Zone I Flexor Tendon Rehabilitation with Limited Extension and Active Flexion

This article describes an immediate active motion protocol for primary repair of zone I flexor tendons treated with tendon to tendon, or tendon to bone repair, and reviews clinical results. A rehabilitation protocol is proposed that will limit excursion of the zone I repair by blocking full distal i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hand therapy 2005-04, Vol.18 (2), p.128-140
1. Verfasser: Evans, Roslyn B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 140
container_issue 2
container_start_page 128
container_title Journal of hand therapy
container_volume 18
creator Evans, Roslyn B.
description This article describes an immediate active motion protocol for primary repair of zone I flexor tendons treated with tendon to tendon, or tendon to bone repair, and reviews clinical results. A rehabilitation protocol is proposed that will limit excursion of the zone I repair by blocking full distal interphalangeal (DIP) extension and by applying controlled active tension to both the unrepaired flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and the repaired flexor digitorum profundus (FDP). The rehabilitation technique utilized a dorsal protective splint with a relaxed position of immobilization with 30 degrees of wrist flexion, 40 degrees of metacarpophalangeal (MP) joint flexion, and a neutral position for the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints without dynamic traction. In addition, within the confines of the dorsal splint, the involved DIP joint was splinted at 40-45 degrees to prevent DIP joint extension during the early wound healing phases. Relaxed composite flexion was used to apply active tension to both the uninjured FDS, and the repaired FDP. This technique applies excursion of approximately 3mm to the zone I tendon in a limited arc (45–75 degrees). The modified position of active flexion applies low loads of force (< 500 g), even with drag considered. This technique is supported by previous mathematical studies of excursion and internal tendon force, and clinical experience. Forty nine cases treated over a 10-year period were reviewed, and eight were excluded for incomplete follow-up. The use of this protocol for 41 zone I flexor digitorum profundus repairs by 12 different surgeons using varied surgical techniques was evaluated. None of the tendon to tendon repairs used more than two suture strands for the core repairs. Mean total active range of motion was 142 degrees (PIP 95 degrees plus DIP 47 degrees), or 81% of normal. Three tendons ruptured in non–protocol-related incidents and were excluded from the study. Results from this clinical study support the use of limited DIP extension combined with active tension with conventional repair in zone I.
doi_str_mv 10.1197/j.jht.2005.03.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67822314</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S089411300500058X</els_id><sourcerecordid>849902421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-41672fe51eb5fd0c4264f0680e5b24011ed6aa17c94ba749d485d563c8a279ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVoabZJf0AuxfSQm90ZWfIHOYWQtIENgZBA6UXI0piV8dqJpM3Hv6-2u1DoIXMRMzzvi3gYO0EoENv6-1AMq1hwAFlAWQDgAVugFDIHEL8-sAU0rcgRSzhkn0MYEiA51J_YIcqmTQW4YDe_54my6-xqpNfZZ_c02XnK7milOze6qKNL64uLq2zp1i6SzS5fI01he9aTzc5NdM_0N55Ox-xjr8dAX_bvEXu4ury_-Jkvb39cX5wvc8PbMuYCq5r3JJE62Vswgleih6oBkh0XgEi20hpr04pO16K1opFWVqVpNK9bsuURO931Pvr5aUMhqrULhsZRTzRvgqrqhvMSRQK__QcO88ZP6W-KpykrbHmCcAcZP4fgqVeP3q21f1MIaitaDSqJVlvRCkqVPKbM133xpluT_ZfYm03A2Q6g5OHZkVfBOJoMWefJRGVn9079H8sGjNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222236192</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Zone I Flexor Tendon Rehabilitation with Limited Extension and Active Flexion</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Evans, Roslyn B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Evans, Roslyn B.</creatorcontrib><description>This article describes an immediate active motion protocol for primary repair of zone I flexor tendons treated with tendon to tendon, or tendon to bone repair, and reviews clinical results. A rehabilitation protocol is proposed that will limit excursion of the zone I repair by blocking full distal interphalangeal (DIP) extension and by applying controlled active tension to both the unrepaired flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and the repaired flexor digitorum profundus (FDP). The rehabilitation technique utilized a dorsal protective splint with a relaxed position of immobilization with 30 degrees of wrist flexion, 40 degrees of metacarpophalangeal (MP) joint flexion, and a neutral position for the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints without dynamic traction. In addition, within the confines of the dorsal splint, the involved DIP joint was splinted at 40-45 degrees to prevent DIP joint extension during the early wound healing phases. Relaxed composite flexion was used to apply active tension to both the uninjured FDS, and the repaired FDP. This technique applies excursion of approximately 3mm to the zone I tendon in a limited arc (45–75 degrees). The modified position