Quality of life of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with injectable drugs in relation to medical practice in France
The French study VISION is a multicentric, prospective and retrospective study, designed first to evaluate patients’ qualitys of life during ovarian stimulation for ovulation induction, intrauterine insemination (IUI) or IVF, and secondly to analyse current medical practice in France. Answers were d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Reproductive biomedicine online 2006-03, Vol.12 (3), p.298-303 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 303 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 298 |
container_title | Reproductive biomedicine online |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Sedbon, Eric Wainer, Robert Perves, Catherine |
description | The French study VISION is a multicentric, prospective and retrospective study, designed first to evaluate patients’ qualitys of life during ovarian stimulation for ovulation induction, intrauterine insemination (IUI) or IVF, and secondly to analyse current medical practice in France. Answers were directly entered on a pocket PC. The study was conducted from January to August 2004 and 186 practitioners filled in a total of 1476 questionnaires. The percentages for the different treatments used were analysed according to type of technique [ovulation induction, IUI, IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)], type of product used [urinary gonadotrophins, recombinant FSH (rFSH), gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists] and methods of administration (intramuscularly, subcutaneously, use of Pen-injector, nurses or self-injections). Initial and total amounts of urinary gonadotrophins per cycle were approximately 30% higher compared with rFSH for IUI and IVF. Generally, the impact of these treatments on professional or social life was less than expected. Patients saw self-injection as a significant improvement in their life, especially when using an injection pen, and when other drugs were also self-injected during treatment (human chorionic gonadotrophin, GnRH agonists or antagonists). Clear information is necessary to increase patient's compliance to the treatment. Simplification will make these procedures more patient-friendly and less of a struggle. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61001-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67811081</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1472648310610012</els_id><sourcerecordid>67811081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-bf13e2808680eeb3dbf6b8acf7863be3b32f52d0af5fd3692d4ea04f9c6015873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1P3DAQhq2qCJaFn9DKp6ocAp448XpPFUJ8SUgItZwtxxlvvcrGW9uhWn49Dhu1R05jvX7G43kI-QLsHBiIi59QLcpCVJJ_B3YmgDEoyk9kNsVL-PzvLPkROY5xnRHJJD8kRyBqseQgZuT1adCdSzvqLe2cxbFudXLYp0iHvsWw8q5fUf-ig9M9jclthi4Dvqd_XfpNXb9Gk3TTIW3DsIo5oAEnInm6wdYZ3dFt0CY5g-P9TdC9wRNyYHUX8XSqc_J8c_3r6q54eLy9v7p8KEwFLBWNBY5l_riQDLHhbWNFI7WxCyl4g7zhpa3Llmlb25aLZdlWqFlll0YwqOWCz8m3_bvb4P8MGJPauGiw63SPfohKLCQAk5DBeg-a4GMMaNU2uI0OOwVMjdLVu3Q1Gh2jd-mqzH1fpwFDk9f93zVZzsCPPYB5zReHQUWTDZusJmR5qvXugxFvsTOT5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67811081</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality of life of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with injectable drugs in relation to medical practice in France</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Sedbon, Eric ; Wainer, Robert ; Perves, Catherine</creator><creatorcontrib>Sedbon, Eric ; Wainer, Robert ; Perves, Catherine</creatorcontrib><description>The French study VISION is a multicentric, prospective and retrospective study, designed first to evaluate patients’ qualitys of life during ovarian stimulation for ovulation induction, intrauterine insemination (IUI) or IVF, and secondly to analyse current medical practice in France. Answers were directly entered on a pocket PC. The study was conducted from January to August 2004 and 186 practitioners filled in a total of 1476 questionnaires. The percentages for the different treatments used were analysed according to type of technique [ovulation induction, IUI, IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)], type of product used [urinary gonadotrophins, recombinant FSH (rFSH), gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists] and methods of administration (intramuscularly, subcutaneously, use of Pen-injector, nurses or self-injections). Initial and total amounts of urinary gonadotrophins per cycle were approximately 30% higher compared with rFSH for IUI and IVF. Generally, the impact of these treatments on professional or social life was less than expected. Patients saw self-injection as a significant improvement in their life, especially when using an injection pen, and when other drugs were also self-injected during treatment (human chorionic gonadotrophin, GnRH agonists or antagonists). Clear information is necessary to increase patient's compliance to the treatment. Simplification will make these procedures more patient-friendly and less of a struggle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61001-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16569316</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Activities of Daily Living ; assisted conception ; Chorionic Gonadotropin - administration & dosage ; Chorionic Gonadotropin - urine ; Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human - administration & dosage ; dose of FSH ; Female ; Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration & dosage ; France ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration & dosage ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - agonists ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - antagonists & inhibitors ; Gynecology ; Humans ; injection pen ; Injections, Intramuscular - nursing ; Injections, Subcutaneous - nursing ; Longitudinal Studies ; Ovulation Induction - methods ; Patient Compliance ; Peptide Fragments - administration & dosage ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of Life ; recombinant FSH ; Recombinant Proteins - administration & dosage ; Retrospective Studies ; Self Administration - instrumentation ; Self Administration - nursing ; self-injection ; Surveys and Questionnaires]]></subject><ispartof>Reproductive biomedicine online, 2006-03, Vol.12 (3), p.298-303</ispartof><rights>2006 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd, Duck End Farm, Dry Drayton, Cambridge CB23 8DB, UK</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-bf13e2808680eeb3dbf6b8acf7863be3b32f52d0af5fd3692d4ea04f9c6015873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-bf13e2808680eeb3dbf6b8acf7863be3b32f52d0af5fd3692d4ea04f9c6015873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61001-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16569316$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sedbon, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wainer, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perves, Catherine</creatorcontrib><title>Quality of life of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with injectable drugs in relation to medical practice in France</title><title>Reproductive biomedicine online</title><addtitle>Reprod Biomed Online</addtitle><description>The French study VISION is a multicentric, prospective and retrospective study, designed first to evaluate patients’ qualitys of life during ovarian stimulation for ovulation induction, intrauterine insemination (IUI) or IVF, and secondly to analyse current medical practice in France. Answers were directly entered on a pocket PC. The study was conducted from January to August 2004 and 186 practitioners filled in a total of 1476 questionnaires. The percentages for the different treatments used were analysed according to type of technique [ovulation induction, IUI, IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)], type of product used [urinary gonadotrophins, recombinant FSH (rFSH), gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists] and methods of administration (intramuscularly, subcutaneously, use of Pen-injector, nurses or self-injections). Initial and total amounts of urinary gonadotrophins per cycle were approximately 30% higher compared with rFSH for IUI and IVF. Generally, the impact of these treatments on professional or social life was less than expected. Patients saw self-injection as a significant improvement in their life, especially when using an injection pen, and when other drugs were also self-injected during treatment (human chorionic gonadotrophin, GnRH agonists or antagonists). Clear information is necessary to increase patient's compliance to the treatment. Simplification will make these procedures more patient-friendly and less of a struggle.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>assisted conception</subject><subject>Chorionic Gonadotropin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Chorionic Gonadotropin - urine</subject><subject>Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human - administration & dosage</subject><subject>dose of FSH</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration & dosage</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - agonists</subject><subject>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - antagonists & inhibitors</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>injection pen</subject><subject>Injections, Intramuscular - nursing</subject><subject>Injections, Subcutaneous - nursing</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Ovulation Induction - methods</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Peptide Fragments - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>recombinant FSH</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Self Administration - instrumentation</subject><subject>Self Administration - nursing</subject><subject>self-injection</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1472-6483</issn><issn>1472-6491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1P3DAQhq2qCJaFn9DKp6ocAp448XpPFUJ8SUgItZwtxxlvvcrGW9uhWn49Dhu1R05jvX7G43kI-QLsHBiIi59QLcpCVJJ_B3YmgDEoyk9kNsVL-PzvLPkROY5xnRHJJD8kRyBqseQgZuT1adCdSzvqLe2cxbFudXLYp0iHvsWw8q5fUf-ig9M9jclthi4Dvqd_XfpNXb9Gk3TTIW3DsIo5oAEnInm6wdYZ3dFt0CY5g-P9TdC9wRNyYHUX8XSqc_J8c_3r6q54eLy9v7p8KEwFLBWNBY5l_riQDLHhbWNFI7WxCyl4g7zhpa3Llmlb25aLZdlWqFlll0YwqOWCz8m3_bvb4P8MGJPauGiw63SPfohKLCQAk5DBeg-a4GMMaNU2uI0OOwVMjdLVu3Q1Gh2jd-mqzH1fpwFDk9f93zVZzsCPPYB5zReHQUWTDZusJmR5qvXugxFvsTOT5A</recordid><startdate>20060301</startdate><enddate>20060301</enddate><creator>Sedbon, Eric</creator><creator>Wainer, Robert</creator><creator>Perves, Catherine</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060301</creationdate><title>Quality of life of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with injectable drugs in relation to medical practice in France</title><author>Sedbon, Eric ; Wainer, Robert ; Perves, Catherine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-bf13e2808680eeb3dbf6b8acf7863be3b32f52d0af5fd3692d4ea04f9c6015873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>assisted conception</topic><topic>Chorionic