A life history model of somatic damage associated with resource acquisition: damage protection or prevention?
A resource acquisition–allocation model is developed to examine the trade-off between reproduction and somatic protection. Unlike previous studies, resource intake is not assumed to be constrained: instead, resource intake is free to vary, with increased intake being associated with an increased ris...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of theoretical biology 2005-08, Vol.235 (3), p.305-317 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 317 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 305 |
container_title | Journal of theoretical biology |
container_volume | 235 |
creator | Yearsley, Jonathan M. Kyriazakis, Ilias Gordon, Iain J. Johnston, Sarah L. Speakman, John R. Tolkamp, Bert J. Illius, Andrew W. |
description | A resource acquisition–allocation model is developed to examine the trade-off between reproduction and somatic protection. Unlike previous studies, resource intake is not assumed to be constrained: instead, resource intake is free to vary, with increased intake being associated with an increased risk of somatic damage. This gives rise to an optimal resource intake as well as an optimal allocation strategy. This paper studies the relative importance of acquisition and allocation strategies in regulating acquisition-related mortality. Under the optimal allocation strategy mortality rate increases with age, in accordance with the disposable soma theory of aging. Contrary to the usual interpretation of the disposable soma theory, this increase in mortality can arise from an increase in the resource acquisition effort rather than a decrease in the resources allocated to protection. At early ages resource acquisition is found to be the primary path for regulating life history costs, whilst allocating resources to protection becomes more important later in life. Models for targeted and non-targeted damage repair are considered and the robustness of our results to the structure and parameterization of the model is discussed. The results from our models are discussed in light of published data. Resource acquisition is shown to be a potentially important mechanism for controlling somatic damage which deserves further study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.01.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67812418</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022519305000275</els_id><sourcerecordid>67812418</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-1ad11fce9986eb42e2e58ac85bec7ef6ad1fe2927fe5ef239e6da0cc7777473b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU-LFDEQxYMo7jj6BTxITt66TaU76UQEWRb_wYIXPYd0uuJm6J7sJumV_fammRFvbl2KSv3qEd4j5DWwFhjId4f2UMbQcsZEy6BlTD8hO2BaNEr08JTsGOO8EaC7C_Ii5wOrRN_J5-QChFJc6m5Hlks6B4_0JuQS0wNd4oQzjZ7muNgSHJ3sYn8htTlHF2zBif4O5YYmzHFNri7c3RpyKCEe3_-Fb1Ms6LYnGlOd8B6P2_TxJXnm7Zzx1bnvyc_Pn35cfW2uv3_5dnV53bgeZGnATgDeodZK4thz5CiUdUqM6Ab0sq49cs0HjwI97zTKyTLnhlr90I3dnrw96daf3K2Yi1lCdjjP9ohxzUYOCngP6lGQs2FQfc8eBWEQkutq6Z7wE-hSzDmhN7cpLDY9GGBmi80czBab2WIzDEwNpR69Oauv44LTv5NzThX4cAKwunYfMJnsAh4dTiFVp80Uw__0_wCc96tv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17562969</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A life history model of somatic damage associated with resource acquisition: damage protection or prevention?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Yearsley, Jonathan M. ; Kyriazakis, Ilias ; Gordon, Iain J. ; Johnston, Sarah L. ; Speakman, John R. ; Tolkamp, Bert J. ; Illius, Andrew W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yearsley, Jonathan M. ; Kyriazakis, Ilias ; Gordon, Iain J. ; Johnston, Sarah L. ; Speakman, John R. ; Tolkamp, Bert J. ; Illius, Andrew W.</creatorcontrib><description>A resource acquisition–allocation model is developed to examine the trade-off between reproduction and somatic protection. Unlike previous studies, resource intake is not assumed to be constrained: instead, resource intake is free to vary, with increased intake being associated with an increased risk of somatic damage. This gives rise to an optimal resource intake as well as an optimal allocation strategy. This paper studies the relative importance of acquisition and allocation strategies in regulating acquisition-related mortality. Under the optimal allocation strategy mortality rate increases with age, in accordance with the disposable soma theory of aging. Contrary to the usual interpretation of the disposable soma theory, this increase in mortality can arise from an increase in the resource acquisition effort rather than a decrease in the resources allocated to protection. At early ages resource acquisition is found to be the primary path for regulating life history costs, whilst allocating resources to protection becomes more important later in life. Models for targeted and non-targeted damage repair are considered and the robustness of our results to the structure and parameterization of the model is discussed. The results from our models are discussed in light of published data. Resource acquisition is shown to be a potentially important mechanism for controlling somatic damage which deserves further study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5193</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.01.