Guided tissue regeneration enhances bone formation in a rat model of failed osteogenesis

Guided tissue regeneration is a technique that uses barrier materials to enhance tissue regeneration. Although previously demonstrated to be an effective way of enhancing craniofacial osteogenesis in several animal models, the ability of guided tissue regeneration to augment bone formation in the co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2006-04, Vol.117 (4), p.1177-1185
Hauptverfasser: FANG, Tony D, NACAMULI, Randall P, SONG, Han Joon M, FONG, Kenton D, SHI, Yun-Ymg, LONGAKER, Michael T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1185
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1177
container_title Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)
container_volume 117
creator FANG, Tony D
NACAMULI, Randall P
SONG, Han Joon M
FONG, Kenton D
SHI, Yun-Ymg
LONGAKER, Michael T
description Guided tissue regeneration is a technique that uses barrier materials to enhance tissue regeneration. Although previously demonstrated to be an effective way of enhancing craniofacial osteogenesis in several animal models, the ability of guided tissue regeneration to augment bone formation in the context of distraction osteogenesis is unknown. In the current study, the authors applied the principle of guided tissue regeneration to their rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis model in an attempt to enhance bone regeneration. Twelve (n = 6 per group) adult Sprague-Dawley rats underwent routine gradual distraction (5 days' latency, 4-mm distraction over 8 days, 4 to 6 weeks of consolidation) and acute distraction (immediate lengthening to 4 mm, 6 to 8 weeks of consolidation). An additional 10 animals underwent acute distraction followed by application of bioabsorbable Gore Resolut XT membranes (acute distraction plus guided tissue regeneration). Membranes were completely wrapped around the distraction gap. Animals were killed 6 and 8 weeks postoperatively and mandibles analyzed radiographically and histologically. Quantitative histomorphometric analyses were performed to compare relative bone formation between all three groups. Gradual distraction mandibles achieved bony union by 6 weeks with 86 percent bone formation, which increased to 98 percent by 8 weeks. Acute distraction mandibles healed with a fibrous nonunion and only 37 percent bone formation by 8 weeks. In contrast, acute distraction plus guided tissue regeneration-treated mandibles formed significantly more bone than acute distraction mandibles by 6 weeks (57 percent) and achieved bony bridging by 8 weeks, with 88 percent new bone formation. The authors' data demonstrate that guided tissue regeneration can significantly enhance bone formation in a fibrous nonunion model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.prs.0000204581.59190.53
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67824761</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67824761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-549d6996cf1d20d809579ecf6afb450dadcb484ec58bce4d64e7452b5f9538db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE2LFDEQhoMo7uzqX5Ag6K3bJJ1Pb7LorrDgRcFbk04qGunujKnug_9-s87A1KWgeOqt4iHkLWc9Z858YLw_VuxZK8GksrxXjjvWq-EZOXAlXCeFFM_JgbFBdJwpcUWuEf8wxs2g1UtyxbWywlh5ID_v9hwh0i0j7kAr_IIVqt9yWSmsv_0aAOlUVqCp1OU0zyv1tDF0KRFmWhJNPs8tpOAG5SkAM74iL5KfEV6f-w358eXz99v77uHb3dfbTw9dGKTZOiVd1M7pkHgULFrmlHEQkvZpkopFH8MkrYSg7BRARi3BSCUmlZwabJyGG_L-lHus5e8OuI1LxgDz7FcoO47aWCGN5g38eAJDLYgV0nisefH138jZ-OR1ZLyNcLx4Hf97HdXQlt-cr-zTAvGyehbZgHdnwGPwc6rNXMYLZ7SWtr38CDfggyY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67824761</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Guided tissue regeneration enhances bone formation in a rat model of failed osteogenesis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>FANG, Tony D ; NACAMULI, Randall P ; SONG, Han Joon M ; FONG, Kenton D ; SHI, Yun-Ymg ; LONGAKER, Michael T</creator><creatorcontrib>FANG, Tony D ; NACAMULI, Randall P ; SONG, Han Joon M ; FONG, Kenton D ; SHI, Yun-Ymg ; LONGAKER, Michael T</creatorcontrib><description>Guided tissue regeneration is a technique that uses barrier materials to enhance tissue regeneration. Although previously demonstrated to be an effective way of enhancing craniofacial osteogenesis in several animal models, the ability of guided tissue regeneration to augment bone formation in the context of distraction osteogenesis is unknown. In the current study, the authors applied the principle of guided tissue regeneration to their rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis model in an attempt to enhance bone regeneration. Twelve (n = 6 per group) adult Sprague-Dawley rats underwent routine gradual distraction (5 days' latency, 4-mm distraction over 8 days, 4 to 6 weeks of consolidation) and acute distraction (immediate lengthening to 4 mm, 6 to 8 weeks of consolidation). An additional 10 animals underwent acute distraction followed by application of bioabsorbable Gore Resolut XT membranes (acute distraction plus guided tissue regeneration). Membranes were completely wrapped around the distraction gap. Animals were killed 6 and 8 weeks postoperatively and mandibles analyzed radiographically and histologically. Quantitative histomorphometric analyses were performed to compare relative bone formation between all three