcoO47aWCGN5g38eAJDLYgV0nisefH138jZ-OR1ZLyNcLx4Hf97HdXQlt-cr-zTAvGyehbZgHdnwGPwc6rNXMYLZ7SWtr38CDfggyY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67824761</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Guided tissue regeneration enhances bone formation in a rat model of failed osteogenesis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>FANG, Tony D ; NACAMULI, Randall P ; SONG, Han Joon M ; FONG, Kenton D ; SHI, Yun-Ymg ; LONGAKER, Michael T</creator><creatorcontrib>FANG, Tony D ; NACAMULI, Randall P ; SONG, Han Joon M ; FONG, Kenton D ; SHI, Yun-Ymg ; LONGAKER, Michael T</creatorcontrib><description>Guided tissue regeneration is a technique that uses barrier materials to enhance tissue regeneration. Although previously demonstrated to be an effective way of enhancing craniofacial osteogenesis in several animal models, the ability of guided tissue regeneration to augment bone formation in the context of distraction osteogenesis is unknown. In the current study, the authors applied the principle of guided tissue regeneration to their rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis model in an attempt to enhance bone regeneration.
Twelve (n = 6 per group) adult Sprague-Dawley rats underwent routine gradual distraction (5 days' latency, 4-mm distraction over 8 days, 4 to 6 weeks of consolidation) and acute distraction (immediate lengthening to 4 mm, 6 to 8 weeks of consolidation). An additional 10 animals underwent acute distraction followed by application of bioabsorbable Gore Resolut XT membranes (acute distraction plus guided tissue regeneration). Membranes were completely wrapped around the distraction gap. Animals were killed 6 and 8 weeks postoperatively and mandibles analyzed radiographically and histologically.
Quantitative histomorphometric analyses were performed to compare relative bone formation between all three groups. Gradual distraction mandibles achieved bony union by 6 weeks with 86 percent bone formation, which increased to 98 percent by 8 weeks. Acute distraction mandibles healed with a fibrous nonunion and only 37 percent bone formation by 8 weeks. In contrast, acute distraction plus guided tissue regeneration-treated mandibles formed significantly more bone than acute distraction mandibles by 6 weeks (57 percent) and achieved bony bridging by 8 weeks, with 88 percent new bone formation.
The authors' data demonstrate that guided tissue regeneration can significantly enhance bone formation in a fibrous nonunion model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000204581.59190.53</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16582784</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Regeneration ; Cell physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Guided Tissue Regeneration ; Mandible - diagnostic imaging ; Mandible - surgery ; Medical sciences ; Mineralization, calcification ; Molecular and cellular biology ; Osteogenesis, Distraction ; Prostheses and Implants ; Radiography ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Skeleton and joints ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2006-04, Vol.117 (4), p.1177-1185</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-549d6996cf1d20d809579ecf6afb450dadcb484ec58bce4d64e7452b5f9538db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-549d6996cf1d20d809579ecf6afb450dadcb484ec58bce4d64e7452b5f9538db3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17664895$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16582784$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FANG, Tony D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NACAMULI, Randall P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SONG, Han Joon M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FONG, Kenton D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHI, Yun-Ymg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LONGAKER, Michael T</creatorcontrib><title>Guided tissue regeneration enhances bone formation in a rat model of failed osteogenesis</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>Guided tissue regeneration is a technique that uses barrier materials to enhance tissue regeneration. Although previously demonstrated to be an effective way of enhancing craniofacial osteogenesis in several animal models, the ability of guided tissue regeneration to augment bone formation in the context of distraction osteogenesis is unknown. In the current study, the authors applied the principle of guided tissue regeneration to their rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis model in an attempt to enhance bone regeneration.
Twelve (n = 6 per group) adult Sprague-Dawley rats underwent routine gradual distraction (5 days' latency, 4-mm distraction over 8 days, 4 to 6 weeks of consolidation) and acute distraction (immediate lengthening to 4 mm, 6 to 8 weeks of consolidation). An additional 10 animals underwent acute distraction followed by application of bioabsorbable Gore Resolut XT membranes (acute distraction plus guided tissue regeneration). Membranes were completely wrapped around the distraction gap. Animals were killed 6 and 8 weeks postoperatively and mandibles analyzed radiographically and histologically.
Quantitative histomorphometric analyses were performed to compare relative bone formation between all three groups. Gradual distraction mandibles achieved bony union by 6 weeks with 86 percent bone formation, which increased to 98 percent by 8 weeks. Acute distraction mandibles healed with a fibrous nonunion and only 37 percent bone formation by 8 weeks. In contrast, acute distraction plus guided tissue regeneration-treated mandibles formed significantly more bone than acute distraction mandibles by 6 weeks (57 percent) and achieved bony bridging by 8 weeks, with 88 percent new bone formation.
