Does the advent of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) sound the death knell for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)?

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been the premier diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedure in the management of pancreatic and biliary diseases (PBD). The use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), including EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA), of pancreatic and biliary...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore Singapore, 2006-02, Vol.35 (2), p.89-95
1. Verfasser: Mesenas, Steven J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 95
container_issue 2
container_start_page 89
container_title Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore
container_volume 35
creator Mesenas, Steven J
description Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been the premier diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedure in the management of pancreatic and biliary diseases (PBD). The use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), including EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA), of pancreatic and biliary tumours has become more widely available in the last decade and has gradually replaced diagnostic ERCP. Together with EUS, other imaging modalities like magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) have resulted in a decrease in the number of ERCPs. With the advent of interventional EUS, ERCP is at risk of being completely eclipsed. A search of all relevant articles on EUS and ERCP from Medline and peer-reviewed journals. This review article examines the exact place of ERCP and EUS and their relative contributions in the management algorithm of PBD. Although diagnostic EUS, including EUS-guided FNA, is well established in the evaluation of PBD, interventional EUS is still in its infancy and its true potential is unknown. Therefore, therapeutic ERCP still has a vital, albeit smaller role to play in the treatment of pancreatic and biliary diseases.
doi_str_mv 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V35N2p89
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67782429</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67782429</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-413ae3bb51ef6c0b8f33009a8260b7ce6922902efc22af341034386b9a459c583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0EolD4BWSxQHSR4lechA1CpTykChBQtpHjTNpCagc7QeqKXyelBbqa0cy98zgIHVPSFxEl7EwZo0ofKK3yOeR-0n_l4T2r4mQL7RFORCAkYdsbeQfte_9GiIgIk7uoQ2Uow0jSPfR1ZcHjegpY5Z9gamwLDCa3XttqpnFT1k5525gcnw7Hzz28ypf6HFQ9xe8GyhIX1m26HNTOTpzKAeupLZWZzGyljHatZVmvpot23NPgsXdxgHaK9hc4XMcuGl8PXwa3wejh5m5wOQo0p1EdCMoV8CwLKRRSkywuOCckUTGTJIs0yISxhDAoNGOq4IISLngss0SJMNFhzLvoZDW3cvajAV-n85nX7e3KgG18KqMoZoIlrfB8JdTOeu-gSCs3myu3SClJf_CnK_zpH_70F39rPlpvabK29W9d8-bfbAyIJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67782429</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the advent of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) sound the death knell for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Mesenas, Steven J</creator><creatorcontrib>Mesenas, Steven J</creatorcontrib><description>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been the premier diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedure in the management of pancreatic and biliary diseases (PBD). The use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), including EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA), of pancreatic and biliary tumours has become more widely available in the last decade and has gradually replaced diagnostic ERCP. Together with EUS, other imaging modalities like magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) have resulted in a decrease in the number of ERCPs. With the advent of interventional EUS, ERCP is at risk of being completely eclipsed. A search of all relevant articles on EUS and ERCP from Medline and peer-reviewed journals. This review article examines the exact place of ERCP and EUS and their relative contributions in the management algorithm of PBD. Although diagnostic EUS, including EUS-guided FNA, is well established in the evaluation of PBD, interventional EUS is still in its infancy and its true potential is unknown. Therefore, therapeutic ERCP still has a vital, albeit smaller role to play in the treatment of pancreatic and biliary diseases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-4602</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0304-4602</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V35N2p89</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16565761</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore</publisher><subject>Biliary Tract Diseases - diagnosis ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - trends ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - utilization ; Clinical Competence ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Endosonography - economics ; Endosonography - utilization ; Humans ; Pancreatic Diseases - diagnosis</subject><ispartof>Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 2006-02, Vol.35 (2), p.89-95</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-413ae3bb51ef6c0b8f33009a8260b7ce6922902efc22af341034386b9a459c583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-413ae3bb51ef6c0b8f33009a8260b7ce6922902efc22af341034386b9a459c583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16565761$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mesenas, Steven J</creatorcontrib><title>Does the advent of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) sound the death knell for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)?