groups. Gradual distraction mandibles achieved bony union by 6 weeks with 86 percent bone formation, which increased to 98 percent by 8 weeks. Acute distraction mandibles healed with a fibrous nonunion and only 37 percent bone formation by 8 weeks. In contrast, acute distraction plus guided tissue regeneration-treated mandibles formed significantly more bone than acute distraction mandibles by 6 weeks (57 percent) and achieved bony bridging by 8 weeks, with 88 percent new bone formation. The authors' data demonstrate that guided tissue regeneration can significantly enhance bone formation in a fibrous nonunion model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000204581.59190.53</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16582784</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Regeneration ; Cell physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Guided Tissue Regeneration ; Mandible - diagnostic imaging ; Mandible - surgery ; Medical sciences ; Mineralization, calcification ; Molecular and cellular biology ; Osteogenesis, Distraction ; Prostheses and Implants ; Radiography ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Skeleton and joints ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2006-04, Vol.117 (4), p.1177-1185</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-549d6996cf1d20d809579ecf6afb450dadcb484ec58bce4d64e7452b5f9538db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-549d6996cf1d20d809579ecf6afb450dadcb484ec58bce4d64e7452b5f9538db3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17664895$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16582784$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FANG, Tony D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NACAMULI, Randall P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SONG, Han Joon M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FONG, Kenton D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHI, Yun-Ymg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LONGAKER, Michael T</creatorcontrib><title>Guided tissue regeneration enhances bone formation in a rat model of failed osteogenesis</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>Guided tissue regeneration is a technique that uses barrier materials to enhance tissue regeneration. Although previously demonstrated to be an effective way of enhancing craniofacial osteogenesis in several animal models, the ability of guided tissue regeneration to augment bone formation in the context of distraction osteogenesis is unknown. In the current study, the authors applied the principle of guided tissue regeneration to their rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis model in an attempt to enhance bone regeneration. Twelve (n = 6 per group) adult Sprague-Dawley rats underwent routine gradual distraction (5 days' latency, 4-mm distraction over 8 days, 4 to 6 weeks of consolidation) and acute distraction (immediate lengthening to 4 mm, 6 to 8 weeks of consolidation). An additional 10 animals underwent acute distraction followed by application of bioabsorbable Gore Resolut XT membranes (acute distraction plus guided tissue regeneration). Membranes were completely wrapped around the distraction gap. Animals were killed 6 and 8 weeks postoperatively and mandibles analyzed radiographically and histologically. Quantitative histomorphometric analyses were performed to compare relative bone formation between all three groups. Gradual distraction mandibles achieved bony union by 6 weeks with 86 percent bone formation, which increased to 98 percent by 8 weeks. Acute distraction mandibles healed with a fibrous nonunion and only 37 percent bone formation by 8 weeks. In contrast, acute distraction plus guided tissue regeneration-treated mandibles formed significantly more bone than acute distraction mandibles by 6 weeks (57 percent) and achieved bony bridging by 8 weeks, with 88 percent new bone formation. The authors' data demonstrate that guided tissue regeneration can significantly enhance bone formation in a fibrous nonunion model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Regeneration</subject><subject>Cell physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Guided Tissue Regeneration</subject><subject>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mandible - surgery</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mineralization, calcification</subject><subject>Molecular and cellular biology</subject><subject>Osteogenesis, Distraction</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>Skeleton and joints</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE2LFDEQhoMo7uzqX5Ag6K3bJJ1Pb7LorrDgRcFbk04qGunujKnug_9-s87A1KWgeOqt4iHkLWc9Z858YLw_VuxZK8GksrxXjjvWq-EZOXAlXCeFFM_JgbFBdJwpcUWuEf8wxs2g1UtyxbWywlh5ID_v9hwh0i0j7kAr_IIVqt9yWSmsv_0aAOlUVqCp1OU0zyv1tDF0KRFmWhJNPs8tpOAG5SkAM74iL5KfEV6f-w358eXz99v77uHb3dfbTw9dGKTZOiVd1M7pkHgULFrmlHEQkvZpkopFH8MkrYSg7BRARi3BSCUmlZwabJyGG_L-lHus5e8OuI1LxgDz7FcoO47aWCGN5g38eAJDLYgV0nisefH138jZ-OR1ZLyNcLx4Hf97HdXQlt-cr-zTAvGyehbZgHdnwGPwc6rNXMYLZ7SWtr38CDfggyY</recordid><startdate>20060401</startdate><enddate>20060401</enddate><creator>FANG, Tony D</creator><creator>NACAMULI, Randall P</creator><creator>SONG, Han Joon M</creator><creator>FONG, Kenton D</creator><creator>SHI, Yun-Ymg</creator><creator>LONGAKER, Michael