Sound strategy: acoustic aposematism in the bat-tiger moth arms race

The night sky is the venue for an ancient arms race. Insectivorous bats with their ultrasonic sonar exert an enormous selective pressure on nocturnal insects. In response insects have evolved the ability to hear bat cries, to evade their hunting maneuvers, and some, the tiger moths (Arctiidae), to u...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Die Naturwissenschaften 2005-04, Vol.92 (4), p.164-169
Hauptverfasser: Hristov, Nickolay I, Conner, William E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 169
container_issue 4
container_start_page 164
container_title Die Naturwissenschaften
container_volume 92
creator Hristov, Nickolay I
Conner, William E
description The night sky is the venue for an ancient arms race. Insectivorous bats with their ultrasonic sonar exert an enormous selective pressure on nocturnal insects. In response insects have evolved the ability to hear bat cries, to evade their hunting maneuvers, and some, the tiger moths (Arctiidae), to utter an ultrasonic reply. We here determine what it is that tiger moths "say" to bats. We chose four species of arctiid moths, Cycnia tenera, Euchaetes egle, Utetheisa ornatrix, and Apantesis nais, that naturally differ in their levels of unpalatability and their ability to produce sound. Moths were tethered and offered to free-flying naive big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus. The ability of the bats to capture each species was compared to their ability to capture noctuid, geometrid, and wax moth controls over a learning period of 7 days. We repeated the experiment using the single arctiid species E. egle that through diet manipulation and simple surgery could be rendered palatable or unpalatable and sound producing or mute. We again compared the capture rates of these categories of E. egle to control moths. Using both novel learning approaches we have found that the bats only respond to the sounds of arctiids when they are paired with defensive chemistry. The sounds are in essence a warning to the bats that the moth is unpalatable-an aposematic signal.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00114-005-0611-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67784160</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67784160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-76763da0a6502bd4bdefea9f78cbd231f8a0f3826201e231940a0fd258ef81b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwA1iQJzbDnePYDhviW6rEAMyWk1zaoKYptjP035OqlRiZTnd63lenh7FLhBsEMLcRAFEJgFyARhTmiE1RZVJgAeqYTQGkFQhKTthZjN8jXZi8OGUTzI2RFsyUPX70w7rmMQWfaLG9477qh5jaivtNH6nzqY0db9c8LYmXPonULijwrk9L7kMXefAVnbOTxq8iXRzmjH09P30-vIr5-8vbw_1cVFmhkzDa6Kz24HUOsqxVWVNDvmiMrcpaZthYD01mpZaANO6FgvFQy9xSY7Esshm73vduQv8zUEyua2NFq5Vf0_i108ZYhRr-BcdqKRXuQNyDVehjDNS4TWg7H7YOwe0cu71jNzp2O8fOjJmrQ_lQdlT_JQ5Ss1-yAXaC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19422410</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sound strategy: acoustic aposematism in the bat-tiger moth arms race</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Hristov, Nickolay I ; Conner, William E</creator><creatorcontrib>Hristov, Nickolay I ; Conner, William E</creatorcontrib><description>The night sky is the venue for an ancient arms race. Insectivorous bats with their ultrasonic sonar exert an enormous selective pressure on nocturnal insects. In response insects have evolved the ability to hear bat cries, to evade their hunting maneuvers, and some, the tiger moths (Arctiidae), to utter an ultrasonic reply. We here determine what it is that tiger moths "say" to bats. We chose four species of arctiid moths, Cycnia tenera, Euchaetes egle, Utetheisa ornatrix, and Apantesis nais, that naturally differ in their levels of unpalatability and their ability to produce sound. Moths were tethered and offered to free-flying naive big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus. The ability of the bats to capture each species was compared to their ability to capture noctuid, geometrid, and wax moth controls over a learning period of 7 days. We repeated the experiment using the single arctiid species E. egle that through diet manipulation and simple surgery could be rendered palatable or unpalatable and sound producing or mute. We again compared the capture rates of these categories of E. egle to control moths. Using both novel learning approaches we have found that the bats only respond to the sounds of arctiids when they are paired with defensive chemistry. The sounds are in essence a warning to the bats that the moth is unpalatable-an aposematic signal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-1042</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1904</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00114-005-0611-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15772807</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><subject>Animals ; Apantesis ; Apantesis nais ; Arctiidae ; Chiroptera - physiology ; Eptesicus fuscus ; Euchaetes egle ; Moths - classification ; Moths - physiology ; Sound ; Utetheisa ornatrix ; Vocalization, Animal</subject><ispartof>Die Naturwissenschaften, 2005-04, Vol.92 (4), p.164-169</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-76763da0a6502bd4bdefea9f78cbd231f8a0f3826201e231940a0fd258ef81b93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-76763da0a6502bd4bdefea9f78cbd231f8a0f3826201e231940a0fd258ef81b93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15772807$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hristov, Nickolay I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conner, William E</creatorcontrib><title>Sound strategy: acoustic aposematism in the bat-tiger moth arms race</title><title>Die Naturwissenschaften</title><addtitle>Naturwissenschaften</addtitle><description>The night sky is the venue for an ancient arms race. Insectivorous bats with their ultrasonic sonar exert an enormous selective pressure on nocturnal insects. In response insects have evolved the ability to hear bat cries, to evade their hunting maneuvers, and some, the tiger moths (Arctiidae), to utter an ultrasonic reply. We