</title><title>Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore</title><addtitle>Ann Acad Med Singapore</addtitle><description>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been the premier diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedure in the management of pancreatic and biliary diseases (PBD). The use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), including EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA), of pancreatic and biliary tumours has become more widely available in the last decade and has gradually replaced diagnostic ERCP. Together with EUS, other imaging modalities like magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) have resulted in a decrease in the number of ERCPs. With the advent of interventional EUS, ERCP is at risk of being completely eclipsed. A search of all relevant articles on EUS and ERCP from Medline and peer-reviewed journals. This review article examines the exact place of ERCP and EUS and their relative contributions in the management algorithm of PBD. Although diagnostic EUS, including EUS-guided FNA, is well established in the evaluation of PBD, interventional EUS is still in its infancy and its true potential is unknown. Therefore, therapeutic ERCP still has a vital, albeit smaller role to play in the treatment of pancreatic and biliary diseases.</description><subject>Biliary Tract Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - trends</subject><subject>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - utilization</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Endosonography - economics</subject><subject>Endosonography - utilization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pancreatic Diseases - diagnosis</subject><issn>0304-4602</issn><issn>0304-4602</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0EolD4BWSxQHSR4lechA1CpTykChBQtpHjTNpCagc7QeqKXyelBbqa0cy98zgIHVPSFxEl7EwZo0ofKK3yOeR-0n_l4T2r4mQL7RFORCAkYdsbeQfte_9GiIgIk7uoQ2Uow0jSPfR1ZcHjegpY5Z9gamwLDCa3XttqpnFT1k5525gcnw7Hzz28ypf6HFQ9xe8GyhIX1m26HNTOTpzKAeupLZWZzGyljHatZVmvpot23NPgsXdxgHaK9hc4XMcuGl8PXwa3wejh5m5wOQo0p1EdCMoV8CwLKRRSkywuOCckUTGTJIs0yISxhDAoNGOq4IISLngss0SJMNFhzLvoZDW3cvajAV-n85nX7e3KgG18KqMoZoIlrfB8JdTOeu-gSCs3myu3SClJf_CnK_zpH_70F39rPlpvabK29W9d8-bfbAyIJQ</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Mesenas, Steven J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Does the advent of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) sound the death knell for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)?</title><author>Mesenas, Steven J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-413ae3bb51ef6c0b8f33009a8260b7ce6922902efc22af341034386b9a459c583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Biliary Tract Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - trends</topic><topic>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - utilization</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Endosonography - economics</topic><topic>Endosonography - utilization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pancreatic Diseases - diagnosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mesenas, Steven J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mesenas, Steven J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the advent of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) sound the death knell for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)?</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Acad Med Singapore</addtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>89-95</pages><issn>0304-4602</issn><eissn>0304-4602</eissn><abstract>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been the premier diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedure in the management of pancreatic and biliary diseases (PBD). The use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), including EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA), of pancreatic and biliary tumours has become more widely available in the last decade and has gradually replaced diagnostic ERCP. Together with EUS, other imaging modalities like magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) have resulted in a decrease in the number of ERCPs. With the advent of interventional EUS, ERCP is at risk of being completely eclipsed. A search of all relevant articles on EUS and ERCP from Medline and peer-reviewed journals. This review article examines the exact place of ERCP and EUS and their relative contributions in the management algorithm of PBD. Although diagnostic EUS, including EUS-guided FNA, is well established in the evaluation of PBD, interventional EUS is still in its infancy and its true potential is unknown. Therefore, therapeutic ERCP still has a vital, albeit smaller role to play in the treatment of pancreatic and biliary diseases.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pmid>16565761</pmid><doi>10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V35N2p89</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0304-4602
ispartof Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 2006-02, Vol.35 (2), p.89-95
issn 0304-4602
0304-4602
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67782429
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Biliary Tract Diseases - diagnosis
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - trends
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - utilization
Clinical Competence
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Endosonography - economics
Endosonography - utilization
Humans
Pancreatic Diseases - diagnosis
title Does the advent of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) sound the death knell for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T16%3A10%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20advent%20of%20endoscopic%20ultrasound%20(EUS)%20sound%20the%20death%20knell%20for%20endoscopic%20retrograde%20cholangiopancreatography%20(ERCP)?&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20Academy%20of%20Medicine,%20Singapore&rft.au=Mesenas,%20Steven%20J&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=89-95&rft.issn=0304-4602&rft.eissn=0304-4602&rft_id=info:doi/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V35N2p89&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67782429%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67782429&rft_id=info:pmid/16565761&rfr_iscdi=true