T</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060401</creationdate><title>Guided tissue regeneration enhances bone formation in a rat model of failed osteogenesis</title><author>FANG, Tony D ; NACAMULI, Randall P ; SONG, Han Joon M ; FONG, Kenton D ; SHI, Yun-Ymg ; LONGAKER, Michael T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-549d6996cf1d20d809579ecf6afb450dadcb484ec58bce4d64e7452b5f9538db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Regeneration</topic><topic>Cell physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Guided Tissue Regeneration</topic><topic>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mandible - surgery</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mineralization, calcification</topic><topic>Molecular and cellular biology</topic><topic>Osteogenesis, Distraction</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>Skeleton and joints</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FANG, Tony D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NACAMULI, Randall P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SONG, Han Joon M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FONG, Kenton D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHI, Yun-Ymg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LONGAKER, Michael T</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FANG, Tony D</au><au>NACAMULI, Randall P</au><au>SONG, Han Joon M</au><au>FONG, Kenton D</au><au>SHI, Yun-Ymg</au><au>LONGAKER, Michael T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Guided tissue regeneration enhances bone formation in a rat model of failed osteogenesis</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2006-04-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1177</spage><epage>1185</epage><pages>1177-1185</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>Guided tissue regeneration is a technique that uses barrier materials to enhance tissue regeneration. Although previously demonstrated to be an effective way of enhancing craniofacial osteogenesis in several animal models, the ability of guided tissue regeneration to augment bone formation in the context of distraction osteogenesis is unknown. In the current study, the authors applied the principle of guided tissue regeneration to their rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis model in an attempt to enhance bone regeneration. Twelve (n = 6 per group) adult Sprague-Dawley rats underwent routine gradual distraction (5 days' latency, 4-mm distraction over 8 days, 4 to 6 weeks of consolidation) and acute distraction (immediate lengthening to 4 mm, 6 to 8 weeks of consolidation). An additional 10 animals underwent acute distraction followed by application of bioabsorbable Gore Resolut XT membranes (acute distraction plus guided tissue regeneration). Membranes were completely wrapped around the distraction gap. Animals were killed 6 and 8 weeks postoperatively and mandibles analyzed radiographically and histologically. Quantitative histomorphometric analyses were performed to compare relative bone formation between all three groups. Gradual distraction mandibles achieved bony union by 6 weeks with 86 percent bone formation, which increased to 98 percent by 8 weeks. Acute distraction mandibles healed with a fibrous nonunion and only 37 percent bone formation by 8 weeks. In contrast, acute distraction plus guided tissue regeneration-treated mandibles formed significantly more bone than acute distraction mandibles by 6 weeks (57 percent) and achieved bony bridging by 8 weeks, with 88 percent new bone formation. The authors' data demonstrate that guided tissue regeneration can significantly enhance bone formation in a fibrous nonunion model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>16582784</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.prs.0000204581.59190.53</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-1052
ispartof Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2006-04, Vol.117 (4), p.1177-1185
issn 0032-1052
1529-4242
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67824761
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Bone Regeneration
Cell physiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Guided Tissue Regeneration
Mandible - diagnostic imaging
Mandible - surgery
Medical sciences
Mineralization, calcification
Molecular and cellular biology
Osteogenesis, Distraction
Prostheses and Implants
Radiography
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Skeleton and joints
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Vertebrates: osteoarticular system, musculoskeletal system
title Guided tissue regeneration enhances bone formation in a rat model of failed osteogenesis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T14%3A16%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Guided%20tissue%20regeneration%20enhances%20bone%20formation%20in%20a%20rat%20model%20of%20failed%20osteogenesis&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=FANG,%20Tony%20D&rft.date=2006-04-01&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1177&rft.epage=1185&rft.pages=1177-1185&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.prs.0000204581.59190.53&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67824761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67824761&rft_id=info:pmid/16582784&rfr_iscdi=true