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15882693</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acquisition–allocation model ; Aging ; Animals ; Behavior, Animal ; Computer Simulation ; Energy Metabolism ; Feeding Behavior ; Lifehistory ; Models, Biological ; Reproduction ; Resource intake ; Somatic damage ; Survival ; Wounds and Injuries - metabolism ; Wounds and Injuries - prevention & control</subject><ispartof>Journal of theoretical biology, 2005-08, Vol.235 (3), p.305-317</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-1ad11fce9986eb42e2e58ac85bec7ef6ad1fe2927fe5ef239e6da0cc7777473b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-1ad11fce9986eb42e2e58ac85bec7ef6ad1fe2927fe5ef239e6da0cc7777473b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022519305000275$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15882693$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yearsley, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyriazakis, Ilias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Iain J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Sarah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speakman, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tolkamp, Bert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Illius, Andrew W.</creatorcontrib><title>A life history model of somatic damage associated with resource acquisition: damage protection or prevention?</title><title>Journal of theoretical biology</title><addtitle>J Theor Biol</addtitle><description>A resource acquisition–allocation model is developed to examine the trade-off between reproduction and somatic protection. Unlike previous studies, resource intake is not assumed to be constrained: instead, resource intake is free to vary, with increased intake being associated with an increased risk of somatic damage. This gives rise to an optimal resource intake as well as an optimal allocation strategy. This paper studies the relative importance of acquisition and allocation strategies in regulating acquisition-related mortality. Under the optimal allocation strategy mortality rate increases with age, in accordance with the disposable soma theory of aging. Contrary to the usual interpretation of the disposable soma theory, this increase in mortality can arise from an increase in the resource acquisition effort rather than a decrease in the resources allocated to protection. At early ages resource acquisition is found to be the primary path for regulating life history costs, whilst allocating resources to protection becomes more important later in life. Models for targeted and non-targeted damage repair are considered and the robustness of our results to the structure and parameterization of the model is discussed. The results from our models are discussed in light of published data. Resource acquisition is shown to be a potentially important mechanism for controlling somatic damage which deserves further study.</description><subject>Acquisition–allocation model</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Lifehistory</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Resource intake</subject><subject>Somatic damage</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - metabolism</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - prevention & control</subject><issn>0022-5193</issn><issn>1095-8541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU-LFDEQxYMo7jj6BTxITt66TaU76UQEWRb_wYIXPYd0uuJm6J7sJumV_fammRFvbl2KSv3qEd4j5DWwFhjId4f2UMbQcsZEy6BlTD8hO2BaNEr08JTsGOO8EaC7C_Ii5wOrRN_J5-QChFJc6m5Hlks6B4_0JuQS0wNd4oQzjZ7muNgSHJ3sYn8htTlHF2zBif4O5YYmzHFNri7c3RpyKCEe3_-Fb1Ms6LYnGlOd8B6P2_TxJXnm7Zzx1bnvyc_Pn35cfW2uv3_5dnV53bgeZGnATgDeodZK4thz5CiUdUqM6Ab0sq49cs0HjwI97zTKyTLnhlr90I3dnrw96daf3K2Yi1lCdjjP9ohxzUYOCngP6lGQs2FQfc8eBWEQkutq6Z7wE-hSzDmhN7cpLDY9GGBmi80czBab2WIzDEwNpR69Oauv44LTv5NzThX4cAKwunYfMJnsAh4dTiFVp80Uw__0_wCc96tv</recordid><startdate>20050807</startdate><enddate>20050807</enddate><creator>Yearsley, Jonathan M.</creator><creator>Kyriazakis, Ilias</creator><creator>Gordon, Iain J.</creator><creator>Johnston, Sarah L.</creator><creator>Speakman, John R.</creator><creator>Tolkamp, Bert J.</creator><creator>Illius, Andrew W.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050807</creationdate><title>A life history model of somatic damage associated with resource acquisition: damage protection or prevention?