Quality of life of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with injectable drugs in relation to medical practice in France

The French study VISION is a multicentric, prospective and retrospective study, designed first to evaluate patients’ qualitys of life during ovarian stimulation for ovulation induction, intrauterine insemination (IUI) or IVF, and secondly to analyse current medical practice in France. Answers were d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reproductive biomedicine online 2006-03, Vol.12 (3), p.298-303
Hauptverfasser: Sedbon, Eric, Wainer, Robert, Perves, Catherine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 303
container_issue 3
container_start_page 298
container_title Reproductive biomedicine online
container_volume 12
creator Sedbon, Eric
Wainer, Robert
Perves, Catherine
description The French study VISION is a multicentric, prospective and retrospective study, designed first to evaluate patients’ qualitys of life during ovarian stimulation for ovulation induction, intrauterine insemination (IUI) or IVF, and secondly to analyse current medical practice in France. Answers were directly entered on a pocket PC. The study was conducted from January to August 2004 and 186 practitioners filled in a total of 1476 questionnaires. The percentages for the different treatments used were analysed according to type of technique [ovulation induction, IUI, IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)], type of product used [urinary gonadotrophins, recombinant FSH (rFSH), gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists] and methods of administration (intramuscularly, subcutaneously, use of Pen-injector, nurses or self-injections). Initial and total amounts of urinary gonadotrophins per cycle were approximately 30% higher compared with rFSH for IUI and IVF. Generally, the impact of these treatments on professional or social life was less than expected. Patients saw self-injection as a significant improvement in their life, especially when using an injection pen, and when other drugs were also self-injected during treatment (human chorionic gonadotrophin, GnRH agonists or antagonists). Clear information is necessary to increase patient's compliance to the treatment. Simplification will make these procedures more patient-friendly and less of a struggle.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61001-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67811081</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1472648310610012</els_id><sourcerecordid>67811081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-bf13e2808680eeb3dbf6b8acf7863be3b32f52d0af5fd3692d4ea04f9c6015873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1P3DAQhq2qCJaFn9DKp6ocAp448XpPFUJ8SUgItZwtxxlvvcrGW9uhWn49Dhu1R05jvX7G43kI-QLsHBiIi59QLcpCVJJ_B3YmgDEoyk9kNsVL-PzvLPkROY5xnRHJJD8kRyBqseQgZuT1adCdSzvqLe2cxbFudXLYp0iHvsWw8q5fUf-ig9M9jclthi4Dvqd_XfpNXb9Gk3TTIW3DsIo5oAEnInm6wdYZ3dFt0CY5g-P9TdC9wRNyYHUX8XSqc_J8c_3r6q54eLy9v7p8KEwFLBWNBY5l_riQDLHhbWNFI7WxCyl4g7zhpa3Llmlb25aLZdlWqFlll0YwqOWCz8m3_bvb4P8MGJPauGiw63SPfohKLCQAk5DBeg-a4GMMaNU2uI0OOwVMjdLVu3Q1Gh2jd-mqzH1fpwFDk9f93zVZzsCPPYB5zReHQUWTDZusJmR5qvXugxFvsTOT5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67811081</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality of life of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with injectable drugs in relation to medical practice in France</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Sedbon, Eric ; Wainer, Robert ; Perves, Catherine</creator><creatorcontrib>Sedbon, Eric ; Wainer, Robert ; Perves, Catherine</creatorcontrib><description>The French study VISION is a multicentric, prospective and retrospective study, designed first to evaluate patients’ qualitys of life during ovarian stimulation for ovulation induction, intrauterine insemination (IUI) or IVF, and secondly to analyse current medical practice in France. Answers were directly entered on a pocket PC. The study was conducted from January to August 2004 and 186 practitioners filled in a total of 1476 questionnaires. The percentages for the different treatments used were analysed according to type of technique [ovulation induction, IUI, IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)], type of product used [urinary gonadotrophins, recombinant FSH (rFSH), gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists] and methods of administration (intramuscularly, subcutaneously, use of Pen-injector, nurses or self-injections). Initial and total amounts of urinary gonadotrophins per cycle were approximately 30% higher compared with rFSH for IUI and IVF. Generally, the impact of these treatments on professional or social life was less than expected. Patients saw self-injection as a significant improvement in their life, especially when using an injection pen, and when other drugs were also self-injected during treatment (human chorionic gonadotrophin, GnRH agonists or antagonists). Clear information is necessary to increase patient's compliance to the treatment. Simplification will make these procedures more patient-friendly and less of a struggle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61001-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16569316</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Activities of Daily Living ; assisted conception ; Chorionic Gonadotropin - administration & dosage ; Chorionic Gonadotropin - urine ; Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human - administration & dosage ; dose of FSH ; Female ; Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration & dosage ; France ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration & dosage ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - agonists ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - antagonists & inhibitors ; Gynecology ; Humans ; injection pen ; Injections, Intramuscular - nursing ; Injections, Subcutaneous - nursing ; Longitudinal Studies ; Ovulation Induction - methods ; Patient Compliance ; Peptide Fragments - administration & dosage ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of Life ; recombinant FSH ; Recombinant Proteins - administration & dosage ; Retrospective Studies ; Self Administration - instrumentation ; Self Administration - nursing ; self-injection ; Surveys and Questionnaires]]></subject><ispartof>Reproductive biomedicine online, 2006-03, Vol.12 (3), p.298-303</ispartof><rights>2006 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd, Duck End Farm, Dry Drayton, Cambridge CB23 8DB, UK</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-bf13e2808680eeb3dbf6b8acf7863be3b32f52d0af5fd3692d4ea04f9c6015873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-bf13e2808680eeb3dbf6b8acf7863be3b32f52d0af5fd3692d4ea04f9c6015873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61001-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16569316$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sedbon, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wainer, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perves, Catherine</creatorcontrib><title>Quality of life of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with injectable drugs in relation to medical practice in France</title><title>Reproductive biomedicine online</title><addtitle>Reprod Biomed Online</addtitle><description>The French study VISION is a multicentric, prospective and retrospective study, designed first to evaluate patients’ qualitys of life during ovarian stimulation for ovulation induction, intrauterine insemination (IUI) or IVF, and secondly to analyse current medical practice in France. Answers were directly entered on a pocket PC. The study was conducted from January to August 2004 and 186 practitioners filled in a total of 1476 questionnaires. The percentages for the different treatments used were analysed according to type of technique [ovulation induction, IUI, IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)], type of product used [urinary gonadotrophins, recombinant FSH (rFSH), gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists] and methods of administration (intramuscularly, subcutaneously, use of Pen-injector, nurses or self-injections). Initial and total amounts of urinary gonadotrophins per cycle were approximately 30% higher compared with rFSH for IUI and IVF. Generally, the impact of these treatments on professional or social life was less than expected. Patients saw self-injection as a significant improvement in their life, especially when using an injection pen, and when other drugs were also self-injected during treatment (human chorionic gonadotrophin, GnRH agonists or antagonists). Clear information is necessary to increase patient's compliance to the treatment. Simplification will make these procedures more patient-friendly and less of a struggle.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>assisted conception</subject><subject>Chorionic Gonadotropin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Chorionic Gonadotropin - urine</subject><subject>Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>dose of FSH</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - agonists</subject><subject>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>injection pen</subject><subject>Injections, Intramuscular - nursing</subject><subject>Injections, Subcutaneous - nursing</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Ovulation Induction - methods</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Peptide Fragments - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>recombinant FSH</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Self Administration - instrumentation</subject><subject>Self Administration - nursing</subject><subject>self-injection</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1472-6483</issn><issn>1472-6491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1P3DAQhq2qCJaFn9DKp6ocAp448XpPFUJ8SUgItZwtxxlvvcrGW9uhWn49Dhu1R05jvX7G43kI-QLsHBiIi59QLcpCVJJ_B3YmgDEoyk9kNsVL-PzvLPkROY5xnRHJJD8kRyBqseQgZuT1adCdSzvqLe2cxbFudXLYp0iHvsWw8q5fUf-ig9M9jclthi4Dvqd_XfpNXb9Gk3TTIW3DsIo5oAEnInm6wdYZ3dFt0CY5g-P9TdC9wRNyYHUX8XSqc_J8c_3r6q54eLy9v7p8KEwFLBWNBY5l_riQDLHhbWNFI7WxCyl4g7zhpa3Llmlb25aLZdlWqFlll0YwqOWCz8m3_bvb4P8MGJPauGiw63SPfohKLCQAk5DBeg-a4GMMaNU2uI0OOwVMjdLVu3Q1Gh2jd-mqzH1fpwFDk9f93zVZzsCPPYB5zReHQUWTDZusJmR5qvXugxFvsTOT5A</recordid><startdate>20060301</startdate><enddate>20060301</enddate><creator>Sedbon, Eric</creator><creator>Wainer, Robert</creator><creator>Perves, Catherine</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060301</creationdate><title>Quality of life of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with injectable drugs in relation to medical practice in France</title><author>Sedbon, Eric ; Wainer, Robert ; Perves, Catherine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-bf13e2808680eeb3dbf6b8acf7863be3b32f52d0af5fd3692d4ea04f9c6015873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>assisted