Gonadotropin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Chorionic Gonadotropin - urine</topic><topic>Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human - administration & dosage</topic><topic>dose of FSH</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration & dosage</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - agonists</topic><topic>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - antagonists & inhibitors</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>injection pen</topic><topic>Injections, Intramuscular - nursing</topic><topic>Injections, Subcutaneous - nursing</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Ovulation Induction - methods</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Peptide Fragments - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>recombinant FSH</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Self Administration - instrumentation</topic><topic>Self Administration - nursing</topic><topic>self-injection</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sedbon, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wainer, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perves, Catherine</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Reproductive biomedicine online</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sedbon, Eric</au><au>Wainer, Robert</au><au>Perves, Catherine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality of life of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with injectable drugs in relation to medical practice in France</atitle><jtitle>Reproductive biomedicine online</jtitle><addtitle>Reprod Biomed Online</addtitle><date>2006-03-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>298</spage><epage>303</epage><pages>298-303</pages><issn>1472-6483</issn><eissn>1472-6491</eissn><abstract>The French study VISION is a multicentric, prospective and retrospective study, designed first to evaluate patients’ qualitys of life during ovarian stimulation for ovulation induction, intrauterine insemination (IUI) or IVF, and secondly to analyse current medical practice in France. Answers were directly entered on a pocket PC. The study was conducted from January to August 2004 and 186 practitioners filled in a total of 1476 questionnaires. The percentages for the different treatments used were analysed according to type of technique [ovulation induction, IUI, IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)], type of product used [urinary gonadotrophins, recombinant FSH (rFSH), gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists] and methods of administration (intramuscularly, subcutaneously, use of Pen-injector, nurses or self-injections). Initial and total amounts of urinary gonadotrophins per cycle were approximately 30% higher compared with rFSH for IUI and IVF. Generally, the impact of these treatments on professional or social life was less than expected. Patients saw self-injection as a significant improvement in their life, especially when using an injection pen, and when other drugs were also self-injected during treatment (human chorionic gonadotrophin, GnRH agonists or antagonists). Clear information is necessary to increase patient's compliance to the treatment. Simplification will make these procedures more patient-friendly and less of a struggle.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16569316</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61001-2</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1472-6483 |
ispartof | Reproductive biomedicine online, 2006-03, Vol.12 (3), p.298-303 |
issn | 1472-6483 1472-6491 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67811081 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Activities of Daily Living assisted conception Chorionic Gonadotropin - administration & dosage Chorionic Gonadotropin - urine Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human - administration & dosage dose of FSH Female Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration & dosage France Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration & dosage Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - agonists Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - antagonists & inhibitors Gynecology Humans injection pen Injections, Intramuscular - nursing Injections, Subcutaneous - nursing Longitudinal Studies Ovulation Induction - methods Patient Compliance Peptide Fragments - administration & dosage Practice Patterns, Physicians Prospective Studies Quality of Life recombinant FSH Recombinant Proteins - administration & dosage Retrospective Studies Self Administration - instrumentation Self Administration - nursing self-injection Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Quality of life of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with injectable drugs in relation to medical practice in France |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T08%3A33%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20of%20life%20of%20patients%20undergoing%20ovarian%20stimulation%20with%20injectable%20drugs%20in%20relation%20to%20medical%20practice%20in%20France&rft.jtitle=Reproductive%20biomedicine%20online&rft.au=Sedbon,%20Eric&rft.date=2006-03-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=298&rft.epage=303&rft.pages=298-303&rft.issn=1472-6483&rft.eissn=1472-6491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61001-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67811081%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67811081&rft_id=info:pmid/16569316&rft_els_id=S1472648310610012&rfr_iscdi=true |