</title><author>Yearsley, Jonathan M. ; Kyriazakis, Ilias ; Gordon, Iain J. ; Johnston, Sarah L. ; Speakman, John R. ; Tolkamp, Bert J. ; Illius, Andrew W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-1ad11fce9986eb42e2e58ac85bec7ef6ad1fe2927fe5ef239e6da0cc7777473b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Acquisition–allocation model</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Lifehistory</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Resource intake</topic><topic>Somatic damage</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - metabolism</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - prevention & control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yearsley, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyriazakis, Ilias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Iain J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Sarah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speakman, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tolkamp, Bert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Illius, Andrew W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of theoretical biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yearsley, Jonathan M.</au><au>Kyriazakis, Ilias</au><au>Gordon, Iain J.</au><au>Johnston, Sarah L.</au><au>Speakman, John R.</au><au>Tolkamp, Bert J.</au><au>Illius, Andrew W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A life history model of somatic damage associated with resource acquisition: damage protection or prevention?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of theoretical biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Theor Biol</addtitle><date>2005-08-07</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>235</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>305</spage><epage>317</epage><pages>305-317</pages><issn>0022-5193</issn><eissn>1095-8541</eissn><abstract>A resource acquisition–allocation model is developed to examine the trade-off between reproduction and somatic protection. Unlike previous studies, resource intake is not assumed to be constrained: instead, resource intake is free to vary, with increased intake being associated with an increased risk of somatic damage. This gives rise to an optimal resource intake as well as an optimal allocation strategy. This paper studies the relative importance of acquisition and allocation strategies in regulating acquisition-related mortality. Under the optimal allocation strategy mortality rate increases with age, in accordance with the disposable soma theory of aging. Contrary to the usual interpretation of the disposable soma theory, this increase in mortality can arise from an increase in the resource acquisition effort rather than a decrease in the resources allocated to protection. At early ages resource acquisition is found to be the primary path for regulating life history costs, whilst allocating resources to protection becomes more important later in life. Models for targeted and non-targeted damage repair are considered and the robustness of our results to the structure and parameterization of the model is discussed. The results from our models are discussed in light of published data. Resource acquisition is shown to be a potentially important mechanism for controlling somatic damage which deserves further study.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15882693</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.01.009</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-5193 |
ispartof | Journal of theoretical biology, 2005-08, Vol.235 (3), p.305-317 |
issn | 0022-5193 1095-8541 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67812418 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Acquisition–allocation model Aging Animals Behavior, Animal Computer Simulation Energy Metabolism Feeding Behavior Lifehistory Models, Biological Reproduction Resource intake Somatic damage Survival Wounds and Injuries - metabolism Wounds and Injuries - prevention & control |
title | A life history model of somatic damage associated with resource acquisition: damage protection or prevention? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T16%3A41%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20life%20history%20model%20of%20somatic%20damage%20associated%20with%20resource%20acquisition:%20damage%20protection%20or%20prevention?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20theoretical%20biology&rft.au=Yearsley,%20Jonathan%20M.&rft.date=2005-08-07&rft.volume=235&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=305&rft.epage=317&rft.pages=305-317&rft.issn=0022-5193&rft.eissn=1095-8541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.01.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67812418%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17562969&rft_id=info:pmid/15882693&rft_els_id=S0022519305000275&rfr_iscdi=true |