Postoperative evaluation of femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction: plain radiography versus computed tomography

Inaccurate femoral tunnel placement has been identified as one of the most frequent errors in failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Most surgeons evaluate the femoral tunnel position on plain radiographs but in a lot of cases it is difficult to detect the femoral tunnel. The goal of thi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2005-05, Vol.13 (4), p.256-262
Hauptverfasser: Hoser, Christian, Tecklenburg, Katja, Kuenzel, Karl Heinz, Fink, Christian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 262
container_issue 4
container_start_page 256
container_title Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA
container_volume 13
creator Hoser, Christian
Tecklenburg, Katja
Kuenzel, Karl Heinz
Fink, Christian
description Inaccurate femoral tunnel placement has been identified as one of the most frequent errors in failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Most surgeons evaluate the femoral tunnel position on plain radiographs but in a lot of cases it is difficult to detect the femoral tunnel. The goal of this study was to compare plain digital radiographs and multiplanar computed tomography (CT) scans for the evaluation of femoral tunnel position. We examined 50 patients 24-60 months postoperatively, following an arthroscopically-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with central third bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Endobutton fixation was used on the femoral side and titanium interference screws on the tibial side. Standard antero-posterior and lateral X-rays and a CT scan were obtained from each patient. Sagittal and frontal reconstructions of the CT scan were used for the evaluation. We measured the height of the center of the tunnel in the notch in the frontal plane, and the position of the tunnel along Blumensaat's line (BL) in the lateral plane. Measurements are reported as percentages of total notch height and of the length of BL. On plain X-rays the tunnel was invisible in 46 cases in the anterior-posterior plane and in eight cases on the lateral plane. The average position in the frontal plane was 89.8%, and in the lateral plane 38.6%. In the CT scans, measurements were able to be done in 48 patients. The frontal-plane position averaged 90.5% and the lateral-plane position 34.1%. Pearson's correlation coefficient for the values in the lateral plane for CT and X-rays was low at 0.22, with p>0.05. In our group of 50 patients we were able to detect the femoral tunnel on both plains of standard X-rays in only four patients, whereas it was possible to take accurate measurements in 48 patients on reconstructed CT scans. We advocate the use of CT technology for the evaluation of femoral position whenever precise measurements are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00167-004-0548-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67802577</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67802577</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-71f477d7218fa33d707938698d5c093ae7ed1bf5b16bce7ac7368a0fa16963fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFr3DAQhUVpaLZpf0AvRfTQm5uRZWvk3MLSNIGF5pCchVYetQ625UjWhv338WYXCj3NY957w8DH2BcBPwQAXiYAobAAqAqoK13s37GVqKQsUFb4nq2gqcqihFqds48pPQEssmo-sHNRK13KSq_Yy31Ic5go2rnbEaed7fMiw8iD556GEG3P5zyO1PMppO7N6kZ-vd7wSC6MaY7ZHbZXfOrt4kTbduFPtNPfPd9RTDlxF4Ypz9TyOQwn6xM787ZP9Pk0L9jjzc-H9W2x-f3rbn29KZxsyrlA4SvEFkuhvZWyRcBGatXotnbQSEtIrdj6eivU1hFah1JpC94K1Sjpnbxg3493pxieM6XZDF1y1Pd2pJCTUaihrBGX4Lf_gk8hx3H5zWjAWtWlVEtIHEMuhpQieTPFbrBxbwSYAxJzRGIWJOaAxOyXztfT4bwdqP3XODGQr9AJihU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>807565236</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Postoperative evaluation of femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction: plain radiography versus computed tomography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hoser, Christian ; Tecklenburg, Katja ; Kuenzel, Karl Heinz ; Fink, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Hoser, Christian ; Tecklenburg, Katja ; Kuenzel, Karl Heinz ; Fink, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>Inaccurate femoral tunnel placement has been identified as one of the most frequent errors in failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Most surgeons evaluate the femoral tunnel position on plain radiographs but in a lot of cases it is difficult to detect the femoral tunnel. The goal of this study was to compare plain digital radiographs and multiplanar computed tomography (CT) scans for the evaluation of femoral tunnel position. We examined 50 patients 24-60 months postoperatively, following an arthroscopically-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with central third bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Endobutton fixation was used on the femoral side and titanium interference screws on the tibial side. Standard antero-posterior and lateral X-rays and a CT scan were obtained from each patient. Sagittal and frontal reconstructions of the CT scan were used for the evaluation. We measured the height of the center of the tunnel in the notch in the frontal plane, and the position of the tunnel along Blumensaat's line (BL) in the lateral plane. Measurements are reported as percentages