Does the advent of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) sound the death knell for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)?
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been the premier diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedure in the management of pancreatic and biliary diseases (PBD). The use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), including EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA), of pancreatic and biliary...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore Singapore, 2006-02, Vol.35 (2), p.89-95 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 95 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 89 |
container_title | Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Mesenas, Steven J |
description | Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been the premier diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedure in the management of pancreatic and biliary diseases (PBD). The use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), including EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA), of pancreatic and biliary tumours has become more widely available in the last decade and has gradually replaced diagnostic ERCP. Together with EUS, other imaging modalities like magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) have resulted in a decrease in the number of ERCPs. With the advent of interventional EUS, ERCP is at risk of being completely eclipsed.
A search of all relevant articles on EUS and ERCP from Medline and peer-reviewed journals.
This review article examines the exact place of ERCP and EUS and their relative contributions in the management algorithm of PBD.
Although diagnostic EUS, including EUS-guided FNA, is well established in the evaluation of PBD, interventional EUS is still in its infancy and its true potential is unknown. Therefore, therapeutic ERCP still has a vital, albeit smaller role to play in the treatment of pancreatic and biliary diseases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V35N2p89 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67782429</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67782429</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-413ae3bb51ef6c0b8f33009a8260b7ce6922902efc22af341034386b9a459c583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0EolD4BWSxQHSR4lechA1CpTykChBQtpHjTNpCagc7QeqKXyelBbqa0cy98zgIHVPSFxEl7EwZo0ofKK3yOeR-0n_l4T2r4mQL7RFORCAkYdsbeQfte_9GiIgIk7uoQ2Uow0jSPfR1ZcHjegpY5Z9gamwLDCa3XttqpnFT1k5525gcnw7Hzz28ypf6HFQ9xe8GyhIX1m26HNTOTpzKAeupLZWZzGyljHatZVmvpot23NPgsXdxgHaK9hc4XMcuGl8PXwa3wejh5m5wOQo0p1EdCMoV8CwLKRRSkywuOCckUTGTJIs0yISxhDAoNGOq4IISLngss0SJMNFhzLvoZDW3cvajAV-n85nX7e3KgG18KqMoZoIlrfB8JdTOeu-gSCs3myu3SClJf_CnK_zpH_70F39rPlpvabK29W9d8-bfbAyIJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>67782429</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the advent of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) sound the death knell for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Mesenas, Steven J</creator><creatorcontrib>Mesenas, Steven J</creatorcontrib><description>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been the premier diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedure in the management of pancreatic and biliary diseases (PBD). The use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), including EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA), of pancreatic and biliary tumours has become more widely available in the last decade and has gradually replaced diagnostic ERCP. Together with EUS, other imaging modalities like magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) have resulted in a decrease in the number of ERCPs. With the advent of interventional EUS, ERCP is at risk of being completely eclipsed.
A search of all relevant articles on EUS and ERCP from Medline and peer-reviewed journals.
This review article examines the exact place of ERCP and EUS and their relative contributions in the management algorithm of PBD.
Although diagnostic EUS, including EUS-guided FNA, is well established in the evaluation of PBD, interventional EUS is still in its infancy and its true potential is unknown. Therefore, therapeutic ERCP still has a vital, albeit smaller role to play in the treatment of pancreatic and biliary diseases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-4602</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0304-4602</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V35N2p89</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16565761</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore</publisher><subject>Biliary Tract Diseases - diagnosis ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - trends ; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - utilization ; Clinical Competence ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Endosonography - economics ; Endosonography - utilization ; Humans ; Pancreatic Diseases - diagnosis</subject><ispartof>Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 2006-02, Vol.35 (2), p.89-95</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-413ae3bb51ef6c0b8f33009a8260b7ce6922902efc22af341034386b9a459c583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-413ae3bb51ef6c0b8f33009a8260b7ce6922902efc22af341034386b9a459c583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16565761$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mesenas, Steven J</creatorcontrib><title>Does the advent of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) sound the death knell for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)?</title><title>Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore</title><addtitle>Ann Acad Med Singapore</addtitle><description>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been the premier diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedure in the management of pancreatic and biliary diseases (PBD). The use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), including EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA), of pancreatic and biliary tumours has become more widely available in the last decade and has gradually replaced diagnostic ERCP. Together with EUS, other imaging modalities like magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) have resulted in a decrease in the number of ERCPs. With the advent of interventional EUS, ERCP is at risk of being completely eclipsed.
