Genetic architecture of Arabidopsis thaliana response to infection by Pseudomonas syringae

Plant pathogens can severely reduce host yield and fitness. Thus, investigating the genetic basis of plant response to pathogens is important to further understand plant-pathogen coevolution and to improve crop production. The interaction between Arabidopsis thaliana and Pseudomonas syringae is an i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heredity 2005-05, Vol.94 (5), p.507-517
Hauptverfasser: Kover, P.X, Wolf, J.B, Kunkel, B.N, Cheverud, J.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Plant pathogens can severely reduce host yield and fitness. Thus, investigating the genetic basis of plant response to pathogens is important to further understand plant-pathogen coevolution and to improve crop production. The interaction between Arabidopsis thaliana and Pseudomonas syringae is an important model for studying the genetic basis of plant-pathogen interactions. Studies in this model have led to the discovery of many genes that differentiate a resistant from a susceptible plant. However, little is known about the genetic basis of quantitative variation in response to P. syringae. In this study, we investigate the genetic basis of three aspects of A. thaliana's response to P. syringae: symptom severity, bacterial population size and fruit production using a quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis. We found two QTL for symptom severity and two for fruit production (possible candidate genes for observed QTL are discussed). We also found significant two-locus epistatic effect on symptom severity and fruit production. Although bacterial population size and symptom severity were strongly phenotypically correlated, we did not detect any QTL for bacterial population size. Despite the detected genetic variation observed for susceptibility, we found only a weak overall relationship between susceptibility traits and fitness, suggesting that these traits may not respond to selection.
ISSN:0018-067X
1365-2540
DOI:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800651