The authors' data demonstrate that guided tissue regeneration can significantly enhance bone formation in a fibrous nonunion model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration</subject><subject>Cell physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Guided Tissue Regeneration</subject><subject>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mandible - surgery</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mineralization, calcification</subject><subject>Molecular and cellular biology</subject><subject>Osteogenesis, Distraction</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>Skeleton and joints</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE2LFDEQhoMo7uzqX5Ag6K3bJJ1Pb7LorrDgRcFbk04qGunujKnug_9-s87A1KWgeOqt4iHkLWc9Z858YLw_VuxZK8GksrxXjjvWq-EZOXAlXCeFFM_JgbFBdJwpcUWuEf8wxs2g1UtyxbWywlh5ID_v9hwh0i0j7kAr_IIVqt9yWSmsv_0aAOlUVqCp1OU0zyv1tDF0KRFmWhJNPs8tpOAG5SkAM74iL5KfEV6f-w358eXz99v77uHb3dfbTw9dGKTZOiVd1M7pkHgULFrmlHEQkvZpkopFH8MkrYSg7BRARi3BSCUmlZwabJyGG_L-lHus5e8OuI1LxgDz7FcoO47aWCGN5g38eAJDLYgV0nisefH138jZ-OR1ZLyNcLx4Hf97HdXQlt-cr-zTAvGyehbZgHdnwGPwc6rNXMYLZ7SWtr38CDfggyY</recordid><startdate>20060401</startdate><enddate>20060401</enddate><creator>FANG, Tony D</creator><creator>NACAMULI, Randall P</creator><creator>SONG, Han Joon M</creator><creator>FONG, Kenton D</creator><creator>SHI, Yun-Ymg</creator><creator>LONGAKER, Michael T</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060401</creationdate><title>Guided tissue regeneration enhances bone formation in a rat model of failed osteogenesis</title><author>FANG, Tony D ; NACAMULI, Randall P ; SONG, Han Joon M ; FONG, Kenton D ; SHI, Yun-Ymg ; LONGAKER, Michael T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-549d6996cf1d20d809579ecf6afb450dadcb484ec58bce4d64e7452b5f9538db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration</topic><topic>Cell physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Guided Tissue Regeneration</topic><topic>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mandible - surgery</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mineralization, calcification</topic><topic>Molecular and cellular biology</topic><topic>Osteogenesis, Distraction</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>Skeleton and joints</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FANG, Tony D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NACAMULI, Randall P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SONG, Han Joon M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FONG, Kenton D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHI, Yun-Ymg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LONGAKER, Michael T</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FANG, Tony D</au><au>NACAMULI, Randall P</au><au>SONG, Han Joon M</au><au>FONG, Kenton D</au><au>SHI, Yun-Ymg</au><au>LONGAKER, Michael T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Guided tissue regeneration enhances bone formation in a rat model of failed osteogenesis</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2006-04-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1177</spage><epage>1185</epage><pages>1177-1185</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>Guided tissue regeneration is a technique that uses barrier materials to enhance tissue regeneration. Although previously demonstrated to be an effective way of enhancing craniofacial osteogenesis in several animal models, the ability of guided tissue regeneration to augment bone formation in the context of distraction osteogenesis is unknown. In the current study, the authors applied the principle of guided tissue regeneration to their rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis model in an attempt to enhance bone regeneration.
Twelve (n = 6 per group) adult Sprague-Dawley rats underwent routine gradual distraction (5 days' latency, 4-mm distraction over 8 days, 4 to 6 weeks of consolidation) and acute distraction (immediate lengthening to 4 mm, 6 to 8 weeks of consolidation). An additional 10 animals underwent acute distraction followed by application of bioabsorbable Gore Resolut XT membranes (acute distraction plus guided tissue regeneration). Membranes were completely wrapped around the distraction gap. Animals were killed 6 and 8 weeks postoperatively and mandibles analyzed radiographically and histologically.
Quantitative histomorphometric analyses were performed to compare relative bone formation between all three groups. Gradual distraction mandibles achieved bony union by 6 weeks with 86 percent bone formation, which increased to 98 percent by 8 weeks. Acute distraction mandibles healed with a fibrous nonunion and only 37 percent bone formation by 8 weeks. In contrast, acute distraction plus guided tissue regeneration-treated mandibles formed significantly more bone than acute distraction mandibles by 6 weeks (57 percent) and achieved bony bridging by 8 weeks, with 88 percent new bone formation.
The authors' data demonstrate that guided tissue regeneration can significantly enhance bone formation in a fibrous nonunion model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>16582784</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.prs.0000204581.59190.53</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-1052 |
ispartof | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2006-04, Vol.117 (4), p.1177-1185 |
issn | 0032-1052 1529-4242 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67824761 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Animals Biological and medical sciences Bone Regeneration Cell physiology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Guided Tissue Regeneration Mandible - diagnostic imaging Mandible - surgery Medical sciences Mineralization, calcification Molecular and cellular biology Osteogenesis, Distraction Prostheses and Implants Radiography Rats Rats, Sprague-Dawley Skeleton and joints Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system |
title | Guided tissue regeneration enhances bone formation in a rat model of failed osteogenesis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T14%3A16%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Guided%20tissue%20regeneration%20enhances%20bone%20formation%20in%20a%20rat%20model%20of%20failed%20osteogenesis&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=FANG,%20Tony%20D&rft.date=2006-04-01&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1177&rft.epage=1185&rft.pages=1177-1185&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.prs.0000204581.59190.53&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67824761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67824761&rft_id=info:pmid/16582784&rfr_iscdi=true |