A search of all relevant articles on EUS and ERCP from Medline and peer-reviewed journals.
This review article examines the exact place of ERCP and EUS and their relative contributions in the management algorithm of PBD.
Although diagnostic EUS, including EUS-guided FNA, is well established in the evaluation of PBD, interventional EUS is still in its infancy and its true potential is unknown. Therefore, therapeutic ERCP still has a vital, albeit smaller role to play in the treatment of pancreatic and biliary diseases.</description><subject>Biliary Tract Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - trends</subject><subject>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - utilization</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Endosonography - economics</subject><subject>Endosonography - utilization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pancreatic Diseases - diagnosis</subject><issn>0304-4602</issn><issn>0304-4602</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMtOwzAQRS0EolD4BWSxQHSR4lechA1CpTykChBQtpHjTNpCagc7QeqKXyelBbqa0cy98zgIHVPSFxEl7EwZo0ofKK3yOeR-0n_l4T2r4mQL7RFORCAkYdsbeQfte_9GiIgIk7uoQ2Uow0jSPfR1ZcHjegpY5Z9gamwLDCa3XttqpnFT1k5525gcnw7Hzz28ypf6HFQ9xe8GyhIX1m26HNTOTpzKAeupLZWZzGyljHatZVmvpot23NPgsXdxgHaK9hc4XMcuGl8PXwa3wejh5m5wOQo0p1EdCMoV8CwLKRRSkywuOCckUTGTJIs0yISxhDAoNGOq4IISLngss0SJMNFhzLvoZDW3cvajAV-n85nX7e3KgG18KqMoZoIlrfB8JdTOeu-gSCs3myu3SClJf_CnK_zpH_70F39rPlpvabK29W9d8-bfbAyIJQ</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Mesenas, Steven J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Does the advent of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) sound the death knell for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)?</title><author>Mesenas, Steven J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-413ae3bb51ef6c0b8f33009a8260b7ce6922902efc22af341034386b9a459c583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Biliary Tract Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - trends</topic><topic>Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - utilization</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Endosonography - economics</topic><topic>Endosonography - utilization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pancreatic Diseases - diagnosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mesenas, Steven J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mesenas, Steven J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the advent of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) sound the death knell for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)?</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Acad Med Singapore</addtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>89-95</pages><issn>0304-4602</issn><eissn>0304-4602</eissn><abstract>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been the premier diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedure in the management of pancreatic and biliary diseases (PBD). The use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), including EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA), of pancreatic and biliary tumours has become more widely available in the last decade and has gradually replaced diagnostic ERCP. Together with EUS, other imaging modalities like magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) have resulted in a decrease in the number of ERCPs. With the advent of interventional EUS, ERCP is at risk of being completely eclipsed.
A search of all relevant articles on EUS and ERCP from Medline and peer-reviewed journals.
This review article examines the exact place of ERCP and EUS and their relative contributions in the management algorithm of PBD.
Although diagnostic EUS, including EUS-guided FNA, is well established in the evaluation of PBD, interventional EUS is still in its infancy and its true potential is unknown. Therefore, therapeutic ERCP still has a vital, albeit smaller role to play in the treatment of pancreatic and biliary diseases.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pmid>16565761</pmid><doi>10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V35N2p89</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0304-4602 |
ispartof | Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 2006-02, Vol.35 (2), p.89-95 |
issn | 0304-4602 0304-4602 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_67782429 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Biliary Tract Diseases - diagnosis Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - trends Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde - utilization Clinical Competence Cost-Benefit Analysis Endosonography - economics Endosonography - utilization Humans Pancreatic Diseases - diagnosis |
title | Does the advent of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) sound the death knell for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T16%3A10%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20advent%20of%20endoscopic%20ultrasound%20(EUS)%20sound%20the%20death%20knell%20for%20endoscopic%20retrograde%20cholangiopancreatography%20(ERCP)?&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20Academy%20of%20Medicine,%20Singapore&rft.au=Mesenas,%20Steven%20J&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=89-95&rft.issn=0304-4602&rft.eissn=0304-4602&rft_id=info:doi/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V35N2p89&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67782429%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=67782429&rft_id=info:pmid/16565761&rfr_iscdi=true |