Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations: Empirical Evidence, Strategies for Professionals, and Research Directions

Several states have passed civil commitment laws that allow the precautionary detention of sex offenders who have completed their criminal sentences. Over 2,500 sex offenders have been committed across states with such statutes and several thousand more sex offenders have been evaluated. Most statut...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Law and human behavior 2005-02, Vol.29 (1), p.29-54
Hauptverfasser: Miller, Holly A, Amenta, Amy E, Conroy, Mary Alice
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 54
container_issue 1
container_start_page 29
container_title Law and human behavior
container_volume 29
creator Miller, Holly A
Amenta, Amy E
Conroy, Mary Alice
description Several states have passed civil commitment laws that allow the precautionary detention of sex offenders who have completed their criminal sentences. Over 2,500 sex offenders have been committed across states with such statutes and several thousand more sex offenders have been evaluated. Most statutes call for an evaluation of risk by a mental health professional and, although each state statute is worded differently, three main elements common to sexually violent predator evaluations are used to guide evaluators: mental abnormality, volitional capacity, and likelihood of future sexual violence. The current article presents empirical evidence for the main tenants of these forensic evaluations, provides recommendations for evaluators in light of current limitations of evidence, and offers suggestions for future research in this area of forensic assessment.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10979-005-1398-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67792836</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4499407</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4499407</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a437t-c81fcb411e2b0c25a18b8977ec6827cea909685e0ae0243e6c9956e6252d639a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ke1rFDEQh4Mo9qz-AYLIodgPhdWZvOdjKa0KBQVf8FvI5uZwj9ztmeyW7n_flD0URQpD5sPvmWF4wthzhLcIYN4VBGdcA6AaFM420wO2QGVEozX-eMgWgNI0RoA5Yk9K2QCAs6AesyNUVishcMHefKGbMaQ0Lb93faLdsPycaRWGPi8vrkMaw9D1u_KUPVqHVOjZoR-zb5cXX88_NFef3n88P7tqghRmaKLFdWwlIvEWIlcBbWudMRS15SZScOC0VQSBgEtBOjqnNGmu-EoLF8QxO5n37nP_a6Qy-G1XIqUUdtSPxWtjHLdCV_DVP-CmH_Ou3uYdSm2N1XgfxEHWktZVCGco5r6UTGu_z9025Mkj-DvLfrbsq2V_Z9lPdeblYfHYbmn1Z-KgtQIvZmBTqsnfuZTOSTA1Pp3jsA9-X6YY8tDFRCWOOdc_8Oln67nzWJ8Kv_4__Bd1Cy0Tmpk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204204489</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations: Empirical Evidence, Strategies for Professionals, and Research Directions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Miller, Holly A ; Amenta, Amy E ; Conroy, Mary Alice</creator><contributor>Wiener, Richard L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Miller, Holly A ; Amenta, Amy E ; Conroy, Mary Alice ; Wiener, Richard L</creatorcontrib><description>Several states have passed civil commitment laws that allow the precautionary detention of sex offenders who have completed their criminal sentences. Over 2,500 sex offenders have been committed across states with such statutes and several thousand more sex offenders have been evaluated. Most statutes call for an evaluation of risk by a mental health professional and, although each state statute is worded differently, three main elements common to sexually violent predator evaluations are used to guide evaluators: mental abnormality, volitional capacity, and likelihood of future sexual violence. The current article presents empirical evidence for the main tenants of these forensic evaluations, provides recommendations for evaluators in light of current limitations of evidence, and offers suggestions for future research in this area of forensic assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-7307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-661X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10979-005-1398-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15865331</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer</publisher><subject>Commitment of Mentally Ill - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Criminal Behavior ; Criminal Law ; Criminal Offenders ; Criminals ; Forensic Assessment ; Forensic Evaluation ; Forensic Psychiatry - methods ; Human ; Humans ; Legal Detention ; Mental disorders ; Mental Disorders - diagnosis ; Mental Disorders - psychology ; Mental illness ; Paraphilias ; Pedophilia ; Personality disorders ; Predators ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk assessment ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Sentences ; Sex offenders ; Sex Offenses ; Sex Offenses - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Sex Offenses - psychology ; Sexual violence ; State laws ; Statutory law ; Studies ; United States ; Violence ; Violent crimes ; Volition</subject><ispartof>Law and human behavior, 2005-02, Vol.29 (1), p.29-54</ispartof><rights>2005 American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2005 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright 2005 American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a437t-c81fcb411e2b0c25a18b8977ec6827cea909685e0ae0243e6c9956e6252d639a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a437t-c81fcb411e2b0c25a18b8977ec6827cea909685e0ae0243e6c9956e6252d639a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15865331$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Wiener, Richard L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Miller, Holly A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amenta, Amy E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conroy, Mary Alice</creatorcontrib><title>Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations: Empirical Evidence, Strategies for Professionals, and Research Directions</title><title>Law and human behavior</title><addtitle>Law Hum Behav</addtitle><description>Several states have passed civil commitment laws that allow the precautionary detention of sex offenders who have completed their criminal sentences. Over 2,500 sex offenders have been committed across states with such statutes and several thousand more sex offenders have been evaluated. Most statutes call for an evaluation of risk by a mental health professional and, although each state statute is worded differently, three main elements common to sexually violent predator evaluations are used to guide evaluators: mental abnormality, volitional capacity, and likelihood of future sexual violence. The current article presents empirical evidence for the main tenants of these forensic evaluations, provides recommendations for evaluators in light of current limitations of evidence, and offers suggestions for future research in this area of forensic assessment.