conception</topic><topic>Chorionic Gonadotropin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Chorionic Gonadotropin - urine</topic><topic>Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>dose of FSH</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - agonists</topic><topic>Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>injection pen</topic><topic>Injections, Intramuscular - nursing</topic><topic>Injections, Subcutaneous - nursing</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Ovulation Induction - methods</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Peptide Fragments - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>recombinant FSH</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Self Administration - instrumentation</topic><topic>Self Administration - nursing</topic><topic>self-injection</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sedbon, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wainer, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perves, Catherine</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Reproductive biomedicine online</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sedbon, Eric</au><au>Wainer, Robert</au><au>Perves, Catherine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality of life of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with injectable drugs in relation to medical practice in France</atitle><jtitle>Reproductive biomedicine online</jtitle><addtitle>Reprod Biomed Online</addtitle><date>2006-03-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>298</spage><epage>303</epage><pages>298-303</pages><issn>1472-6483</issn><eissn>1472-6491</eissn><abstract>The French study VISION is a multicentric, prospective and retrospective study, designed first to evaluate patients’ qualitys of life during ovarian stimulation for ovulation induction, intrauterine insemination (IUI) or IVF, and secondly to analyse current medical practice in France. Answers were directly entered on a pocket PC. The study was conducted from January to August 2004 and 186 practitioners filled in a total of 1476 questionnaires. The percentages for the different treatments used were analysed according to type of technique [ovulation induction, IUI, IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)], type of product used [urinary gonadotrophins, recombinant FSH (rFSH), gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists] and methods of administration (intramuscularly, subcutaneously, use of Pen-injector, nurses or self-injections). Initial and total amounts of urinary gonadotrophins per cycle were approximately 30% higher compared with rFSH for IUI and IVF. Generally, the impact of these treatments on professional or social life was less than expected. Patients saw self-injection as a significant improvement in their life, especially when using an injection pen, and when other drugs were also self-injected during treatment (human chorionic gonadotrophin, GnRH agonists or antagonists). Clear information is necessary to increase patient's compliance to the treatment. Simplification will make these procedures more patient-friendly and less of a struggle.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16569316</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61001-2</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1472-6483
ispartof Reproductive biomedicine online, 2006-03, Vol.12 (3), p.298-303
issn 1472-6483
1472-6491
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67811081
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Activities of Daily Living
assisted conception
Chorionic Gonadotropin - administration & dosage
Chorionic Gonadotropin - urine
Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human - administration & dosage
dose of FSH
Female
Follicle Stimulating Hormone - administration & dosage
France
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - administration & dosage
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - agonists
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone - antagonists & inhibitors
Gynecology
Humans
injection pen
Injections, Intramuscular - nursing
Injections, Subcutaneous - nursing
Longitudinal Studies
Ovulation Induction - methods
Patient Compliance
Peptide Fragments - administration & dosage
Practice Patterns, Physicians
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life
recombinant FSH
Recombinant Proteins - administration & dosage
Retrospective Studies
Self Administration - instrumentation
Self Administration - nursing
self-injection
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Quality of life of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with injectable drugs in relation to medical practice in France
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T08%3A33%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20of%20life%20of%20patients%20undergoing%20ovarian%20stimulation%20with%20injectable%20drugs%20in%20relation%20to%20medical%20practice%20in%20France&rft.jtitle=Reproductive%20biomedicine%20online&rft.au=Sedbon,%20Eric&rft.date=2006-03-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=298&rft.epage=303&rft.pages=298-303&rft.issn=1472-6483&rft.eissn=1472-6491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61001-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67811081%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67811081&rft_id=info:pmid/16569316&rft_els_id=S1472648310610012&rfr_iscdi=true