of total notch height and of the length of BL. On plain X-rays the tunnel was invisible in 46 cases in the anterior-posterior plane and in eight cases on the lateral plane. The average position in the frontal plane was 89.8%, and in the lateral plane 38.6%. In the CT scans, measurements were able to be done in 48 patients. The frontal-plane position averaged 90.5% and the lateral-plane position 34.1%. Pearson's correlation coefficient for the values in the lateral plane for CT and X-rays was low at 0.22, with p&gt;0.05. In our group of 50 patients we were able to detect the femoral tunnel on both plains of standard X-rays in only four patients, whereas it was possible to take accurate measurements in 48 patients on reconstructed CT scans. We advocate the use of CT technology for the evaluation of femoral position whenever precise measurements are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0942-2056</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00167-004-0548-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15682348</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament - diagnostic imaging ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery ; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries ; Cadaver ; Female ; Femur - diagnostic imaging ; Femur - surgery ; Humans ; Knee ; Knee Injuries - diagnostic imaging ; Knee Injuries - surgery ; Ligaments ; Male ; Skin &amp; tissue grafts ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2005-05, Vol.13 (4), p.256-262</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-71f477d7218fa33d707938698d5c093ae7ed1bf5b16bce7ac7368a0fa16963fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-71f477d7218fa33d707938698d5c093ae7ed1bf5b16bce7ac7368a0fa16963fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15682348$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hoser, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tecklenburg, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuenzel, Karl Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Postoperative evaluation of femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction: plain radiography versus computed tomography</title><title>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</title><addtitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</addtitle><description>Inaccurate femoral tunnel placement has been identified as one of the most frequent errors in failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Most surgeons evaluate the femoral tunnel position on plain radiographs but in a lot of cases it is difficult to detect the femoral tunnel. The goal of this study was to compare plain digital radiographs and multiplanar computed tomography (CT) scans for the evaluation of femoral tunnel position. We examined 50 patients 24-60 months postoperatively, following an arthroscopically-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with central third bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Endobutton fixation was used on the femoral side and titanium interference screws on the tibial side. Standard antero-posterior and lateral X-rays and a CT scan were obtained from each patient. Sagittal and frontal reconstructions of the CT scan were used for the evaluation. We measured the height of the center of the tunnel in the notch in the frontal plane, and the position of the tunnel along Blumensaat's line (BL) in the lateral plane. Measurements are reported as percentages of total notch height and of the length of BL. On plain X-rays the tunnel was invisible in 46 cases in the anterior-posterior plane and in eight cases on the lateral plane. The average position in the frontal plane was 89.8%, and in the lateral plane 38.6%. In the CT scans, measurements were able to be done in 48 patients. The frontal-plane position averaged 90.5% and the lateral-plane position 34.1%. Pearson's correlation coefficient for the values in the lateral plane for CT and X-rays was low at 0.22, with p&gt;0.05. In our group of 50 patients we were able to detect the femoral tunnel on both plains of standard X-rays in only four patients, whereas it was possible to take accurate measurements in 48 patients on reconstructed CT scans. We advocate the use of CT technology for the evaluation of femoral position whenever precise measurements are needed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery</subject><subject>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Injuries - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Knee Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Ligaments</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Skin &amp; tissue grafts</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0942-2056</issn><issn>1433-7347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFr3DAQhUVpaLZpf0AvRfTQm5uRZWvk3MLSNIGF5pCchVYetQ625UjWhv338WYXCj3NY957w8DH2BcBPwQAXiYAobAAqAqoK13s37GVqKQsUFb4nq2gqcqihFqds48pPQEssmo-sHNRK13KSq_Yy31Ic5go2rnbEaed7fMiw8iD556GEG3P5zyO1PMppO7N6kZ-vd7wSC6MaY7ZHbZXfOrt4kTbduFPtNPfPd9RTDlxF4Ypz9TyOQwn6xM787ZP9Pk0L9jjzc-H9W2x-f3rbn29KZxsyrlA4SvEFkuhvZWyRcBGatXotnbQSEtIrdj6eivU1hFah1JpC94K1Sjpnbxg3493pxieM6XZDF1y1Pd2pJCTUaihrBGX4Lf_gk8hx3H5zWjAWtWlVEtIHEMuhpQieTPFbrBxbwSYAxJzRGIWJOaAxOyXztfT4bwdqP3XODGQr9AJihU</recordid><startdate>20050501</startdate><enddate>20050501</enddate><creator>Hoser, Christian</creator><creator>Tecklenburg, Katja</creator><creator>Kuenzel, Karl