</description><subject>Commitment of Mentally Ill - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Criminal Behavior</subject><subject>Criminal Law</subject><subject>Criminal Offenders</subject><subject>Criminals</subject><subject>Forensic Assessment</subject><subject>Forensic Evaluation</subject><subject>Forensic Psychiatry - methods</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Legal Detention</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Mental illness</subject><subject>Paraphilias</subject><subject>Pedophilia</subject><subject>Personality disorders</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Sex offenders</subject><subject>Sex Offenses</subject><subject>Sex Offenses - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Sex Offenses - psychology</subject><subject>Sexual violence</subject><subject>State laws</subject><subject>Statutory law</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Violent crimes</subject><subject>Volition</subject><issn>0147-7307</issn><issn>1573-661X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ke1rFDEQh4Mo9qz-AYLIodgPhdWZvOdjKa0KBQVf8FvI5uZwj9ztmeyW7n_flD0URQpD5sPvmWF4wthzhLcIYN4VBGdcA6AaFM420wO2QGVEozX-eMgWgNI0RoA5Yk9K2QCAs6AesyNUVishcMHefKGbMaQ0Lb93faLdsPycaRWGPi8vrkMaw9D1u_KUPVqHVOjZoR-zb5cXX88_NFef3n88P7tqghRmaKLFdWwlIvEWIlcBbWudMRS15SZScOC0VQSBgEtBOjqnNGmu-EoLF8QxO5n37nP_a6Qy-G1XIqUUdtSPxWtjHLdCV_DVP-CmH_Ou3uYdSm2N1XgfxEHWktZVCGco5r6UTGu_z9025Mkj-DvLfrbsq2V_Z9lPdeblYfHYbmn1Z-KgtQIvZmBTqsnfuZTOSTA1Pp3jsA9-X6YY8tDFRCWOOdc_8Oln67nzWJ8Kv_4__Bd1Cy0Tmpk</recordid><startdate>200502</startdate><enddate>200502</enddate><creator>Miller, Holly A</creator><creator>Amenta, Amy E</creator><creator>Conroy, Mary Alice</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers</general><general>American Psychological Law Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200502</creationdate><title>Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations</title><author>Miller, Holly A ; Amenta, Amy E ; Conroy, Mary Alice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a437t-c81fcb411e2b0c25a18b8977ec6827cea909685e0ae0243e6c9956e6252d639a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Commitment of Mentally Ill - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Criminal Behavior</topic><topic>Criminal Law</topic><topic>Criminal Offenders</topic><topic>Criminals</topic><topic>Forensic Assessment</topic><topic>Forensic Evaluation</topic><topic>Forensic Psychiatry - methods</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Legal Detention</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Mental illness</topic><topic>Paraphilias</topic><topic>Pedophilia</topic><topic>Personality disorders</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Sex offenders</topic><topic>Sex Offenses</topic><topic>Sex Offenses - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Sex Offenses - psychology</topic><topic>Sexual violence</topic><topic>State laws</topic><topic>Statutory law</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Violent crimes</topic><topic>Volition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miller, Holly A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amenta, Amy E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conroy, Mary Alice</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Law and human behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miller, Holly A</au><au>Amenta, Amy E</au><au>Conroy, Mary Alice</au><au>Wiener, Richard L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations: Empirical Evidence, Strategies for Professionals, and Research Directions</atitle><jtitle>Law and human behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Law Hum Behav</addtitle><date>2005-02</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>29</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>29-54</pages><issn>0147-7307</issn><eissn>1573-661X</eissn><abstract>Several states have passed civil commitment laws that allow the precautionary detention of sex offenders who have completed their criminal sentences. Over 2,500 sex offenders have been committed across states with such statutes and several thousand more sex offenders have been evaluated. Most statutes call for an evaluation of risk by a mental health professional and, although each state statute is worded differently, three main elements common to sexually violent predator evaluations are used to guide evaluators: mental abnormality, volitional capacity, and likelihood of future sexual violence. The current article presents empirical evidence for the main tenants of these forensic evaluations, provides recommendations for evaluators in light of current limitations of evidence, and offers suggestions for future research in this area of forensic assessment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>15865331</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10979-005-1398-y</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-7307
ispartof Law and human behavior, 2005-02, Vol.29 (1), p.29-54
issn 0147-7307
1573-661X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67792836
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Commitment of Mentally Ill - legislation & jurisprudence
Criminal Behavior
Criminal Law
Criminal Offenders
Criminals
Forensic Assessment
Forensic Evaluation
Forensic Psychiatry - methods
Human
Humans
Legal Detention
Mental disorders
Mental Disorders - diagnosis
Mental Disorders - psychology
Mental illness
Paraphilias
Pedophilia
Personality disorders
Predators
Reproducibility of Results
Risk assessment
Risk Assessment - methods
Sentences
Sex offenders
Sex Offenses
Sex Offenses - legislation & jurisprudence
Sex Offenses - psychology
Sexual violence
State laws
Statutory law
Studies
United States
Violence
Violent crimes
Volition
title Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations: Empirical Evidence, Strategies for Professionals, and Research Directions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T20%3A04%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sexually%20Violent%20Predator%20Evaluations:%20Empirical%20Evidence,%20Strategies%20for%20Professionals,%20and%20Research%20Directions&rft.jtitle=Law%20and%20human%20behavior&rft.au=Miller,%20Holly%20A&rft.date=2005-02&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=29-54&rft.issn=0147-7307&rft.eissn=1573-661X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10979-005-1398-y&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4499407%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204204489&rft_id=info:pmid/15865331&rft_jstor_id=4499407&rfr_iscdi=true