of active flexion applies low loads of force (&lt; 500 g), even with drag considered. This technique is supported by previous mathematical studies of excursion and internal tendon force, and clinical experience. Forty nine cases treated over a 10-year period were reviewed, and eight were excluded for incomplete follow-up. The use of this protocol for 41 zone I flexor digitorum profundus repairs by 12 different surgeons using varied surgical techniques was evaluated. None of the tendon to tendon repairs used more than two suture strands for the core repairs. Mean total active range of motion was 142 degrees (PIP 95 degrees plus DIP 47 degrees), or 81% of normal. Three tendons ruptured in non–protocol-related incidents and were excluded from the study. Results from this clinical study support the use of limited DIP extension combined with active tension with conventional repair in zone I.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-1130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-004X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2005.03.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15891971</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Finger Injuries - classification ; Finger Injuries - therapy ; Fractures ; Humans ; Injuries ; Patient satisfaction ; Physical Therapy Modalities ; Rehabilitation ; Splints ; Tendon Injuries - classification ; Tendon Injuries - therapy ; Tendons ; Tendons - physiopathology ; Tendons - surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of hand therapy, 2005-04, Vol.18 (2), p.128-140</ispartof><rights>2005 Hanley &amp; Belfus</rights><rights>Copyright Hanley &amp; Belfus, Inc. Apr-Jun 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-41672fe51eb5fd0c4264f0680e5b24011ed6aa17c94ba749d485d563c8a279ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-41672fe51eb5fd0c4264f0680e5b24011ed6aa17c94ba749d485d563c8a279ed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/222236192?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15891971$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Evans, Roslyn B.</creatorcontrib><title>Zone I Flexor Tendon Rehabilitation with Limited Extension and Active Flexion</title><title>Journal of hand therapy</title><addtitle>J Hand Ther</addtitle><description>This article describes an immediate active motion protocol for primary repair of zone I flexor tendons treated with tendon to tendon, or tendon to bone repair, and reviews clinical results. A rehabilitation protocol is proposed that will limit excursion of the zone I repair by blocking full distal interphalangeal (DIP) extension and by applying controlled active tension to both the unrepaired flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and the repaired flexor digitorum profundus (FDP). The rehabilitation technique utilized a dorsal protective splint with a relaxed position of immobilization with 30 degrees of wrist flexion, 40 degrees of metacarpophalangeal (MP) joint flexion, and a neutral position for the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints without dynamic traction. In addition, within the confines of the dorsal splint, the involved DIP joint was splinted at 40-45 degrees to prevent DIP joint extension during the early wound healing phases. Relaxed composite flexion was used to apply active tension to both the uninjured FDS, and the repaired FDP. This technique applies excursion of approximately 3mm to the zone I tendon in a limited arc (45–75 degrees). The modified position of active flexion applies low loads of force (&lt; 500 g), even with drag considered. This technique is supported by previous mathematical studies of excursion and internal tendon force, and clinical experience. Forty nine cases treated over a 10-year period were reviewed, and eight were excluded for incomplete follow-up. The use of this protocol for 41 zone I flexor digitorum profundus repairs by 12 different surgeons using varied surgical techniques was evaluated. None of the tendon to tendon repairs used more than two suture strands for the core repairs. Mean total active range of motion was 142 degrees (PIP 95 degrees plus DIP 47 degrees), or 81% of normal. Three tendons ruptured in non–protocol-related incidents and were excluded from the study. Results from this clinical study support the use of limited DIP extension combined with active tension with conventional repair in zone I.</description><subject>Finger Injuries - classification</subject><subject>Finger Injuries - therapy</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Physical Therapy Modalities</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Splints</subject><subject>Tendon Injuries - classification</subject><subject>Tendon Injuries - therapy</subject><subject>Tendons</subject><subject>Tendons - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tendons - surgery</subject><issn>0894-1130</issn><issn>1545-004X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVoabZJf0AuxfSQm90ZWfIHOYWQtIENgZBA6UXI0piV8dqJpM3Hv6-2u1DoIXMRMzzvi3gYO0EoENv6-1AMq1hwAFlAWQDgAVugFDIHEL8-sAU0rcgRSzhkn0MYEiA51J_YIcqmTQW4YDe_54my6-xqpNfZZ_c02XnK7milOze6qKNL64uLq2zp1i6SzS5fI01he9aTzc5NdM_0N55Ox-xjr8dAX_bvEXu4ury_-Jkvb39cX5wvc8PbMuYCq5r3JJE62Vswgleih6oBkh0XgEi20hpr04pO16K1opFWVqVpNK9bsuURO931Pvr5aUMhqrULhsZRTzRvgqrqhvMSRQK__QcO88ZP6W-KpykrbHmCcAcZP4fgqVeP3q21f1MIaitaDSqJVlvRCkqVPKbM133xpluT_ZfYm03A2Q6g5OHZkVfBOJoMWefJRGVn9079H8sGjNA</recordid><startdate>200504</startdate><enddate>200504</enddate><creator>Evans, Roslyn