here determine what it is that tiger moths "say" to bats. We chose four species of arctiid moths, Cycnia tenera, Euchaetes egle, Utetheisa ornatrix, and Apantesis nais, that naturally differ in their levels of unpalatability and their ability to produce sound. Moths were tethered and offered to free-flying naive big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus. The ability of the bats to capture each species was compared to their ability to capture noctuid, geometrid, and wax moth controls over a learning period of 7 days. We repeated the experiment using the single arctiid species E. egle that through diet manipulation and simple surgery could be rendered palatable or unpalatable and sound producing or mute. We again compared the capture rates of these categories of E. egle to control moths. Using both novel learning approaches we have found that the bats only respond to the sounds of arctiids when they are paired with defensive chemistry. The sounds are in essence a warning to the bats that the moth is unpalatable-an aposematic signal.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Apantesis</subject><subject>Apantesis nais</subject><subject>Arctiidae</subject><subject>Chiroptera - physiology</subject><subject>Eptesicus fuscus</subject><subject>Euchaetes egle</subject><subject>Moths - classification</subject><subject>Moths - physiology</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>Utetheisa ornatrix</subject><subject>Vocalization, Animal</subject><issn>0028-1042</issn><issn>1432-1904</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwA1iQJzbDnePYDhviW6rEAMyWk1zaoKYptjP035OqlRiZTnd63lenh7FLhBsEMLcRAFEJgFyARhTmiE1RZVJgAeqYTQGkFQhKTthZjN8jXZi8OGUTzI2RFsyUPX70w7rmMQWfaLG9477qh5jaivtNH6nzqY0db9c8LYmXPonULijwrk9L7kMXefAVnbOTxq8iXRzmjH09P30-vIr5-8vbw_1cVFmhkzDa6Kz24HUOsqxVWVNDvmiMrcpaZthYD01mpZaANO6FgvFQy9xSY7Esshm73vduQv8zUEyua2NFq5Vf0_i108ZYhRr-BcdqKRXuQNyDVehjDNS4TWg7H7YOwe0cu71jNzp2O8fOjJmrQ_lQdlT_JQ5Ss1-yAXaC</recordid><startdate>20050401</startdate><enddate>20050401</enddate><creator>Hristov, Nickolay I</creator><creator>Conner, William E</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050401</creationdate><title>Sound strategy: acoustic aposematism in the bat-tiger moth arms race</title><author>Hristov, Nickolay I ; Conner, William E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-76763da0a6502bd4bdefea9f78cbd231f8a0f3826201e231940a0fd258ef81b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Apantesis</topic><topic>Apantesis nais</topic><topic>Arctiidae</topic><topic>Chiroptera - physiology</topic><topic>Eptesicus fuscus</topic><topic>Euchaetes egle</topic><topic>Moths - classification</topic><topic>Moths - physiology</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>Utetheisa ornatrix</topic><topic>Vocalization, Animal</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hristov, Nickolay I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conner, William E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Die Naturwissenschaften</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hristov, Nickolay I</au><au>Conner, William E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sound strategy: acoustic aposematism in the bat-tiger moth arms race</atitle><jtitle>Die Naturwissenschaften</jtitle><addtitle>Naturwissenschaften</addtitle><date>2005-04-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>164</spage><epage>169</epage><pages>164-169</pages><issn>0028-1042</issn><eissn>1432-1904</eissn><abstract>The night sky is the venue for an ancient arms race. Insectivorous bats with their ultrasonic sonar exert an enormous selective pressure on nocturnal insects. In response insects have evolved the ability to hear bat cries, to evade their hunting maneuvers, and some, the tiger moths (Arctiidae), to utter an ultrasonic reply. We here determine what it is that tiger moths "say" to bats. We chose four species of arctiid moths, Cycnia tenera, Euchaetes egle, Utetheisa ornatrix, and Apantesis nais, that naturally differ in their levels of unpalatability and their ability to produce sound. Moths were tethered and offered to free-flying naive big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus. The ability of the bats to capture each species was compared to their ability to capture noctuid, geometrid, and wax moth controls over a learning period of 7 days. We repeated the experiment using the single arctiid species E. egle that through diet manipulation and simple surgery could be rendered palatable or unpalatable and sound producing or mute. We again compared the capture rates of these categories of E. egle to control moths. Using both novel learning approaches we have found that the bats only respond to the sounds of arctiids when they are paired with defensive chemistry. The sounds are in essence a warning to the bats that the moth is unpalatable-an aposematic signal.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>15772807</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00114-005-0611-7</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-1042
ispartof Die Naturwissenschaften, 2005-04, Vol.92 (4), p.164-169
issn 0028-1042
1432-1904
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67784160
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Animals
Apantesis
Apantesis nais
Arctiidae
Chiroptera - physiology
Eptesicus fuscus
Euchaetes egle
Moths - classification
Moths - physiology
Sound
Utetheisa ornatrix
Vocalization, Animal
title Sound strategy: acoustic aposematism in the bat-tiger moth arms race
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T21%3A53%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sound%20strategy:%20acoustic%20aposematism%20in%20the%20bat-tiger%20moth%20arms%20race&rft.jtitle=Die%20Naturwissenschaften&rft.au=Hristov,%20Nickolay%20I&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=164&rft.epage=169&rft.pages=164-169&rft.issn=0028-1042&rft.eissn=1432-1904&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00114-005-0611-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67784160%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19422410&rft_id=info:pmid/15772807&rfr_iscdi=true