Heinz</creator><creator>Fink, Christian</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050501</creationdate><title>Postoperative evaluation of femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction: plain radiography versus computed tomography</title><author>Hoser, Christian ; Tecklenburg, Katja ; Kuenzel, Karl Heinz ; Fink, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-71f477d7218fa33d707938698d5c093ae7ed1bf5b16bce7ac7368a0fa16963fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery</topic><topic>Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Injuries - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Knee Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Ligaments</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Skin &amp; tissue grafts</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hoser, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tecklenburg, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuenzel, Karl Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fink, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hoser, Christian</au><au>Tecklenburg, Katja</au><au>Kuenzel, Karl Heinz</au><au>Fink, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Postoperative evaluation of femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction: plain radiography versus computed tomography</atitle><jtitle>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</jtitle><addtitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</addtitle><date>2005-05-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>256</spage><epage>262</epage><pages>256-262</pages><issn>0942-2056</issn><eissn>1433-7347</eissn><abstract>Inaccurate femoral tunnel placement has been identified as one of the most frequent errors in failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Most surgeons evaluate the femoral tunnel position on plain radiographs but in a lot of cases it is difficult to detect the femoral tunnel. The goal of this study was to compare plain digital radiographs and multiplanar computed tomography (CT) scans for the evaluation of femoral tunnel position. We examined 50 patients 24-60 months postoperatively, following an arthroscopically-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with central third bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Endobutton fixation was used on the femoral side and titanium interference screws on the tibial side. Standard antero-posterior and lateral X-rays and a CT scan were obtained from each patient. Sagittal and frontal reconstructions of the CT scan were used for the evaluation. We measured the height of the center of the tunnel in the notch in the frontal plane, and the position of the tunnel along Blumensaat's line (BL) in the lateral plane. Measurements are reported as percentages of total notch height and of the length of BL. On plain X-rays the tunnel was invisible in 46 cases in the anterior-posterior plane and in eight cases on the lateral plane. The average position in the frontal plane was 89.8%, and in the lateral plane 38.6%. In the CT scans, measurements were able to be done in 48 patients. The frontal-plane position averaged 90.5% and the lateral-plane position 34.1%. Pearson's correlation coefficient for the values in the lateral plane for CT and X-rays was low at 0.22, with p&gt;0.05. In our group of 50 patients we were able to detect the femoral tunnel on both plains of standard X-rays in only four patients, whereas it was possible to take accurate measurements in 48 patients on reconstructed CT scans. We advocate the use of CT technology for the evaluation of femoral position whenever precise measurements are needed.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>15682348</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00167-004-0548-y</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0942-2056
ispartof Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2005-05, Vol.13 (4), p.256-262
issn 0942-2056
1433-7347
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67802577
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Anterior Cruciate Ligament - diagnostic imaging
Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Cadaver
Female
Femur - diagnostic imaging
Femur - surgery
Humans
Knee
Knee Injuries - diagnostic imaging
Knee Injuries - surgery
Ligaments
Male
Skin & tissue grafts
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
title Postoperative evaluation of femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction: plain radiography versus computed tomography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A54%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postoperative%20evaluation%20of%20femoral%20tunnel%20position%20in%20ACL%20reconstruction:%20plain%20radiography%20versus%20computed%20tomography&rft.jtitle=Knee%20surgery,%20sports%20traumatology,%20arthroscopy%20:%20official%20journal%20of%20the%20ESSKA&rft.au=Hoser,%20Christian&rft.date=2005-05-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=256&rft.epage=262&rft.pages=256-262&rft.issn=0942-2056&rft.eissn=1433-7347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00167-004-0548-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67802577%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=807565236&rft_id=info:pmid/15682348&rfr_iscdi=true