Sound strategy: acoustic aposematism in the bat-tiger moth arms race
The night sky is the venue for an ancient arms race. Insectivorous bats with their ultrasonic sonar exert an enormous selective pressure on nocturnal insects. In response insects have evolved the ability to hear bat cries, to evade their hunting maneuvers, and some, the tiger moths (Arctiidae), to u...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Die Naturwissenschaften 2005-04, Vol.92 (4), p.164-169 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 169 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 164 |
container_title | Die Naturwissenschaften |
container_volume | 92 |
creator | Hristov, Nickolay I Conner, William E |
description | The night sky is the venue for an ancient arms race. Insectivorous bats with their ultrasonic sonar exert an enormous selective pressure on nocturnal insects. In response insects have evolved the ability to hear bat cries, to evade their hunting maneuvers, and some, the tiger moths (Arctiidae), to utter an ultrasonic reply. We here determine what it is that tiger moths "say" to bats. We chose four species of arctiid moths, Cycnia tenera, Euchaetes egle, Utetheisa ornatrix, and Apantesis nais, that naturally differ in their levels of unpalatability and their ability to produce sound. Moths were tethered and offered to free-flying naive big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus. The ability of the bats to capture each species was compared to their ability to capture noctuid, geometrid, and wax moth controls over a learning period of 7 days. We repeated the experiment using the single arctiid species E. egle that through diet manipulation and simple surgery could be rendered palatable or unpalatable and sound producing or mute. We again compared the capture rates of these categories of E. egle to control moths. Using both novel learning approaches we have found that the bats only respond to the sounds of arctiids when they are paired with defensive chemistry. The sounds are in essence a warning to the bats that the moth is unpalatable-an aposematic signal. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00114-005-0611-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67784160</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67784160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-76763da0a6502bd4bdefea9f78cbd231f8a0f3826201e231940a0fd258ef81b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwA1iQJzbDnePYDhviW6rEAMyWk1zaoKYptjP035OqlRiZTnd63lenh7FLhBsEMLcRAFEJgFyARhTmiE1RZVJgAeqYTQGkFQhKTthZjN8jXZi8OGUTzI2RFsyUPX70w7rmMQWfaLG9477qh5jaivtNH6nzqY0db9c8LYmXPonULijwrk9L7kMXefAVnbOTxq8iXRzmjH09P30-vIr5-8vbw_1cVFmhkzDa6Kz24HUOsqxVWVNDvmiMrcpaZthYD01mpZaANO6FgvFQy9xSY7Esshm73vduQv8zUEyua2NFq5Vf0_i108ZYhRr-BcdqKRXuQNyDVehjDNS4TWg7H7YOwe0cu71jNzp2O8fOjJmrQ_lQdlT_JQ5Ss1-yAXaC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19422410</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sound strategy: acoustic aposematism in the bat-tiger moth arms race</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Hristov, Nickolay I ; Conner, William E</creator><creatorcontrib>Hristov, Nickolay I ; Conner, William E</creatorcontrib><description>The night sky is the venue for an ancient arms race. Insectivorous bats with their ultrasonic sonar exert an enormous selective pressure on nocturnal insects. In response insects have evolved the ability to hear bat cries, to evade their hunting maneuvers, and some, the tiger moths (Arctiidae), to utter an ultrasonic reply. We here determine what it is that tiger moths "say" to bats. We chose four species of arctiid moths, Cycnia tenera, Euchaetes egle, Utetheisa ornatrix, and Apantesis nais, that naturally differ in their levels of unpalatability and their ability to produce sound. Moths were tethered and offered to free-flying naive big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus. The ability of the bats to capture each species was compared to their ability to capture noctuid, geometrid, and wax moth controls over a learning period of 7 days. We repeated the experiment using the single arctiid species E. egle that through diet manipulation and simple surgery could be rendered palatable or unpalatable and sound producing or mute. We again compared the capture rates of these categories of E. egle to control moths. Using both novel learning approaches we have found that the bats only respond to the sounds of arctiids when they are paired with defensive chemistry. The sounds are in essence a warning to the bats that the moth is unpalatable-an aposematic signal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-1042</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1904</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00114-005-0611-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15772807</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><subject>Animals ; Apantesis ; Apantesis nais ; Arctiidae ; Chiroptera - physiology ; Eptesicus fuscus ; Euchaetes egle ; Moths - classification ; Moths - physiology ; Sound ; Utetheisa ornatrix ; Vocalization, Animal</subject><ispartof>Die Naturwissenschaften, 2005-04, Vol.92 (4), p.164-169</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-76763da0a6502bd4bdefea9f78cbd231f8a0f3826201e231940a0fd258ef81b93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-76763da0a6502bd4bdefea9f78cbd231f8a0f3826201e231940a0fd258ef81b93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15772807$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hristov, Nickolay I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conner, William E</creatorcontrib><title>Sound strategy: acoustic aposematism in the bat-tiger moth arms race</title><title>Die Naturwissenschaften</title><addtitle>Naturwissenschaften</addtitle><description>The night sky is the venue for an ancient arms race. Insectivorous bats with their ultrasonic sonar exert an enormous selective pressure on nocturnal insects. In response insects have evolved the ability to hear bat cries, to evade their hunting maneuvers, and some, the tiger moths (Arctiidae), to utter an ultrasonic reply. We here determine