B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200504</creationdate><title>Zone I Flexor Tendon Rehabilitation with Limited Extension and Active Flexion</title><author>Evans, Roslyn B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-41672fe51eb5fd0c4264f0680e5b24011ed6aa17c94ba749d485d563c8a279ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Finger Injuries - classification</topic><topic>Finger Injuries - therapy</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Physical Therapy Modalities</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Splints</topic><topic>Tendon Injuries - classification</topic><topic>Tendon Injuries - therapy</topic><topic>Tendons</topic><topic>Tendons - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tendons - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Evans, Roslyn B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of hand therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Evans, Roslyn B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Zone I Flexor Tendon Rehabilitation with Limited Extension and Active Flexion</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hand therapy</jtitle><addtitle>J Hand Ther</addtitle><date>2005-04</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>128</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>128-140</pages><issn>0894-1130</issn><eissn>1545-004X</eissn><abstract>This article describes an immediate active motion protocol for primary repair of zone I flexor tendons treated with tendon to tendon, or tendon to bone repair, and reviews clinical results. A rehabilitation protocol is proposed that will limit excursion of the zone I repair by blocking full distal interphalangeal (DIP) extension and by applying controlled active tension to both the unrepaired flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and the repaired flexor digitorum profundus (FDP). The rehabilitation technique utilized a dorsal protective splint with a relaxed position of immobilization with 30 degrees of wrist flexion, 40 degrees of metacarpophalangeal (MP) joint flexion, and a neutral position for the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints without dynamic traction. In addition, within the confines of the dorsal splint, the involved DIP joint was splinted at 40-45 degrees to prevent DIP joint extension during the early wound healing phases. Relaxed composite flexion was used to apply active tension to both the uninjured FDS, and the repaired FDP. This technique applies excursion of approximately 3mm to the zone I tendon in a limited arc (45–75 degrees). The modified position of active flexion applies low loads of force (&lt; 500 g), even with drag considered. This technique is supported by previous mathematical studies of excursion and internal tendon force, and clinical experience. Forty nine cases treated over a 10-year period were reviewed, and eight were excluded for incomplete follow-up. The use of this protocol for 41 zone I flexor digitorum profundus repairs by 12 different surgeons using varied surgical techniques was evaluated. None of the tendon to tendon repairs used more than two suture strands for the core repairs. Mean total active range of motion was 142 degrees (PIP 95 degrees plus DIP 47 degrees), or 81% of normal. Three tendons ruptured in non–protocol-related incidents and were excluded from the study. Results from this clinical study support the use of limited DIP extension combined with active tension with conventional repair in zone I.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>15891971</pmid><doi>10.1197/j.jht.2005.03.001</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-1130
ispartof Journal of hand therapy, 2005-04, Vol.18 (2), p.128-140
issn 0894-1130
1545-004X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67822314
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Finger Injuries - classification
Finger Injuries - therapy
Fractures
Humans
Injuries
Patient satisfaction
Physical Therapy Modalities
Rehabilitation
Splints
Tendon Injuries - classification
Tendon Injuries - therapy
Tendons
Tendons - physiopathology
Tendons - surgery
title Zone I Flexor Tendon Rehabilitation with Limited Extension and Active Flexion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T22%3A59%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Zone%20I%20Flexor%20Tendon%20Rehabilitation%20with%20Limited%20Extension%20and%20Active%20Flexion&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hand%20therapy&rft.au=Evans,%20Roslyn%20B.&rft.date=2005-04&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=128-140&rft.issn=0894-1130&rft.eissn=1545-004X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1197/j.jht.2005.03.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E849902421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222236192&rft_id=info:pmid/15891971&rft_els_id=S089411300500058X&rfr_iscdi=true