what it is that tiger moths "say" to bats. We chose four species of arctiid moths, Cycnia tenera, Euchaetes egle, Utetheisa ornatrix, and Apantesis nais, that naturally differ in their levels of unpalatability and their ability to produce sound. Moths were tethered and offered to free-flying naive big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus. The ability of the bats to capture each species was compared to their ability to capture noctuid, geometrid, and wax moth controls over a learning period of 7 days. We repeated the experiment using the single arctiid species E. egle that through diet manipulation and simple surgery could be rendered palatable or unpalatable and sound producing or mute. We again compared the capture rates of these categories of E. egle to control moths. Using both novel learning approaches we have found that the bats only respond to the sounds of arctiids when they are paired with defensive chemistry. The sounds are in essence a warning to the bats that the moth is unpalatable-an aposematic signal.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Apantesis</subject><subject>Apantesis nais</subject><subject>Arctiidae</subject><subject>Chiroptera - physiology</subject><subject>Eptesicus fuscus</subject><subject>Euchaetes egle</subject><subject>Moths - classification</subject><subject>Moths - physiology</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>Utetheisa ornatrix</subject><subject>Vocalization, Animal</subject><issn>0028-1042</issn><issn>1432-1904</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwA1iQJzbDnePYDhviW6rEAMyWk1zaoKYptjP035OqlRiZTnd63lenh7FLhBsEMLcRAFEJgFyARhTmiE1RZVJgAeqYTQGkFQhKTthZjN8jXZi8OGUTzI2RFsyUPX70w7rmMQWfaLG9477qh5jaivtNH6nzqY0db9c8LYmXPonULijwrk9L7kMXefAVnbOTxq8iXRzmjH09P30-vIr5-8vbw_1cVFmhkzDa6Kz24HUOsqxVWVNDvmiMrcpaZthYD01mpZaANO6FgvFQy9xSY7Esshm73vduQv8zUEyua2NFq5Vf0_i108ZYhRr-BcdqKRXuQNyDVehjDNS4TWg7H7YOwe0cu71jNzp2O8fOjJmrQ_lQdlT_JQ5Ss1-yAXaC</recordid><startdate>20050401</startdate><enddate>20050401</enddate><creator>Hristov, Nickolay I</creator><creator>Conner, William E</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050401</creationdate><title>Sound strategy: acoustic aposematism in the bat-tiger moth arms race</title><author>Hristov, Nickolay I ; Conner, William E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-76763da0a6502bd4bdefea9f78cbd231f8a0f3826201e231940a0fd258ef81b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Apantesis</topic><topic>Apantesis nais</topic><topic>Arctiidae</topic><topic>Chiroptera - physiology</topic><topic>Eptesicus fuscus</topic><topic>Euchaetes egle</topic><topic>Moths - classification</topic><topic>Moths - physiology</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>Utetheisa ornatrix</topic><topic>Vocalization, Animal</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hristov, Nickolay I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conner, William E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Die Naturwissenschaften</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hristov, Nickolay I</au><au>Conner, William E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sound strategy: acoustic aposematism in the bat-tiger moth arms race</atitle><jtitle>Die Naturwissenschaften</jtitle><addtitle>Naturwissenschaften</addtitle><date>2005-04-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>164</spage><epage>169</epage><pages>164-169</pages><issn>0028-1042</issn><eissn>1432-1904</eissn><abstract>The night sky is the venue for an ancient arms race. Insectivorous bats with their ultrasonic sonar exert an enormous selective pressure on nocturnal insects. In response insects have evolved the ability to hear bat cries, to evade their hunting maneuvers, and some, the tiger moths (Arctiidae), to utter an ultrasonic reply. We here determine what it is that tiger moths "say" to bats. We chose four species of arctiid moths, Cycnia tenera, Euchaetes egle, Utetheisa ornatrix, and Apantesis nais, that naturally differ in their levels of unpalatability and their ability to produce sound. Moths were tethered and offered to free-flying naive big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus. The ability of the bats to capture each species was compared to their ability to capture noctuid, geometrid, and wax moth controls over a learning period of 7 days. We repeated the experiment using the single arctiid species E. egle that through diet manipulation and simple surgery could be rendered palatable or unpalatable and sound producing or mute. We again compared the capture rates of these categories of E. egle to control moths. Using both novel learning approaches we have found that the bats only respond to the sounds of arctiids when they are paired with defensive chemistry. The sounds are in essence a warning to the bats that the moth is unpalatable-an aposematic signal.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>15772807</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00114-005-0611-7</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-1042 |
ispartof | Die Naturwissenschaften, 2005-04, Vol.92 (4), p.164-169 |
issn | 0028-1042 1432-1904 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67784160 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Animals Apantesis Apantesis nais Arctiidae Chiroptera - physiology Eptesicus fuscus Euchaetes egle Moths - classification Moths - physiology Sound Utetheisa ornatrix Vocalization, Animal |
title | Sound strategy: acoustic aposematism in the bat-tiger moth arms race |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T21%3A53%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sound%20strategy:%20acoustic%20aposematism%20in%20the%20bat-tiger%20moth%20arms%20race&rft.jtitle=Die%20Naturwissenschaften&rft.au=Hristov,%20Nickolay%20I&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=164&rft.epage=169&rft.pages=164-169&rft.issn=0028-1042&rft.eissn=1432-1904&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00114-005-0611-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67784160%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19422410&rft_id=info:pmid/15772807&rfr_iscdi=true |